Comprehensive Evaluation of Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of 21 Oat Varieties in Northwest of Hebei Province

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.016

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 1311-1318.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.016

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comprehensive Evaluation of Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of 21 Oat Varieties in Northwest of Hebei Province

WANG Yun-tao^1,3, YANG Zhi-min², LIU Jian-cheng², LI Feng², YU Lin-qing³, YUAN Ting^1,4, LIANG Xiao^1,4, ZHOU Wen-xiu⁵

1. Zhangjiakou University, Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province 075000, China;
2. Zhangjiakou academy of agricultural sciences, Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province 075000, China;
3. Grassland Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Huhhot, Inner Mongolia 010010, China;
4. Zhangjiakou Innovation Center of Ecological Monitoring and Comprehensive Management Technology, Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province 075000, China;
5. Agricultural Technology Popularization Station of Kelegou Town, weichang, Hebei Province 068453, China

Received:2020-06-06 Revised:2020-07-11 Online:2020-10-15 Published:2020-09-19

冀西北地区21个燕麦品种生产性能与营养品质综合评价

王运涛^1,3, 杨志敏², 刘建成², 李峰², 于林清³, 远婷^1,4, 梁潇^1,4, 周文秀⁵

1. 张家口学院, 河北张家口 075000;
2. 张家口市农业科学院, 河北张家口 075000;
3. 中国农业科学院草原研究所, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010010;
4. 张家口市生态监测与综合治理技术创新中心, 河北张家口 075000;
5. 围场县克勒沟镇农业技术推广站, 河北承德 068453

通讯作者: 杨志敏, 于林清
作者简介:王运涛(1985-),男,河北曲阳人,博士研究生,讲师,主要从事牧草育种与栽培方面的研究,E-mail:wytao88@163.com
基金资助:
河北省重点研发项目（19226362D）；河北省重点研发项目（19226424D）；张家口学院张家口地区草地资源保护与利用科研团队资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to select special oat varieties suitable for planting in the northwest of Hebei province,21 oat varieties from home and abroad were used as materials. The production performance and nutritional quality were measured and analyzed,and also evaluated with gray correlation analysis. The results showed that different oat varieties had different adaptability to local environment according to their agronomic characters,‘Zhangyou NO.9’and ‘Baiyan NO.2’ had high hay yield,above 7 000 kg·hm^-2;‘Qingyin NO.2’ had high leaf stem ratio and dry fresh ratio;‘Molasses’ had good nutritional quality. According to the gray correlation analysis,the top four oat varieties are ‘Molasses’,‘Bayou NO.3’,‘Souris’ and ‘Baler NO.2’,and they are better suitable for planting in the northwest of Hebei province and similar area.

Key words: Northwest of Hebei province, Avena sativa, Production performance, Nutritional quality, Gray correlation analysis

摘要： 为筛选出适宜冀西北地区种植的优良燕麦（Avena sativa）品种，本试验对引进的国内外21个燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质相关指标进行了测定和分析，并运用灰色关联度分析法进行了综合评价。结果表明：不同燕麦品种对同一生态环境的适应性差异较大，其中‘张莜9号’和‘白燕2号’的干草产量较高，达到7 000 kg·hm^-2以上；‘青引2号’的干鲜比和叶茎比较高，适口性较好；而‘牧思乐’的营养品质较好。参试燕麦品种各指标的权重系数从高到低的顺序为：干草产量 > 中性洗涤纤维含量 > 酸性洗涤纤维含量 > 粗蛋白含量 > 叶茎比 > 株高 > 相对饲草品质 > 粗脂肪含量 > 干鲜比 > 粗灰分含量，通过加权关联度评价得出综合表现较好的燕麦品种为‘牧思乐’、‘坝莜3号’、‘领袖’和‘贝勒2’，这4个品种可以作为冀西北及周边地区的优良燕麦品种进行推广种植。

关键词: 冀西北, 燕麦, 生产性能, 营养品质, 灰色关联度分析

CLC Number:

S512.6

WANG Yun-tao, YANG Zhi-min, LIU Jian-cheng, LI Feng, YU Lin-qing, YUAN Ting, LIANG Xiao, ZHOU Wen-xiu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of 21 Oat Varieties in Northwest of Hebei Province[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1311-1318.

王运涛, 杨志敏, 刘建成, 李峰, 于林清, 远婷, 梁潇, 周文秀. 冀西北地区21个燕麦品种生产性能与营养品质综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1311-1318.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.016

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2020/V28/I5/1311

References

[1] 马艳明,刘志勇,白玉亭,等. 新疆燕麦地方品种资源多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学,2006(06):510-513
[2] 崔海,王加启,卜登攀,等. 燕麦饲料在动物生产中的应用[J]. 中国畜牧兽医,2010,37(06):214-217
[3] 王茜,李志坚,李晶,周帮伟. 不同类型燕麦农艺和饲草品质性状分析[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(12):149-158
[4] 李颖,毛培胜. 燕麦种质资源研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学,2013,41(1):74-75
[5] ObourA K,Holman J D,Schlegel A J. Seeding rate and nitrogen application effects on oat forage yield and nutritive value[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2019,42(13):1-9
[6] 李向林,沈禹颖,万里强. 种植业结构调整和草牧业发展潜力分析及政策建议[J]. 中国工程科学,2016,18(1):94-105.
[7] 杨富,郑敏娜,康佳惠,等. 9个燕麦品种在晋北地区的生产性能及饲用价值综合评价[J]. 作物杂志,2019(02):94-98
[8] 南铭,赵桂琴,李晶,等. 西北半干旱区引种燕麦品种产量与品质的关联分析及评价[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(01):125-133
[9] 郑敏娜,李荫藩,梁秀芝,等. 晋北地区引种苜蓿品种的灰色关联度分析与综合评价[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(03):631-637
[10] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,1999:19-61
[11] 周启龙,多吉顿珠,益西央宗. 拉萨地区16个燕麦引进品种的灰色关联度评价[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(02):389-396
[12] 潘蒙英健, 高峰, 李长忠, 等. 黄淮海地区不同青贮玉米品种播期及其适应性研究[J]. 青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018,35(3):200-206
[13] 孙建平,董宽虎,蒯晓妍,等. 晋北农牧交错区引进燕麦品种生产性能及饲用价值比较[J].草业学报,2017,26(11):222-230
[14] 孙建平,薛竹慧,杨国义,等. 施氮对晋北燕麦饲草主要农艺性状及干物质产量的影响[J].草地学报,2018,26(04):964-970
[15] 吴娜,卜洪震,曾昭海,等. 灌溉定额对夏播裸燕麦产量和品质的影响[J].草业学报,2010,19(05):204-209
[16] 王娟,李荫藩,梁秀芝,等. 北方主栽燕麦品种种质资源形态多样性分析[J]. 作物杂志,2017,5(4):27-32
[17] 吴亚,张卫红,陈鸣晖,等. 不同品种燕麦在扬州地区的生产性能[J]. 草业科学,2018,35(7):1728-1733
[18] Adras V O,Mahadevan M,Zwer P K. Oat phenotypes for drought adaptation and yield potential. Field Crops Research,2017(212):135-144
[19] 郭兴燕,梁丹妮,兰剑. 宁夏引黄灌区燕麦品种生产性能及营养价值研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2016(4):105-111
[20] 郑凯,顾洪如,沈益新,等. 牧草品质评价体系及品质育种的研究进展[J]. 草业科学,2006,23(5):57-61
[21] 韩华雯,孙丽娜,姚拓,等. 不同促生菌株组合对紫花苜蓿产量和品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2013,22(05):104-112
[22] 凌树礼. 应用RFV评价鄂尔多斯荒漠草原优势牧草营养价值[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学,2014,35(10):15-16
[23] 李春喜, 叶润荣, 周玉碧, 等. 高寒牧区不同燕麦品种饲草产量及品质的研究[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(4):882-888
[24] 王士强,胡银岗,佘奎军,等. 小麦抗旱相关农艺性状和生理生化性状的灰色关联度分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007,40(11):2452-2459
[25] 冯海生,李春喜. 应用灰色关联度综合评价甜高粱的生产性能[J]. 草地报,2013,21(3):622-625
[26] 耿慧,王志锋,刘卓,等. 国内外苜蓿品种主要性状间的灰色关联度分析[J]. 草业科学,2009,26(10):85-88
[27] 娜日苏,梁庆伟,杨秀芳,等. 阿鲁科尔沁旗燕麦新品种的灰色关联度评价[J]. 饲料研究,2019,42(03):83-86

Comprehensive Evaluation of Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of 21 Oat Varieties in Northwest of Hebei Province

冀西北地区21个燕麦品种生产性能与营养品质综合评价

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, LI Quan-lin, WANG You-bin, MA Bing-yun, LEI Yan-min, ZHOU Rui, XIE Jiu-xiang. Characteristics of Forage Nutritional Quality and Digestibility in Different Types of Grassland in Qinghai Tibet Plateau and their Correlation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[2]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun, ZHOU Rui. Effects of Grazing on Vegetation Characteristics and Forage Nutrientional Quality in a Temperate Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[3]	YAO Xi-xi, XIAO Feng, QI Shou-zhong, CHEN Guo-ming, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun. Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[4]	WANG Jing, LIU Xiao-jing, Cheng Tian-tian, Tong Chang-chun, WANG Xue. Study on Leaf Characteristics and Yield Effect of Alfalfa with Different Nitrogen Efficiency [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1941-1949.
[5]	WU Hai-yan, QU Zhen, LIU Zhao-ming, LABA Dun-zhu, TONGSANG Cuo-mu, QU Ni, NIMA zhuo-ga, MA Yu-shou. Comparative study on Production Performance of Oat Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1967-1973.
[6]	YAO Xi-xi, CAI Hua, LIU Hao-dong, LI Chang-hui. Analysis of Rumen Fermentation Characteristics and In Vitro Digestibility of Alpine Meadow Forage in Different Seasons [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1729-1737.
[7]	SONG Jian-chao, YU Xiao-jun, WEI Kong-tao, WANG Peng-bin, TONG Yong-shang, LI Zhen, HE You-long, WANG Hai-bo. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Elymus nutans in Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564.
[8]	DONG Zhi-xiao, HE Run-hao, KUANG Jian-yang, NIE Cong, YANG Jian, ZHANG Jian-bo, GOU Wen-long, MA Xiao. Effects of Sweet Sorghum Intercropping with Lablab Purpureus on Yield and Quality of Mixed Forage in Chengdu Plain,China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1578-1583.
[9]	LI Wen, MA Lin-feng, CAO Xi-min, YU Feng-fang, SHE Zhi-hui, XU Zhan-yun, LIU Gui-he, LYU Ai-zhi. Effect of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Zea mays L. in Bashang Agro-pastoral Ecotone in Northwest Hebei Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.
[10]	TONG Yong-shang, YU Xiao-jun, XU Chang-lin, WANG Peng-bin, SONG Jian-chao, LI Zhen, LI Ying. Effects of Sowing Date on Forage Yield and Quality of Seven Oat Varieties in Tianzhu Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1094-1106.
[11]	NIE Cong, YANG Xiao-peng, LIU Zhe-chuan, ZHAO Yu-han, CHEN Wan-ting, HE Run-hao, LIU Wei, GOU Wen-long, MA Xiao. Effects of Different Preceding Combination and Planting Density on Production Performance and Quality of Forage Corn [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 709-716.
[12]	LI Man-you, MA Zhong-ren, WANG Bing, YANG Yu-qi, SHEN Xiao-tian, CAO Li-juan, LI Xiao-yun, LAN Jian. Study on the Mixed Planting Mode of Two Alfalfa Varieties in Different Row Ratios in the Yellow River Irrigation Area in Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 798-804.
[13]	WANG Wei-qiang, LIU Jing, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua. Adaptability Evaluation of Secale cereale ‘Gannong No.2’ in Different Regions of Qinghai Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 504-514.
[14]	ZHANG Qi, WEI Zhen-wu, YAN Tian-fang, GENG Xiao-li. Identification and Evaluation of Genetic Diversity of Agronomic Traits in Oat Germplasm Resources [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 309-316.
[15]	SU Li-he, ZHANG Fan-fan, WANG Xu-zhe, WANG Ting, FU Dong-qing, MA Chun-hui. Effects of Snow Cover on the Yield and Nutritional Quality of Alfalfa with Different Fall-dormancy Levels [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 356-363.