Effects of Maize Special Biofertilizer on Maize Growth in Arid Area

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.01.027

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 173-179.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.01.027

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Maize Special Biofertilizer on Maize Growth in Arid Area

WANG Guo-ji^1,2, CHAI Qiang⁴, ZHANG Yu-xia^1,2, YAO Tuo^1,2,3, MA Wen-bin^1,2, MA Wen-wen^1,2

1. Pratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
3. Sino-U.S. Centers for Sustainable Development of Grassland and Animal Husbandry, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
4. College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2014-03-12 Revised:2014-06-08 Online:2015-02-15 Published:2015-01-31

干旱区玉米专用菌肥对玉米生长特性的影响

王国基^1,2, 柴强⁴, 张玉霞^1,2, 姚拓^1,2,3, 马文文^1,2, 马文彬^1,2

1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 草业科学实验室, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 草业生态系统教育部重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730070;
3. 中-美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心, 甘肃兰州 730070;
4. 甘肃农业大学农学院, 甘肃兰州 730070

通讯作者: 姚拓
作者简介:王国基(1986-),男,甘肃白银人,硕士,研究方向为草业科学,E-mail:wang_gj1008@163.com
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划(2007BAD89B17)(2012BAD14B10);国家自然基金(31360584);现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-35)资助

Abstract

Abstract:

This research aimed to develop biofertilizer for maize using plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains screened from pasture rhizosphere. The effects of the biofertilizer on maize growth traits in arid area were investigated here. The results showed that the quality of the biofertilizer complied with the Standard of Microbiological Fertilizer of China (NY227-94). The leaf number and hay yield of the treatment using maize special biofertilizer instead of 15%～30% chemical fertilizer were no significant difference compared with that of local fertilizing standard (100% chemical fertilizer). The growth trait indexes (plant height, dry material accumulation, agronomic traits, yield components and economic yield, yield of plant, et.) of the treatment using maize special biofertilizer instead of 15% chemical fertilizer were no significant difference, and some indexes increased compared with that of the local fertilizing standard, whereas the growth traits (except the yield of plant) of the treatment using maize special biofertilizer instead of 30% chemical fertilizer decreased compared to that of the local fertilizing standard. Using the specialized biofertilizer instead of the 15%～30% chemical fertilizer could reduce the 416.4 CNY·hm^-2 and 1058.4 CNY·hm^-2 costs of fertilizers.

Key words: Maize, Biofertilizer, Biomass, Economic yield

摘要：

利用前期筛选出的优良根际促生菌株,研制玉米专用菌肥,进行大田试验,测定其替代部分化肥对玉米生长特性的影响.结果表明:利用筛选的优良促生菌研制的玉米专用菌肥符合微生物肥料NY227-94标准.菌肥替代15%~30% 化肥的玉米叶片数及植物产量与当地高产栽培方式最佳施肥量之间差异不显著.替代15% 化肥的玉米生长特性(株高、干物质积累、农艺性状、产量构成因素及经济产量、植物产量等)与当地高产栽培方式最佳施肥量差异不显著,且个别指标有不同程度提高;替代30% 化肥除在植物产量与最佳施肥量相比差异不显著外,其他各项指标均有所下降.专用菌肥替代15%~30%化肥,可以减少化肥投入,其直接经济效益分别为416.4和1058.4元·hm^-2.

关键词: 玉米, 菌肥, 植物产量, 经济产量

CLC Number:

S144

WANG Guo-ji, CHAI Qiang, ZHANG Yu-xia, YAO Tuo, MA Wen-bin, MA Wen-wen. Effects of Maize Special Biofertilizer on Maize Growth in Arid Area[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(1): 173-179.

王国基, 柴强, 张玉霞, 姚拓, 马文文, 马文彬. 干旱区玉米专用菌肥对玉米生长特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(1): 173-179.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.01.027

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2015/V23/I1/173

References

[1] 赵其国,孙波,张桃林. 土壤质量与持续环境:土壤质量的定义及评价方法[J]. 土壤,1997(3):113-120
[2] 许光辉,郑洪元. 土壤微生物分析方法手册[M]. 北京:农业出版社,1986:249-251
[3] Malik K A, Rakhshanda B. Association of nitrogen-fixing plant growth promoting rhizobateria (PGPR) with Kallar grass and Rice [J]. Plant and Soil,1997,194(1):37-44
[4] Banchio E, Bogino P C, Zygadlo J, et al. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria improve growth and essential oil yield inOriganummajorana L. Biochem [J]. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology,2008,36(10):766-771
[5] BardasG A, Lagopodi A L, Kadoglidou K, et al. Biological control of three Colletotrichum lindemuthianumraces using Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1391 and Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 [J]. Biological Control,2009,49(2):139-145
[6] Esitken A, Yildiz HE, Ercisli S, et al. Effects of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) on yield, growth and nutrient contents of organically grown strawberry [J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2010,124(1):62-66
[7] Kumar S, Pandey P, Maheshwari D K. Reduction in dose of chemical fertilizers and growth enhancement of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)with application of rhizospheric competent Pseudomonas aeruginosa LES4 [J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2009,45(4):334-340
[8] Liu H, Wu X Q, Ren J H, et al. Isolation and identification of phosphobacteria in poplar rhizosphere from different regions of China [J]. Pedosphere,2011,21(1):90-97
[9] Oliveira CA, Alves VM C, Marriel I E. Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms isolated from rhizosphere of maize cultivated in an Oxisolofthe Brazilian Cerrado Biome [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2009,41(9):1782-1787
[10] 荣良燕,姚拓,黄高宝,等. 植物根际优良促生菌(PGPR)筛选及其接种剂部分替代化肥对玉米生长影响研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2013,31(2):59-65
[11] 姚拓. 促进植物生长菌的研究进展[J]. 草原与草坪,2002(4):3-5
[12] 赵伯福,万纪红. 玉米应用壮园牌生态菌肥试验效果分析[J]. 黑龙江农业科学,2011(1):49-50
[13] 邓振山,党军龙,张海州,等. 植物根际促生菌的筛选及其对玉米的促生效应[J]. 微生物学通报,2012,39(7):980-988
[14] 刘青海. 六株溶磷菌与四株固氮菌互作效应及其菌剂对苜蓿促生效果研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2011
[15] 韩华雯,姚拓,王国基,等. 根际促生菌肥复合载体配方筛选[J]. 草原与草坪,2013(5):15-20
[16] 中华人民共和国农业行业标准. NY227-94微生物肥料标准 [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,1994
[17] 赵小蓉,林启美. 微生物解磷的研究进展[J]. 土壤肥料,2001(3):7-11
[18] 庞天,梁子洪,王伦旺. PGPR复混肥料对旱地甘蔗的施用效应[J]. 广西农业科学,2008,39(4):504-506
[19] 李玉娥,姚拓,荣良燕. 溶磷菌溶磷和分泌IAA特性及对苜蓿生长的影响[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(1):84-88
[20] 张堃,姚拓,张德罡,等. 高寒地区联合固氮菌肥对青稞的促生效应研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2010,16(3):708-713
[21] Mirz MS, Rasul G, Mehnaz S. Beneficial effects of inoculated nitrogen-fixing bacteria on rice[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2000,31(2):191-204
[22] 韩文星,姚拓,席琳乔,等. PGPR菌肥制作及其对燕麦生长和品质影响的研究[J]. 草业学报,2008,17(2):75-84
[23] 段秀梅,高晓蓉,吕军,等. 两株土壤分离菌的解磷能力及对玉米的促生作用[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2010(2):79-85

Effects of Maize Special Biofertilizer on Maize Growth in Arid Area

干旱区玉米专用菌肥对玉米生长特性的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	SHE Yan-di, YANG Xiao-yuan, MA Li, ZHANG Zhong-hua, WANG Dang-jun, HUANG Xiao-tao, MA Zhen, YAO Bu-qing, ZHOU Hua-kun. Study on the Characteristics and Interrelationship of Plant Community and Soil in Degraded Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[2]	ZHANG Zhong-hua, MA Li, ZHOU Bing-rong, SONG Ming-hua, XU Wen-hua, DENG Yan-fang, WANG Fang, SHE Yan-di, ZHANG Qian, YAO Bu-qing, MA Zhen, ZHOU Hua-kun. Esponse of the Functional Diversity of Dominant Plants to Warming and Simulated Grazing in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 225-232.
[3]	MA Ying, ZHANG Hong-jia, KUDUSI Abu-dushalamu, GENG Shu-juan, XUE Ao-ran, ZHAO Han-wei, JIAN Bai-han. Effects of Salt and Alkali Stresses on the Growth,Accumulation of Organic Acids and other Solutes and their Physiological Functions of Suaeda salsa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1934-1940.
[4]	HUANG Jia-xing, WU Jing, LI Chun-bin, QIN Ge-xia, QIAN Juan-bing, LI Huai-hai. Remote Sensing Retrieval of grassland Above-Ground Biomass in Tianzhu County based on Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 Data [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2023-2030.
[5]	GAO Hong-yuan, HOU Meng-jing, GE Jing, BAO Xu-ying, LI Yuan-chun, LIU Jie, FENG Qi-sheng, LIANG Tian-gang, HE Jin-sheng, QIAN Da-wen. Hyperspectral Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Alpine Grassland based on Random Forest Algorithm [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1757-1768.
[6]	DUAN Li-hui, LIU Xiao-li, HAN Bing, WEI Xiao-ting, CAI Ren-cuo, SHAO Xin-qing. Effects of Native Species Reseeding on the Community Stability of Alpine Meadow in the Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1793-1800.
[7]	SUN Yu, ZHANG Feng, ZHENG Jia-hua, ZHAO Tian-qi, ZHAO Meng-li, ZHANG Bin. Effects of Mowing Stubble Height on Species Diversity and Aboveground Biomass of Stipa grandis Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1859-1864.
[8]	LIN Chun-ying, LI Xi-lai, SUN Hai-song, SUN Hua-fang, MA Cheng-biao, HAN Hui-bang, ZHANG Yu-Peng, LI Cheng-yi. Responses of Soil Organic Carbon Component on Different Degrees of Degradation of Alpine Wetland in the Source of Yellow River [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1540-1548.
[9]	WO Ye, HUANG Jia-yuan, YANG Ning, LU Xuan, LIN Zhi-ling, ZHAO Li-xing, LI Tian-qi, GAO Kai. Effects of Phosphorus Addition at Budding Stage on Biomass and Material Distribution of Jerusalem Artichoke [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1594-1598.
[10]	GUO Chao-fan, CHEN Ze-wei, ZHANG Zhi-gao. Research on Remote Sensing Estimation of Forage Above-ground Biomass Based on Optimal Model Selection [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 946-955.
[11]	DING Cheng-xiang, LIU Yu. Effects of Solar Photovoltaic Park Construction on Soil Microbial Community in Alpine Desert of Qinghai Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1061-1069.
[12]	LI Wen, MA Lin-feng, CAO Xi-min, YU Feng-fang, SHE Zhi-hui, XU Zhan-yun, LIU Gui-he, LYU Ai-zhi. Effect of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Zea mays L. in Bashang Agro-pastoral Ecotone in Northwest Hebei Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.
[13]	GUO Yan-hong, PU Xiao-jian, PU Xiao-peng, DU Wen-hua. Change Tendency of the Aboveground Biomass and Nutrition Quality in the Alpine Pastoral Area of Qinghai Tibet [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 734-742.
[14]	ZHANG Xiao-jie, WANG Chun-ming, ZHOU Tian-wang, LIU Hao, SHEN Rui-qing, LI Min-quan, GUO Cheng. Isolation and Identification of Pathogens of Maize Fusarium Stalk Rot in Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 805-812.
[15]	DU Chong-xuan, LIU Yun-gen, WANG Yan, BAO Ning-ying, CHEN Tian. Effects of Arsenic Pollution on the Growth of Typha and the Secretion of N-alkanes in Roots [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 349-355.