Comprehensive Evaluation on Soil Nutrient Change Characteristics and Quality of Different Degraded Grasslands in Qilian Mountains

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.07.002

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 1621-1629.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.07.002

Comprehensive Evaluation on Soil Nutrient Change Characteristics and Quality of Different Degraded Grasslands in Qilian Mountains

MA Ya-chun¹, ZHANG Jie², GAO Ya-min³, YAO Tuo¹, LI Hai-yun⁴, LI Chang-ning¹, JIN Yan-li¹

1. Pratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Lanzhou, Qinghai Province, 730070, China;
2. Grassland Technical Extension Station of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Qinghai Province 730010, China;
3. College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
4. Lanzhou University, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Western Ecol Safety, Lanzhou, Qinghai Province 730000, China

Received:2021-11-24 Revised:2022-02-18 Published:2022-08-02

祁连山不同退化草地土壤养分变化特征及质量综合评价

马亚春¹, 张洁², 高亚敏³, 姚拓¹, 李海云⁴, 李昌宁¹, 金艳丽¹

1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 甘肃省草原技术推广总站, 甘肃兰州 730010;
3. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
4. 兰州大学西部生态安全省部共建协同创新中心, 甘肃兰州 730000

通讯作者: 姚拓,E-mail:yaotuo@gsau.edu.cn
作者简介:马亚春(1996-)，女，汉族，陕西杨凌人，硕士研究生，主要从事草地微生物多样性研究，E-mail：1149846202@qq.com
基金资助:
甘肃省林业和草原局(GFG2019-366-2)；生物炭制备关键技术及在草原生态修复中的应用研究(2020KJ081)资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to explore the variation law of soil characteristics of different degraded grasslands in Qilian Mountains,the soil nutrients,ecological stoichiometric ratios and comprehensive evaluation coefficients of soil environmental fertility of grasslands with different degrees of degradation (lightly degraded grassland,moderately degraded grassland and severely degraded grassland) in the same area of the Qilian Mountains were continuously studied in 2017 and 2018. The results showed that the contents of soil organic carbon,total nitrogen and total phosphorus decreased with the increase of soil depth in 2018,and the differences were significant(P<0.05);the contents of soil alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen and available phosphorus decreased with the aggravation of degradation degree and the increase of soil depth;C/N,C/P,N/P ranged from 16.00 to 75.54,90.01 to 182.65,and 1.68 to 9.33 in different soil layers of different degraded grasslands,respectively. The results of soil environmental fertility quality evaluation index showed that the overall ranking of soil fertility quality in the two years was Tianzhu County in Zhuoxixiulong Town(1.00)>Sunan County in Kangle Town(0.89)>Sunan County in Huangcheng Town(0.84),and the comprehensive evaluation coefficients all showed a decreasing trend with the intensification of the degradation degree;the Qilian Mountains soil total phosphorus fertilizer index reached the extreme poor standard (Pi < 1) for two consecutive years. To sum up,the degraded grassland soils in different degrees of Qilian Mountains had gradually deteriorated,and it was necessary to pay attention and take reasonable measures to protect them.

Key words: Qilian Mountain, Grassland degradation, Soil nutrient, Ecological stoichiometric ratio, Fertility quality evaluation

摘要： 为探究祁连山不同退化草地土壤特性的变化规律，在2017和2018年持续对祁连山同一区域不同退化程度草地(轻度退化草地、中度退化草地和重度退化草地)土壤养分、生态化学计量比和土壤环境肥力综合评价系数进行研究。结果表明：2018年，各试验点土壤有机碳、全氮和全磷含量均随着土层深度的增加而减小，且差异显著(P<0.05)；各试验点土壤碱解氮和有效磷含量均随退化程度的加剧和土层深度的增加而减小；不同退化草地不同土层中，C/N变化范围为16.00~75.54，C/P变化范围为90.01~182.65，N/P变化范围为1.68~9.33。土壤环境肥力质量评价指数结果表明，整体两年中土壤肥力质量综合排序为：天祝县抓喜秀龙乡(1.00)>肃南县康乐镇(0.89)>肃南县皇城镇(0.84)，且综合评价系数都表现为随退化程度的加剧而减小的趋势。综上，祁连山不同程度退化草地土壤已逐步恶化，需重视并采取合理措施保护。

关键词: 祁连山, 退化草地, 土壤理化特征, 生态化学计量比, 土壤环境肥力综合评价

CLC Number:

S153

MA Ya-chun, ZHANG Jie, GAO Ya-min, YAO Tuo, LI Hai-yun, LI Chang-ning, JIN Yan-li. Comprehensive Evaluation on Soil Nutrient Change Characteristics and Quality of Different Degraded Grasslands in Qilian Mountains[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(7): 1621-1629.

马亚春, 张洁, 高亚敏, 姚拓, 李海云, 李昌宁, 金艳丽. 祁连山不同退化草地土壤养分变化特征及质量综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(7): 1621-1629.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.07.002

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2022/V30/I7/1621

References

[1] 蔡晓布,张永青,钱成,等.西藏中部退化土壤在不同培肥措施下的肥力特征[J].生态学报,2004(1):75-83
[2] 雒丽,赵雪雁,王亚茹,等.基于结构方程模型的高寒生态脆弱区农户的气候变化感知研究——以甘南高原为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(10):3274-3285
[3] 王亚茹,赵雪雁,张钦,等.高寒生态脆弱区农户的气候变化适应策略评价——以甘南高原为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(7):2392-2402
[4] 刘雪梅,张明军,王圣杰,等.2008-2014年祁连山区夏季降水的日变化特征及其影响因素[J].地理学报,2016,71(5):754-767
[5] 张莉,党军,刘伟,等.高寒草甸连续围封与施肥对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(11):3072-3078
[6] 德科加,张德罡,王伟,等.施肥对高寒草甸植物及土壤N,P,K的影响[J].草地学报,2014,22(2):299-305
[7] 杨成德,龙瑞军,陈秀蓉,等.东祁连山高寒草甸土壤微生物量及其与土壤物理因子相关性特征[J].草业学报,2007(4):62-68
[8] 岳东霞,惠苍.高寒草地生态经济系统价值流、畜群结构、最优控制管理及可持续发展[J].西北植物学报,2004(3):437-442
[9] 冯瑞章,周万海,龙瑞军,等.江河源区不同退化程度高寒草地土壤物理、化学及生物学特征研究[J].土壤通报,2010,41(2):263-269
[10] 李海云,姚拓,张建贵,等.东祁连山退化高寒草地土壤细菌群落与土壤环境因子间的相互关系[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(11):3793-3801
[11] 周丽,张德罡,贠旭江,等.退化高寒草甸植被与土壤特征[J].草业科学,2016,33(11):2196-2201
[12] 张建贵,王理德,姚拓,等.东祁连山不同退化草地植物群落特征与土壤养分特性[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(1):227-233
[13] 芦光新,李欣,党宁,等.不同形态及配比的氮素对高寒草甸植物生长高度和生物量的影响[J].草地学报,2018,26(1):210-215
[14] 王奇,王金枝,姜丽丽,等.氮和磷添加对草原群落特征及有关生态过程的影响[J].草地学报,2017,25(5):914-920
[15] GÜSEWELL S,BOLLENS U.Composition of plant species mixtures grown at various N:P ratios and levels of nutrient supply[J].Basic&Applied Ecology,2003,4(5):453-466
[16] 曾冬萍,蒋利玲,曾从盛,等.生态化学计量学特征及其应用研究进展[J].生态学报,2013,33(18):5484-5492
[17] QI Y,DARILEK J L,HUANG B,et al.Evaluating soil quality indices in an agricultural region of jiangsu province,China[J].Geoderma,2009,149(3):325-334
[18] 李海云,姚拓,张建贵,等.东祁连山不同干扰生境草地土壤养分时空变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):249-257
[19] 张金屯主编.应用生态学[J].华中建筑,2003(4):0,102-105
[20] 鲍士旦主编.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000
[21] 王婷,吕刚,魏忠平,等.科尔沁沙地南缘樟子松固沙林更新迹地土壤理化特性演变研究[J].土壤通报,2016,47(6):1332-1338
[22] 单奇华,俞元春,张建锋,等.城市森林土壤肥力质量综合评价[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(4):186-190,223
[23] 阚文杰,吴启堂.一个定量综合评价土壤肥力的方法初探[J].土壤通报,1994(6):245-247
[24] 甘肃农业大学.草原生态化学实验指导草原专业用[M]:草原生态化学实验指导草原专业用,1987
[25] 姜哲浩,周泽,陈建忠,等.三江源区不同海拔高寒草原土壤养分及化学计量特征[J].草地学报,2019,27(4):1029-1036
[26] LI H,QIU Y,YAO T,et al.Nutrients available in the soil regulate the changes of soil microbial community alongside degradation of alpine meadows in the northeast of the Qinghai-tibet Plateau[J].Science of the Total Environment,2021
[27] 姚喜喜,宫旭胤,白滨,等.祁连山高寒牧区不同类型草地植被特征与土壤养分及其相关性研究[J].草地学报,2018,26(2):371-379
[28] 邓燕,李钒,姚树冉,等.不同程度退化草地的植被土壤特征及其相互间的关系[J].草业科学,2021,38(7):1260-1269
[29] FAN H,WU J,LIU W,et al.Linkages of plant and soil C:N:P stoichiometry and their relationships to forest growth in subtropical plantations[J].Plant Soil,2015,392(1-2):127-138
[30] 马源,李林芝,张德罡,等.高寒草甸根际土壤化学计量特征对草地退化的响应[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(9):3039-3048
[31] GÜSEWELL S.N:P ratios in terrestrial plants:Variation and functional significance[J].New Phytologist,2010,164(2):243-266
[32] 李海云.祁连山高寒草地退化过程中"植被-土壤-微生物"互作关系[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2019
[33] 张萍,章广琦,赵一娉,等.黄土丘陵区不同森林类型叶片-凋落物-土壤生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2018,38(14):5087-5098
[34] 由政,张鹏,薛萐,等.退耕地植被演替过程对土壤化学计量特征的影响[J].草地学报,2017,25(3):657-661
[35] 王建林,钟志明,王忠红,等.青藏高原高寒草原生态系统土壤氮磷比的分布特征[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(12):3399-3406
[36] 林丽,李以康,张法伟,等.高寒矮嵩草群落退化演替系列氮、磷生态化学计量学特征[J].生态学报,2013,33(17):5245-5251
[37] 宋娟丽.黄土高原草地土壤质量特征及评价研究[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2010

Comprehensive Evaluation on Soil Nutrient Change Characteristics and Quality of Different Degraded Grasslands in Qilian Mountains

祁连山不同退化草地土壤养分变化特征及质量综合评价

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHAO Wen, YIN Ya-li, LI Shi-xiong, LIU Jing-jing, DONG Yi-ling, SU Shi-feng. Study on Vegetation Communities and Forage Nutrition Characteristics of Different Types of Grassland in Qilian Mountains [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(6): 1328-1335.
[2]	SU Hong-ye, ZHANG Zhong-hua, SHE Yan-di, MA Li, MAO Xu-feng, JIA Shun-bin, MA Zhen, ZHOU Hua-kun, HUANG Xiao-tao. Effects of Different Managements on Soil Nutrients in Alpine Grassland in The Qinghai Lake Basin [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1071-1076.
[3]	LIU Xiao-long, HU Jian, ZHOU Qing-ping, CAO Quan-heng, SUN Mei-ling, CHEN Xue-ling, YANG Li-xue. Effects of Typical Shrub-encroached Grassland on Vegetation Characteristics and Soil Nutrients in the Zoige Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(4): 901-908.
[4]	CHEN Qiang-qiang, ZHAO Rong-fang, ZHANG Hao-zhen, YANG Qing. Evolution and Decoupling Effects of Human-Environment Relationship in the Pastoral Area on the Northern Slope of Qilian Mountains [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 269-277.
[5]	LI Qiang, HE Guo-xing, LIU Zhi-gang, GUAN Wen-hao, QIAO Huan-huan, ZHANG De-gang, HAN Tian-hu, SUN Bin, PAN Dong-rong, LIU Xiao-ni. Responses of Vegetation Characteristics and Biodiversity to habitat in Alpine Meadows in Eastern Qilian Mountains [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(1): 169-177.
[6]	LAN Yun-fei, LI Chuan-hua. Spatiotemporal Pattern of Vegetation Net Primary Productivity (NPP) and Its Response to Climate Change in Qilian Mountains during the past 16 Years [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(1): 188-195.
[7]	ZHANG Chu, WANG Miao, ZHANG Yu, WANG Xu, CHEN Jin-qiang, LI Rui-qiang, DAI Jing-zhong, BAI Yu-ting, XIN Xiao-ping, WEI Zhi-jun, CHENG Li, ZHAO Man, YAN Rui-rui. Effects of Root Cutting and Organic Fertilizer Application on Aboveground Biomass and Soil Nutrients in the Mowing Ggrassland of Leymus chinensis Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(1): 220-228.
[8]	WANG Zhan-qing, ZHANG Jie-xue, YANG Xue-lian, HUANG Xia, CHEN Si-liang, QIAO You-ming. Characteristics of Soil Microbial Diversity in Different Patches of Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[9]	WANG Xiao-fen, WU Yu-xin, XIAO Hai-long, ZHANG Ge-fei, CHEN Jian-gang, ZHANG De-gang. Features of Soil Aggregates and Plant Interspecific Affinity along Degraded Alpine Grasslands in Three Rivers Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2001-2009.
[10]	ZHAO Peng-bo, QIU Kai-yang, XIE Ying-zhong, ZHAO Xiang-jun, CHEN Lin, LIU Wang-suo, LI Hai-quan, MENG Wen-fen, HU Xue-qin, HE Yi, HUANG Ye-yun, LI Ya-yuan. Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Nutrients under Different Sand-fixing Shrubs in Southern Mu Us Sandy Land, China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2040-2048.
[11]	XIAO Yun-fei, CHEN Wen-ye, WANG Bin-jie, TAN Yan-rong, BING Dan-hui, ZHU Li, LIU Hong-yuan. Study On Temporal and Spatial Change of Land Use and Its Relationship with Climate Factors in Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2049-2057.
[12]	YU Tie-feng, HAO Feng, ZHANG Yong-liang, GAO Kai. Response of Soil Enzyme and Soil Fertility of Artificial Grassland in Sandy Soil to Different Mixture Ratio of Alfalfa and Smooth Brome [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1217-1223.
[13]	LI Na-na, YANG Jiu-yan, JIA Zhe-ting, YAN Rui-ling, CHEN Qi. Effects of Different Grazing Patterns on Community Characteristics and Soil Nutrients in the Main Pasture Types of Alxa Zuoqi [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 991-1003.
[14]	WANG Xiao-fen, MA Yuan, ZHANG Ge-fei, LIN Dong, ZHANG De-gang. Relationship between Plant Community Diversity and Ecosystem Multifunctionality During Alpine Meadow Degradation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1053-1060.
[15]	MA Hai-li, LIN Hui-long, XIONG Xiao-yu, HAN Xue-ping. The Impact of the Grassland Ecological Reward Policy on Grassland Vegetation in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 545-554.