Effect of Simulated Precipitation on Soil Enzyme Activity of Stipa breviflora Desert Steppe in Inner Mongolia

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.05.004

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1339-1347.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.05.004

Effect of Simulated Precipitation on Soil Enzyme Activity of Stipa breviflora Desert Steppe in Inner Mongolia

REN Zi-huan^1,2, WANG Zhong-wu^1,2, KANG hui^1,2, FU Jing-yao^1,2, MENG Pu-jia^1,2, HAN Guo-dong^1,2

1. College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010010, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010010, China

Received:2023-10-17 Revised:2024-02-16 Published:2024-06-01

模拟降水对内蒙古短花针茅荒漠草原土壤酶活性的影响

任梓欢^1,2, 王忠武^1,2, 康慧^1,2, 付净瑶^1,2, 孟浦嘉^1,2, 韩国栋^1,2

1. 内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010010;
2. 内蒙古农业大学草地资源教育部重点实验室, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010010

通讯作者: 韩国栋，E-mail:nmghanguodong@163.com
作者简介:任梓欢(1998-)，女，汉族，河北衡水人，硕士研究生，主要从事草地生态研究，E-mail: renzihuan@emails.imau.edu.cn
基金资助:
内蒙古农业大学学科交叉基金项目(BR22-14-04)；国家自然科学基金项目(31560140)和内蒙古重大科技专项(2021ZD0044);“草种创新与草地资源可持续利用创新团队”基本科研业务费项目(BR12-12-07)资助

Abstract

Abstract: The intrinsic mechanism underlying the changes in soil enzyme activities (urease,alkaline phosphatase,and sucrase) in response to simulated precipitation alterations and their relationship with soil nutrient supply conditions were investigated in the desert grassland of Inner Mongolia. Four precipitation gradients were set based on the average precipitation levels over several years:a 50% reduction in natural precipitation (P_-50%),a control group (P_CK),a 50% increase in natural precipitation (P_+50%),and a 100% increase in natural precipitation (P_+100%). Results indicated significant differences in the sensitivity of urease,alkaline phosphatase,and sucrase activities to water availability in the desert grassland of Inner Mongolia. Increasing precipitation significantly enhanced the activities of urease (17.36%),alkaline phosphatase (9.9%),and sucrase (34.85%) in the soil layer at a depth of 10~20 cm,while decreased precipitation only significantly reduced alkaline phosphatase activity. All three soil enzymes are significantly correlated with available phosphorus and total nitrogen (P<0.05),while an increase in available phosphorus decreased the total potassium content. Overall,decreased precipitation significantly reduced alkaline phosphatase activity (P<0.01),while sucrase activity exhibited a significant increase followed by a significant decrease with increasing precipitation gradients (P<0.05),and urease activity showed a steady increase. Soil enzymes indirectly promoted soil nutrient content,the excessive nutrients exert an inhibitory effect on each other.

Key words: Desert steppe, Simulated precipitation, Soil enzyme activity, Soil nutrient

摘要： 为探究模拟降水处理下土壤酶(脲酶、碱性磷酸酶和蔗糖酶)活性变化与土壤养分供应状况的内在联系机制。以内蒙古荒漠草原为研究对象，根据多年降水平均量设置了4个梯度：减少自然降水的50%(P_-50%)、对照(P_CK)、增加自然降水的50%(P_+50%)和增加自然降水的100%(P_+100%)。结果表明：内蒙古荒漠草原中脲酶、碱性磷酸酶和蔗糖酶活性对水分敏感度有较大差异；10～20 cm土层增水下显著增加了脲酶(17.36%)、碱性磷酸酶(9.9%)、蔗糖酶(34.85%)活性；3种土壤酶均与速效磷、全氮有显著相关关系(P<0.05)，而速效磷的增加会降低全钾含量。综上，减水处理极显著抑制了碱性磷酸酶活性(P<0.01)，蔗糖酶活性随增水梯度的增加表现为先显著升高后显著降低(P<0.05)，脲酶活性表现为平稳升高，土壤酶活性改变对土壤养分含量起到促进作用，过量养分之间又产生抑制作用。

关键词: 荒漠草原, 模拟降水, 土壤酶活性, 土壤养分

CLC Number:

S812.2

REN Zi-huan, WANG Zhong-wu, KANG hui, FU Jing-yao, MENG Pu-jia, HAN Guo-dong. Effect of Simulated Precipitation on Soil Enzyme Activity of Stipa breviflora Desert Steppe in Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(5): 1339-1347.

任梓欢, 王忠武, 康慧, 付净瑶, 孟浦嘉, 韩国栋. 模拟降水对内蒙古短花针茅荒漠草原土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1339-1347.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.05.004

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2024/V32/I5/1339

References

[1] 韩芳. 气候变化对内蒙古荒漠草原生态系统的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2013:9-12
[2] MA W J,LI J,GAO Y,et al. Responses of soil extracellular enzyme activities and microbial community properties to interaction between nitrogen addition and increased precipitation in a semi-arid grassland ecosystem[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2020,709(10):7-9
[3] 李吉玫,张毓涛,韩燕梁,等. 降水变化对天山云杉细根分解及养分释放的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2015,24(9):1453-1460
[4] 杨万勤,王开运. 土壤酶研究动态与展望[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2002,8(5):564-570
[5] 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究方法[M]. 北京:农业出版社,1986:14-339
[6] 周礼恺. 土壤酶学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1987:32-54
[7] 薛冬,姚槐应,何振立,等. 红壤酶活性与肥力的关系[J]. 应用生态学报,2005,16(8):1455-1458
[8] 何跃军,钟章成,刘济明,等. 石灰岩退化生态系统不同恢复阶段土壤酶活性研究[J]. 应用生态学报,2005,16(6):1077-1081
[9] 米琦,王毅,秦小静,等. 青藏高原高寒草甸不同围栏年限土壤酶化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(1):33-41
[10] 陈立明,满秀玲. 云冷杉林土壤酶活性与土壤养分的研究[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2009,7(4):94-99
[11] 张建锋,张旭东,周金星,等. 盐分胁迫对杨树苗期生长和土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2005,16(3):426-430
[12] A’BEAR A D,JONES T H,KANDELER E L,et al. Interactive effects of temperature and soil moisture on fungal-mediated wood decomposition and extracellular enzyme activity[J]. Soil Biology and Biochem,2014(70):151-158
[13] MCDANIEL M,KAYE J,KAYE M. Increased temperature and precipitation had limited effects on soil extracellular enzyme activities in a post-harvest forest[J]. Soil Biology and Biochem,2013(56):90-98
[14] 张萌萌,敖红,李鑫,等. 桑树/苜蓿间作对根际土壤酶活性和微生物群落多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(2):302-309
[15] 谢伟. 不同水分条件下砷污染对土壤酶活性影响及机理研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2015:62-64
[16] 万忠梅,宋长春. 土壤酶活性对生态环境的响应研究进展[J]. 土壤通报,2009,40(4):951-956
[17] 刘善江,夏雪,陈桂梅,等. 土壤酶的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报,2011,27(21):1-7
[18] 吴怡,董炜华,李晓强,等. 土壤酶活性对土壤环境变化的响应研究进展[J]. 南方农业,2023,17(15):42-46,52
[19] 康静,韩国栋,任海燕,等. 不同降水条件下荒漠草原植物的养分含量及回收对增温和氮素添加的响应[J]. 西北植物学报,2019,39(9):1651-1660
[20] 钞然,张东,陈雅丽,等. 模拟增温增雨对典型草原土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 干旱区研究,2018,35(5):1068-1074
[21] 许华,何明珠,孙岩. 干旱荒漠区土壤酶活性对降水调控的响应[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2018,54(6):790-797
[22] 柴锦隆,徐长林,张德罡,等. 模拟践踏和降水对高寒草甸土壤养分和酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(1):333-344
[23] 周贵格,周灵燕,邵钧炯,等. 极端干旱对陆地生态系统的影响:进展与展望[J]. 生态学报2020,44(5)515-525
[24] KANG Y,LIU S,WAN S,et al. Assessment of soil enzyme activities of saline-sodic soil under drip irrigation in the Songnen plain[J]. Paddy and Water Environment,2013,11(1-4):87-95
[25] 李林海,邱莉萍,梦梦. 黄土高原沟壑区土壤酶活性对植被恢复的响应[J]. 应用生态学报,2012,23(12):3355-3360
[26] 杨梅焕,曹明明,朱志梅. 毛乌素沙地东南缘沙漠化过程中土壤酶活性的演变研究[J]. 生态环境学报,2012,21(1):69-73
[27] 秦燕. 贺兰山西坡不同草地类型土壤酶活性特征[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2007:45-46
[28] 朱丽,郭继勋,鲁萍,等. 松嫩羊草草甸羊草、碱茅群落土壤酶活性比较研究[J]. 草业学报,2002,11(4):28-34
[29] 王理德,姚拓,何芳兰,等. 石羊河下游退耕区次生草地自然恢复过程及土壤酶活性的变化[J]. 草业学报,2014,23(4):253-261
[30] ZHANG Y L,CHEN L J,CHEN X H,et al. Response of soil enzyme activity to long-term restoration of desertified land[J]. Catena,2015(133):64-70
[31] LIU Y,YANG H,LI X,et al. Effects of biological soil crusts on soil enzyme activities in revegetated areas of the Tengger Desert,China[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2014(80):6-14
[32] SUN H,WU X C,QIN J H,et al. Response of soil catalase activities to temperature and CO₂ in subalpine forest in the western Sichuan[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science,2007,38(5):891-895
[33] 刘迪,邓强,时新荣,等. 黄土高原刺槐人工林根际和非根际土壤磷酸酶活性对模拟降水变化的响应[J]. 水土保持研究,2020,27(1):95-103
[34] 许艺馨,余海龙,李春环,等. 模拟降水量变化对荒漠草原土壤酶活性的影响及其相关因素分析[J]. 西北植物学报,2021,41(11):1912-1923
[35] LI H,XU Z W. YANG S,et al. Responses of soil bacterial communities to nitrogen deposition and precipitation increment are closely linked with aboveground community variation[J]. Microbial Ecology.2016,71(4):974-989
[36] 孙岩,何明珠,王立. 降水控制对荒漠植物群落物种多样性和生物量的影响[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(7):2425-2433
[37] 万忠梅,宋长春,郭跃东,等. 毛苔草湿地土壤酶活性及活性有机碳组分对水分梯度的响应[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(12):5980-5986
[38] 朱同彬,诸葛玉平,刘少军,等. 不同水肥条件对土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 山东农业科学,2008(3):74-78
[39] 王志婷. 不同围封处理对半干旱草甸草原植被群落特征与土壤酶活性的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2022:14-16
[40] ELSE K,BVNEMANN,GIULIA B,et al,Soil quality -A critical review[J]. Soil Biol Biochem,2018(120):105-125
[41] 刘建新. 不同农田土壤酶活性与土壤养分相关关系研究[J]. 土壤通报,2004,35(4):523-525
[42] MINGZHU H,FEIKE A,KE Z,et al. Influence of life form,taxonomy,climate,and soil properties on shoot and root concentrations of 11 elements in herbaceous plants in a temperate desert[J]. Plant and Soil,2016,398(1-2):339-350
[43] 谈嫣蓉,杜国祯,陈懂懂,等. 放牧对青藏高原东缘高寒草甸土壤酶活性及土壤养分的影响[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2012,48(1):86-91
[44] HAN C,WANG Z,SI G. Increased precipitation accelerates soil organic matter turnover associated with microbial community composition in topsoil of alpine grassland on the eastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Canadian Journal of Microbiology,2017,63(10):811-821
[45] 张志南,武高林,王冬,等. 黄土高原半干旱区天然草地群落结构与土壤水分关系[J]. 草业学报,2014(6)313-319
[46] 杨新宇,林笠,李颖,等. 青藏高原高寒草甸土壤物理性质及碳组分对增温和降水改变的响应[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),2017(4):765-774
[47] 刘禹,李兴福,丁成翔,等. 短期增水对高寒草甸补播草地植被群落和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(6):1622-1632
[48] 肖烨,商丽娜,黄志刚,等. 吉林东部山地沼泽湿地土壤碳、氮、磷含量及其生态化学计量学特征[J]. 地理科学,2014,34(8):994-1001
[49] 王青,袁勇,李传哲,等. 白洋淀湿地土壤氮素空间分布特征研究[J]. 环境保护科学,2013,39(4):1-6
[50] 申卫博,刘云鹏,郑纪勇,等. 毛乌素退化湿地土壤生源要素垂直分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报,2012,26(5):220-223
[51] 向雪梅,德科加,林伟山,等. 氮素添加对高寒草甸植物群落多样性和土壤生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(12):2769-2777
[52] 高雪峰,张功,卢萍. 短花针茅草原土壤的酶活性及其生态因子的季节动态变化研究[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版),2006(2):226-228,237
[53] NANNIPIERI P,TRASAR-CEPEDA C,DICK R P. Soil enzyme activity:a brief. Dick. Soil enzyme activity:a brief history and biochemistry as a basis for appropriate interpretations and meta-analysis[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2018,54(1):11-19
[54] BELL C,CARRILLO Y,BOOT C M,et al. Rhizosphere stoichiometry:are C;N:P ratios of plants,soils,and enzymes conserved at the plant species-level? [J]. New Phytologist,2014,201(2):505-517

Effect of Simulated Precipitation on Soil Enzyme Activity of Stipa breviflora Desert Steppe in Inner Mongolia

模拟降水对内蒙古短花针茅荒漠草原土壤酶活性的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	XIONG Mei, AN Hai-Bo, ZHAO Meng-li, QIAO Ji-Rong, ZHANG Feng, ZHENG Jia-Hua. Effects of Grazing on Species Diversity and Turnover of Main Species Patch in Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(4): 1112-1119.
[2]	XIONG Mei, AN Hai-bo, ZHAO Meng-li, QIAO Ji-rong, ZHANG Feng, ZHENG Jia-hua. Effect of Grazing on Spatial Pattern and Niche Characteristics of Main Species in Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(4): 1177-1183.
[3]	WU Qian, JU Xin, REN Hai-yan, HAN Guo-dong. Precipitation Regulates the Response of Ecosystem Carbon Exchange to Warming and Nitrogen Addition in a Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(4): 1224-1233.
[4]	ZHANG Xia, LIU Yang-qiao, ZHANG Can-hao, WU Saqila, ZHU Lin, KANG Saruul. Response of Spatial Heterogeneity of Biomass to Different Long-term Grazing Intensity in Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(4): 1243-1251.
[5]	LI Wei, WANG Jun, XU Ru-min, DU Shi-zhou, QIAO Yu-qiang, CHEN Huan. Effects of Sludge Biochar Addition on Ryegrass and Soil Nutrient Properties [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(4): 1295-1302.
[6]	HUANG Jing, LIU Ke-si, DOU Peng-peng, GAO Qian, LIU Cheng, MIAO Zheng-zhou, REN Zhuo-ran, WANG Kun. Effects of Different Years of Abandonment on Cropland Soil in the Agro-pastoral Ecotone [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(3): 677-683.
[7]	SHU Yang, CHEN Jin-ping, DING Zhao-hua, LI Hang, ZHAO Peng-wu, ZHOU Mei, JIA Wen-jie, ZHANG Yi-chao, ZHANG Guo-chen, WEI Jiang-sheng. Effects of Forest Fire Intensity on Functional Genes of Soil Nitrogen Cycling in Larix Gmelinii [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(3): 726-735.
[8]	CHUN Feng, ZHANG Feng, WU Yong-sheng, ZHAO Meng-li. Effects of Different Grazing Intensities on Biodiversity in the Stipa breviflora Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(3): 848-858.
[9]	LEI Lei, ZHANG Feng, ZHENG Jia-hua, YANG Li-shan, WANG Wen-qiong, LI Shao-yu, ZHANG Bin. Effects of Grazing Intensities on Ecosystem Multifunctionality in a Stipa breviflora Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 275-283.
[10]	RAN Yi-qian, ZHOU Jun, ZHANG Xi-yu, FAN Jian-rong, LI Xiao-long, MA Yue-wei. Effects of Burning Intensity on Soil Chemical and Physical Properties in Southwest subtropical Forests [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(9): 2796-2804.
[11]	ZHAO Min, MA Lu-hua, MENG Xian-chao, LI Yi-kang, ZHOU Hua-kun. Effects of Succession of Artificial Grassland on Forage Quality in Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 2155-2161.
[12]	LIU Zhuo-tong, CUI Yuan-yuan, BAI Liu, WANG Yue-hua, SONG Xiao-hui, LI Zhi-guo, HAN Guo-dong, WANG Zhong-wu. Effects of Simulated Precipitation on Aboveground and Belowground Biomass and Their Allocation Proportion of Plant Community in Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1632-1639.
[13]	PAN Sen, BU Jia-wei, GAN An-qi, SHANG Zhen-yan, GUO Ding, YANG Xiao-xia, DONG Quan-min, NIU De-cao. Effect of Grazing Intensities on Extracellular Enzyme Stoichiometry of Soil Microorganisms in Alpine Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1780-1787.
[14]	LI Xue-jie, CHEN Jie, CHANG Shuai, YU Hong-bo, ZHANG Li-hua, ZHANG Qiao-feng, LI Xiang. Spatial Distribution of Organic Carbon and Available Nutrients in Grassland Soils and Analysis of the Main Controlling Factors [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1798-1809.
[15]	CHANG Tao, LI Shan, LI Yi-kang, XU Wen-hua, SUN Jian, ZHANG Zhong-hua, MA Li, QIN Rui-min, SU Hong-ye, HU Xue, A Di-ha-ze, YUAN Fang, LI Hong-lin, ZHOU Hua-kun. Restoration Effects of Mixed Sowing Artificial Grassland on Vegetation and Soil of Black Soil Land at the Initial Planting Stage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1546-1555.