Effects of Construction Years of Coal Mine Slag Mountain Grass on Soil Bacterial Diversity

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.008

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 2590-2599.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.008

Effects of Construction Years of Coal Mine Slag Mountain Grass on Soil Bacterial Diversity

DAO Ri-na, ZHANG Ying, SU Bei-bei, LI Xi-lai, MA Lin-xiong, TIE Xiao-long

College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University, Key Laboratory of Alpine Grassland Ecology in the Three Rivers Source Region, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China

Received:2022-05-11 Revised:2022-06-17 Published:2022-11-05

高寒煤矿渣山植被建植年限对土壤细菌多样性的影响

道日娜, 张英, 苏贝贝, 李希来, 马林雄, 铁晓龙

青海大学农牧学院, 三江源区高寒草地生态省部共建重点实验室, 青海西宁 810016

通讯作者: 张英,E-mail:zhangying2019@126.com
作者简介:道日娜(1997-),女,蒙古族,内蒙古阿拉善人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地土壤微生物多样性方面的研究,E-mail:1160360909@qq.com
基金资助:
青海省基础研究计划项目(2019-ZJ-7008)；国家自然科学基金项目(41561006，31260025)资助

Abstract

Abstract: To understand the ecological restoration of coal mine slag hills,we investigated the soil chemical properties,soil enzyme activity and soil bacterial diversity of sites with soil inoculation under different restoration durations (1,3 and 5 years) in the slag hills of Jiangcang mine were measured and analyzed by high-throughput sequencing technology. The results showed that soil nutrients,except for available potassium (AK),increased significantly (P<0.05) in 5 years of establishment compared with 1 year of establishment. Soil enzyme activity increased significantly (P<0.05) with the increase of establishment year. Bacterial richness and diversity were significantly higher (P<0.05) in the 3 years of establishment than in the 1 and 5 years of establishment. The dominant bacteria were Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria,and Sphingomonas. Soil organic matter (OM),total nitrogen (TN) and soil enzyme activity could significantly affect proteobacteria and acidobacteria with the increase of planting time. Therefore,vegetation construction in Jiangcang mining area can effectively improve soil nutrient content,enzyme activity and bacterial community richness and diversity.

Key words: Soil enzyme activity, Soil bacterial diversity, High-throughput sequencing, Jiangcang mine, Planting duration

摘要： 针对高寒煤矿渣山生态恢复问题，选取江仓矿区渣山不同建植年限(1，3，5年)草地土壤为研究对象，测定土壤化学性质、土壤酶活性，利用高通量测序技术分析土壤细菌多样性。结果表明：与建植1年相比，建植5年的土壤养分含量除速效钾以外均显著增加(P＜0.05)；随建植年限的延长，土壤酶活性均显著增加(P＜0.05)；建植3年的细菌丰富度与多样性均显著高于建植1年和5年(P＜0.05)；样地优势细菌门为放线菌门(Actinobacteria)与变形菌门(Proteobacteria)，优势菌属为鞘氨醇单胞菌属(Sphingomonas)；随建植年限的增长，土壤有机质、全氮含量和土壤酶活性等能够显著影响变形菌门、酸杆菌门(Acidobacteria)相对丰度。因此，对江仓矿区进行植被建植能有效提高和改善土壤养分含量、酶活性以及细菌群落丰富度与多样性。

关键词: 土壤酶活性, 细菌多样性, 高通量测序, 江仓矿区, 建植年限

CLC Number:

S154.36

DAO Ri-na, ZHANG Ying, SU Bei-bei, LI Xi-lai, MA Lin-xiong, TIE Xiao-long. Effects of Construction Years of Coal Mine Slag Mountain Grass on Soil Bacterial Diversity[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(10): 2590-2599.

道日娜, 张英, 苏贝贝, 李希来, 马林雄, 铁晓龙. 高寒煤矿渣山植被建植年限对土壤细菌多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10): 2590-2599.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.008

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2022/V30/I10/2590

References

[1] FU J,HUANG B. Involvement of antioxidants and lipid peroxidation in the adaptation of two cool-season grasses to localized drought stress[J]. Environmental&Experimental Botany,2001,45(2):105-114
[2] ZHANG Z J,CAO Y G,WANG S F,et al. Analysis of soil microbial and enzyme activities in reclaimed land of Pingshuo Loess Open-pit Mining Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2021,41(1):110-123
[3] 孙良杰,齐玉春,董云社,等.全球变化对草地土壤微生物群落多样性的影响研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(12):1715-1723
[4] 张振佳,曹银贵,王舒菲,等.平朔黄土露天矿区复垦地表层土壤微生物与酶活性分析[J].生态学报,2021,41(1):110-123
[5] LU Z X,WANG P,OU H B,et al. Effects of different vegetation restoration on soil nutrients,enzyme activities,and microbial communities in degraded karst landscapes in southwest China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2022,508:120002
[6] 吴道铭,陈晓阳,曾曙才.芒属植物重金属耐性及其在矿山废弃地植被恢复中的应用潜力[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(4):1397-1406
[7] 孙梦媛,刘景辉,米俊珍,等.植被复垦对露天煤矿排土场土壤化学及生物学特征影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):206-212
[8] 金立群,李希来,孙华方,等.不同恢复年限对高寒露天煤矿区渣山植被和土壤特性的影响[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(1):121-128
[9] 胡雷,阿的鲁骥,字洪标,等.高原鼢鼠扰动及恢复年限对高寒草甸土壤养分和微生物功能多样性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(9):2794-2802
[10] 王瑞宏,贾彤,曹苗文,等.铜尾矿坝不同恢复年限土壤理化性质和酶活性的特征[J].环境科学,2018(7):1-13
[11] MURPHY D V,STOCKDALE E A,BROOKES P C,et al. Impact of microorganisms on chemical transformations in soil[J]. Soil Biological Fertility,2007:37-59
[12] 赵吉,廖仰南.羊草草地分解者亚系统的特性及作用[J].生态学报,1995,15(4):359-364
[13] CHEN F,YANG B D,MA J,et al. Effects of CO₂ geo-logical storage leakage on soil microbial community[J]. Journal of China University of Mining&Technology,2016,45(6):1129-1138
[14] 阚海明,庞卓,陈超,等.北京西北浅山区退化草地植被恢复对土壤微生物群落多样性的影响[J].草地学报,2022,30(6):1350-1358
[15] CHEN X Y,WANG F,YAN J P,et al. Effects of soil cover thickness on diurnal variation of soil respiration during reclamation in mining area[J]. Journal of China University of Mining&Technology,2016,45(1):164-169
[16] AN L Y,LI J J,YAN J X,et al. Effects of microbial diversity on soil carbon mineralization[J]. Environmental Science,2017,38(10):4420-4426
[17] LI F L,LIU M,LI Z P,et al. Changes in soil microbial biomass and functional diversity with a nitrogen gradient in soil columns[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2013(34):1-6
[18] YANG N,YANG M Y,LEI Y L,et al. Seasonal variations of soil microbial communities on sloping-land with purple soils[J]. Ecology and Environmental Science,2015,24(1):34-40
[19] LI Y Y,CHEN L A,WEN H Y,et al. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of bacterial community structure in mine soil affected by mining subside[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology,2014(24):701-706
[20] SHARMA S K,RMESH A,SHARMA M P,et al. Microbial community structure and diversity as indicators for evaluating soil quality[J]. Biodiversity,Biofuels,Agroforestry and Conservation Agriculture,2011(5):317-358
[21] YAO H M,ZHANG S Y,ZHENG L,et al. Diversity of soil microbes in vineyard under two different cropping patterns[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Agricultural Science,2013,41(8):372-374
[22] 张菁,江山,王改玲.安太堡露天矿不同复垦年限苜蓿地土壤养分和酶活性剖面特征[J].灌溉排水学报,2018,37(1):42-48
[23] 熊亚,莫彩莲,刘园.攀枝花尾矿土壤微生物数量及土壤酶活性分析[J].广州化工,2017,45(10):132-135
[24] 马大龙,臧淑英,李莹,等.黑龙江省松茸生长地土壤微生物量及土壤酶活性研究[J].广东农业科学,2014,41(19):39-42
[25] 钟珍梅,杨庆,游小凤,等.圆叶决明添加量对红壤可溶性氮及酶活性的影响[J].草地学报,2022,30(3):622-630
[26] 田艳洪.简述长期施肥对土壤酶活性的影响[J].现代化农业,2019(8):36-38
[27] 魏丹,杨谦,迟凤琴.东北黑土区土壤资源现状与存在问题[J].黑龙江农业科学,2006(6):69-72
[28] 陈文新.土壤和环境微生物学[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1990:9-16
[29] 鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000:146-195
[30] 邵文山,李国旗.土壤酶功能及测定方法研究进展[J].北方园艺,2016(9):188-193
[31] 程立君,王磊,吴银梅,等.高通量测序技术分析光叶珙桐根际土壤微生物多样性[J].广东农业科学,2019,46(1):43-49
[32] 张小琴,赵华富,姜艳艳,等.不同植茶年限茶园土壤有效营养元素分析[J].热带作物学报,2017,38(12):2226-2231
[33] KUMAR S,MAID S K,CHAUDHURI S. Soil development in 2-21 years old coalmine reclaimed spoil with trees:A Case study from Sonepur-Bazari opencast project,Raniganj Coalfield,India[J]. Ecological Engineering,2015,84:311-324
[34] 杨鑫光,李希来,金立群,等.短期恢复下高寒矿区煤矸石山土壤变化特征研究[J].草业学报,2018,27(8):30-38
[35] 王锐,李希来,张静,等.不同覆土处理对青海木里煤田排土场渣山表层土壤基质特征的影响[J].草地学报,2019,27(5):1266-1276
[36] VERMA S,SHARMA P K. Effect of long-term manuring and fertilizers on carbon pools,soil structure,and sustainability under different cropping systems in wet-temperate zone of northwest Himalayas[J]. Biology&Fertility of Soils,2007,44:235-240
[37] 田小明,李俊华,危常州,等.连续3年施用生物有机肥对土壤有机质组分、棉花养分吸收及产量的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2012,18(5):1111-1118
[38] JING Z R,WANG J M,ZHU Y C,et al. Effects of land subsidence resulted from coal minim on soil nutrient distributions in a loess area of China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,177:350-361
[39] 田应兵,熊明彪,宋光煜.若尔盖高原湿地生态恢复过程中土壤有机质的变化研究[J].湿地科学,2004,2(2):88-93
[40] AHIRWAL J,MAITI S K,REDDY M S. Development of carbon,nitrogen and phosphate stocks of reclaimed coal mine soil within 8 years after forestation with Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) Dc[J]. Catena,2017,156:42-50
[41] TRIPATHI N,SINGH R S,HILLS C D. Soil carban development in rejuvenated Indian coal mine spoil[J]. Ecological Engineering,2016,90:482-490
[42] 樊文华,李慧峰,白中科.黄土区大型露天煤矿不同复垦模式和年限下土壤肥力的变化-以平朔安太堡露天煤矿为例[J].山西农业大学学报,2006,26(4):313-316
[43] ZHAO Z Q,SHAHROUR I,BAI Z K,et al. Soils development in opencast coal mine spoils reclaimed for 1-13 years in the West-Northern Loess Plateau of China[J]. Europrean Journal of Soil Biology,2013,55:40-46
[44] 李鹏飞,张兴昌,郝明德,等.植被恢复对黄土高原矿区重构土壤理化性质、酶活性以及真菌群落的影响[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(5):1-7
[45] 胡华英,张燕林,褚昭沛,等.红壤侵蚀区不同植被恢复阶段土壤酶活性和微生物多样性变化[J].应用与环境生物学报,2021,27(3):734-741
[46] ZHANG K R,CHENG X L,SHU X,et al. Linking soil bacterial and fungal communities to vegetation succession following agricultural abandonment[J]. Plant and Soil,2018,431(1-2):19-36
[47] 李媛媛.采煤塌陷地泥浆泵复垦土壤微生物多样性及土壤酶活性研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2015:1-131
[48] JOHNSON S S,HEBSGAARD M B,CHRISTENSEN T R,et al. Ancient bacteria show evidence of DNA repair[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy Sciences USA,2007,104(36):14401-14405
[49] 刘善江,夏雪,陈桂梅,等.土壤酶的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(21):1-7
[50] LAUBER C L,HAMADY M,KNIGHT R,et al. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2009,75(15):5111-5120
[51] 马转转,乔沙沙,曹苗文,等.环境选择和扩散限制驱动温带森林土壤细菌群落的构建[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(4):1179-1189
[52] 朱灵,李易,杨婉秋,等.沙化对高寒草地土壤碳、氮、酶活性及细菌多样性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):350-358

Effects of Construction Years of Coal Mine Slag Mountain Grass on Soil Bacterial Diversity

高寒煤矿渣山植被建植年限对土壤细菌多样性的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LI Ya-nan, LI Shao-yu, SHI Shi-bin, WANG Zhan-hai, ZHANG Bin, CHEN Heng, ZHAO Meng-li. Study on Soil Enzyme Stoichiometric Characteristics of Different Grazing Intensities in Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2239-2248.
[2]	LI Ya-nan, LI Shao-yu, SUN Yu, HU Xue-feng, HE Qi-shen, ZHANG Bin, ZHAO Meng-li. Responses of Soil Enzyme Activities and Stoichiometry Characteristics of Desert Steep to Different Stocking Rates [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8): 2019-2026.
[3]	HOU Lin-xiu, ZHANG Bin, SUN Hao-yu, XU Zhi-chao, WANG Yong-hui, WEN Lu, WANG Li-xin. Effects of Fencing,Grazing and Clipping on Nematode Communities in Typical Steppe of Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(7): 1738-1747.
[4]	LU Gang, HUANG Hai-xia, ZHOU Xiao-lei, CAO Xue-ping, ZHAO An. Characteristics of Soil Organic Carbon and Changes of Enzyme Activities in Burned Area of Spruce-Fir Forests in Diebu Forest Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(4): 943-949.
[5]	WANG Fang, LI Wei, LIU Xin, LI Wen-chen, ZHAO Jin-bo, ZHANG Zhi-hui, YANG Zhao. Bacteria Communities of Medicago sativa Rhizosphere Soil in Response to Composted Cow Manure [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(3): 603-611.
[6]	SUN Zhi-xuan, AO Ping-xing, BI Yu-fen, ZHAO Yan. Complete Chloroplast Genome Sequence and Characteristics Analysis of Medicago sativa ‘Deqin’ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 320-328.
[7]	ZHAO Yang-an, LU Guang-xin, DENG Ye, WANG Ying-cheng, MA Kun, YAN Hui-lin, ZHANG Hai-juan, ZHOU Xue-li, DOU Sheng-yun. Effect of Rhizobium Seed Dressing on Growth of Two Alfalfa and Rhizosphere Microbial Diversity [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 370-378.
[8]	WU Xue-mei, YANG Xue-yan, LIN Yuan-yuan, DAI Yi, CAO Le-le, DONG Wen-xuan, LIU Zeng-wen. Response of Humification of Robinia pseudoacacia and Pinus tabulaeformis Litter to Climate Temperature and Humidity Changes [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1738-1747.
[9]	WANG Ming-tao, FANG Jiang-ping, BAOSAI Hen-na, MIAO Yan-jun, WANG Xiang-tao, ZHAO Yu-hong, XIE Wen-dong, CANGMU De-ji. Effects of Continuous Utilization and Abandonment of Oat Grassland on Soil Characteristics of Alpine Grassland in Northern Tibet [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1801-1808.
[10]	WU Jian-bo, WANG Xiao-dan. Responses of Soil Enzyme Activities to Nitrogen Addition and Its Impact Factors at the Alpine Steppe of Northern Tibet [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 555-562.
[11]	WANG Xiao-yan, YAO Bao-hui, ZHANG Cai-jun, WANG Chan, SUN Xiao-mei, SU Jun-hu. Seasonal Changes of Soil Physicochemical Properties and Enzyme Activity of “Bare land” Degraded Meadow in Gannan [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 220-227.
[12]	SU Bei-bei, ZHANG Ying, DAO Ri-na. Study on the Distribution Characteristics of Bacterial Communities in the Rhizosphere Soil of Four Leguminous Cultivated Forages [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 250-258.
[13]	ZHANG Jie-xue, WANG Zhan-qing, QUAN Xiao-long, LIANG Jun, SHI Hui-lan, CHEN Meng-ci, QIAO You-ming. Responses of Soil Microbial Communities of Sown Perennial Grassland in Alpine Region to Different Sowing Ways and Growth Years [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 270-280.
[14]	SU Bei-bei, ZHANG Ying, DAO Ri-na. Correlation Analysis between Fungal Community Characteristics and Soil Physicochemcal Factors in the Rhizosphere of Four Legumes [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2670-2677.
[15]	LIU Chong-yi, JIN Xu-mei, WANG Ying-ying, LI Teng-fei, CHEN Xin-yi, CAO Xin-yue, LONG Ming-xiu, HE Shu-bin. Response of Soil Characteristics and Bacterial Communities to Cover Crops in Organic Kiwifruit Orchard in Guanzhong Plain,China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2711-2720.