Alpine Meadow Succession and Plant Species Diversity Characteristics under Different Grazing Gradients

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.05.006

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 944-950.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.05.006

Alpine Meadow Succession and Plant Species Diversity Characteristics under Different Grazing Gradients

OUYANG Jing-zheng^1,2, LI Yi-kang^1,2, LIN Li¹, DU Yan-gong¹, ZHANG Fa-wei¹, GUO Xiao-wei¹, LI Qian¹, LIU Shu-li^1,2, SUN Ya-nan^1,2, KE Xun^1,2, CAO Guang-min¹

1. Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, Qinghai Province 810008, China;
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received:2014-08-22 Revised:2014-12-18 Online:2015-10-15 Published:2015-12-01

不同牧压梯度下高寒草甸演替及植物物种多样性分异特征

欧阳经政^1,2, 李以康^1,2, 林丽¹, 杜岩功¹, 张法伟¹, 李茜¹, 郭小伟¹, 刘淑丽^1,2, 孙亚男^1,2, 柯洵^1,2, 曹广民¹

1. 中国科学院西北高原生物研究所, 青海西宁 810008;
2. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

通讯作者: 曹广民
作者简介:欧阳经政(1988-),男,甘肃会宁人,硕士生,研究方向为生物结皮对高寒草甸生物多样性影响,E-mail:oyjztt@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(31270576);青海省科技厅项目(2013-N-540)(2013-Z-915)资助

Abstract

Abstract:

A comparative study on four adjacent plant community species characteristics with different grazing intensities was conducted in alpine meadows. The variations of plant species diversity at different successional stages were discussed under different grazing gradients, aiming to provide the basis of vegetation protection in this region. The results showed that Shannon-Wiener index changed indistinctively between the stage of Kobresia humilis community and matticepipedon cracking stage of K. pygmaea community, however, it changed significantly among the other three stages. Simpson index did not significantly change between the matticepipedon cracking stage of K. pygmaea community with Gramineae and K. humilis community stage, matticepipedon thickening stage of K. pygmaea community and K. pygmaea community, whereas significantly changed among other stages. The evenness indices based on the Shannon-Wiener index did not change significantly between K. pygmaea community and matticepipedon thickening stage of K. pygmaea community, whereas it changed significantly among the other three stages. Grazing measure significantly changed the constructive species and dominant species of meadow, resulting in the change of species important value. With the increases of grazing pressure, the plant community was significantly changed. The community succession of the alpine meadow was from Gramineae and K. humilis community to K. pygmaea community, matticepipedon thickening stage of K.pygmaea community to matticepipedon cracking stage of K.pygmaea community. The important value of Cyperaceae species increased with the successions of communities in the alpine meadow, whereas the important value of Gramineae species decreased.

Key words: Grazing pressure gradient, Alpine meadow, Succession, Species diversity

摘要：

通过对不同牧压梯度导致的4个相邻高寒草甸植物群落物种多样性的调查,探讨了放牧驱动下高寒草甸演替及植物物种多样性分异特征,以期为高寒草甸合理利用提供依据。结果表明:矮嵩草时期与小嵩草草毡表层开裂期的多样性指数D差异不显著,其他3个阶段间差异显著(P<0.05);多样性指数H除禾草矮嵩草时期与小嵩草草毡表层开裂期,矮嵩草时期与小嵩草草毡表层加厚期差异不显著外,其他均差异显著(P<0.05);均匀度指数除矮嵩草时期与小嵩草草毡表层加厚期差异不显著,其他3个时期差异均达到显著水平(P<0.05);放牧明显改变了高寒草甸的主要建群种和优势种,伴随牧压强度增大,植物群落发生更替,莎草科重要值增大,禾本科重要值减小,草甸植物群落由禾草矮嵩草时期向矮嵩草时期、小嵩草草毡表层加厚期、小嵩草草毡表层开裂期演替。

关键词: 牧压梯度, 高寒草甸, 演替, 物种多样性

CLC Number:

S812.3

OUYANG Jing-zheng, LI Yi-kang, LIN Li, DU Yan-gong, ZHANG Fa-wei, GUO Xiao-wei, LI Qian, LIU Shu-li, SUN Ya-nan, KE Xun, CAO Guang-min. Alpine Meadow Succession and Plant Species Diversity Characteristics under Different Grazing Gradients[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(5): 944-950.

欧阳经政, 李以康, 林丽, 杜岩功, 张法伟, 李茜, 郭小伟, 刘淑丽, 孙亚男, 柯洵, 曹广民. 不同牧压梯度下高寒草甸演替及植物物种多样性分异特征[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(5): 944-950.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.05.006

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2015/V23/I5/944

References

[1] 王伯荪,彭少麟. 植被生态学-群落与生态系统[M]. 北京:中国环境科学技术出版社,1997:5-12
[2] 王献浦,刘玉凯. 生物多样性的理论与实践[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,1994:1-67
[3] 谢高地,鲁春霞,肖玉,等. 青藏高原高寒草地生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 山地学报,2003,21(1):50-55
[4] Naeem S, Li S. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability[J]. Nature,1997,390(4):507-509
[5] Tilman D, Downing J A. Biodiversity and stability in grassland[J]. Nature,1994,367(27):363-365
[6] 李春刚. 放牧干扰对高寒草甸植物群落特征的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学,2010,38(5):128-132
[7] 仁青吉,武高林,任国华. 放牧强度对青藏高原东部高寒草甸植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草业学报,2009,18(5):256-261
[8] 臧岳铭,朱志红,李英年,等. 高寒矮嵩草草甸物种多样性与功能多样性对初级生产力的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2009,28(6):999-1005
[9] 郑伟,董全民,李世雄,等. 放牧强度对环青海湖高寒草原群落物种多样性和生产力的影响[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(6):1033-1038
[10] 王向涛,张世虎,陈懂懂,等. 不同放牧强度下高寒草甸植被特征和土壤养分变化研究[J]. 草业学报,2010,18(4):510-516
[11] 崔树娟,布仁巴音,朱小雪,等. 不同季节适度放牧对高寒草甸植物群落特征的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2014,34(2):349-357
[12] 王长庭,龙瑞军,王启兰,等. 放牧扰动下高寒草甸植物多样性、生产力对土壤养分条件变化的响应[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(9):4145-4151
[13] 张伟娜,干珠扎布,李亚伟,等. 禁牧休牧对藏北高寒草甸物种多样性和生物量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2013,15(3):143-149
[14] 许岳飞,益西措姆,付娟娟,等. 青藏高原高山嵩草草甸植物多样性和土壤养分对放牧的响应机制[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(6):1026-1032
[15] 李以康,林丽,张法伟,等. 小嵩草群落-高寒草甸地带性植被放牧压力下的偏途顶极群落[J]. 山地学报,2010,28(3):257-265
[16] 李以康,林丽,张法伟,等. 嵩草草甸退化和恢复过程中主要牧草演替和地表特征变化[J]. 草业学报,2010,19(5):179-185
[17] 林丽,李以康,张法伟,等. 高寒矮嵩草群落退化演替系列氮、磷生态化学计量学特征[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(17):5245-5251
[18] 曹广民,杜岩功,梁东营,等. 高寒嵩草草甸的被动与主动退化分异特征及其发生机理[J]. 山地学报,2007,25(6):641-648
[19] 任继周. 草业科学研究方法[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,1998:1-29
[20] 李永强,许志信. 典型草原区撂荒地植物群落演替过程中物种多样性变化[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报,2002,23(4):26-31
[21] 覃林. 统计生态学[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社,2009:61-73
[22] 柳小妮,孙九林,张德罡,等. 东祁连山不同退化阶段高寒草甸群落结构与植物多样性特征研究[J]. 草业学报,2008,17(4):1-11
[23] 刘军,陈益泰,罗阳富,等. 毛红椿天然林群落结构特征研究[J]. 林业科学研究,2010,23(1):93-97
[24] 郝文芳,杜峰,陈小燕,等. 黄土丘陵区天然群落的植物组成、植物多样性及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(5):609-615
[25] 许中旗,李文华,许晴,等. 禁牧对锡林郭勒典型草原物种多样性的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2008,27(8):1307-1312
[26] 许晴,张放,许中旗,等. Simpson 指数和Shannon-Wiener指数若干特征的分析及"稀释效应"[J]. 草业科学,2011,28(4):527-531
[27] 罗天相,刘莎. 中度放牧干扰对草地生物多样性影响的思考[J]. 安徽农业科学,2007,35(21):6567-6568
[28] 马玉寿,郎百宁,王启基. 黑土型"退化草地研究进展工作的回顾与展望[J]. 草业科学,1999,16(2):5-9
[29] 曹广民,龙瑞军. 放牧高寒嵩草草甸的稳定性及自我维持机制[J]. 中国农业气象,2009,30(4):553-559
[30] 林丽,曹广民,李以康,等. 人类活动对青藏高原高寒矮嵩草草甸碳过程的影响[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(15):4012-4018
[31] 周兴民,王启基,张堰青,等. 不同放牧强度下高寒草甸植被演替规律的数量分析[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学学报,1987,11(4):276-285
[32] 史惠兰,王启基,景增春,等. 江河源区人工草地群落特征、多样性及其稳定性分析[J]. 草业学报,2005,14(3):23-30
[33] 王文颖,王启基. 高寒嵩草草甸退化生态系统植物群落结构特征及物种多样性分析[J]. 草业学报,2001,10(3):8-14
[34] 曹广民,林丽,张法伟,等. 青藏高原高寒矮嵩草草甸稳定性的维持、丧失与恢复[J]. 草业科学,2010,27(8):34-38

Alpine Meadow Succession and Plant Species Diversity Characteristics under Different Grazing Gradients

不同牧压梯度下高寒草甸演替及植物物种多样性分异特征

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	XU Jing, LI Wen-long, WU Xin-yue, LUO Jia-ning, LIAO Yuan-cheng. Differentiation of Seed Germination Behavior in Alpine Meadow on the Tibetan Plateau along the Elevation Gradient [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 10-18.
[2]	SHE Yan-di, YANG Xiao-yuan, MA Li, ZHANG Zhong-hua, WANG Dang-jun, HUANG Xiao-tao, MA Zhen, YAO Bu-qing, ZHOU Hua-kun. Study on the Characteristics and Interrelationship of Plant Community and Soil in Degraded Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[3]	YAO Xi-xi, CAI Hua, LI Chang-hui. Effects of Fencing and Grazing on Vegetation Community Characteristics and Soil Properties in An Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 128-136.
[4]	LYU Ting, LIU Yu-ping, KANG Jun-hua, LIU Tao, LIANG Rui-fang, SU Xu. Studies on Composition and Diversity of Species Based on Different Habitats along the Delingha-Hala Lake [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 146-155.
[5]	ZHANG Zhen-hua, LIU Zhen-jie, CHEN Bai-jie, LI Yi-kang. Effects of Litter Addition on Soil Organic Carbon Mineralization in the Degraded Alpine Meadow in the Three-River Headwaters Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 156-164.
[6]	HUANG Cai-xia, LU Guang-xin, LI Xin, FAN Yue-jun, ZHOU Hua-kun, WANG Ying-cheng, WANG Zhi-hui, YAO Shi-ting. Effect of a Laccase Producing Fungus on the Mineralization Characteristics of Soil Organic Matter in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 173-178.
[7]	SHI Guo-xi, WANG Fang-ping, MA Li, ZHANG Zhong-hua, WANG Yi-bo, WANG Zhi-bo, YAO Bu-qing, ZHOU Hua-kun. Effects of Long-term and Short-term Warming on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Community in Alpine Meadow Ecosystem [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 179-189.
[8]	YAO Xi-xi, XIAO Feng, QI Shou-zhong, CHEN Guo-ming, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun. Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[9]	YAO Shi-ting, LU Guang-xin, ZHOU Hua-kun, ZHANG Hai-juan, YAN Hui-lin, WANG Jun-bang. Effect of Simulated Temperature Increase on Carbon and Nitrogen Changes in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 218-224.
[10]	WANG Zhan-qing, ZHANG Jie-xue, YANG Xue-lian, HUANG Xia, CHEN Si-liang, QIAO You-ming. Characteristics of Soil Microbial Diversity in Different Patches of Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[11]	XIANG Xue-mei, DE Ke-jia, FENG Ting-xu, WEI Xi-jie, WANG wei, XU Cheng-ti. Response of Vegetation and Soil to Exogenous Nitrogen Inputs in the Alpine Meadow of Sanjiangyuan Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2010-2016.
[12]	LIU Jing-jing, YIN Ya-li, LI Shi-xiong, ZHAO Wen, DONG Yi-ling, SU Shi-feng. Effects of Different Regulation Measures on Vegetation and Soil of Moderately Degraded Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2074-2080.
[13]	DUAN Li-hui, LIU Xiao-li, HAN Bing, WEI Xiao-ting, CAI Ren-cuo, SHAO Xin-qing. Effects of Native Species Reseeding on the Community Stability of Alpine Meadow in the Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1793-1800.
[14]	SUN Yu, ZHANG Feng, ZHENG Jia-hua, ZHAO Tian-qi, ZHAO Meng-li, ZHANG Bin. Effects of Mowing Stubble Height on Species Diversity and Aboveground Biomass of Stipa grandis Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1859-1864.
[15]	ZHANG Wan-tong, LI Chao-qun, YU Lu, SHAO Xin-qing. Study on the Effect of the Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Bio-fertilizer Instead of Chemical Fertilizer in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1423-1429.