Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Forms on Production and Quality of Italian Ryegrass

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.06.030

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 1368-1375.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.06.030

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Forms on Production and Quality of Italian Ryegrass

LI Xiao-mei, CHEN Tian-feng, PENG An-qi, LUO Yan, ZHANG Xin-quan, YAN Yan-hong

Department of Grassland Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 611130, China

Received:2017-06-16 Revised:2018-01-06 Online:2017-12-15 Published:2018-03-30

氮肥种类对多花黑麦草产量与品质的影响

李小梅, 陈天峰, 彭安琪, 罗燕, 张新全, 闫艳红

四川农业大学动物科技学院, 四川成都 611130

通讯作者: 闫艳红,E-mail:yanyanhong3588284@126.com
作者简介:李小梅(1993-),女,四川眉山人,硕士研究生,主要从事饲草生产及利用方面研究,E-mail:lixiaomei1008@sina.com
基金资助:
四川省科技厅应用基础重点项目（2016JY0031）；国家自然科学基金面上项目（31271668）公益性行业（农业）科研专项（201303061）资助

Abstract

Abstract:

To make full use of forage resources in southwest China and optimize fertilization technology, the effect of different nitrogen fertilizater forms on production and quality of Italian ryegrass(Lolium multiflom Lam.)were studied. Three varieties of Italian ryegrass (‘Yangtze River NO.2’, ‘Te Gao’ and ‘F4N’) were used as the materials. The results showed that the plant height and the yield of Italian ryegrass in the urea treatment were significantly higher than those of ammonium bicarbonate treatment and nitrate fertilizer compound treatment (P<0.05). The content of crude protein (CP) of the first three cutting of Italian ryegrass in nitrate fertilizer compound was the highest among the three varieties, but the yield of total crude protein (CP) in urea treatment was significantly higher than both ammonium bicarbonate treatment and nitrate fertilizer compound treatment (P<0.05). The urea treatment contains the lowest level of the content of acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) in the first three cutting. There was no significant difference between the urea treatment and the ammonium bicarbonate treatment in the content of ether extract (EE), but both were significantly higher than that of nitrate nitrogen treatment (P<0.05). The content of water soluble carbohydrate (WSC) in the ammonium bicarbonate treatment was significantly higher than that of urea treatment and nitrate fertilizer compound treatment (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the urea treatment and nitrate fertilizer compound treatment. Based on the forage yield and quality, the application of urea (amide nitrogen) was better for all the three varieties of Italian Ryegrass production.

Key words: Nitrogen fertilizer forms, Italian Ryegrass, Production, Quality

摘要：

为充分利用西南地区牧草资源，完善牧草营养施肥技术，本试验以‘长江2号’、‘特高’、‘F4N’3个品种多花黑麦草（Lolium multiflorum L.）为材料，研究不同氮肥种类对其产量和品质的影响。结果表明：施用尿素的多花黑麦草的株高和产量均为最高，其中尿素处理的多花黑麦草第2茬鲜草产量为7 023 kg·hm^-2，显著高于碳铵和硝基复合肥处理（P<0.05）；硝基复合肥处理的前3茬多花黑麦草的粗蛋白（CP）含量均最高，但施用尿素的多花黑麦草的蛋白质产量（2 054.10 kg·hm^-2）显著高于碳铵和硝基复合肥处理（P<0.05）；尿素处理前3茬多花黑麦草的中、酸性洗涤纤维（NDF、ADF）含量均显著低于碳铵和硝基复合肥处理（P<0.05）；施用尿素和碳铵的多花黑麦草粗脂肪（EE）含量差异不显著，但均显著高于硝基复合肥处理（P<0.05）。碳铵处理的多花黑麦草的可溶性碳水化合物（WSC）含量显著高于硝基复合肥和尿素（P<0.05），但硝基复合肥和尿素处理间差异不显著。因此从产量和品质综合考虑，3个品种多花黑麦草均以施用尿素较好。

关键词: 氮肥种类, 多花黑麦草, 产量, 品质

CLC Number:

S541

LI Xiao-mei, CHEN Tian-feng, PENG An-qi, LUO Yan, ZHANG Xin-quan, YAN Yan-hong. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Forms on Production and Quality of Italian Ryegrass[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(6): 1368-1375.

李小梅, 陈天峰, 彭安琪, 罗燕, 张新全, 闫艳红. 氮肥种类对多花黑麦草产量与品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(6): 1368-1375.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.06.030

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2017/V25/I6/1368

References

[1] 景文, 潘明洪, 彭燕. 施肥对白三叶生长和营养成分的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(05):64-70
[2] 李威, 温翠平, 漆智平, 等. 施氮水平和方式对王草生产特性和品质的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2012, 29(8):1262-1271
[3] 张永亮, 骆秀梅, 张浩, 等. 行距与氮肥对通草1号虉草生长特性的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(01):44-48
[4] Fensham R J, Holman J E, Cox M J. Plant species responses along a grazing disturbance gradient in Australian grassland[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1999, 10(1):77-86
[5] 苏富源, 郝明德, 郭慧慧, 等. 施用氮肥对人工羊草草地产量及养分吸收的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(4):893-896
[6] 唐伟杰, 何飞飞, 周冀衡. 不同形态氮肥在稻田土壤中的变化规律及对烤烟生长和烟碱含量的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2009, 23(01):30-34
[7] 周伟, 吕腾飞, 杨志平, 等. 氮肥种类及运筹技术调控土壤氮素损失的研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(09):3051-3058
[8] 谢晋, 严玛丽, 陈建军, 等. 不同铵态氮硝态氮配比对烤烟产量、质量及其主要化学成分的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(4):1030-1037
[9] 尹飞, 陈明灿, 刘君瑞. 氮素形态对小麦花后干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(13):78-81
[10] 叶芳, 刘晓静, 张进霞. 氮素形态对‘甘农3号’苜蓿不同生育期氮代谢的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(02):285-293
[11] 李小梅, 陈天峰, 孙娟娟, 等. 氮肥水平对多花黑麦草产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2016, 38(01):54-60
[12] 张磊, 刘东燕, 邵涛. 黑麦草的饲用价值及其应用前景[J]. 草业科学, 2008, 25(04):64-49
[13] 龙忠富, 罗京焰, 杨飞, 等. 贵草1号多花黑麦草饲喂肉牛肉羊的效果[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2009, 37(01):114-115
[14] 宋中齐, 干友民, 田刚, 等. 多花黑麦草在生长肉兔上的营养价值评定[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(5):352-358
[15] Abraha A B, Truter W F, Annandale J G, et al. Forage yield and quality response of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) to different water and nitrogen levels[J]. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 2015, 32(2):125-131
[16] Trindade H, Coutinho J, Jarvis S, et al. Effects of different rates and timing of application of nitrogen as slurry and mineral fertilizer on yield of herbage and nitrate-leaching potential of a maize/Italian ryegrass cropping system in north-west Portugal[J]. Grass & Forage Science, 2009, 64(1):2-11
[17] 张艾青, 黄尧瑶, 初晓辉, 等. 施氮水平对多花黑麦草生产性能和营养品质的影响[J]. 草业与畜牧, 2014(4):1-5
[18] 张厚锋, 张淑萍. 双缩脲法和凯式定氮法测定饲料中蛋白质含量的比较研究[J]. 中国饲料, 2008, 11(2):177-182
[19] 袁翠林, 朱亚骏, 林英庭, 等. 饲料中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维不同测定方法的比较[J].粮食与饲料工业, 2014, 21(5):217-223
[20] 毕颖, 刘燕, 张平, 等. 采蒽酮比色法测定大豆乳清废液中总含糖量[J]. 大豆通报, 2006, 4(15):77-83
[21] Osborne S L, Raun W R, Jonson G V, et al.Bermudagrass response to high nitrogen rates, source and season of application[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1999(3), 91:438-444
[22] 庞立东, 李卫军, 朱进忠. 追施氮肥对苏丹草碳氮代谢及氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2016, 38(04):115-120
[23] 王伟, 德科加. 不同氮肥及施氮水平对称多县高寒草甸生物量和养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(05):968-977.
[24] 尹飞, 陈明灿, 刘君瑞. 氮素形态对小麦花后干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(13):78-81
[25] 彭畅, 刘晓斌, 尹彩侠, 等. 不同形态氮肥及其运筹对春玉米产量和农艺性状的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2013, 27(4):0509-0514
[26] 王佳, 王晓凌. 硝态氮对去叶多花黑麦草再生性的影响及其调控机制[J]. 草业科学, 2013, 30(3):409-417
[27] 孟可爱, 刘小飞. 氮肥种类和用量对桂牧一号杂交象草光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2011, 15:53-55
[28] 谢丽凤, 陆开宏, 胡智勇, 等. 多花黑麦草对不同形态氮的吸收动力学特征研究[J]. 生态科学, 2010, 29(3):229-233
[29] 朱兆良, 张绍林, 徐银华. 种稻下氮素的气态损失与氮肥品种及施用方法的关系[J]. 土壤学报, 1985, 22(1), 4:5-12
[30] 凌德, 李婷, 王火焰, 等. 施用方式和氮肥种类对水稻土中氮素迁移的影响效应[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(3):478-482
[31] 周伟, 吕腾飞, 杨志平, 等. 氮肥种类及运筹技术调控土壤氮素损失的研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(9):3051-3058
[32] Fraser P M, Curtin D, Harrison-Kirk T, et al. Winter nitrate leaching under different tillage and winter cover crop management practices[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2012, 77:1391-1401
[33] 刘小飞, 孟可爱. 不同茬次桂牧一号营养成分对尿素和碳铵的响应[J]. 草业科学, 2013, 30(11):1790-1795
[34] Alberto C. Bernardi, Edson P. Mota, Rodrigo D. Cardosa, et al. Ammonia volatilization from soil, dry-matter yield, and nitrogen levels of Italian Ryegrass[J]. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 2014, 45(2):153-162
[35] 张宇. 王草营养特性与优化施肥研究[D]. 海口:海南大学, 2011:18-21
[36] 杨宇虹, 赵正雄, 李春俭, 等. 不同氮形态和氮水平对水田与旱地烤烟烟叶糖含量及相关酶活性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(6):1386-1394

Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Forms on Production and Quality of Italian Ryegrass

氮肥种类对多花黑麦草产量与品质的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, LI Quan-lin, WANG You-bin, MA Bing-yun, LEI Yan-min, ZHOU Rui, XIE Jiu-xiang. Characteristics of Forage Nutritional Quality and Digestibility in Different Types of Grassland in Qinghai Tibet Plateau and their Correlation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[2]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun, ZHOU Rui. Effects of Grazing on Vegetation Characteristics and Forage Nutrientional Quality in a Temperate Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[3]	YAN He-piao, LI Wen-long, LIANG Tian-gang, ZHOU Hua-kun, CAO Ya-peng, LIAO Yuan-cheng. Effects of Different Restoration Measures on Degraded Alpine Grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau: A meta-analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.
[4]	YAO Xi-xi, XIAO Feng, QI Shou-zhong, CHEN Guo-ming, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun. Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[5]	WANG Jing, LIU Xiao-jing, Cheng Tian-tian, Tong Chang-chun, WANG Xue. Study on Leaf Characteristics and Yield Effect of Alfalfa with Different Nitrogen Efficiency [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1941-1949.
[6]	WU Hai-yan, QU Zhen, LIU Zhao-ming, LABA Dun-zhu, TONGSANG Cuo-mu, QU Ni, NIMA zhuo-ga, MA Yu-shou. Comparative study on Production Performance of Oat Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1967-1973.
[7]	MENG Xuan-chen, MA Peng-cheng, MA Jie, DUAN Zhen, HAN Yang-yang, ZHANG Ji-yu. Study on the Effect of Mulching Furrow and Fertilization of Alfalfa in Semi-arid Areas of Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[8]	MA Ran-ran, YUAN Jie, ZHANG Wen-jie, XU Neng-xiang, GU Hong-ru. Effects of Stacking Time on Feeding and Fermentation Quality of Broccoli Waste [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[9]	YAO Xi-xi, CAI Hua, LIU Hao-dong, LI Chang-hui. Analysis of Rumen Fermentation Characteristics and In Vitro Digestibility of Alpine Meadow Forage in Different Seasons [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1729-1737.
[10]	DU Zhao-chang, WANG Hong, YAN Yan-hong, MUHAMMAD Tahir, WEI Xiao, ZENG Tai-ru, LI Hong-liang. Effects of Rice Husk and Wheat Bran Addition on Silage Quality of Fresh Corn Straw [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[11]	SONG Jian-chao, YU Xiao-jun, WEI Kong-tao, WANG Peng-bin, TONG Yong-shang, LI Zhen, HE You-long, WANG Hai-bo. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Elymus nutans in Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564.
[12]	WU Shuo, ZOU Xuan, WANG Ming-ya, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Chenpi Citrus Juice on Fermentation Quality of Stylo and Rice Straw Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[13]	FU Zhi-hui, GE Gen-tu, JIA Yu-shan, WANG Zhi-jun, LYU Shi-jie, HOU Mei-ling, NAN Ding-han, YI Ru-le, A Xi-da, JIN Guo. Effects of Cutting Times and Varieties on the Yield and Nutrient Value of Italian Ryegrass Planted in Northern Regions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1571-1577.
[14]	DONG Zhi-xiao, HE Run-hao, KUANG Jian-yang, NIE Cong, YANG Jian, ZHANG Jian-bo, GOU Wen-long, MA Xiao. Effects of Sweet Sorghum Intercropping with Lablab Purpureus on Yield and Quality of Mixed Forage in Chengdu Plain,China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1578-1583.
[15]	LYU Hong-jian, ZOU Xuan, WU Shuo, LI Yun, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing. Effect of Adding Moringa Oleifera Leaves and Lactobacillus farciminis on Quality of Corn Stover Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.