Drought Processes of Alpine Wetland and Their Influences on CO2 Exchange

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.03.020

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 750-758.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.03.020

Previous Articles Next Articles

Drought Processes of Alpine Wetland and Their Influences on CO₂ Exchange

LI Cheng-yi¹, LI Xi-lai^1,2, SUN Hua-fang¹, LI De-qin³, ZHANG Feng¹, LIN Chun-ying¹, ZHANG Jing^1,2, MA Cheng-biao⁴

1. College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China;
2. Qinghai-Guangdong Joint Key Laboratory of Natural Resources Monitoring and Evaluation, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China;
3. Agriculture, Rural and Science and Technology Bureau, Ping'an District, Haidong City, Qinghai Province, Haidong, Qinghai Province 810600, China;
4. Geographical State Monitoring Institute of Qinghai Province, Xining, Qinghai Province 810007, China

Received:2020-02-09 Revised:2020-03-12 Online:2020-06-15 Published:2020-05-30

高寒湿地旱化过程及其对CO₂交换的影响

李成一¹, 李希来^1,2, 孙华方¹, 李得琴³, 张锋¹, 林春英¹, 张静^1,2, 马程彪⁴

1. 青海大学农牧学院, 青海西宁 810016;
2. 青海-广东自然资源监测与评价联合实验室, 青海西宁 810016;
3. 青海省海东市平安区农业农村和科技局, 青海海东 810600;
4. 青海省地理国情监测院, 青海西宁 810007

通讯作者: 李希来
作者简介:李成一(1995-),男,青海省平安人,硕士研究生,主要从事三江源高寒湿地保护与演变研究,E-mail:1527523489@qq.com;
基金资助:
青海省科技厅项目（2017-HZ-802，2018-ZJ-781）；国家自然科学基金面上项目（31872999）；高等学校学科创新引智计划资助（D18013）项目；教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划（IRT_17R62）共同资助

Abstract

Abstract: Effects of drought processes of alpine wetland on carbon flux on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau were analyzed to discuss the changes of carbon flux during the drought processes of alpine wetland. Alpine wetland,swamp meadow and alpine meadow were selected in this study. The TARGAS-1 static box method was used to perform a carbon flux dynamic detection test so as to explore the differences of carbon exchange in the drought processes in alpine wetland at the peak of plant growth in July and August. The results showed that photosynthetic rate,ecosystem respiration rate and net ecosystem carbon exchange of vegetation community in swamp meadow and alpine meadow were significantly increased (P<0.05),compared within alpine wetland;There were significant differences in soil temperature and moisture,and vegetation community biomass at different degradation stages (P<0.05),but there was no significant difference in soil electrical conductivity;Compared with soil moisture and soil conductivity,soil temperature had the greatest effect on CO₂ exchange,and the temperature had a significantly negative relationship with net ecosystem carbon exchange (P<0.05). The carbon exchange in alpine meadow was more sensitive to soil temperature than that in alpine wetland and swamp meadow;With the drought processes of alpine wetland at the peak of plant growth,the soil temperature increased significantly,and wetland soil moisture and plant community biomass decreased. The functions of carbon sink in alpine wetland presented as a downward trend.

Key words: Alpine wetland, Swamp meadow, Alpine meadow, Drought processes, Wetland degradation, Carbon source/sink, Net ecosystem carbon exchange

摘要： 为研究青藏高原高寒湿地旱化对碳通量的影响，探讨高寒湿地旱化碳通量变化规律，本研究于7-8月生长高峰期以高寒湿地、沼泽化草甸和高寒草甸为研究对象，利用TARGAS-1静态箱法，比较高寒湿地不同退化阶段碳交换的动态差异。结果表明：与高寒湿地相比，沼泽化草甸与高寒草甸植被群落光合速率、生态系统呼吸速率、净生态系统碳交换显著提高（P<0.05）；不同退化阶段土壤温湿度及植被群落生物量存在显著差异（P<0.05），土壤电导率差异不显著；相比于土壤湿度和土壤电导率，土壤温度对CO₂交换的影响更大，其与净生态系统碳交换呈显著负相关（P<0.05），高寒草甸的碳交换对土壤温度的敏感性要大于高寒湿地和沼泽化草甸的碳交换对土壤温度的敏感性；在植物生长高峰期，高寒湿地旱化过程土壤温度显著上升，土壤湿度和植物群落生物量显著下降，导致其碳汇功能呈下降趋势。

关键词: 高寒湿地, 沼泽化草甸, 高寒草甸, 湿地退化, 碳源/汇, 净生态系统碳交换

CLC Number:

S812

LI Cheng-yi, LI Xi-lai, SUN Hua-fang, LI De-qin, ZHANG Feng, LIN Chun-ying, ZHANG Jing, MA Cheng-biao. Drought Processes of Alpine Wetland and Their Influences on CO₂ Exchange[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(3): 750-758.

李成一, 李希来, 孙华方, 李得琴, 张锋, 林春英, 张静, 马程彪. 高寒湿地旱化过程及其对CO₂交换的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 750-758.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.03.020

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2020/V28/I3/750

References

[1] 赵志龙,张镱锂,刘林山,等. 青藏高原湿地研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2014,33(09):1218-1230
[2] 刘志伟,李胜男,韦玮,等. 近三十年青藏高原湿地变化及其驱动力研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志,2019,38(03):856-862
[3] 李飞,刘振恒,贾甜华,等. 高寒湿地和草甸退化及恢复对土壤微生物碳代谢功能多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(17):1-10
[4] 青烨,孙飞达,李勇,等. 若尔盖高寒退化湿地土壤碳氮磷比及相关性分析[J]. 草业学报,2015,24(3):38-47
[5] 赵爽凯,陈克龙,吴成永,等. 增温对高寒湿地土壤呼吸动态变化的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(02):225-233
[6] 曹磊,宋金明,李学刚,等. 中国滨海盐沼湿地碳收支与碳循环过程研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(17):5141-5152
[7] 朱玲玲,戎郁萍,王伟光,等. 放牧对草地生态系统CO₂净气体交换影响研究概述[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(01):3-10
[8] Zhang F W,Liu A H,Li Y N,et al. CO₂ flux in alpine wetland ecosystem on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau,China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2008,28(2):453-462
[9] 王冬雪,高永恒,安小娟,等. 青藏高原高寒湿地温室气体释放对水位变化的响应[J]. 草业学报,2016,25(08):27-35
[10] Shang Z H,Feng Q S,Wu G L,et al. Grasslandification has significant impacts on soil carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus of alpine wetlands on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Ecological Engineering,2013,58(2):170-179
[11] 汪浩,于凌飞,陈立同,等. 青藏高原海北高寒湿地土壤呼吸对水位降低和氮添加的响应[J]. 植物生态学报,2014,38(06):619-625
[12] 林春英,李希来,李红梅,等. 不同退化高寒沼泽湿地土壤碳氮和贮量分布特征[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(04):805-816
[13] 李其,刘琳,蔡义民,等. 川西北高寒沙化草地治理恢复过程中CO₂通量变化[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(03):441-449
[14] Niu S,Sherry R A,Zhou X,et al. Nitrogen regulation of the climate-carbon feedback:evidence from a long-term global change experiment[J]. Ecology,2010,91(11):3261-3273
[15] 游成铭,胡中民,郭群,等. 氮添加对内蒙古温带典型草原生态系统碳交换的影响[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(08):2142-2150
[16] 张海宏,李林,周秉荣,等. 青藏高原高寒湿地CO₂通量特征及影响因子分析[J]. 冰川冻土,2017,39(01):54-60
[17] Niu B,He Y,Zhang X,et al. CO₂exchange in an alpine swamp meadow on the central Tibetan Plateau[J]. Wetlands,2017,37(3):525-543
[18] 朱志鹍,马耀明,胡泽勇,等. 青藏高原那曲高寒草甸生态系统CO₂净交换及其影响因子[J]. 高原气象,2015,34(05):1217-1223
[19] 马维伟,李广,宋捷,等. 植被退化对尕海湿地土壤有机碳库及碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(03):687-694
[20] 聂志刚,吴江琪,马维伟,等. 甘南尕海湿地不同退化程度植物碳、氮、磷的化学计量特征及动态变化[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(02):386-392
[21] 王丽丽,宋长春. 陆地生态系统碳循环对土地利用变化的响应[J]. 土壤通报,2010,41(01):216-221
[22] 郑云云,胡泓,邵志芳,等. 典型滨海地植被演替研究进展[J]. 湿地科学与管理,2013,9(4):56-60
[23] 李宏林,徐当会,杜国祯. 青藏高原高寒沼泽湿地在退化梯度上植物群落组成的改变对湿地水分状况的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2012,36(05):403-410
[24] 张景慧,黄永梅,龚吉蕊,等. 内蒙古大针茅草原常见植物在不同土地利用方式下的固碳相关属性[J]. 植物生态学报,2014,38(8):54-63
[25] 黄祥忠,郝彦宾,王艳芬,等. 极端干旱条件下锡林河流域羊草草原净生态系统碳交换特征[J]. 植物生态学报,2006,30(06):894-900
[26] 邢鹏飞,李刚,陈晓鹏,等. 放牧对晋北农牧交错带赖草草地生态系统碳交换的影响[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(10):1-11
[27] 吴琴,尧波,朱丽丽,等. 鄱阳湖典型苔草湿地生物量季节变化及固碳功能评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(02):215-219
[28] 马维伟,王辉,李广,等. 甘南尕海湿地退化过程中植被生物量变化及其季节动态[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(15):5091-5101
[29] 张志燕,王艳荣,赵利君. 土壤水分含量对草坪植物生理指标的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学,2007,35(25):7779-7780,7791
[30] 范爱武,刘伟,刘炳成. 土温对植物生长的影响及其机理分析[J]. 工程热物理学报,2004,25(01):124-126
[31] 丁成翔,杨晓霞,董全民. 青藏高原高寒草原放牧方式对植被、土壤及微生物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(01):159-16
[32] 陈小平,刘廷玺,王冠丽,等. 温度和水分对科尔沁草甸湿地净生态系统碳交换量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2018,29(05):1523-1534
[33] Ganjurjav H,Gao Q Z,Zhang W N,et al. Effects of warming on CO₂ fluxes in an alpine meadow ecosystem on the central Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Plos One,2015,10(7):e0132044
[34] 胡毅,朱新萍,贾宏涛,等. 围栏封育对天山北坡草甸草原生态系统碳交换的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2018,42(03):372-381
[35] 李红琴,张法伟,毛绍娟,等. 放牧强度对青海海北高寒矮嵩草草甸碳交换的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2019,41(02):16-21

Drought Processes of Alpine Wetland and Their Influences on CO₂ Exchange

高寒湿地旱化过程及其对CO₂交换的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	XU Jing, LI Wen-long, WU Xin-yue, LUO Jia-ning, LIAO Yuan-cheng. Differentiation of Seed Germination Behavior in Alpine Meadow on the Tibetan Plateau along the Elevation Gradient [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 10-18.
[2]	WANG Xiu-ying, HAO Yun, HU Jun-nan, LI Fan, YU Di. Recognitions of Meteorological Drought Process and Charactistic Analysis on Disaster Causing Factors [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 35-42.
[3]	SHE Yan-di, YANG Xiao-yuan, MA Li, ZHANG Zhong-hua, WANG Dang-jun, HUANG Xiao-tao, MA Zhen, YAO Bu-qing, ZHOU Hua-kun. Study on the Characteristics and Interrelationship of Plant Community and Soil in Degraded Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[4]	YAO Xi-xi, CAI Hua, LI Chang-hui. Effects of Fencing and Grazing on Vegetation Community Characteristics and Soil Properties in An Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 128-136.
[5]	ZHANG Zhen-hua, LIU Zhen-jie, CHEN Bai-jie, LI Yi-kang. Effects of Litter Addition on Soil Organic Carbon Mineralization in the Degraded Alpine Meadow in the Three-River Headwaters Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 156-164.
[6]	HUANG Cai-xia, LU Guang-xin, LI Xin, FAN Yue-jun, ZHOU Hua-kun, WANG Ying-cheng, WANG Zhi-hui, YAO Shi-ting. Effect of a Laccase Producing Fungus on the Mineralization Characteristics of Soil Organic Matter in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 173-178.
[7]	SHI Guo-xi, WANG Fang-ping, MA Li, ZHANG Zhong-hua, WANG Yi-bo, WANG Zhi-bo, YAO Bu-qing, ZHOU Hua-kun. Effects of Long-term and Short-term Warming on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Community in Alpine Meadow Ecosystem [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 179-189.
[8]	YAO Xi-xi, XIAO Feng, QI Shou-zhong, CHEN Guo-ming, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun. Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[9]	YAO Shi-ting, LU Guang-xin, ZHOU Hua-kun, ZHANG Hai-juan, YAN Hui-lin, WANG Jun-bang. Effect of Simulated Temperature Increase on Carbon and Nitrogen Changes in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 218-224.
[10]	WANG Zhan-qing, ZHANG Jie-xue, YANG Xue-lian, HUANG Xia, CHEN Si-liang, QIAO You-ming. Characteristics of Soil Microbial Diversity in Different Patches of Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[11]	XIANG Xue-mei, DE Ke-jia, FENG Ting-xu, WEI Xi-jie, WANG wei, XU Cheng-ti. Response of Vegetation and Soil to Exogenous Nitrogen Inputs in the Alpine Meadow of Sanjiangyuan Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2010-2016.
[12]	LIU Jing-jing, YIN Ya-li, LI Shi-xiong, ZHAO Wen, DONG Yi-ling, SU Shi-feng. Effects of Different Regulation Measures on Vegetation and Soil of Moderately Degraded Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2074-2080.
[13]	DUAN Li-hui, LIU Xiao-li, HAN Bing, WEI Xiao-ting, CAI Ren-cuo, SHAO Xin-qing. Effects of Native Species Reseeding on the Community Stability of Alpine Meadow in the Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1793-1800.
[14]	ZHANG Wan-tong, LI Chao-qun, YU Lu, SHAO Xin-qing. Study on the Effect of the Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Bio-fertilizer Instead of Chemical Fertilizer in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1423-1429.
[15]	LIN Chun-ying, LI Xi-lai, SUN Hai-song, SUN Hua-fang, MA Cheng-biao, HAN Hui-bang, ZHANG Yu-Peng, LI Cheng-yi. Responses of Soil Organic Carbon Component on Different Degrees of Degradation of Alpine Wetland in the Source of Yellow River [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1540-1548.