Effects of Different Application Rates of Biogas Slurry on Growth and Quality of Alfalfa and Soil Fertility

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.04.027

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 1006-1012.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.04.027

Effects of Different Application Rates of Biogas Slurry on Growth and Quality of Alfalfa and Soil Fertility

GUO Zhi-guo¹, LI Zi-dan¹, LIU Hua¹, LIU Bo-shuai¹, ZHU Xiao-yan^1,2,3, FU Tong^1,2,3, LI De-feng^1,2,3, WANG Cheng-zhang^1,2,3, LI Zhi-wei⁴, SHI Ying-hua^1,2,3

1. College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450002, China;
2. Henan Key Laboratory of Innovation and Utilization of Grassland Resources in Henan, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450002, China;
3. Henan Forage Engineering Technology Research Center, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450002, China;
4. Luohe Academy of Agricultural Science, Luohe, Henan Province 452000, China

Received:2019-04-02 Revised:2019-07-03 Online:2019-08-15 Published:2019-09-26

不同比例沼液施用量对苜蓿生长发育、品质及土壤肥力的影响

郭治国¹, 李梓丹¹, 刘华¹, 刘伯帅¹, 朱晓艳^1,2,3, 付彤^1,2,3, 李德锋^1,2,3, 王成章^1,2,3, 李志伟⁴, 史莹华^1,2,3

1. 河南农业大学牧医工程学院, 河南郑州 450002;
2. 河南省草地资源创新与利用重点实验室, 河南郑州 450002;
3. 河南省牧草工程技术研究中心, 河南郑州 450002;
4. 漯河市农业科学院, 河南漯河 452000

通讯作者: 史莹华
作者简介:郭治国(1992-),男,河南洛阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向为牧草营养及饲料,E-mail:Guozhiguo2019@163.com
基金资助:
苜蓿品种引进与中低产田土壤生态环境修复（2015-Z46）；国家牧草产业技术体系建设专项基金（CARS-34）资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to realize the resource utilization of biogas slurry and improve the forage yield and nutritional value,six treatments in this study were used to find out the effects of different application rates of biogas slurry on the growth,development,quality of alfalfa and soil fertility,including control treatment (T0),inorganic fertilizer treatment (T1),volume fraction of 25% biogas slurry treatment (T2),50% biogas slurry treatment (T3),75% biogas slurry treatment (T4),and 100% biogas slurry treatment (T5). The results showed that the T3 significantly increased the plant height and dry matter yield of the second-cutting alfalfa (P<0.05). Crude protein (CP) of alfalfa in the T0 and T1 was significantly higher than that in the T3 and T5 (P<0.05). Crude fat (EE) in the T0 was significantly higher than that in the T3 (P<0.05). The acid detergent fiber (ADF) in the T3 was significantly higher than that in the T0,T1,T2,and T4 (P<0.05). The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) in T0 was significantly higher than that in T2 (P<0.05). The relative feeding value (RFV) in the T2 was significantly higher than that in the T0,T3,T4,and T5 (P<0.05). In terms of soil fertility,Soil pH in the T5 was significantly lower than that in the T1 (P<0.05),while the total nitrogen was significantly higher than that in the T0,T1,and T2 (P<0.05). The soil available potassium in the T3 was significantly higher than that in the T0 and T2 (P<0.05). The results showed that irrigating 25%~50% of biogas slurry could increase the yield and nutritional value of alfalfa,and achieve the purpose of fecal waste resources utilization and the combination of cultivation and green development.

Key words: Biogas slurry, Alfalfa, Relative feeding value, Quality, Soil fertility

摘要： 为了实现沼液的资源化利用、提高饲草产量和营养价值，本研究设6个处理组：对照处理组（T0）、无机肥处理组（T1）、体积分数25%沼液处理组（T2）、体积分数50%沼液处理组（T3）、体积分数75%沼液处理组（T4）、体积分数100%沼液处理组（T5），探明不同比例沼液施用量对苜蓿生长发育、品质以及土壤肥力的影响。结果发现：在苜蓿生长发育方面，T3显著提高第二茬苜蓿的株高及干物质产量（P<0.05）；在苜蓿品质方面，T0，T1的粗蛋白较T3，T5显著提高（P<0.05），T0的粗脂肪较T3显著提高（P<0.05），T3的酸性洗涤纤维较T0，T1，T2，T4显著提高（P<0.05），T0的中性洗涤纤维较T2显著提高（P<0.05），T2的相对饲喂价值较T0，T3，T4，T5显著提高（P<0.05）；在土壤肥力方面，T5的土壤pH值较T1显著降低（P<0.05），而总氮较T0，T1，T2显著提高（P<0.05）；T3的土壤速效钾较T0，T2显著提高（P<0.05）。结果表明，灌溉25%~50%的沼液可以提高苜蓿的产量和营养价值，并可以实现粪污资源化利用和种养结合绿色发展的目的。

关键词: 沼液, 苜蓿, 相对饲用价值, 品质, 土壤肥力

CLC Number:

GUO Zhi-guo, LI Zi-dan, LIU Hua, LIU Bo-shuai, ZHU Xiao-yan, FU Tong, LI De-feng, WANG Cheng-zhang, LI Zhi-wei, SHI Ying-hua. Effects of Different Application Rates of Biogas Slurry on Growth and Quality of Alfalfa and Soil Fertility[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(4): 1006-1012.

郭治国, 李梓丹, 刘华, 刘伯帅, 朱晓艳, 付彤, 李德锋, 王成章, 李志伟, 史莹华. 不同比例沼液施用量对苜蓿生长发育、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 1006-1012.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.04.027

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2019/V27/I4/1006

References

[1] 钟珍梅,宋亚娜,黄秀声,等. 沼液对狼尾草地土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(01):54-60
[2] 彭新宇,张陆彪. 畜禽养殖业的环境影响及经济分析[J]. 生态经济(学术版),2007(01):271-273,277
[3] 苏杨. 我国集约化畜禽养殖场污染问题研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2006(02):15-18
[4] 孙振钧,孙永明. 我国农业废弃物资源化与农村生物质能源利用的现状与发展[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2006(01):6-13
[5] 孙国峰,郑建初,陈留根,等. 沼液替代化肥对麦季CH₄、N₂O排放及温室效应的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2012,31(08):1654-1661
[6] 赵莉,于建光,常志州,等. 施用沼液对水芹产量及品质的影响[J]. 土壤,2014,01:94-99
[7] Sørensen P,Amato M. Remineralisation and residual effects of N after application of pig slurry to soil[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,2002,16(2):81-95
[8] 徐铭泽,孙丽英,张良,等. 沼液与化肥配施对西红柿生长和土壤组分的影响[J]. 中国沼气,2017,35(06):75-82
[9] 李友强,盛康,彭思姣,等. 沼液施用量对小麦产量及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2014,30(12):181-186
[10] 李文娆,张岁岐,丁圣彦,等. 干旱胁迫下紫花苜蓿根系形态变化及与水分利用的关系[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(19):5140-5150
[11] 张立全,张凤英,哈斯阿古拉. 紫花苜蓿耐盐性研究进展[J]. 草业学报,2012,21(06):296-305
[12] 刘晓静,刘艳楠,蒯佳林,等. 供氮水平对不同紫花苜蓿产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(04):702-707
[13] 刘喜龙,温彩霞,刘建伟,等. 施用沼液对苜蓿品质及土壤相关理化性质的影响[J]. 吉林农业,2012(10):54-55,57
[14] Liu B,Wang W,Zhu X,et al. Response of Gut Microbiota to Dietary Fiber and Metabolic Interaction with SCFAs in Piglets[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2018,9:2344
[15] 李欢欢,史莹华,张晓霞,等. 不同亚麻酸水平及饲料组成对育肥猪生长性能和肉品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2018,27(03):98-107
[16] 董红敏,左玲玲,魏莎,等. 建立畜禽废弃物养分管理制度促进种养结合绿色发展[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2019,34(02):180-189
[17] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所微生物室. 土壤微生物研究法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1985:263-275
[18] 国家环境保护总局. 水和废水监测分析方法编委会. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 第4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002
[19] 王彦华,王成章,李德锋,等. 播种量和品种对紫花苜蓿植株动态变化、产量及品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2017,26(02):123-135
[20] Hoffman P C,Sievert S J,Shaver R D,et al. In situ dry matter,protein,and fiber degradation of perennial forages[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1993,76(9):2632
[21] 焦翔翔,朱教宁,李永平,等. 不同浓度沼液滴灌对设施番茄生长发育的影响[J]. 山西农业科学,2018,46(11):1834-1837
[22] 徐瑞强,董合林,徐文修,等. 喷施浓缩沼液对棉花幼苗生长发育和生理特性的影响[J]. 棉花学报,2018,30(03):261-271
[23] 徐海东,董合林,苏丽丽,等. 液态有机肥对滴灌棉花光合特性及产量形成规律的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2017,33(20):71-77
[24] Matsi T,Lithourgidis A S,Gagianas A A. Effects of Injected Liquid Cattle Manure on Growth and Yield of Winter Wheat and Soil Characteristics[J]. Agronomy Journal,2003,95(3):592-596
[25] 袁大刚,蒲光兰. "三沼"在植物生产上的应用研究进展与展望[J]. 四川农业大学学报,2009,27(02):258-264
[26] 吴华山,郭德杰,马艳,等. 猪粪沼液施用对土壤氨挥发及玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2012,20(02):163-168
[27] Busbice T H,Wilsie C P. Fall growth,winter hardiness,recovery after cutting and wilt resistance in F2 progenies of Vernal×DuPuits alfalfa crosses1[J]. Crop Science,1965,5(5):429-432
[28] 顾存秀. 沼液在农业生产上的应用效果[J]. 农业工程技术,2019,39(02):48-50
[29] 邵小达,李三红. 沼液在农业上的应用及其研究进展[J]. 农业装备技术,2015,41(05):38-39
[30] 陈谷,邰建辉. 美国商业应用中的牧草质量及质量标准[J]. 中国牧业通讯,2010(11):48-49
[31] 孙万斌. 不同生境下20个紫花苜蓿品种的综合评价及不同生育期营养特性的比较[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2016:3-9
[32] Riday H,Brummer E C,Moore K J. Heterosis of forage quality in alfalfa[J]. Crop Science,2002,42(4):1088-1093
[33] 熊乙,许庆方,玉柱,等. 不同苜蓿干草营养成分及饲用价值评价[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(05):1262-1266
[34] 唐华,郭彦军,李智燕. 沼液灌溉对黑麦草生长及土壤性质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2011,19(06):939-942
[35] 马钊,郑桂亮,何峰,仝宗永,等. 施用有机无机复混肥对盐碱地紫花苜蓿生产性能、营养品质和土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(02):466-472
[36] 李丙智,王桂芳,秦晓飞,等. 沼液配施钾肥对果园土壤理化特性和微生物及果实品质影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2010,43(22):4671-4677
[37] 吕汶霖. 沼液农用对小麦产量、品质及土壤质量的影响研究[D]. 雅安:四川农业大学,2011:48-49

Effects of Different Application Rates of Biogas Slurry on Growth and Quality of Alfalfa and Soil Fertility

不同比例沼液施用量对苜蓿生长发育、品质及土壤肥力的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, LI Quan-lin, WANG You-bin, MA Bing-yun, LEI Yan-min, ZHOU Rui, XIE Jiu-xiang. Characteristics of Forage Nutritional Quality and Digestibility in Different Types of Grassland in Qinghai Tibet Plateau and their Correlation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[2]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun, ZHOU Rui. Effects of Grazing on Vegetation Characteristics and Forage Nutrientional Quality in a Temperate Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[3]	YAN He-piao, LI Wen-long, LIANG Tian-gang, ZHOU Hua-kun, CAO Ya-peng, LIAO Yuan-cheng. Effects of Different Restoration Measures on Degraded Alpine Grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau: A meta-analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.
[4]	YAO Xi-xi, XIAO Feng, QI Shou-zhong, CHEN Guo-ming, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun. Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[5]	WANG Jing, LIU Xiao-jing, Cheng Tian-tian, Tong Chang-chun, WANG Xue. Study on Leaf Characteristics and Yield Effect of Alfalfa with Different Nitrogen Efficiency [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1941-1949.
[6]	MENG Xuan-chen, MA Peng-cheng, MA Jie, DUAN Zhen, HAN Yang-yang, ZHANG Ji-yu. Study on the Effect of Mulching Furrow and Fertilization of Alfalfa in Semi-arid Areas of Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[7]	MA Ran-ran, YUAN Jie, ZHANG Wen-jie, XU Neng-xiang, GU Hong-ru. Effects of Stacking Time on Feeding and Fermentation Quality of Broccoli Waste [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[8]	YAO Xi-xi, CAI Hua, LIU Hao-dong, LI Chang-hui. Analysis of Rumen Fermentation Characteristics and In Vitro Digestibility of Alpine Meadow Forage in Different Seasons [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1729-1737.
[9]	CHEN Lei, BAO Xue-yan, GUO Gang, HUO Wen-jie, LI Qing-hong, XU Qing-fang, WANG Cong, LIU Qiang. Effects of Tannic Acid and Lactic Acid Bacteria on Alfalfa Silage Quality and Ruminal Fermentation in Vitro [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[10]	LI Chun-pin, QIU Yi-hui, XIA Hou-yin, TAN Lu-na, XU Huan-yu, ZHANG Han-wen, GAO Jing-hui. Membership Function Analysis of Low Transpiration and Yield Traits in Alfalfa Multi-paternal Hybrid F₁Generation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1416-1422.
[11]	LI Tian-qi, LIN Zhi-ling, LU Xuan, HUANG Jia-yuan, YANG Ning, WO Ye, GAO Kai, LIU Xiao-ni, WANG Xian-guo. Effects of Irrigation Amount on Soil Available Nutrient Distribution and Leaching Loss of Alfalfa in Horqin Sandy Land [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1454-1461.
[12]	LI Hong, LI Bo, FANG Zhi-jian, YANG Zhao, ZHANG Chao, FENG Cheng-long, JIN Shan-shan, WANG Si-qi, SHI Wan-ying. Physiological Response of Alfalfa Seedlings to Freeze-thaw or Freeze-thaw Versus Soda Saline-alkali Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1469-1476.
[13]	DU Zhao-chang, WANG Hong, YAN Yan-hong, MUHAMMAD Tahir, WEI Xiao, ZENG Tai-ru, LI Hong-liang. Effects of Rice Husk and Wheat Bran Addition on Silage Quality of Fresh Corn Straw [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[14]	SONG Jian-chao, YU Xiao-jun, WEI Kong-tao, WANG Peng-bin, TONG Yong-shang, LI Zhen, HE You-long, WANG Hai-bo. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Elymus nutans in Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564.
[15]	WU Shuo, ZOU Xuan, WANG Ming-ya, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Chenpi Citrus Juice on Fermentation Quality of Stylo and Rice Straw Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.