Study on Forage Yield and Nutritional Value of Mixed-culture Grassland of Different Legume and Grass Forage in Semi-arid Area of Xinjiang

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.08.027

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (8): 1835-1842.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.08.027

Previous Articles Next Articles

Study on Forage Yield and Nutritional Value of Mixed-culture Grassland of Different Legume and Grass Forage in Semi-arid Area of Xinjiang

XIE Kai-yun¹, Meng xiang¹, XU Zhen-zhen¹, ZHANG Li-wen², WAN Jiang-chun¹, YAN An¹, Li Chen-jian¹

1. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology and Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Western Arid Region Grassland Resources and Ecology, College of Grassland and Environment Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China;
2. Forestry and Grassland Station of Fukang City, Fukang, Xinjiang 831500, China

Received:2020-12-20 Revised:2021-01-30 Online:2021-08-15 Published:2021-09-06

新疆半干旱地区不同种类混播草地的牧草产量和营养价值研究

谢开云¹, 孟翔¹, 徐珍珍¹, 张力文², 万江春¹, 颜安¹, 李陈建¹

1. 西部干旱荒漠区草地资源与生态教育部重点实验室, 新疆农业大学草业与环境科学学院, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052;
2. 阜康市林业与草原局, 新疆阜康 831500

通讯作者: 颜安,E-mail:zryanan@163.com
作者简介:谢开云(1984-),男,汉族,甘肃武威人,副教授,博士,主要从事牧草生产及养分利用教学与研究工作,E-mail:xkycah@163.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区高校科研计划项目（XJEDU2018Y022）；国家自然基金（31660604）和新疆农业大学博士后流动站项目资助

Abstract

Abstract: Improving the productivity of mixed-culture grassland and maintaining its nutritional value are of great significance for improving the productivity of grazing livestock in semi-arid areas of Xinjiang. In this study, the mono-culture of four forage, such as smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis L), ochard grass (Dactylis glomerata L), sainfoin (Onobrychis viciaefolia Scop) and red clover (Trifolium pratense), were control, the forage yields and nutritional value of mixed-culture grassland of two kinds and three forage combinations were monitored for three years, to analyze the quality change of forage in mixed grassland. The results showed that compared with single sowing, the forage yield of two forages and three forages in mixed grassland had obvious advantages. The forage in mixed grassland had lower acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and digestibility, and higher crude protein content (CP), dry matter digestibility (DDM), dry matter intake (DMI) and relative feeding value (RFV). With the increase of growth years, the DMY, CPY, ADF, and NDF of the forages were significantly increased in monoculture and mixed grassland, but CP, DDM, DMI, and RFV were all significantly decreased.

Key words: Semi-arid area, Mixed grassland, Legume, Grass, Nutritional value

摘要： 提高混播草地的生产力和维持其营养价值对提高新疆半干旱地区放牧家畜生产力具有重要意义。本研究选择4种牧草，以单播为对照，设置豆禾两种牧草和3种牧草进行混播，分析混播草地生产力和牧草营养价值变化。结果表明：与单播相比，混播草地不仅具有明显生物量优势，而且牧草的酸性洗涤纤维和中性洗涤纤维含量更低，粗蛋白含量、干物质消化率、干物质采食量和相对饲喂价值更高；随着生长年限的增加（2016年到2018年），单播和混播草地牧草干物质产量、粗蛋白产量、酸性洗涤纤维、中性洗涤纤维含量均显著增加，但粗蛋白含量、干物质消化率、干物质采食量和相对饲喂价值均显著下降。

关键词: 半干旱区, 混播草地, 豆科牧草, 禾本科牧草, 营养价值

CLC Number:

XIE Kai-yun, Meng xiang, XU Zhen-zhen, ZHANG Li-wen, WAN Jiang-chun, YAN An, Li Chen-jian. Study on Forage Yield and Nutritional Value of Mixed-culture Grassland of Different Legume and Grass Forage in Semi-arid Area of Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1835-1842.

谢开云, 孟翔, 徐珍珍, 张力文, 万江春, 颜安, 李陈建. 新疆半干旱地区不同种类混播草地的牧草产量和营养价值研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1835-1842.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.08.027

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2021/V29/I8/1835

References

[1] 沈海花, 朱言坤, 赵霞, 等. 中国草地资源的现状分析[J]. 科学通报, 2016, 61(2):139-154
[2] 潘庆民, 薛建国, 陶金, 等. 中国北方草原退化现状与恢复技术[J]. 科学通报, 2018, 63(17):1642-1650
[3] 谢开云, 曹凯, 万江春, 等. 新疆半干旱区不同豆科/禾本科牧草混播草地生产力的变化研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4):29-40
[4] 郑伟, 加娜尔古丽, 唐高溶, 等. 混播种类与混播比例对豆禾混播草地浅层土壤养分的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2015, 32(3):329-339
[5] 郑伟, 加娜尔古丽, 唐高溶, 等. 不同混播方式下豆禾混播草地群落稳定性的测度与比较[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(3):155-167
[6] Aponte A, Samarappuli D, Berti M T. Alfalfa-grass mixtures in comparison to grass and alfalfa monocultures[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2019, 111(2):628-638
[7] Cox S, Peel M D, Creech J E, et al. Forage production of grass-legume binary mixtures on intermountain western USA irrigated pastures[J]. Crop Science, 2017, 57(3):1742-1753
[8] 韩德梁, 何胜江, 陈超, 等. 豆禾混播草地群落稳定性的比较[J]. 生态环境, 2008, 17(5):1974-1979
[9] Tracy B F, Albrecht K, Flores J, et al. Evaluation of alfalfa-tall fescue mixtures across multiple environments[J]. Crop Science, 2016, 56(4):2026-2034
[10] Albayrak S, Mevlüt T, YVKSEL O, et al. Forage yield and the quality of perennial legume-grass mixtures under rainfed conditions[J]. Notulae botanicae horti agrobotanici cluj-napoca, 2011, 39(1):114-118
[11] 张强强, 靳瑰丽, 朱进忠, 等. 不同建植年限混播人工草地主要植物种群空间分布格局分析[J]. 草地学报, 2011, 19(5):735-739
[12] 王平, 周道玮, 张宝田. 禾-豆混播草地种间竞争与共存[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(5):2560-2567
[13] Bell L W, Sparling B, Tenuta M, et al. Soil profile carbon and nutrient stocks under long-term conventional and organic crop and alfalfa-crop rotations and re-established grassland[J]. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2012, 158:156-163
[14] Li Q, Song Y, Li G, et al. Grass-legume mixtures impact soil N, species recruitment, and productivity in temperate steppe grassland[J]. Plant and Soil, 2015, 394(1-2):271-285
[15] 董世魁. 高寒地区多年生禾草混播草地群落稳定性及其调控机制研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2001:26
[16] Kuchenmeister K, Kuchenmeister F, Kayser M, et al. Influence of drought stress on nutritive value of perennial forage legumes[J]. International Journal of Plant Production, 2013, 7(4):693-710
[17] 高继卿, 杨晓光, 董朝阳, 等. 气候变化背景下中国北方干湿区降水资源变化特征分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(12):99-110
[18] 陈谷, 邰建辉. 牧草质量及质量标准[C]. 中国奶业协会.首届中国奶业大会论文集(上册). 北京:中国奶牛编辑部, 2010, 4:113-116
[19] Da Silva M S, Tremblay G F, Bélanger G, et al. Forage energy to protein ratio of several legume-grass complex mixtures[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2014, 188(1):17-27
[20] 王宏辉, 李瑜鑫, 王建洲, 等. 藏东南地区草地资源与营养评价[J]. 草业科学, 2010, 27(1):56-59
[21] Sleugh B, Moore K J, George J R, et al. Binary legume-grass mixtures improve forage yield, quality, and seasonal distribution[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2000, 92(1):24-29
[22] 李强, 黄迎新, 钟荣珍, 等.豆-禾混播草地中紫花苜蓿比例对其固氮效率的影响及潜在生理机制[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(13):2647-2656
[23] Hakl J, Fuksa P, Konečná J, et al. Differences in the crude protein fractions of lucerne leaves and stems under different stand structures[J]. Grass and Forage Science, 2016, 71(3):413-423
[24] Kaplan M. Determination of potential nutritive value of sainfoin (Onobrychis sativa) hays harvested at flowering stage[J]. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 2011, 10(15):2028-2031
[25] Bal M A, Ozturk D, Aydin R, et al. Nutritive value of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciaefolia) harvested at different maturity stages[J]. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2006, 9(2):205-209
[26] De Santis G, Chiaravalle E, Martiniello P. Variability for chemical composition in tall fescue progenies, yield and traits associated with in vitro digestibility[C]//Proc. XVIII International Grassland Congress, Winnipeg and Saskatoon(Canada), 1997, 2:97-98
[27] Ammar H, López S, Bochi-Brum O, et al. Composition and in vitro digestibility of leaves and stems of grasses and legumes harvested from permanent mountain meadows at different stages of maturity[J]. Journal of Animal Feed Sciences, 1999, 8(4):599-610
[28] Ergon A, Kirwan L, Bleken M A, et al. Species interactions in a grassland mixture under low nitrogen fertilization and two cutting frequencies:1. dry-matter yield and dynamics of species composition[J]. Grass and Forage Science, 2016, 71(4):667-682
[29] Thomas R J.The role of the legume in the nitrogen cycle of productive and sustainable pastures[J]. Grass and forage science, 1992, 47(2):133-142
[30] Carbonero C H, Mueller-Harvey I, Brown T A, et al. Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia):a beneficial forage legume[J]. Plant Genetic Resources, 2011, 9(1):70-85
[31] Enguita I D, Salvia J, Buil I, et al. The agronomic variability of a collection of sainfoin accessions[J]. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 2008(3):401-407
[32] Zahran H H. Rhizobium-legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate[J]. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews, 1999, 63(4):968-989
[33] White L M, Wight J R. Forage yield and quality of dryland grasses and legumes[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management/Journal of Range Management Archives, 1984, 37(3):233-236
[34] Surprenant J, Barnes D K, Busch R H, et al. Bidirectional selection for neutral detergent fiber and yield in reed canarygrass[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1988, 68(3):705-712
[35] Cusicanqui J A, Lauer J G. Plant density and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and quality[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1999, 91(6):911-915
[36] 石岳, 马殷雷, 马文红, 等. 中国草地的产草量和牧草品质:格局及其与环境因子之间的关系[J]. 科学通报, 2013, 58(3):226-239
[37] Elgersma A, Søegaard K. Effects of species diversity on seasonal variation in herbage yield and nutritive value of seven binary grass-legume mixtures and pure grass under cutting[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2016, 78:73-83
[38] Aerts R, Chapin III F S. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited:a re-evaluation of processes and patterns[J]. Advances in ecological research, 1999, 30:1-67

Study on Forage Yield and Nutritional Value of Mixed-culture Grassland of Different Legume and Grass Forage in Semi-arid Area of Xinjiang

新疆半干旱地区不同种类混播草地的牧草产量和营养价值研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	JIN Yan-xia, CHEN Zhe, ZHOU Hua-kun, FU Jing-jing. Research Progress of Canopy Interception of Vegetation in Grassland Ecosystem [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 1-9.
[2]	HUANG Xiao-tao, YAO Bu-qing, MA Zhen, ZHOU Hua-kun. Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Grassland Net Primary Productivity and Precipitation Use Efficiency in Qinghai Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 19-26.
[3]	YANG Chong, WANG Wen-ying, LIU Pan, ZHOU Hua-kun, SUONANJi, LIU Yan-fang, GUAN Jin-hong. Characteristics and Analysis of Mineral Elements Content in Plants of Different Alpine Grasslands in the Regions of Three-River-Source [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 52-61.
[4]	ZHAO Meng-fan, ZHOU Bing-rong, ZHAO Tong, ZHOU Hua-kun, XIAO Rui-xiang, YAN Liang-dong, LI Fan. Drought Evaluation and Driving Force Analysis of Grassland in Qinghai Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 93-103.
[5]	QIN Hai-rong, CHEN Zhang-cheng, HU Yue-ming, WANG Li-ya, XIAO Wu, ZHAO Zhi-zhong, HU Yong-qiang, ZHAO Li, MA Bing-yun, HUO Jun-ling, WANG Fu-cheng. Soil Degradation Intensity and Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Alpine Grassland in Qinghai Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 104-112.
[6]	YAN He-piao, LI Wen-long, LIANG Tian-gang, ZHOU Hua-kun, CAO Ya-peng, LIAO Yuan-cheng. Effects of Different Restoration Measures on Degraded Alpine Grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau: A meta-analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.
[7]	Taiergeli, CAI Jin-hong, CUI Feng-chao, HANG Nan, PU Xin-chun, SUN Yan, WANG Ke-hua. Safe Application of Herbicides in Buffalograss [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1865-1876.
[8]	ZHAO Shu-dong, LI Jian-hong. The Study on Screening and Characteristics of Rhizosphere Growth-promoting Bacteria of Poa alpigena L. [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1885-1891.
[9]	LU Jia-ding, YANG Xu, ZHU Xiao-yan, CUI Ya-lei, WANG Cheng-zhang, LI De-feng, SHI Ying-hua. Comprehensive Evaluation of 21 Corn Silage Varieties with both Grain and Forage in Henan Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1950-1958.
[10]	WANG Xiao-fen, WU Yu-xin, XIAO Hai-long, ZHANG Ge-fei, CHEN Jian-gang, ZHANG De-gang. Features of Soil Aggregates and Plant Interspecific Affinity along Degraded Alpine Grasslands in Three Rivers Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2001-2009.
[11]	HUANG Jia-xing, WU Jing, LI Chun-bin, QIN Ge-xia, QIAN Juan-bing, LI Huai-hai. Remote Sensing Retrieval of grassland Above-Ground Biomass in Tianzhu County based on Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 Data [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2023-2030.
[12]	YUE Fang-zheng, GAO Shu-jing, CHENG Tong-tong, XU Lin-bo, HAN Hai-bin, DING Wei, CHAI Shou-quan. Current Situation and Prospect of Pest Control in Grassland of China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1615-1620.
[13]	QU Yan, SONG Qian, YANG He-long, ZHAO Kun, ZHAO Min, LIU Yu-ling, WANG De-ping, RONG Yu-ping. The Influence of Different Utilization Methods of Hulunbuir Grassland on the Structure of Soil Microbial Clusters [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1621-1627.
[14]	LIAN He-na, CHEN Tai-xiang, CHEN Zhen-jiang, WEI Xue-kai, LI Chun-jie. Potential Analysis of Achnatherum inebrians Epichloё Endophyte Infestation as an Airfield Grass to Repel Birds [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1649-1657.
[15]	ZHANG Xin-fei, SHE Mu-zi, LI Han-yu, JING Song, JIANG Hui-na, GAO Hao, ZHU Yan-xiao, FU Juan-juan. Growth Promotion Mechanisms of flavobacterium succinicans and Their Physiological Regulation on the Growth and Stress Tolerance in Lolium perenne [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1704-1711.