Effects of Six Different Additives on the Silage Fermented Quality of Sugarcane Top

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.02.029

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 407-413.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.02.029

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Six Different Additives on the Silage Fermented Quality of Sugarcane Top

ZHU Xin¹, HAO Jun¹, LIU Hong-hai¹, CHEN Qiu-sheng¹, CHEN Gang-yan¹, MA Long², CHEN Chao¹

1. College of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province 550025, China;
2. Center of grassland and livestock in Ceheng county, Guizhou, Guizhou Province 552200, China

Received:2014-07-01 Revised:2014-12-08 Online:2015-04-15 Published:2015-03-25

6种不同添加物对甘蔗叶梢青贮发酵品质的影响

朱欣¹, 郝俊¹, 刘洪来¹, 陈秋生¹, 陈光燕¹, 马龙², 陈超¹

1. 贵州大学动物科学学院, 贵州贵阳 550025;
2. 贵州省册亨县草地畜牧中心, 贵州贵阳 552200

通讯作者: 陈超
作者简介:朱欣(1988-),女,贵州毕节人,研究生,主要从事草地畜牧业方面研究,E-mail:764091308@qq.com
基金资助:
贵州省农业公关黔科合(NY20103049);贵州省州合作项目黔西南科(201108);黔省专合字(2011039)资助

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to improve the silage fermented quality of sugarcane top, the effects of six different additives (cellulase: 2 g·kg^-1, NaCl: 0.5%, urea: 0.6%, compound microbial: 2 mL·kg^-1, formic acid: 0.6%, and mixture of corn stover and rice bran: 10%+10%) on the silage fermented quality of sugarcane top were investigated with the method of single factor completely randomized design. The results showed that the quality of sugarcane top silage was poorer. Compound microbial additive (2 mL·kg^-1) didn't have significant effects on fermentation quality and nutritional values, whereas formic acid (0.6%), cellulase (2 g·kg^-1) and NaCl (0.5%) additives improved the fermentation quality and nutritional values of the sugarcane top silage. The treatments of adding 0.6% urea additives or 10% corn stover plus 10% rice bran additive had the best silage fermentation quality and nutritional values. The influences of six different additives on the silage fermented quality of sugarcane top were ordered as 0.6% urea> corn stover+ rice bran (10%+10%) mixture > formic acid (0.6%)> NaCl (0.5%)> cellulase (2 g·kg^-1)> compound microbial (2 mL·kg^-1).

Key words: Sugarcane top, Silage, Fermented quality, Ensiling additive

摘要：

为提高甘蔗(Saccharum officinarum)叶梢青贮饲料品质,采用单因子完全随机化设计,研究了纤维素酶(2 g·kg^-1)、NaCl(0.5%)、尿素(0.6%)、复合微生物(2 mL·kg^-1)、甲酸(0.6%)以及玉米(Zea mays)秸秆+米糠混合物(10%+10%)等6种添加物对青贮甘蔗叶梢饲料品质的影响.结果表明:甘蔗叶梢直接青贮品质稍差;添加2 mL·kg^-1 复合微生物对甘蔗叶梢青贮饲料的发酵品质和营养价值与对照相比差异不显著; 0.6%甲酸、2 g·kg^-1纤维素酶和0.5%NaCl提高了发酵品质和营养价值;0.6%尿素和10%玉米秸秆+10%米糠青贮饲料的发酵品质和营养价值效果最好.6种添加物对甘蔗叶梢青贮发酵效果的影响依次为:0.6%尿素 >10%玉米秸秆+10%米糠 >0.6%甲酸 >0.5%NaCl >2 g·kg^-1纤维素酶 >2 mL·kg^-1 EM.

关键词: 甘蔗叶梢, 青贮, 发酵品质, 青贮添加物

CLC Number:

S543

ZHU Xin, HAO Jun, LIU Hong-hai, CHEN Qiu-sheng, CHEN Gang-yan, MA Long, CHEN Chao. Effects of Six Different Additives on the Silage Fermented Quality of Sugarcane Top[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(2): 407-413.

朱欣, 郝俊, 刘洪来, 陈秋生, 陈光燕, 马龙, 陈超. 6种不同添加物对甘蔗叶梢青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(2): 407-413.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.02.029

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2015/V23/I2/407

References

[1] 张艳兰. 蔗叶循环利用改良土壤理化性状[J]. 广西热带农业,2008(2):28-29
[2] 蚁细苗,谭文兴,钟映萍,等. 利用甘蔗梢(叶)作牛饲料[J]. 甘蔗糖业,2013(2):43-46
[3] 李春霞. 纤维酶制剂对甘蔗梢营养成分的影响[D]. 福州:福建农林大学,2010:15-16
[4] Puga D C, Galina H M, Perez-Gil R F, et al. Effect of a controlled release urea supplement on rumen fermentation in sheep fed a diet of sugar cane tops(Saccharum officinarum),corn stubble (Zea mays)and King grass(Pennisetum purpureum) [J]. Small Ruminant Research,2001,39(3):269-276
[5] Ortiz-Rubio M A, Фrskov E R, Milne J, et al. Effect of different sources of nitrogen on in situ degradability and feed intake of Zebu cattle fed sugarcane tops(Saccharum officinarum) [J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2007,139(3):143-158
[6] Gradiz L, Sugimoto A, Ujihara K, et al. Beef cow-calf production system integrated with sugarcane production: Simulation model development and application in Japan [J]. Agricultural Systems,2007,94(4):750-762
[7] 陈育峰,刘艳芬,万江虹,等. 添加尿素和糖蜜对甘蔗尾打捆青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国畜牧兽医,2008,35(2):20-22
[8] 邓卫东,席冬梅,刘勇,等. 添加NaCl对甘蔗梢青贮品质的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2002(4):11-13
[9] 余梅,刘建勇,黄必志,等. 不同处理方式对甘蔗梢营养价值的影响[J]. 中国牛业科学,2010,36(5):19-22
[10] 万江虹,刘艳芬,许瑶,等. 添加甲酸、甲醛对甘蔗尾捆裹青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国草食动物,2008,28(5):49-51
[11] 郑晓灵,刘艳芬,刘铀,等. 纤维素酶对甘蔗梢青贮品质的影响[J]. 饲料工业,2007,28(12):39-41
[12] 刘力,乌雪飞,耿利华. 添加剂在青贮饲料中的应用研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学,2010,31(8):17-18
[13] Zhu Y, Nishino N, Kishida Y, et al. Ensiling characteristics and ruminal degradation of Italian ryegrass and lucerne silages treated with cell wall-degrading enzymes [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,1999,79(14):1987-1992
[14] 张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007:46-72
[15] Deepti T, Tom L R, Megan N M. Experimental methods for laboratory-scale ensilage of lignocellulosic biomass [J]. Biomass and Bioenergy,2012,47:125-133
[16] Cussen R F, Merry R J, Williams A P, et al. The effect of additives on the ensilage of forage of differing perennial ryegrass and white clover content [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1995,50(3):249-258
[17] 闫峻,王文杰,高玉鹏,等. 自动凯氏定氮仪快速测定青贮饲料中的氨态氮[J]. 粮食与饲料工业,2009(4):47-48
[18] 李长慧,班春莉. 披碱草和苜蓿混合青贮试验研究[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2006(2):57-58
[19] Owens V N, Albrecht K A, Muck R E, et al. Protein degradation and fermentation characteristics of red clover and alfalfa silage harvested with varying levels of total nonstructural carbohydrates [J]. Crop Science,1999,39(6):1873-1880
[20] 司丙文. 三种灌木饲用植物青贮微生物种群动态变化与发酵特性[D]. 北京:中国农业科学学院,2012:89-90
[21] 杨富裕,张蕴薇. 尿素在青贮饲料中的应用[J]. 中国奶牛,2002(5):23-25
[22] 刘建勇,余梅,王安奎,等. 添加尿素对甘蔗梢青贮的影响[J]. 中国牛业科学,2010,36(4):22-25
[23] 郭艳萍,玉柱,顾雪莹,等. 不同添加剂对高粱青贮质量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(6):875-879
[24] 王莹,玉柱. 不同添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2010,32(5):80-84
[25] Kennedy S J. An evaluation of three bacterial inoculants and formic acid as additives for first harvest grass [J]. Grass and Forage Science,1990,45(3):281-288
[26] 刘大森,鞠涛,杨方,等. 纤维素酶在反刍动物饲料中的应用研究进展[J]. 东北农业大学学报,2011,42(6):7-11
[27] 吕建敏,陈民利,胡伟莲. 添加酶制剂对青贮玉米秸发酵品质和营养价值的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志,2005,41(7):18-20
[28] 王保平,董晓燕,董宽虎. 不同添加剂对柠条嫩枝叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(5):1096-1102
[29] Colombatto D, Hervás G, Yang W Z, et al. Effects of enzyme supplementation of a total mixed ration on microbial fermentation in continuous culture,maintained at high and low pH [J]. Journal of Animal Science,2003,81(10):2617-2627
[30] Tjandraatmadja M, Norton B W, MacRae I C. Ensilage characteristics of three tropical grasses as influenced by stage of growth and addition of molasses [J]. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology,1994,10(1):74-81
[31] 薛祝林,宋丽梅,黄必志,等. 添加尿素或食盐对高丹草青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2014,36(1):75-79
[32] Sheperd A C, Kunn L J R. An enzyme additive for corn silage:Effects on silage composition and animal performance [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1996,79(10):1767-1773

Effects of Six Different Additives on the Silage Fermented Quality of Sugarcane Top

6种不同添加物对甘蔗叶梢青贮发酵品质的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LU Jia-ding, YANG Xu, ZHU Xiao-yan, CUI Ya-lei, WANG Cheng-zhang, LI De-feng, SHI Ying-hua. Comprehensive Evaluation of 21 Corn Silage Varieties with both Grain and Forage in Henan Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1950-1958.
[2]	MA Ran-ran, YUAN Jie, ZHANG Wen-jie, XU Neng-xiang, GU Hong-ru. Effects of Stacking Time on Feeding and Fermentation Quality of Broccoli Waste [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[3]	DU Zhao-chang, WANG Hong, YAN Yan-hong, MUHAMMAD Tahir, WEI Xiao, ZENG Tai-ru, LI Hong-liang. Effects of Rice Husk and Wheat Bran Addition on Silage Quality of Fresh Corn Straw [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[4]	WU Shuo, ZOU Xuan, WANG Ming-ya, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Chenpi Citrus Juice on Fermentation Quality of Stylo and Rice Straw Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[5]	HAN Xue-qin, DENG Hong-shan, PU Tian-lei, LUO Hui-ying, ZHAO Qiong-ling, LIAO Cheng-fei, XUE Shi-ming, FAN Jian-cheng, JIN Jie. The Study on Agronomic Characters of Silage Maize Varieties in Dry-hot Valley Region of Jinsha River [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1327-1335.
[6]	LYU Hong-jian, ZOU Xuan, WU Shuo, LI Yun, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing. Effect of Adding Moringa Oleifera Leaves and Lactobacillus farciminis on Quality of Corn Stover Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[7]	QIN Wei-na, JIAO Ting, SHI Shang-li, LI Xiong-xiong, GAO Xue-mei, ZHAO Sheng-guo, QI Juan, WANG Zheng-wen. Evaluation of Silage Quality of 10 Green-fed Corn Varieties under Different Hydrothermal Rescource Conditions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.
[8]	LI Wen, MA Lin-feng, CAO Xi-min, YU Feng-fang, SHE Zhi-hui, XU Zhan-yun, LIU Gui-he, LYU Ai-zhi. Effect of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Zea mays L. in Bashang Agro-pastoral Ecotone in Northwest Hebei Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.
[9]	WANG Xin-yu, SHEN Chen, HUO Wen-jie, LIU Qiang, ZHANG Shuan-lin, WANG Cong, CHEN Lei, XU Qing-fang, WANG Yong-xin, GUO Gang. Analysis of Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Community Structure of Whole Corn Silage of Different Varieties in Yanbei Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1087-1093.
[10]	ZHENG Ming-yang, WU Shuo, GUO Xiang, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Lactobacillus and Cellulase on the Silage Quality of Amomum Villosum leaves [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1113-1117.
[11]	YOU Si-Han, DU Shuai, ZHOU Zhong-Yi, Gegentu, WAN Tao, JIA Yu-Shan. Mixed Silage of Sorghum Hybrid Sudan Grass and Perennial Ryegrass with Different Proportions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 821-827.
[12]	WANG Bin, DONG Xiu, LI Man-you, YANG Yu-qi, LAN Jian. Effects of Mixed Planting of Dolichos Lablab with Different Sowing Rates and Silage Corn on Grassland Productivity and Forage Quality [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 828-834.
[13]	LU Yong-xiang, YAN Xian-ming, ZHOU Zhao-xiang, ZHU Hui-xian, GOU Wen-long, YOU Ming-hong, LI Da-xu, CHEN Shi-yong, LI Ping, BAI Shi-qie. Effects of Different Additives on Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Community of High-moisture Whole-plant Corn Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 842-847.
[14]	CHEN De-kui, GUO Xiang, ZHENG Ming-yang, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHOU Wei, ZHANG Qing. The Effects of Amomum Villosum Lour. Essential Oil on the Fermentation Quality of Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 855-860.
[15]	WANG Li-xue, HAN Jing, CHEN Long-bin, YU Xin-yue, LIU Jing-xi, MA Yi, HUO Wen-juan. Effects of Various Lactic Acid Bacteria Combinations on Bacterial Community Structure of Alfalfa Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 388-395.