Effects of Different Mixture Sowing on Yield and Quality of Forage Crop

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.05.019

›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5): 825-829.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.05.019

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Different Mixture Sowing on Yield and Quality of Forage Crop

LI Hong-ying¹, GAO Fei¹, LIU Zhao-ming², CUI Guo-wen¹

1. School of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agriculture University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150030, China;
2. Heilongjiang prairie feed center experimental station, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150009, China.

Received:2011-04-08 Revised:2011-05-28 Online:2011-10-15 Published:2012-07-12

青贮玉米不同混播方式对饲料作物产量和品质的影响

李洪影¹, 高飞¹, 刘昭明², 崔国文¹

1. 东北农业大学动物科技学院, 黑龙江哈尔滨150030;
2. 黑龙江草原饲料中心实验站, 黑龙江哈尔滨150009

通讯作者: 崔国文,E-mail:cgw603@163.com
作者简介:李洪影(1981- ),女,蒙古族,内蒙古通辽人,博士研究生,研究方向牧草及饲料作物栽培和加工,E-mail:lihongying0307@yahoo.com.cn
基金资助:
农业科技跨越计划专项资金(2009跨(29));公益性行业(农业)科研专项经费(200903060)资助

Abstract

Abstract: Forage yield and quality were investigated between different stages of corn silage as well as corn silage and mixture sowing legume.Zhongyuandan 32,Haiyu 9 and Highworth dolichos were used as forage crops in this experiment.The mixture sowing proportion was 1:1,1:2 and 2:1.Results showed that the mixture sowing of late-maturing and early-maturing varieties(2:1) could improve fresh yield and soluble sugar content of forage at accumulated temperature area of northwest Heilongjiang Province.The mixture sowing of silage corn(Zea mays L.) and leguminous forage(Dolichos lab L.cv.Highworth)(1:2) could improve the fresh yield and quality of forage crop at higher accumulated temperature regions of both west and mid-south Heilongjiang Province.

Key words: Silage corn, Dolichos lab L.cv.Highworth, Mixture planting proportion, Yield, Quality

摘要： 对不同生育期青贮玉米(Zea mays L.)品种之间以及青贮玉米和豆科牧草混播对产草量及品质的影响进行研究,试验以中原单32、海育9号和高值扁豆(Dolichos lab L.cv.Highworth)为材料,设3个不同混播比例,即中原单32和海育9号、中原单32和高值扁豆均以1:1,1:2和2:1比例进行混种混收试验。结果表明:在黑龙江省北部积温较低地区,中晚熟玉米和早熟玉米以2:1比例混播,鲜草产量和可溶性总糖(WSC)含量最高;以1:2比例混播,营养品质最好。在黑龙江省西部和中南部积温较高地区,青贮玉米和豆科牧草以1:2比例混播时,鲜草产量最高,营养品质最好。

关键词: 青贮玉米, 高值扁豆, 混播比例, 产量, 品质

CLC Number:

S513
042

LI Hong-ying, GAO Fei, LIU Zhao-ming, CUI Guo-wen. Effects of Different Mixture Sowing on Yield and Quality of Forage Crop[J]. , 2011, 19(5): 825-829.

李洪影, 高飞, 刘昭明, 崔国文. 青贮玉米不同混播方式对饲料作物产量和品质的影响[J]. , 2011, 19(5): 825-829.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.05.019

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2011/V19/I5/825

References

[1] 李洪影.氮磷钾肥对青贮玉米不同形式碳水化合物积累的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2010
[2] 李广.界限积温的计算方法[J].甘肃农业科技,2002(2):40-41
[3] 毛恒青,万晖.华北、东北地区积温的变化[J].中国农业气象,2000,21(3):1-5,18
[4] 李钢.黑龙江省北部地区青贮玉米品种选择和混播的研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2008
[5] 杨胜.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1993:19-61
[6] 张志良,瞿伟菁.植物生理学实验指导[M].第3版.北京:高等教育出版社,2004:127-132
[7] 高飞,高洪雷,王丽霁,等.不同成熟期青贮玉米混播对产量和品质的影响[J].草地学报,2009,17(4):490-494
[8] 高洪雷,高飞,王丽霁,等.混播对青贮玉米生长、产量和饲用品质的影响[J].东北农业大学学报,2009,40(8):68-71
[9] 李钢,刘惠青,高飞,等.混播对青贮玉米产量和品质的影响[J].草地学报,2008,16(4):417-421
[10] 刘慧青.黑龙江省第二积温带青贮玉米栽培密度及混播的研究[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2008
[11] 施建军,洪绂曾,马玉寿,等.人工调控对禾草混播草地群落特征的影[J].草地学报,2009,17(6):745-751
[12] 张永亮,范富,高凯,等.苜蓿、无芒雀麦单播与混播对土壤有机质和速效养分的影响[J].草地学报,2009,17(1):22-26
[13] 顾雪莹,玉柱,郭艳萍,等.全株玉米与秣食豆单贮混贮效果的研究[J].草地学报,2011,19(1):132-136
[14] 寇明科,王安禄,徐占文,等.高寒牧区当年生人工混播草地建植试验[J].草业科学,2003,20(5):6-10
[15] Jeon B T,Lee S M,Moon S H.Studies on the mixederopping with forage rye (Secalecereale L.) and red clover (Trifolium pretense L.)[J].Journal of Grassland Science,1996,16 (3):199-207
[16] 李晶,李伟忠,魏湜,等.混播青贮玉米产量及品质性状研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2005(6):32-33
[17] Contreras-Govea F E,Muck R E,Armstrong K L,et al.Nutritive value of corn silage in mixture with climbing beans[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,2009,150(1-2):1-8

Effects of Different Mixture Sowing on Yield and Quality of Forage Crop

青贮玉米不同混播方式对饲料作物产量和品质的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LAN Xiang-yu, YE Chong-chong, WANG Yi, ZENG Tao, SUN Jian. Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics and Its Driving Forces of Water Conservation Function on the Tibetan Plateau from 1995 to 2014 [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 80-92.
[2]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, LI Quan-lin, WANG You-bin, MA Bing-yun, LEI Yan-min, ZHOU Rui, XIE Jiu-xiang. Characteristics of Forage Nutritional Quality and Digestibility in Different Types of Grassland in Qinghai Tibet Plateau and their Correlation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[3]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun, ZHOU Rui. Effects of Grazing on Vegetation Characteristics and Forage Nutrientional Quality in a Temperate Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[4]	YAN He-piao, LI Wen-long, LIANG Tian-gang, ZHOU Hua-kun, CAO Ya-peng, LIAO Yuan-cheng. Effects of Different Restoration Measures on Degraded Alpine Grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau: A meta-analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.
[5]	YAO Xi-xi, XIAO Feng, QI Shou-zhong, CHEN Guo-ming, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun. Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[6]	LU Jia-ding, YANG Xu, ZHU Xiao-yan, CUI Ya-lei, WANG Cheng-zhang, LI De-feng, SHI Ying-hua. Comprehensive Evaluation of 21 Corn Silage Varieties with both Grain and Forage in Henan Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1950-1958.
[7]	WU Hai-yan, QU Zhen, LIU Zhao-ming, LABA Dun-zhu, TONGSANG Cuo-mu, QU Ni, NIMA zhuo-ga, MA Yu-shou. Comparative study on Production Performance of Oat Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1967-1973.
[8]	MENG Xuan-chen, MA Peng-cheng, MA Jie, DUAN Zhen, HAN Yang-yang, ZHANG Ji-yu. Study on the Effect of Mulching Furrow and Fertilization of Alfalfa in Semi-arid Areas of Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[9]	MA Ran-ran, YUAN Jie, ZHANG Wen-jie, XU Neng-xiang, GU Hong-ru. Effects of Stacking Time on Feeding and Fermentation Quality of Broccoli Waste [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[10]	YAO Xi-xi, CAI Hua, LIU Hao-dong, LI Chang-hui. Analysis of Rumen Fermentation Characteristics and In Vitro Digestibility of Alpine Meadow Forage in Different Seasons [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1729-1737.
[11]	HE Zhen-fu, HE Chun-gui, WANG Fei, CHEN Ping. Analysis of Production Performance and Quality of Different Types of Forage Sorghum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1446-1453.
[12]	ZHANG Feng, ZHAO Tian-qi, QIAO Ji-rong, ZHAO Meng-li, ZHANG Xin-yue, WU Jian-xin. Effects of Stubble Height on productivity and Sustainable Utilization in the Stipa grandis Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1491-1498.
[13]	DU Zhao-chang, WANG Hong, YAN Yan-hong, MUHAMMAD Tahir, WEI Xiao, ZENG Tai-ru, LI Hong-liang. Effects of Rice Husk and Wheat Bran Addition on Silage Quality of Fresh Corn Straw [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[14]	SONG Jian-chao, YU Xiao-jun, WEI Kong-tao, WANG Peng-bin, TONG Yong-shang, LI Zhen, HE You-long, WANG Hai-bo. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Elymus nutans in Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564.
[15]	WU Shuo, ZOU Xuan, WANG Ming-ya, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Chenpi Citrus Juice on Fermentation Quality of Stylo and Rice Straw Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.