Effects of Different Additives on the Quality of Caragana korshinskii Silage

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.05.029

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 1096-1102.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.05.029

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Different Additives on the Quality of Caragana korshinskii Silage

WANG Bao-ping, DONG Xiao-yan, DONG Kuan-hu

College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China

Received:2013-03-30 Revised:2013-07-03 Online:2014-10-15 Published:2014-09-30

不同添加剂对柠条嫩枝叶青贮品质的影响

王保平, 董晓燕, 董宽虎

山西农业大学动物科技学院, 山西太谷 030801

通讯作者: 董宽虎
作者简介:王保平（1984-），男，山西偏关人，博士研究生，研究方向为饲料作物生产与营养体农业，E-mail：wangbp8409@163.com；
基金资助:
山西省林业厅科技项目；山西省科技攻关项目（20120311011-1）；山西省科技基础条件平台建设项目（2012091004-0101）；山西省研究生优秀创新项目（20123053）资助

Abstract

Abstract:

The effects of different additives and addition amounts on the quality of Caragana korshinskii silage were studied. According to random design, there were 17 treatments including control (CK), corn meal (CM1: 10%; CM2: 12%; CM3: 14%; CM4: 16%; CM5: 18%), molasses (M1: 2%; M2: 4%; M3: 6%), cellulases (CE1: 0.05%; CE2: 0.10%; CE3: 0.20%), formic acid (FA1: 0.25%; FA2: 0.50%; FA3: 0.75%) and propionic acid (PA1: 0.30%; PA2: 0.60%; PA3: 0.90%). The fermentation quality and nutrient contents of treatments were determined after ensiling for 60 days. Results showed that the pH, ammonia-N (NH₃-N), propionic acid (PA) and butyric acid (BA) contents of treatments decreased significantly compared with control (P<0.01). Lactic acid (LA) contents of corn meal were significantly higher than control (P<0.05). The contents of LA had no significant difference between CE3, CM3 and PA1, but significantly higher than control and other treatments (P<0.01). All the nutrient contents of treatments were significantly affected by additives, addition amounts and their interaction (P<0.01). The dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) contents of corn meal were significantly higher than control and other treatments (P<0.01), whereas the contents of acid detergent fiber (ADF) were significantly lower (P<0.05). Additives improved the quality of Caragana korshinskii silage, and 14% corn meal was the best additive.

Key words: Caragana korshinskii, Additives, Addition amounts, Silage, Quality

摘要：

为探讨不同添加剂及添加量对柠条（Caragana korshinskii）嫩枝叶青贮饲料品质的影响，采用完全随机设计，设对照组（CK）、玉米粉（CM1：10%；CM2：12%；CM3：14%；CM4：16%；CM5：18%）、糖蜜（M1：2%；M2：4%；M3：6%）、纤维素酶（CE1：0.05%；CE2：0.10%；CE3：0.20%）、甲酸（FA1：0.25%；FA2：0.50%；FA3：0.75%）和丙酸（PA1：0.30%；PA2：0.60%；PA3：0.90%），60 d后测定青贮发酵品质和养分含量。结果表明：各添加剂处理组pH值、氨态氮（NH₃-N）、丙酸（PA）和丁酸（BA）含量极显著低于对照（P<0.01）；玉米粉处理组乳酸（LA）含量显著高于对照组（P<0.05）；CM3和CE3组LA含量与PA1组之间无显著性差异，但极显著高于其他处理组（P<0.01）。添加剂、添加量及交互作用极显著影响柠条嫩枝叶青贮饲料各营养成分含量（P<0.01）。玉米粉处理组干物质（DM）和粗蛋白（CP）含量极显著高于其他处理组（P<0.01），酸性洗涤纤维（ADF）含量显著低于其他处理组（P<0.05）。不同添加剂可以改善柠条嫩枝叶青贮饲料的品质，其中添加14%玉米粉的青贮效果最佳。

关键词: 柠条嫩枝叶, 添加剂, 添加量, 青贮, 品质

CLC Number:

S816.53

WANG Bao-ping, DONG Xiao-yan, DONG Kuan-hu. Effects of Different Additives on the Quality of Caragana korshinskii Silage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(5): 1096-1102.

王保平, 董晓燕, 董宽虎. 不同添加剂对柠条嫩枝叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(5): 1096-1102.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.05.029

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2014/V22/I5/1096

References

[1] 牛西午. 柠条研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,2003:1-45,95-123
[2] 罗惠娣,牛西午,毛杨毅,等. 柠条的营养特点与利用方法研究[J]. 中国草食动物,2005,25(5):36-39
[3] 田树飞,毛可桢. 柠条对草食动物饲用价值的研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学,2007,35(25):7836-7837
[4] 方姝骄. 不同水平柠条对奶牛生产性能和消化性能的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2010:13-20
[5] 张国君,李云,付元瑞,等. 刺槐、柠条和紫穗槐青贮品质的比较[J]. 西北林学院学报,2009,24(1):151-156
[6] 田晋梅,谢海军. 几种豆科植物单独青贮及饲喂效果试验[J]. 草原与牧草,2000,2(5):29-30
[7] 王峰,温学飞,张浩. 柠条饲料化技术及应用[J]. 西北农业学报,2004,13(3):143-147
[8] 王峰,吕海军,温学飞,等. 提高柠条饲料利用率的研究[J]. 草业科学,2005,22(3):35-37
[9] 樊莉娟,孙启忠,张德罡,等. 生物添加剂对灌木青贮中有机酸含量和pH值的影响[J]. 家畜生态学报,2008,29(4):68-71
[10] 高文俊,许庆方,玉柱,等. 添加剂对柠条青贮影响的研究[J]. 草业科学,2011,28(2):323-326
[11] 陈亮,张凌青,罗晓瑜,等. 饲喂柠条包膜青贮饲料对肉牛育肥效果的影响[J]. 饲料研究,2013(7):40-42
[12] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京:北京农业大学出版社,1993:1-260
[13] Owens V N, Albrecht K A, Muck R E, et al. Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates [J]. Crop Science,1999,39(6):1873-1880
[14] Han K J, Collins M, Vanzant E S, et al. Bale density and moisture effects on alfalfa round bale silage [J]. Crop Science, 2004,44(3):914-919
[15] 许庆方,玉柱,韩建国,等. 高效液相色谱法测定苜蓿青贮中的有机酸[J]. 草原与草坪,2007(2):63-65,67
[16] Broderica G A, Kang J H. Auto mated simultaneous determination of ammonia and amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75
[17] 彭海兰. 不同青贮添加剂对苜蓿青贮品质的影响[D]. 北京:中国农业大学,2003:27-31
[18] 黄其芬. 不同添加剂对杂交象草青贮品质的影响[D]. 福州:福建农林大学,2012:12-21
[19] 薛艳林,白春生,玉柱,等. 添加剂对苜蓿草渣青贮饲料品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2007,15(4):339-343
[20] Bial M Q. Effect of molasses and corn as silage additives on cell fractions of Mott grass silage with different fermentation [J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2008,18(4):102-106
[21] Han K J, Collins M, Vanzant E S, et al. Bale density and minaation of moisture effects on alfalfa round bale silage[J]. Crop science,2004,44(3):914-919
[22] Bilal M Q. Effect of molasses and corn as silage additives on the characteristics of Mott Dwarf elephant grass silage at different fermentation periods [J]. Pakistan Veterinary Journal,2009,29(1):19-23
[23] 原现军,王奇,李志华,等. 添加糖蜜对青稞秸秆和多年生黑麦草混合青贮发酵品质及营养价值的影响[J]. 草业学报,2013,22(3):116-123
[24] 程方方,杨连玉,许雪魁,等. 糖蜜和乳酸菌对光叶紫花苕青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(5):947-951
[25] Alli I, Fairbairn R, Noroozi E, et al. The effects of molasses on the fermentation of chopped whole-plant leucaena [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1984,35(3):285-289
[26] Yunus M, Ohba N, Tobisa M, et al. Effect of glucose and formic acid on the quality of Napiergrass silage after treatment with urea [J]. Asian-Australasian Joumal of Animal Science,2001,14(2):211-215
[27] Rezaei J, Rouzbehan Y, Fazaeli H. Nutritive value of fresh and ensiled amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) treated with different levels of molasses [J]. Animal feed Science and Technology,2009,151(1/2):153-160
[28] Dehghani M R, Weisbjerg M R, Hvelplund T, et al. Effect of enzyme addition to forage at ensiling on silage chemical composition and NDF degradation characteristics [J]. Livestock Science,2012,150(1/3):51-58
[29] Selmer-Olsen I, Henderson A R, Robertson S, et al. Cell wall degrading enzymes for silage. 1. The fermentation of enzyme-treated ryegrass in laboratory silos [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1993,48(1):45-54
[30] Jacobs J L, McAllan A B. Enzymes as silage additives. 1. Silage quality, digestion, digestibility and performance in growing cattle [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1991,46(1):63-73
[31] 韩立英,玉柱,周禾. 乳酸菌和纤维素酶对直穗鹅观草青贮的改善效果[J]. 草业科学,2013,30(9):1439-1444
[32] 荣辉,陈杰,余成群,等. 添加甲酸对象草青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(6):1105-1111
[33] 丁武蓉,干友民,郭旭生,等. 甲酸对二色胡枝子青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2008,16(1):81-84
[34] 张晓庆,李鹏,郑琛,等. 添加甲酸对麻叶荨麻青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(3):618-625
[35] Kennedy S J. Comparison of the fermentation quality and nutritive value of sulphuric and formic acid-treated silage fed to beef cattle [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1990,45(1):17-28
[36] Kung L Jr, Myers C L, Neylon J M, et al. The effects of buffered propionic acid-based additives alone or combined with microbial inoculation on the fermentation of high moisture corn and whole-crop barley [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2004,87(5):1310-1316
[37] 郭艳萍,玉柱,顾雪莹,等. 不同添加剂对高粱青贮质量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(6):875-879
[38] 李平,白史且,鄢家俊,等. 添加剂及含水量对老芒麦青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(6):1176-1181
[39] 张增欣,邵涛. 丙酸对多花黑麦草青贮发酵动态变化的影响[J]. 草业学报,2009,18(2):102-107

Effects of Different Additives on the Quality of Caragana korshinskii Silage

不同添加剂对柠条嫩枝叶青贮品质的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, LI Quan-lin, WANG You-bin, MA Bing-yun, LEI Yan-min, ZHOU Rui, XIE Jiu-xiang. Characteristics of Forage Nutritional Quality and Digestibility in Different Types of Grassland in Qinghai Tibet Plateau and their Correlation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[2]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun, ZHOU Rui. Effects of Grazing on Vegetation Characteristics and Forage Nutrientional Quality in a Temperate Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[3]	YAN He-piao, LI Wen-long, LIANG Tian-gang, ZHOU Hua-kun, CAO Ya-peng, LIAO Yuan-cheng. Effects of Different Restoration Measures on Degraded Alpine Grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau: A meta-analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.
[4]	YAO Xi-xi, XIAO Feng, QI Shou-zhong, CHEN Guo-ming, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun. Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[5]	LU Jia-ding, YANG Xu, ZHU Xiao-yan, CUI Ya-lei, WANG Cheng-zhang, LI De-feng, SHI Ying-hua. Comprehensive Evaluation of 21 Corn Silage Varieties with both Grain and Forage in Henan Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1950-1958.
[6]	MENG Xuan-chen, MA Peng-cheng, MA Jie, DUAN Zhen, HAN Yang-yang, ZHANG Ji-yu. Study on the Effect of Mulching Furrow and Fertilization of Alfalfa in Semi-arid Areas of Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[7]	MA Ran-ran, YUAN Jie, ZHANG Wen-jie, XU Neng-xiang, GU Hong-ru. Effects of Stacking Time on Feeding and Fermentation Quality of Broccoli Waste [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[8]	YAO Xi-xi, CAI Hua, LIU Hao-dong, LI Chang-hui. Analysis of Rumen Fermentation Characteristics and In Vitro Digestibility of Alpine Meadow Forage in Different Seasons [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1729-1737.
[9]	DU Zhao-chang, WANG Hong, YAN Yan-hong, MUHAMMAD Tahir, WEI Xiao, ZENG Tai-ru, LI Hong-liang. Effects of Rice Husk and Wheat Bran Addition on Silage Quality of Fresh Corn Straw [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[10]	SONG Jian-chao, YU Xiao-jun, WEI Kong-tao, WANG Peng-bin, TONG Yong-shang, LI Zhen, HE You-long, WANG Hai-bo. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Elymus nutans in Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564.
[11]	WU Shuo, ZOU Xuan, WANG Ming-ya, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Chenpi Citrus Juice on Fermentation Quality of Stylo and Rice Straw Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[12]	DONG Zhi-xiao, HE Run-hao, KUANG Jian-yang, NIE Cong, YANG Jian, ZHANG Jian-bo, GOU Wen-long, MA Xiao. Effects of Sweet Sorghum Intercropping with Lablab Purpureus on Yield and Quality of Mixed Forage in Chengdu Plain,China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1578-1583.
[13]	HAN Xue-qin, DENG Hong-shan, PU Tian-lei, LUO Hui-ying, ZHAO Qiong-ling, LIAO Cheng-fei, XUE Shi-ming, FAN Jian-cheng, JIN Jie. The Study on Agronomic Characters of Silage Maize Varieties in Dry-hot Valley Region of Jinsha River [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1327-1335.
[14]	LYU Hong-jian, ZOU Xuan, WU Shuo, LI Yun, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing. Effect of Adding Moringa Oleifera Leaves and Lactobacillus farciminis on Quality of Corn Stover Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[15]	QIN Wei-na, JIAO Ting, SHI Shang-li, LI Xiong-xiong, GAO Xue-mei, ZHAO Sheng-guo, QI Juan, WANG Zheng-wen. Evaluation of Silage Quality of 10 Green-fed Corn Varieties under Different Hydrothermal Rescource Conditions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.