Interaction Effects of Different Additives and Moisture on the Quality of Alfalfa Silage

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.05.031

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 1138-1144.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.05.031

Previous Articles Next Articles

Interaction Effects of Different Additives and Moisture on the Quality of Alfalfa Silage

YANG Yu-xi¹, WANG Mu-chuan¹, YU Zhu, WANG Xiu-mei², XUE Hai-ying³

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agrcultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Feed Grasses Suoervision and Inspection Station of E'erduosi City, E'erduosi of Inner Mongolia 017000 China;
3. Rural Ecolgical Energy Station of Wuyuan County of Bayanzhuoer City, Bayanzhuoer City of Inner Mongolia 015100 China

Received:2016-09-30 Revised:2017-08-08 Online:2017-10-15 Published:2018-01-25

不同添加剂和原料含水量对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的互作效应

杨玉玺¹, 王木川¹, 玉柱, 王秀美², 薛海英³

1. 中国农业大学动物科技学院, 北京 100193;
2. 鄂尔多斯市饲料草种监督检验站, 内蒙古鄂尔多斯 017000;
3. 巴彦尔市五原县农村生态能源站, 内蒙古巴彦卓尔 015100

通讯作者: 玉柱,E-mail:yuzhu3@sohu.com
作者简介:杨玉玺(1992-),女,山东泰安人,硕士研究生,主要从事饲草加工研究,E-mail:sdfcyyx@163.com
基金资助:
国家牧草产业技术体系（CARS-35）；公益性行业（农业）科研专项（201303061）；天津市农业科技成果转化与推广项目（201404040）；内蒙古自治区科技计划项目（苜蓿混合青贮调制技术研究与示范）资助

Abstract

Abstract:

The effects of moisture content and additives on the quality of alfalfa silage were investigated. The alfalfa with moisture contents of 51.29%, 58.9% and 70% were separately supplemented with 6 additives, which were Lactobacillus plantarum (LP), Lactobacillus casei (LC),sucrose,cellulose, Shaomam additives, and Yazin silage additives, respectively. After these silages ensiled 30 days, the results showed that the silage quality of all additives had been significantly improved (P<0.05). LP+ cellulose was the best additive for 51.29% moisture alfalfa silage. Cellulose and LP+sucrose were the best additives for 58.9% moisture alfalfa silage. LP+ sucrose and sucrose were the best additives for 70% moisture alfalfa silage. The lower of material water content, the better of silage fermentation quality.

Key words: Alfalfa, Moisture, Additives, Silage quality

摘要：

本试验探讨添加剂和水分对苜蓿（Medicago sativa L.）青贮品质的影响，苜蓿经晾晒其原料含水量分别达到51.29%，58.9%和70%后，分别添加植物乳杆菌、干酪乳杆菌、蔗糖、纤维素酶、绍曼乳酸菌、亚芯乳酸菌及复合添加剂并制作青贮饲料，在室温条件下袋贮30天后开启，分析其青贮品质。研究结果表明：添加剂和晾晒处理均可以有效提高苜蓿青贮的发酵品质（P<0.05）。当青贮原料含水量为51.29%时，植物乳杆菌+纤维素酶混合处理的改善效果最好；当青贮原料含水量为58.9%时，纤维素酶处理组和植物乳杆菌+蔗糖混合处理组效果最好；当青贮样品含水量在70%时，蔗糖处理组和植物乳杆菌+蔗糖处理组效果最佳。原料含水量越低，其青贮效果越好。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿, 水分, 添加剂, 青贮品质

CLC Number:

Q945.3

YANG Yu-xi, WANG Mu-chuan, YU Zhu, WANG Xiu-mei, XUE Hai-ying. Interaction Effects of Different Additives and Moisture on the Quality of Alfalfa Silage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(5): 1138-1144.

杨玉玺, 王木川, 玉柱, 王秀美, 薛海英. 不同添加剂和原料含水量对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的互作效应[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(5): 1138-1144.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.05.031

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2017/V25/I5/1138

References

[1] 王位泰,黄斌,张天锋,等. 陇东黄土高原春播紫花苜蓿生态气候特征及适生种植区划[J]. 中国农业气象,2006,27(4):277-280
[2] 万里强,李向林. 乳酸菌复合添加剂糖分浓度对不同含水量苜蓿青贮效果的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2005,27(1):45-51
[3] 徐炜,师尚礼,祁娟,等. 不同添加剂对夏河县紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(2):414-419
[4] 庄益芬,安宅一夫,张文昌. 生物添加剂对苜蓿青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2009,31(1):70-75
[5] Han K J, CollinsM, Vanzant E S, et al. Bale density and moisture effects on alfalfa round bale silage[J]. Crop Science,2004,44(3):914-919
[6] 许庆方,玉柱,韩建国,等. 高效液相色谱法测定紫花苜蓿青贮中的有机酸[J]. 草原与草坪,2007,2007(2):63-65
[7] Bolsen K K, Lin C, Brent B E, et al. Effect of Silage Additives on the Microbial Succession and Fermentation Process of Alfalfa and Corn Silages 1[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1992,75(11):3066-3083
[8] 张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007:53-56,67-78
[9] Goering H K, VanSoest P J. Forage fiber analysis[A]. U. S.Department of AgricultureHandbook[M]. Washington,DC,1970:379-385
[10] 贾志新. 丁酸梭菌对樱桃谷肉鸭生长性能、免疫和抗氧化功能及肠道食糜VFA含量的影响[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2014
[11] 霍迪. 补充过瘤胃蛋氨酸最优化以苜蓿和玉米青贮为基础的奶牛日粮赖蛋比[J]. 饲料与畜牧,2016(11):65-66
[12] 王莹,玉柱. 不同添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2010,32(5):80-84
[13] 高海娟,柴凤久,刘泽东,等. 应用V-Score体系评价不同含水量苜蓿青贮饲料品质[J]. 中国饲料,2016(12):16-18
[14] 余国辉,许庆方,玉柱,等. 甲酸、蔗糖及晾晒对无芒雀麦青贮效果的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2011,33(2):100-104
[15] 邓海军,杨富裕. 3种添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(2):360-364
[16] 李向林,万里强. 苜蓿青贮技术研究进展[J]. 草业学报,2005,14(2):9-15
[17] 王安,张淑芳,钟一民,等. 纤维素复合酶作为青贮饲料添加剂的研究[J]. 东北农业大学学报,1997(4):358-365
[18] 陶莲,孙启忠,玉柱,等. 乳酸菌添加剂对全株玉米和苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国奶牛,2009,(2):13-16
[19] Stokes M R. Effects of an enzyme mixture, an inoculant, and their interaction on silage fermentation and dairy production[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1992,75(3):764
[20] Dean D B, Adesogan A T, Krueger N, et al. Effect of fibrolytic enzymes on the fermentation characteristics, aerobic stability, and digestibility of bermudagrass silage[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2005,88(3):994-1003
[21] 许庆方. 影响苜蓿青贮品质的主要因素及苜蓿青贮在奶牛日粮中应用效果的研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学,2005
[22] 王莹,玉柱. 不同添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2010,32(5):80-84
[23] 张金霞,乔红霞,刘雨田. 水分和添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业科学,2014,31(4):766-770
[24] Steidlová S, Kalac P. The effects of lactic acid bacteria inoculants and formic acid on the formation of biogenic amines in grass silages[J]. Archives of Animal Nutrition,2004,58(3):245-254
[25] 王星凌,朱荣生,赵红波,等. 不同含水量和菌剂对紫花苜蓿裹包青贮质量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学,2015(11):106-110
[26] 张吉鹍,卢德勋,刘建新,等. 粗饲料品质评定指数的研究现状及其进展[J]. 草业科学,2004,21(9):55-61
[27] 刘辉,卜登攀,吕中旺,等. 凋萎和不同添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2015,24(5):126-133
[28] 刘振宇,顾乃杰,玉柱,等. 饲料枣粉对高水分紫花苜蓿青贮饲料质量的影响[J]. 河北农业科学,2016,20(2):90-93

Interaction Effects of Different Additives and Moisture on the Quality of Alfalfa Silage

不同添加剂和原料含水量对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的互作效应

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	CHEN Guo-qian, ZHU Cun-xiong, LI Su-yun, ZHOU Bing-rong, LI Fu, CAO Xiao-yun, ZHOU Hua-kun. Remote Sensing Model Constructions and Spatial-temporal Changes of Soil Moisture in the Three-River Headwaters Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 199-207.
[2]	WANG Jing, LIU Xiao-jing, Cheng Tian-tian, Tong Chang-chun, WANG Xue. Study on Leaf Characteristics and Yield Effect of Alfalfa with Different Nitrogen Efficiency [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1941-1949.
[3]	MENG Xuan-chen, MA Peng-cheng, MA Jie, DUAN Zhen, HAN Yang-yang, ZHANG Ji-yu. Study on the Effect of Mulching Furrow and Fertilization of Alfalfa in Semi-arid Areas of Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[4]	CHEN Lei, BAO Xue-yan, GUO Gang, HUO Wen-jie, LI Qing-hong, XU Qing-fang, WANG Cong, LIU Qiang. Effects of Tannic Acid and Lactic Acid Bacteria on Alfalfa Silage Quality and Ruminal Fermentation in Vitro [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[5]	LI Chun-pin, QIU Yi-hui, XIA Hou-yin, TAN Lu-na, XU Huan-yu, ZHANG Han-wen, GAO Jing-hui. Membership Function Analysis of Low Transpiration and Yield Traits in Alfalfa Multi-paternal Hybrid F₁Generation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1416-1422.
[6]	LI Tian-qi, LIN Zhi-ling, LU Xuan, HUANG Jia-yuan, YANG Ning, WO Ye, GAO Kai, LIU Xiao-ni, WANG Xian-guo. Effects of Irrigation Amount on Soil Available Nutrient Distribution and Leaching Loss of Alfalfa in Horqin Sandy Land [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1454-1461.
[7]	LI Hong, LI Bo, FANG Zhi-jian, YANG Zhao, ZHANG Chao, FENG Cheng-long, JIN Shan-shan, WANG Si-qi, SHI Wan-ying. Physiological Response of Alfalfa Seedlings to Freeze-thaw or Freeze-thaw Versus Soda Saline-alkali Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1469-1476.
[8]	DU Zhao-chang, WANG Hong, YAN Yan-hong, MUHAMMAD Tahir, WEI Xiao, ZENG Tai-ru, LI Hong-liang. Effects of Rice Husk and Wheat Bran Addition on Silage Quality of Fresh Corn Straw [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[9]	WU Shuo, ZOU Xuan, WANG Ming-ya, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Chenpi Citrus Juice on Fermentation Quality of Stylo and Rice Straw Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[10]	LI Peng-zhen, ZHAO De-qin, DENG Bo, Yang Jun, Zhao Guo-hua, Zhao Liang. Effects of Biochar Addition and Drought Stress on Photosynthetic Efficiency and Growth of Alfalfa Inoculated with Rhizobia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[11]	WANG Wen-jing, MA Dong-mei, ZHAO Li-juan, MA Qiao-li. Effects of 2,4-table Brassinolide on Enzyme Activity and Root ion Distribution and Absorption in Alfalfa Seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1363-1368.
[12]	SUN Lei-lei, ZHAO Gui-qin, CHAI Ji-kuan, LIU Fu-yuan, Nie Xiumei, WANG Jun. Effects of Storage Methods and Time on Mould Quantity and Species in Alfalfa Hay [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 884-893.
[13]	HUANG Rong, YAO Bo, ZHANG Yu-juan, JIA Qian-ying, LI Xiang-yang, ZHANG Hong, ZHANG Zhen-fen. Effect of Pantoea agglomerans CQ10 Lipopolysaccharide on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 965-971.
[14]	QIN Wei-na, JIAO Ting, SHI Shang-li, LI Xiong-xiong, GAO Xue-mei, ZHAO Sheng-guo, QI Juan, WANG Zheng-wen. Evaluation of Silage Quality of 10 Green-fed Corn Varieties under Different Hydrothermal Rescource Conditions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.
[15]	ZHENG Ming-yang, WU Shuo, GUO Xiang, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Lactobacillus and Cellulase on the Silage Quality of Amomum Villosum leaves [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1113-1117.