Analysis of Agronomic Characters and Nutritional Quality of Different Germplasm Resources of Elymus sibiricus

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.12.022

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 3868-3876.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.12.022

Analysis of Agronomic Characters and Nutritional Quality of Different Germplasm Resources of Elymus sibiricus

XU Wan-ning¹, WANG Lu-wei¹, XIONG Jie¹, ZHANG Shu-zhen¹, YANG Jin-yu², LI Wei-si¹, HU Xiao-jing¹, ZHANG Bo¹

1. College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology in Western Arid Desert Region of Ministry of Education/Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology of Xinjiang, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China;
2. Research Institute of Soil Fertilizer and Agricultural Water Saving, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830091, China

Received:2024-03-07 Revised:2024-04-22 Published:2024-12-14

不同老芒麦种质资源农艺性状及营养品质分析

徐婉宁¹, 王露巍¹, 熊洁¹, 张树振¹, 杨金钰², 李维思¹, 胡晓静¹, 张博¹

1. 新疆农业大学草业学院/西部干旱荒漠区草地资源与生态教育部重点实验室/新疆草地资源与生态重点实验室, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052;
2. 新疆农业科学院土壤肥料与农业节水研究所, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830091

通讯作者: 张树振,E-mail:xjauzsz@163.com
作者简介:徐婉宁(1998-),女,汉族,吉林白山人,硕士研究生,主要从事牧草生产和老芒麦抗旱研究,E-mail:xwn0609@163.com;
基金资助:
自治区重点研发计划项目(2023B02031)；国家牧草产业技术体系(CARS-34)；青藏高原种质资源研究与利用实验室2023开放课题(2023-SYS-05)资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to select high-yielding and high-quality Elymus sibiricus germplasm that suitable to be cultivated in the arid and semi-arid areas of Xinjiang, 'Tongde’ (E-1) was used as the control material, and five wild Xinjiang Elymus sibiricus germplasm resources (E-2, E-3, E-4, E-5, E-6) were used as the experimental materials. The agronomic traits of each material, nutrition quality forage grass and forage yield were analyzed comparatively. The results showed that there were significant differences among the six tested materials in agronomic traits, forage nutritional quality and forage yield (P<0.05), among them E-3 was more prominent in agronomic traits and forage yield, and E-6 was more prominent in nutritional quality. The comprehensive analysis results showed that E-3 was more suitable to be used as high-yield Elymus sibiricus in arid and semi-arid areas of Xinjiang.

Key words: Elymus sibiricus L, Production property, Nutritional quality, Variety screening

摘要： 为筛选出适宜新疆干旱半干旱地区种植的高产优质老芒麦(Elymus sibiricus L.)种质，本研究以'同德’老芒麦(E-1)作为对照材料，以5个新疆野生老芒麦种质资源(E-2，E-3，E-4，E-5，E-6)作为参试材料，对各材料的农艺性状、饲草营养品质以及饲草产量进行分析比较，并运用相关性分析和灰色关联分析进行了综合评价。结果表明：供试的6个老芒麦种质资源的农艺性状、饲草营养品质以及饲草产量间均存在显著性差异(P<0.05)，其中E-3在农艺性状和饲草产量方面表现较为突出，E-6在营养品质方面表现较为突出。经综合分析表明，E-3更适宜作为高产型老芒麦在新疆干旱半干旱地区推广种植。

关键词: 老芒麦, 生产性能, 营养品质, 品种筛选

CLC Number:

S543.9

XU Wan-ning, WANG Lu-wei, XIONG Jie, ZHANG Shu-zhen, YANG Jin-yu, LI Wei-si, HU Xiao-jing, ZHANG Bo. Analysis of Agronomic Characters and Nutritional Quality of Different Germplasm Resources of Elymus sibiricus[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(12): 3868-3876.

徐婉宁, 王露巍, 熊洁, 张树振, 杨金钰, 李维思, 胡晓静, 张博. 不同老芒麦种质资源农艺性状及营养品质分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(12): 3868-3876.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.12.022

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2024/V32/I12/3868

References

[1] 曾翰国, 岳佳铭, 张曙恒, 等. 76份老芒麦种质资源的农艺性状综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11):3046-3055
[2] 张婷, 周睿, 陈雨生. 我国饲料粮供需缺口估算研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2022, 54(8):158-165
[3] 余静菠, 陈仕勇, 桑杰多吉, 等. 川西北高原短芒型老芒麦种质形态变异及遗传亲缘关系分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9):2787-2795
[4] 鄢家俊, 白史且, 常丹, 等. 青藏高原老芒麦种质遗传多样性的SSR分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(9):26-33
[5] 鄢家俊, 白史且, 张新全, 等. 青藏高原东南缘老芒麦自然居群遗传多样性的SRAP和SSR分析[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(4):122-134
[6] 鄢家俊, 白史且, 马啸, 等. 老芒麦遗传多样性及育种研究进展[J]. 植物学通报, 2007(2):226-231
[7] 胡卉芳, 崔乐乐, 王娟, 等. 老芒麦不同品系种子萌发期耐盐性[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(11):119-126
[8] 贾振宇. 老芒麦新种质创制及主要农艺性状关联分析[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2021:3-4
[9] 柳文蔚, 刘鑫, 雷映霞, 等. 老芒麦种质资源抗寒性综合评价及冷胁迫下的生理反应[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(8):152-163
[10] 吴瑞, 刘文辉, 张永超, 等. 青藏高原地区不同老芒麦种质资源生产性能评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21(4):855-865
[11] 刘新亮. 两种披碱草属牧草种质资源遗传多样性研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2011:27
[12] 李欣瑞, 陈淑娴, 鄢家俊, 等. 老芒麦种质资源研究进展[J]. 草学, 2021(1):6-17
[13] 任春燕, 刘文辉, 梁国玲, 等. 青藏高原六种披碱草属牧草落粒性差异及农艺性状分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4):1008-1015
[14] 熊潮慧, 马啸, 白史且, 等. 老芒麦野生种质的形态和农艺性状多样性研究[J]. 草业与畜牧, 2010(9):10-13
[15] 闫志勇, 周青平, 刘文辉, 等. 青藏高原6份披碱草属牧草农艺性状及生产性能评价[J]. 草业科学, 2014, 31(1):108-115
[16] 何旭阳, 杨振安, 张桥英. 青藏高寒草甸3种牧草营养成分和饲用价值比较[J]. 草学, 2019(4):34-37
[17] 中国农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所. GB/T 6432-2018 饲料中粗蛋白的测定-凯氏定氮法[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2018:1-4
[18] 国家饲料质量监督检验中心(武汉). GB/T 6438-2007 饲料中粗灰分的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2007:1-2
[19] 国家饲料质量监督检验中心(武汉). GB/T 6433-2006 饲料中粗脂肪的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2006:1-3
[20] 张崇玉, 张桂国, 杨泉, 等. 饲料中性洗涤纤维(NDF)和酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)快速测定方法在生产中的应用[J]. 山东畜牧兽医, 2021, 42(7):20-24
[21] 李满有, 杨彦军, 王斌, 等. 干旱地区滴灌条件下燕麦与箭筈豌豆混播模式研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(12):51-57
[22] 陈乐乐, 施建军, 王彦龙, 等. 高寒地区禾本科牧草生产力适应性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(5):1073-1079
[23] 张光雨, 沈振西, 邵小明, 等. 西藏当雄10个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4):1083-1089
[24] 邓聚龙. 灰色系统与农业[J]. 山西农业科学, 1985(5):34-37
[25] 丁琼, 解关琦, 张欢, 等. 成都平原地区4个高丹草品种的生产性能比较[J]. 草业科学, 2021, 38(12):2421-2428
[26] 王运涛, 杨志敏, 刘建成, 等. 冀西北地区21个燕麦品种生产性能与营养品质综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5):1311-1318
[27] 黄帆, 李志勇, 李鸿雁, 等. 老芒麦种质资源形态多样性分析[J]. 中国草地学报, 2015, 37(3):111-115
[28] 汪建军, 汪治刚, 麻安卫, 等.温度和水分对中华羊茅幼苗生长的影响[J].草业学报, 2016, 25(8):65-73
[29] 杨富, 郑敏娜, 康佳惠, 等. 9个燕麦品种在晋北地区的生产性能及饲用价值综合评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2019(2):94-98
[30] 王茜, 李志坚, 李晶, 等. 不同类型燕麦农艺和饲草品质性状分析[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(12):149-158
[31] 陈谷, 邰建辉. 美国商业应用中的牧草质量及质量标准[J]. 中国牧业通讯, 2010(11):48-49
[32] 石岳, 马殷雷, 马文红, 等. 中国草地的产草量和牧草品质:格局及其与环境因子之间的关系[J]. 科学通报, 2013, 58(3):226-239
[33] 杨曌, 张新全, 李向林, 等. 应用灰色关联度综合评价17个不同秋眠级苜蓿的生产性能[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(5):67-72
[34] 郑敏娜, 李荫藩, 梁秀芝, 等. 晋北地区引种苜蓿品种的灰色关联度分析与综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(3):631-637

Analysis of Agronomic Characters and Nutritional Quality of Different Germplasm Resources of Elymus sibiricus

不同老芒麦种质资源农艺性状及营养品质分析

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	DONG Zhi-xiao, XIONG Yi, XIONG Yan-li, ZHAO Jun-ming, ZHANG Jian-bo, PENG Jing-han, CHEN Shu-ming, MIN wei, YU QING-qing, MA Xiao. Evaluation of Production Performance and Nutritional Value of Eleven Forage Sorghum Varieties in Liangshan Prefecture [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(9): 2934-2942.
[2]	ZHU Hao, ZHANG Hui-hui, ZHANG Xue-zhou, LIANG Wei-wei, ASIYA Manlike, GUAN Ting-xian, WANG Xue-min. Comprehensive Evaluation of Production Performance of 15 Introduced Forage Oat Varieties in Changji,Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(7): 2151-2157.
[3]	CHAI Yu-xin, JIA Shu-an, ZHANG Tian, LI Xiao, CHEN Yong-cheng, HUANG Rong-zheng, ZHANG Fan-fan. Effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on Silage Quality of Urtica cannabina and Rumen Degradation Characteristics of Sheep [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(7): 2283-2289.
[4]	YUE Jing-zhi, SUN Mi-ping, CHEN Li, ZHANG Qing-she, NIU Xiao-pei, ZHANG Yue-ling, DU Wen-hua, XIAO Xing-zhong, CAI You-min. Effects of Mowing Methods on Forage Yield and Nutritional Quality of Triticale in Northwest Henan Province,China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(7): 2297-2304.
[5]	YE Yu-nong, YU Shu-yan, WANG Xing, SONG Wen-xue, WANG Jing, HU Peng-fei, WANG Tong-rui, GAO Xue-qin, FU Bing-zhe. Effect of Irrigation Methods and Phosphorus on the Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(5): 1592-1600.
[6]	BAO Wen-long, REN Jia-hui, ZHANG Teng-wei, ZHAO Jin-mei, WANG Zhao-lan, WANG Feng-wu, TANG Jia-gao, YIN Guo-mei, HAN Yun-peng, SUN Juan-juan. Comprehensive Evaluation of Productivity of 12 Forage Oat Varieties in Ulanqab [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(4): 1169-1176.
[7]	NAN Ding-han, GE Gen-tu, WANG Zhi-jun, ZHAO Mu-qi-er, YAN Xing-quan, ZHU Na. Study on Optimal Modeling Method for Nutritional Quality of Multi-Flowered Ryegrass [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(2): 610-619.
[8]	WANG Yu, LI Qi-zheng, MA Xiao-dong, WANG Bin, WANG Teng-fei, LAN Jian, ZHANG Yu. Effects of Different Sowing and Cutting Periods Study on the Production Performance and Nutritional Value of Triticosecale Wittmack in Rain-fed Area of Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(2): 637-645.
[9]	ZHANG Xin-yong, LI Shao-wei, LIU Zeng-hui, CHEN Lin-yao, WU Jian-shuang. Nutritional Quality of Common Forage Species and Their Influences across Natural Alpine Rangelands,Northern Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(12): 3797-3806.
[10]	MA Biao, NAN Li-li, WANG Xue-min, WANG Kun, XIA Jing, YAO Yu-heng. Analyses of Agronomic and Quality Traits of 30 Alfalfa Germplasm Resources [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(12): 3845-3854.
[11]	WANG Ming, SHI Shang-li, CHENG Xi, WEI Bing-huan, YANG Bo-xiang, ZHOU Ting-ting, KANG Wen-juan, LIU Lin-bo. Evaluation of Production Performance and Nutritional Value of ‘Qingshui’ Male Sterile Sterile Line and Male Parent Varieties of Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(11): 3480-3489.
[12]	WU Qiong, YAO Ze-ying, WEI Xiao-ting, LU Xin-ming, WU Rui-xin, YOU Yong-liang, HU Meng-ai, SHI Li-na, SHI Yu-chuan, LI Yuan, ZHAO Hai-ming, HAN Jia-yi, SHAO Xin-qing. Effects of Water and Fertilizer Cooperation on Production Performance and Quality of Legume-Grass Mixed Pasture in North China Plain [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(11): 3547-3553.
[13]	YU Ai-ping, JIANG Ang-chen, ZHANG Hao-hao, CHEN Ai-ping. Comparison and Comprehensive Evaluation of Agronomic Traits and Qroductivity of 14 Bromus inermis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(10): 3205-3214.
[14]	ZHAO Ya-jiao, LIU Xiao-jing, LIN Fang. Effects of Different Intercropping Systems with Forage Combinations on Their Nutrition and Feeding Quality in Lanzhou Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(10): 3241-3251.
[15]	LI Qing-pu, BAI Jian-hai, YAO Tuo, LEI Yang, ZHOU Ze, ZHANG Chen, FU Wei-gang. Effects of the Combined Application of Microbial Inoculant and Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction on the Growth, and Soil Physicochemical Properties of Alfalfa in Hexi Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 314-321.