Soil Enzymatic Activities of Five Typical Grassland Communities in Water-wind Erosion Crisscross Region on the Loess Plateau

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.01.005

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 32-37.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.01.005

Previous Articles Next Articles

Soil Enzymatic Activities of Five Typical Grassland Communities in Water-wind Erosion Crisscross Region on the Loess Plateau

LIU Jian¹, QIU Li-ping², CHENG Ji-min^1,2, ZHANG Jin-e³

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
3. Landscape Management, Guyuan, Ningxia 756000, China

Received:2015-09-07 Revised:2016-07-18 Online:2017-02-15 Published:2017-05-06

黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区5种典型草地群落土壤酶活性的研究

刘建¹, 邱莉萍², 程积民^1,2, 张金娥³

1. 西北农林科技大学动物科技学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
3. 宁夏固原市园林管理所, 宁夏固原 756000

通讯作者: 程积民,E-mail:gyzcjm@ms.iswc.ac.cn
作者简介:刘建(1991-),男,广西桂林人,硕士研究生,主要从事旱区草地生态学研究,E-mail:liu_jian_1991@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41471244，41271315）；陕西省自然科学基金项目（2015JQ4103）资助

Abstract

Abstract:

In this study, 5 different types of grassland communities (Stipa bungeana, Medicago sativa-S.bungeana-Artemisia sacrorum, M.sativa-A.sacrorum, S.bungeana-A.sacrorum and M.sativa-S.bungeana) developed as the form of natural succession after farmland abandoned in water-wind erosion crisscross region were selected as the research object to analyze the distribution of urease, invertase, alk-phosphatase and diastase, and to reveal the effect of different vegetation restoration on soil enzyme activities in water-wind erosion crisscross region on the Loess Plateau. Results showed that soil enzyme activities varied significantly in different grassland communities except for diastase. Activities of urease, invertase and alk-phosphatase all decreased with the increasing soil depth. Soil nutrients and biomass in S.bungeana grassland were the lowest among the 5 grssland communities, and the minimum values of soil enzymatic activities were all found in it, which indicated that the effect of restoration by single vegetation was not ideal. There were significant correlations between soil enzyme activities and soil nutrients, which revealed that soil enzyme activities could indicate the change of soil quality.

Key words: Water-wind erosion crisscross region, Grassland community, Soil enzyme activity, Soil nutrient, Biomass

摘要：

以长芒草（Stipa bungeana）、苜蓿-长芒草-铁杆蒿（Medicago sativa-S.bungeana-Artemisia sacrorum）、苜蓿-铁杆蒿（M.sativa-A.sacrorum）、长芒草-铁杆蒿（S.bungeana-A. sacrorum）和苜蓿-长芒草（M. sativa-S.bungeana）5种弃耕后自然演替形成的草地群落为研究对象，通过分析不同群落中土壤淀粉酶、脲酶、蔗糖酶和碱性磷酸酶活性的分布，进一步阐释黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区弃耕农地不同植被恢复过程对土壤酶活性的影响。结果表明：除土壤淀粉酶外，土壤脲酶、蔗糖酶和碱性磷酸酶活性均受地上植物群落的显著影响，并且土壤脲酶、蔗糖酶和碱性磷酸酶活性均随土层的加深而逐渐减小。长芒草群落土壤酶活性低且土壤养分和生物量均低于其他4个群落，表明弃耕后以单一种为优势种的草地群落植被恢复效果并不理想。4种土壤酶活性与土壤养分因子存在显著相关性，表明土壤酶活性可以指示土壤质量的变化。

关键词: 水蚀风蚀交错区, 草地群落, 土壤酶活性, 土壤养分, 生物量

CLC Number:

S154.2

LIU Jian, QIU Li-ping, CHENG Ji-min, ZHANG Jin-e. Soil Enzymatic Activities of Five Typical Grassland Communities in Water-wind Erosion Crisscross Region on the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(1): 32-37.

刘建, 邱莉萍, 程积民, 张金娥. 黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区5种典型草地群落土壤酶活性的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(1): 32-37.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.01.005

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2017/V25/I1/32

References

[1] 唐克丽. 黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区治理的重要性与紧迫性[J]. 中国水土保持,2000(11):11-12
[2] Sparling G P. Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter[J]. Soil Research,1992,30(2):195-207
[3] 邱莉萍. 黄土高原植被恢复生态系统土壤质量变化及调控措施[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学,2007:116-131
[4] Burns R G. Enzyme activity in soil: location and a possible role in microbial ecology[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1982,14(5):423-427
[5] Frankenberger W, Dick W A. Relationships between enzyme activities and microbial growth and activity indices in soil[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1983,47(5):945-951
[6] 王翔,李晋川,岳建英,等. 安太堡露天矿复垦地不同人工植被恢复下的土壤酶活性和肥力比较[J]. 环境科学,2013,34(9):3601-3606
[7] Caravaca F, Alguacil M M, Figueroa D, et al. Re-establishment of Retama sphaerocarpa as a target species for reclamation of soil physical and biological properties in a semi-arid Mediterranean area[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2003,182(1):49-58
[8] Badiane N N Y, Chotte J, Pate E, et al. Use of soil enzyme activities to monitor soil quality in natural and improved fallows in semi-arid tropical regions[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2001,18(3):229-238
[9] 周礼恺. 土壤酶学[M]. 科学出版社,1987:123-128
[10] 向泽宇,王长庭,宋文彪. 草地生态系统土壤酶活性研究进展[J]. 草业科学,2011,28(10):1801-1806
[11] Zhang Y L, Chen L J, Chen X H, et al. Response of soil enzyme activity to long-term restoration of desertified land[J]. Catena,2015(133):64-70
[12] Cenini V L, Fornara D A, Mcmullan G, et al. Linkages between extracellular enzyme activities and the carbon and nitrogen content of grassland soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2016(96):198-206
[13] Henry H A, Juarez J D, Field C B, et al. Interactive effects of elevated CO2, N deposition and climate change on extracellular enzyme activity and soil density fractionation in a California annual grassland[J]. Global Change Biology,2005,11(10):1808-1815
[14] Zhou X, Chen C, Wang Y, et al. Warming and increased precipitation have differential effects on soil extracellular enzyme activities in a temperate grassland[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2013(444):552-558
[15] Steinauer K, Tilman D, Wragg P D, et al. Plant diversity effects on soil microbial functions and enzymes are stronger than warming in a grassland experiment[J]. Ecology,2015,96(1):99-112
[16] 彭文英,张科利,杨勤科. 黄土坡面土壤性质随退耕时间的动态变化研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(5):153-158
[17] 潘成忠,上官周平,刘国彬. 黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕草地土壤质量演变[J]. 生态学报,2006,26(3):690-696
[18] Schlesinger W H, Reynolds J F, Cunningham G L, et al. Biological feedbacks in global deserti? cation[J]. Science,1990,247(4946):1043-1048
[19] Wardle D A. The influence of biotic interactions on soil biodiversity[J]. Ecology Letters,2006,9(7):870-886
[20] 张平仓,王斌科,唐克丽. 神木试区环境特征[J]. 中科院西北水土保持研究所集刊,1993(18):16-22
[21] 李学章,邵明安,魏孝荣,等. 黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错带水分和密度对人工草地土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2011,25(4):207-211
[22] Burns R G, Deforest J L, Marxsen J, et al. Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current knowledge and future directions[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2013,(58):216-234
[23] Von Mersi W, Schinner F. An improved and accurate method for determining the dehydrogenase activity of soils with iodonitrotetrazolium chloride[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,1991,11(3):216-220
[24] 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 农业出版社,1986:115-134
[25] Bandick A K, Dick R P. Field management effects on soil enzyme activities[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1999,31(11):1471-1479
[26] Groffman P M, Mcdowell W H, Myers J C, et al. Soil microbial biomass and activity in tropical riparian forests[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2001,33(10):1339-1348
[27] Bending G D, Turner M K, Jones J E. Interactions between crop residue and soil organic matter quality and the functional diversity of soil microbial communities[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2002,34(8):1073-1082
[28] 胡亚林,汪思龙,黄宇,等. 凋落物化学组成对土壤微生物学性状及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2005,25(10):2662-2668
[29] 王春阳,周建斌,夏志敏,等. 黄土高原区不同植物凋落物搭配对土壤微生物量碳, 氮的影响[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(8):2139-2147
[30] D'Odorico P, He Y, Collins S, et al. Vegetation–microclimate feedbacks in woodland–grassland ecotones[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography,2013,22(4):364-379
[31] Fliervoet L M, Werger M. Canopy structure and microclimate of two wet grassland communities[J]. New Phytologist,1984,96(1):115-130
[32] 文都日乐,李刚,张静妮. 呼伦贝尔不同草地类型土壤微生物量及土壤酶活性研究[J]. 草业学报,2010,19(5):94-102
[33] 单贵莲,陈功,宁发,等. 典型草原恢复演替过程中土壤微生物及酶活性动态变化研究[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(2):292-297
[34] 高海宁,张勇,秦嘉海,等. 祁连山黑河上游不同退化草地有机碳和酶活性分布特征[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(2):283-290
[35] 韩凤朋,郑纪勇,张兴昌. 黄土退耕坡地植物根系分布特征及其对土壤养分的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2009,25(2):50-55
[36] 邹俊亮,邵明安,龚时慧. 不同植被和土壤类型下土壤水分剖面的分异[J]. 水土保持研究,2011,18(6):12-17
[37] 李裕元,邵明安,陈洪松,等. 水蚀风蚀交错带植被恢复对土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 生态学报,2010(16):4306-4316
[38] 白一茹,王幼奇,展秀丽. 陕北农牧交错带土地利用方式对土壤物理性质及分布特征的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2012,46(8):1619-1627
[39] Herold N, Schoening I, Berner D, et al. Vertical gradients of potential enzyme activities in soil profiles of European beech, Norway spruce and Scots pine dominated forest sites[J]. Pedobiologia,2014,57(3):181-189
[40] 谈嫣蓉,蒲小鹏,张德罡,等. 不同退化程度高寒草地土壤酶活性的研究[J]. 草原与草坪,2006(3):20-22
[41] 王理德,姚拓,何芳兰,等. 石羊河下游退耕区次生草地自然恢复过程及土壤酶活性的变化[J]. 草业学报,2014,23(4):253-261
[42] Bowles T M, Acosta-Martínez V, Calderón F, et al. Soil enzyme activities, microbial communities, and carbon and nitrogen availability in organic agroecosystems across an intensively-managed agricultural landscape[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2014,68:252-262
[43] Wang B, Xue S, Liu G B, et al. Changes in soil nutrient and enzyme activities under different vegetations in the Loess Plateau area, Northwest China[J]. Catena,2012(92):186-195
[44] 王兵,刘国彬,薛萐,等. 黄土丘陵区撂荒对土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2009(3):282-287
[45] 岳中辉,王博文,庞健,等. 松嫩盐碱草地主要植物群落土壤酶活性研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2009(6):158-161
[46] Izquierdo I, Caravaca F, Alguacil M M, et al. Use of microbiological indicators for evaluating success in soil restoration after revegetation of a mining area under subtropical conditions[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2005,30(1):3-10
[47] 王国梁,刘国彬. 黄土丘陵区纸坊沟流域植被恢复的土壤养分效应[J]. 水土保持通报,2002,22(1):1-5

Soil Enzymatic Activities of Five Typical Grassland Communities in Water-wind Erosion Crisscross Region on the Loess Plateau

黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区5种典型草地群落土壤酶活性的研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	SHE Yan-di, YANG Xiao-yuan, MA Li, ZHANG Zhong-hua, WANG Dang-jun, HUANG Xiao-tao, MA Zhen, YAO Bu-qing, ZHOU Hua-kun. Study on the Characteristics and Interrelationship of Plant Community and Soil in Degraded Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[2]	ZHANG Zhong-hua, MA Li, ZHOU Bing-rong, SONG Ming-hua, XU Wen-hua, DENG Yan-fang, WANG Fang, SHE Yan-di, ZHANG Qian, YAO Bu-qing, MA Zhen, ZHOU Hua-kun. Esponse of the Functional Diversity of Dominant Plants to Warming and Simulated Grazing in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 225-232.
[3]	WANG Zhan-qing, ZHANG Jie-xue, YANG Xue-lian, HUANG Xia, CHEN Si-liang, QIAO You-ming. Characteristics of Soil Microbial Diversity in Different Patches of Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[4]	MA Ying, ZHANG Hong-jia, KUDUSI Abu-dushalamu, GENG Shu-juan, XUE Ao-ran, ZHAO Han-wei, JIAN Bai-han. Effects of Salt and Alkali Stresses on the Growth,Accumulation of Organic Acids and other Solutes and their Physiological Functions of Suaeda salsa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1934-1940.
[5]	HUANG Jia-xing, WU Jing, LI Chun-bin, QIN Ge-xia, QIAN Juan-bing, LI Huai-hai. Remote Sensing Retrieval of grassland Above-Ground Biomass in Tianzhu County based on Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 Data [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2023-2030.
[6]	ZHAO Peng-bo, QIU Kai-yang, XIE Ying-zhong, ZHAO Xiang-jun, CHEN Lin, LIU Wang-suo, LI Hai-quan, MENG Wen-fen, HU Xue-qin, HE Yi, HUANG Ye-yun, LI Ya-yuan. Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Nutrients under Different Sand-fixing Shrubs in Southern Mu Us Sandy Land, China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2040-2048.
[7]	WU Xue-mei, YANG Xue-yan, LIN Yuan-yuan, DAI Yi, CAO Le-le, DONG Wen-xuan, LIU Zeng-wen. Response of Humification of Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus tabulaeformis Litter to Climate Temperature and Humidity Changes [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1738-1747.
[8]	GAO Hong-yuan, HOU Meng-jing, GE Jing, BAO Xu-ying, LI Yuan-chun, LIU Jie, FENG Qi-sheng, LIANG Tian-gang, HE Jin-sheng, QIAN Da-wen. Hyperspectral Estimation of Aboveground Biomass of Alpine Grassland based on Random Forest Algorithm [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1757-1768.
[9]	DUAN Li-hui, LIU Xiao-li, HAN Bing, WEI Xiao-ting, CAI Ren-cuo, SHAO Xin-qing. Effects of Native Species Reseeding on the Community Stability of Alpine Meadow in the Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1793-1800.
[10]	SUN Yu, ZHANG Feng, ZHENG Jia-hua, ZHAO Tian-qi, ZHAO Meng-li, ZHANG Bin. Effects of Mowing Stubble Height on Species Diversity and Aboveground Biomass of Stipa grandis Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1859-1864.
[11]	LIN Chun-ying, LI Xi-lai, SUN Hai-song, SUN Hua-fang, MA Cheng-biao, HAN Hui-bang, ZHANG Yu-Peng, LI Cheng-yi. Responses of Soil Organic Carbon Component on Different Degrees of Degradation of Alpine Wetland in the Source of Yellow River [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1540-1548.
[12]	WO Ye, HUANG Jia-yuan, YANG Ning, LU Xuan, LIN Zhi-ling, ZHAO Li-xing, LI Tian-qi, GAO Kai. Effects of Phosphorus Addition at Budding Stage on Biomass and Material Distribution of Jerusalem Artichoke [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1594-1598.
[13]	YU Tie-feng, HAO Feng, ZHANG Yong-liang, GAO Kai. Response of Soil Enzyme and Soil Fertility of Artificial Grassland in Sandy Soil to Different Mixture Ratio of Alfalfa and Smooth Brome [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1217-1223.
[14]	GUO Chao-fan, CHEN Ze-wei, ZHANG Zhi-gao. Research on Remote Sensing Estimation of Forage Above-ground Biomass Based on Optimal Model Selection [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 946-955.
[15]	LI Na-na, YANG Jiu-yan, JIA Zhe-ting, YAN Rui-ling, CHEN Qi. Effects of Different Grazing Patterns on Community Characteristics and Soil Nutrients in the Main Pasture Types of Alxa Zuoqi [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 991-1003.