Response Characteristics of Leaf Water Potential in Different Growth Stages of Amorpha fruticosa Seedlings to Drought Stress and Re-watering

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.022

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 1363-1371.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.022

Previous Articles Next Articles

Response Characteristics of Leaf Water Potential in Different Growth Stages of Amorpha fruticosa Seedlings to Drought Stress and Re-watering

FENG Shu-lin¹, LI Bo-yuan¹, LV Guo-li¹, HUANG You¹, WANG Jin-xin²

1. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China

Received:2020-05-31 Revised:2020-06-29 Published:2020-09-19

紫穗槐幼苗不同生长阶段叶水势对干旱胁迫与复水的响应特征

冯树林¹, 李博渊¹, 吕国利¹, 黄优¹, 王进鑫²

1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌 712100

通讯作者: 王进鑫
作者简介:冯树林(1987-),男,贵州兴仁县人,博士研究生,畜牧师,主要从事林草生态工程研究,E-mail:shulinfeng06@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31670713）；陕西省科技统筹计划项目（2016KTCL03-18）共同资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to reveal the response characteristics of Amorpha fruticosa seedlings leaf water potential at different growth stages to soil drought and re-watering environment,a pot experiment was carried out. The results showed that soil moisture,drought duration,growth stage,as well as the interaction among the three factors had significant effects on leaf water potential of A. fruticosa seedlings (P<0.01). With the aggravation of drought,the seedling leaf water potential decreased while the water stress index increased. Under the condition of 40% soil relative water content,the leaf water potential of seedlings decreased the most. In addition,in the initial and fast growth period of 15 days drought and in late growth stage of 30 days drought,the leaf water potential decreased by 0.71 MPa,1.12 MPa and 0.58 MPa,respectively. The leaf water potential had a compensating effect after re-watering. With the extension of the time after re-watering,the leaf water potential of the three seedlings growth stages gradually recovered. The recovery rate was closely related to drought degree,drought duration and growth stage. However,all indexes recovered to close to the control level after 72 hours of re-watering.

Key words: Leaf water potential, Growth stage, Drought stress, Re-watering, Amorpha fruticosa

摘要： 为揭示紫穗槐（Amorpha fruticosa）幼苗叶水势对土壤干旱与复水环境的响应特征，本研究通过盆栽试验，研究了土壤干旱胁迫及复水对紫穗槐幼苗不同生长阶段叶水势的影响。结果表明：土壤水分、干旱历时和生长阶段3个因素以及各因素间的相互作用对紫穗槐幼苗叶水势均有极显著影响（P<0.01）；随着干旱程度加剧，幼苗叶水势呈下降趋势，水分胁迫指数呈上升趋势；40.00%土壤相对含水量下的幼苗叶水势下降幅度达到最大，其中干旱15 d的生长初期和生长中期以及干旱30 d的生长后期的叶水势分别比对照下降了0.71 MPa，1.12 MPa和0.58 MPa；复水后，叶水势出现补偿效应，随着复水后时间的延长，幼苗3个生长阶段叶水势逐渐恢复，恢复速率与干旱程度、干旱历时和生长阶段密切相关，但均在复水72小时后恢复到接近对照水平。

关键词: 叶水势, 生长阶段, 干旱胁迫, 复水, 紫穗槐

CLC Number:

FENG Shu-lin, LI Bo-yuan, LV Guo-li, HUANG You, WANG Jin-xin. Response Characteristics of Leaf Water Potential in Different Growth Stages of Amorpha fruticosa Seedlings to Drought Stress and Re-watering[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1363-1371.

冯树林, 李博渊, 吕国利, 黄优, 王进鑫. 紫穗槐幼苗不同生长阶段叶水势对干旱胁迫与复水的响应特征[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1363-1371.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.022

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2020/V28/I5/1363

References

[1] 杨丹,张舒芸,田新会,等. 不同黑麦品种(品系)对持续干旱胁迫的形态适应性研究[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(1):122-129
[2] 周欢欢,傅卢成,马玲,等. 干旱胁迫及复水对'波叶金桂'生理特性的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报,2019,36(4):687-696
[3] 施钦,包学文,华建峰,等. 干旱胁迫及复水对海滨木槿光合作用和生理特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2019,30(8):2600-2606
[4] 余莉琳,裴宗平,常晓华,等. 干旱胁迫及复水对4种矿区生态修复草本植物生理特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2013,41(7):362-364
[5] 邢鹏,臧永新,闵孝君,等. 塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘防护林和自然群落中多枝柽柳的光合特征及水分利用效率[J]. 应用生态学报,2019,30(3):768-776
[6] 罗永忠,成自勇. 水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿叶水势、蒸腾速率和气孔导度的影响[J]. 草地学报,2011,19(2):215-221
[7] 刘欣. 植物水势研究与应用综述[J]. 吉林林业科技,2015,44(4):35-37
[8] 刘家琼,邱明新,蒲锦春,等. 我国荒漠典型超旱生植物——红砂[J]. 植物学报,1982,24(5):485-488
[9] 裴艳武,黄来明,贾小旭,等. 干旱胁迫对黄土高原不同质地土壤长柄扁桃和沙柳幼苗生理生态特征的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2018,32(5):234-239
[10] 郭卫华,李波,黄永梅,等.不同程度的水分胁迫对沙棘幼苗生理生态特征的影响[J]. 植物学报(英文),2003,45(10):1238-1244
[11] 杨建伟,梁宗锁,韩蕊莲,等. 不同干旱土壤条件下杨树的耗水规律及水分利用效率研究[J]. 植物生态学报,2004,28(5):630-636
[12] 王青宁,衣学慧,王晗生,等. 干旱胁迫下6种固沙灌木叶片水分状况研究[J]. 河南农业科学,2014,43(2):63-67
[13] 王丁,姚健,杨雪,等. 干旱胁迫条件下6种喀斯特主要造林树种苗木叶片水势及吸水潜能变化[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(8):2216-2226
[14] Zheng H F,Zhang X,Ma W J,et al. Morphological and physiological responses to cyclic drought in two contrasting genotypes of Catalpa bungei[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany,2017(138):77-87
[15] 王竞红,张秀梅,陈艾,等. 紫穗槐幼苗根系生理特性和解剖结构对PEG-6000模拟干旱的响应[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(2):511-517
[16] 赵燕,王辉,李吉跃. 水分胁迫对沙地樟子松和紫穗槐生理特性的影响[J]. 福建林业科技,2014,41(4):7-11,29
[17] 邹苗,王月林,李钢铁,等. 干旱胁迫对酸枣幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2020,22(2):65-72
[18] Liu J W,Zhang R H,Zhang G C,et al. Effects of soil drought on photosynthetic traits and antioxidant enzyme activities in Hippophae rhamnoides seedlings[J]. Journal of Forestry Research,2017,28(2):255-263
[19] Yan W M,Zhong Y Q W,Shangguan Z P. Rapid response of the carbon balance strategy in Robinia pseudoacacia and Amorpha fruticosa to recurrent drought[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany,2017(138):46-56
[20] Adnan M Y,Hussain T,Asrar H,et al. Desmostachya bipinnata manages photosynthesis and oxidative stress at moderate salinity[J]. Flora,2016(225):1-9
[21] 刘燕燕,张聃,曹昀,等. 水分胁迫对紫穗槐种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2014,42(9):145-147
[22] 王丁. 喀斯特地区六种苗木水分生理与抗旱性研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学,2009:20-38
[23] 付爱红,陈亚宁,李卫红,等. 干旱、盐胁迫下的植物水势研究与进展[J]. 中国沙漠,2005,25(5):744-749
[24] Martinez C,Roux C,Jauneau A,et al. Effect of water potential on the development of an haploid strain of Sporisorium reilianum f.sp. zeae[J]. Plant and Soil,2003,251(1):65-71
[25] 廖光瑶. SPAC的水势热力学系统[J]. 四川林业科技,1999,12(1):47-52
[26] 庞云龙. 旱后复水对侧柏和元宝枫幼树生长及生理特性的影响[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008:11
[27] 王平,王沛,孙万斌,等. 8份披碱草属牧草苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(2):397-404
[28] 吉晶. 干旱对苹果树叶水势变化的影响[J]. 山西农业科学,2007,35(1):48-50
[29] 马书燕,牵吉跃,彭祚登. 干旱胁迫对柔枝松幼苗水势的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学,2011,39(7):3923-3924
[30] 魏娟,谢福春,王华田,等. 水分胁迫对海州常山抗逆生理特性的影响[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2009,40(3):371-376
[31] Schimpl F C,Ferreira M J,Jaquetti R K,et al. Physiological responses of young Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) plants to drought stress and subsequent rewatering[J]. Flora,2019(252):10-17

Response Characteristics of Leaf Water Potential in Different Growth Stages of Amorpha fruticosa Seedlings to Drought Stress and Re-watering

紫穗槐幼苗不同生长阶段叶水势对干旱胁迫与复水的响应特征

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	TONG Li-rong, NI Shun-gang, REN Xing-yuan, LIU Jia-xin, WEN Jing, WANG Juan, SONG Yu. Effects of Melatonin on Seedling Growth and Leaf Water Physiology of Lespedeza davurica under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1682-1688.
[2]	YAO Xi-xi, CAI Hua, LIU Hao-dong, LI Chang-hui. Analysis of Rumen Fermentation Characteristics and In Vitro Digestibility of Alpine Meadow Forage in Different Seasons [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1729-1737.
[3]	LI Peng-zhen, ZHAO De-qin, DENG Bo, Yang Jun, Zhao Guo-hua, Zhao Liang. Effects of Biochar Addition and Drought Stress on Photosynthetic Efficiency and Growth of Alfalfa Inoculated with Rhizobia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[4]	LIANG Jia, MAYINU·Wusiman, FANG Zhi-gang. Effects of Exogenous Growth Substances on Seed Germination of Sweet Sorghum under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 610-617.
[5]	YE Xiao-qian, LIU Rui-xi, FENG Jin-hui, DENG Shi-ming, LI Ji-tao, DENG Zhi-jun. Effect of Mucilage of Plantago asiatica Seeds on Its Deterioration and Germination Resistance [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2728-2732.
[6]	YU Shu-yan, ZHOU Yan-fei, HUANG Wei, WANG Xing, GAO Xue-qin, FU Bing-zhe. Effects of Drought,Salt,and Drought-salt Combined Stress on Photosynthetic and Physiological Characteristics of Agropyron mongolicum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2399-2406.
[7]	QI Chen-xi, YI Guan-tao, FU Xiao-xuan, WANG Hai-long, WANG Jia-lin, WU Jian-hui. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Physiological Indexes of Potentilla anserina under Drought-Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2407-2412.
[8]	QIN Li-gang, LI Xue, LI Wei-yao, HU Yao, LI Jun, CUI Guo-wen. Effects of PEG Stress on Osmotic Regulation Substances and Enzyme Activities during Seed Germination of Three Allium L. [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 72-79.
[9]	ZHANG Ran, MA Xiang, ZHU Rui-ting, NIU Kui-ju, ZHAO Chun-xu, MA Hui-ling. Metabolic Pathway and Transcriptional Regulation of Qinghai Wild Poa pratensis in Response to Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1508-1518.
[10]	LIU Kai-qiang, LIU Wen-hui, JIA Zhi-feng, MA Xiang, LIANG Guo-ling. Effects of Water Stress on Organ Growth and Water Use Efficiency of Avena sativa ‘Qingyan No. 1’ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1552-1562.
[11]	WANG Xiao-xue, LI Yue, ZHANG Bin, JIA Ju-qing, FENG Mei-chen, ZHANG Mei-jun, YANG Wu-de. Effects of Drought Stress and Rehydration on Root Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Oats [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1588-1596.
[12]	LI Chun-yan, WANG Xi, ZHOU Sheng-hua, LI Xi, ZHONG Hua, DONG Kuan-hu. Excavation of R2R3-MYB Transcription Factor and Its Response to Drought Stress in Bothriochloa ischaemum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1784-1790.
[13]	CHEN Ai-ping, SUI Xiao-qing, WANG Yu-xiang, JIN Gui-li, WANG Kun, AN Sha-zhou. Effects of Drought and Re-watering on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Seriphidium transiliense Seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1216-1225.
[14]	LUO Xiao-yan, LI Xin-yong, ZHANG Yu, WANG Wen-qiang, DING Xi-peng. Difference Analysis of Salt and Drought Tolerance of Eight Desmodium Species Seeds During Germination [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1329-1336.
[15]	YU Xin-rong, ZHANG Zhi-wei, ZHOU Yu, LIU Peng, YAO Hong-bin, MIAO Yan-jun, FU Juan-juan. Effects of Melatonin on Growth and Antioxidant System of Perennial Ryegrass Seedlings Under Cold and Drought Stresses [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1337-1345.