Comprehensive Evaluation of Productivity of 12 Forage Oat Varieties in Ulanqab

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.04.020

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 1169-1176.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.04.020

Comprehensive Evaluation of Productivity of 12 Forage Oat Varieties in Ulanqab

BAO Wen-long¹, REN Jia-hui¹, ZHANG Teng-wei¹, ZHAO Jin-mei¹, WANG Zhao-lan¹, WANG Feng-wu², TANG Jia-gao³, YIN Guo-mei⁴, HAN Yun-peng⁵, SUN Juan-juan¹

1. Institute of Grassland Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Inner Mongolia Academy of Grassland and Grassland, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010010, China;
2. Ulanqab City Institute of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Ulanqab, Inner Mongolia 012000, China;
3. Shangdu County Amila Agricultural Technology Company, Shangdu County, Inner Mongolia 013450, China;
4. Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010031, China;
5. Ulanqab Science and Technology Development Center, Ulanqab, Inner Mongolia 012001, China

Received:2023-12-21 Revised:2024-02-23 Published:2024-05-07

12个饲用燕麦品种在乌兰察布生产力的综合评价

包文龙¹, 任家辉¹, 张腾薇¹, 赵金梅¹, 王照兰¹, 王凤梧², 唐加高³, 殷国梅⁴, 韩云鹏⁵, 孙娟娟¹

1. 中国农业科学院草原研究所/内蒙古草业与草原研究院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010010;
2. 乌兰察布市农林科学研究所, 内蒙古乌兰察布 012000;
3. 商都县啊咪啦农业科技公司, 内蒙古商都 013450;
4. 内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010031;
5. 乌兰察布市科学技术事业发展中心, 内蒙古乌兰察布 012001

通讯作者: 孙娟娟,E-mail:sunjuanjuan@caas.cn
作者简介:包文龙(1997-)，男，汉族，甘肃天水人，硕士研究生，主要从事饲草生产加工及利用方面研究，E-mail：b18515229877@163.com
基金资助:
内蒙古自治区燕麦藜麦产业技术创新推广体系岗位科学家项目；乌兰察布揭榜挂帅项目(2022 JB008)；中国农业科学院创新工程(CAAS-ASTIP-IGR)；国家牧草产业技术体系(CARS-34)资助

Abstract

Abstract: The agronomic characteristics,yield traits,and nutritional quality of 12 domestic and foreign oat varieties were analyzed to select high-quality forage oat varieties for widespread cultivation under dry farming conditions in the Wulanqab area. The results revealed significant variations in yield traits among different oat varieties in the Ulanqab area. 'Baiyan No.1’'Pepis’'Morden’ and 'Madison’ exhibited exceeding 20 000 kg·hm^-2 fresh grass yields. 'Madison’ showed the highest hay yield,more than 5 892.23 kg·hm^-2. 'Diang’ and 'Youmu No.1’ had the highest dry-fresh ratio. Dion,Hummer,and 'Youmu No.1’ displayed the highest crude protein content while 'Monica’ had the lowest acid detergent fiber content and 'Hummer’ had the lowest neutral detergent fiber content. 'Hummer’ and 'Monica’ showed the highest relative feeding value. Leaf proportion exerted significant influence on oat quality and demonstrated positive correlation with crude protein content and relative feeding value (P＜0.05). Grey correlation degree analysis indicated that stem diameter,plant height,hay yield,spike ratio,and crude protein content were the top five influential factors out of sixteen indexes. Considering comprehensive production performance along with nutritional quality performance while prioritizing high yield combined with high quality attributes,'Hummer’'Dieng’ and 'Youmu No.1’ were recommended for cultivation in Ulanqab region.

Key words: Feed oats, Production performance, Nutritional quality, Grey correlation degree

摘要： 为筛选适合在乌兰察布地区旱作条件下推广种植的优质饲用燕麦(Avena sativa L.)品种，对12个国内外燕麦品种的农艺性状、产量性状和营养品质进行测定分析。结果表明：不同燕麦品种在乌兰察布地区的产量性状差异较大，'白燕1号’'百事’'摩登’和'麦迪逊’4个品种的鲜草产量超过了20 000 kg·hm^-2，干草产量'麦迪逊’最高达5 892.23 kg·hm^-2，干鲜比最高的是'迪昂’和'优牧1号’；粗蛋白含量最高的品种是'迪昂’'悍马’和'优牧1号’，酸性洗涤纤维最低的是'莫妮卡’，中性洗涤纤维最低的是'悍马’，相对饲喂价值最高的为'悍马’和'莫妮卡’。叶占比对于燕麦品质的影响显著，与粗蛋白和相对饲喂价值呈显著正相关(P＜0.05)。灰色关联度分析结果表明，16个指标中权重系数排在前5位分别是茎粗、株高、干草产量、穗占比和粗蛋白含量。综合生产性能和营养品质表现，兼顾高产优质，乌兰察布地区推荐'悍马’'迪昂’和'优牧1号’。

关键词: 饲用燕麦, 生产性能, 营养品质, 灰色关联度

CLC Number:

S512.6

BAO Wen-long, REN Jia-hui, ZHANG Teng-wei, ZHAO Jin-mei, WANG Zhao-lan, WANG Feng-wu, TANG Jia-gao, YIN Guo-mei, HAN Yun-peng, SUN Juan-juan. Comprehensive Evaluation of Productivity of 12 Forage Oat Varieties in Ulanqab[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(4): 1169-1176.

包文龙, 任家辉, 张腾薇, 赵金梅, 王照兰, 王凤梧, 唐加高, 殷国梅, 韩云鹏, 孙娟娟. 12个饲用燕麦品种在乌兰察布生产力的综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1169-1176.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.04.020

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2024/V32/I4/1169

References

[1] 郑殿升. 中国燕麦的多样性[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2010,11(3):249-252
[2] 刘彦明,南铭,边芳,等. 11个燕麦品种在甘肃中部干旱半干旱地区的表现[J]. 甘肃农业科技,2017,501(9):33-36
[3] 刘欢,赵桂琴. 燕麦抗逆性研究进展[J]. 草原与草坪,2007,125(6):63-68
[4] 周启龙. 西藏阿里19个燕麦引进品种的灰色关联度评价[J]. 作物杂志,2021,200(1):26-31
[5] 赵祎伟,马祥,张然,等. 青海东部农区高产优质燕麦品种筛选[J]. 草业科学,2020,37(3):532-541
[6] 柴继宽,赵桂琴,师尚礼. 7个燕麦品种在甘肃二阴区的适应性评价[J]. 草原与草坪,2011,31(2):1-6
[7] 张杰,闫志坚,尹强,等. 22种燕麦饲草品种在达拉特地区的评价与筛选[J]. 中国草地学报,2020,42(6):134-140
[8] 张晴晴,梁庆伟,杨秀芳,等. 12份燕麦品种在阿鲁科尔沁旗地区的生产性能研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报,2020,48(3):23-29,38
[9] 王国良,吴波,张进红,等. 黄河三角洲地区不同品种燕麦生产性能比较[J]. 中国草地学报,2020,42(6):141-148
[10] 孙娟娟.青贮饲料质量检测实用手册[M]. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2017:14-31
[11] 孙娟娟,王国良,阿拉木斯,等. 苜蓿方捆袋贮饲料品质评价[J]. 中国农业科学,2018,51(13):2592-2599
[12] GOTO I,MINSON D. Prediction of the dry matter digestibility of tropical grasses using a pepsin-cellulase essay[J]. Animal feed Science and Technology,1977,(2):247-253
[13] ROHWEDER,D,A,et al. Proposed Hay Grading Standards Based on Laboratory Analyses for Evaluating Quality[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1978,47(3):747
[14] 姜慧新,柏杉杉,吴波,等. 22个燕麦品种在黄淮海地区的农艺性状与饲草品质综合评价[J]. 草业学报,2021,30(1):140-149
[15] 孙建平,董宽虎,蒯晓妍,等. 晋北农牧交错区引进燕麦品种生产性能及饲用价值比较[J]. 草业学报,2017,26(11):222-230
[16] 王霞,赵金花,李青丰,等. 5个饲用燕麦品种在乌兰察布不同地区的品质性状比较分析[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2021,613(1):118-123
[17] 王筱,李夺,潘翔磊,等. 赤峰半干旱区10个饲用燕麦品种适应性评价[J]. 草业科学,2023,40(2):521-529
[18] 张冉,徐震,王文,等. 11个燕麦品种在迪庆地区的生产性能和适应性评价[J]. 中国草地学报,2023,45(5):32-40
[19] 孙建平,薛竹慧,杨国义,等. 施氮对晋北燕麦饲草主要农艺性状及干物质产量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(4):964-970
[20] 徐远东,朱瑞芬,冉启凡,等. 19份燕麦品种(系)在重庆地区的生产性能与饲用价值综合评价[J]. 饲料研究,2022,45(19):109-113
[21] 田慧慧,侯启雷,王万涛,等. 不同饲用燕麦品种在兰州新区新开垦山地的适应性评价[J]. 中国草食动物科学,2023,43(4):41-45
[22] 侯建杰,赵桂琴,焦婷,等. 6个燕麦品种(系)在甘肃夏河地区的适应性评价[J]. 草原与草坪,2013,33(2):26-32,37
[23] 张清平,田莉华,蒋海亮,等. 甘肃陇东黄土高原一年生饲草生产性能综合评价研究[J]. 中国草地学报,2014,36(2):25-28
[24] 徐欣然,范昱,刘思源,等. 燕麦饲草多组分营养差异分析[J]. 中国草地学报,2021,43(1):43-49
[25] 王鹏,马垭杰,甘辉林,等. 祁连山北麓14个饲用燕麦生产性能及饲用价值评价[J].畜牧兽医杂志,2022,41(6):95-98,100
[26] 娄春华,王博,李德锋,等. 黄河滩区16个春播燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(7):1843-1851
[27] 贾存辉,钱文熙,吐尔逊阿依·赛买提,等. 粗饲料营养价值指数及评定方法[J]. 草业科学,2017,34(2):415-427
[28] 凌树礼. 应用RFV评价鄂尔多斯荒漠草原优势牧草营养价值[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学,2014,35(10):15-16,19
[29] 曹丽霞,赵世锋,石碧红,等. 6个饲用燕麦品种不同刈割期的产草量比较[J]. 河北农业科学,2017,21(6):11-16
[30] 周磊,王璐,赵宝平,等. 北方农牧交错区不同播期和刈割期对燕麦饲草产量和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(10):2355-2363
[31] 付东青,王彦超,毛家乡,等. 山区旱作条件下不同燕麦品种品质分析及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学,2022,59(2):344-352
[32] 王运涛,杨志敏,刘建成,等. 冀西北地区21个燕麦品种生产性能与营养品质综合评价[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(5):1311-1318
[33] 徐长林. 高寒牧区不同燕麦品种生长特性比较研究[J]. 草业学报,2012,21(2):280-285

Comprehensive Evaluation of Productivity of 12 Forage Oat Varieties in Ulanqab

12个饲用燕麦品种在乌兰察布生产力的综合评价

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	HE Peng-liang, JIE Hong-dong, ZHU Ning-jing, LUO Zi-xuan, XU Yan, XIE Zhi-yu, XING Hu-cheng, JIE Yu-cheng. Comparison of Silage Maize Production Performance in the Eastern and Western Regions of Hunan Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(3): 977-984.
[2]	GAO Shan, YAN Chen-ming, WAN Chang, REN Wei, GUO Xing-yu, YU Hong-zhu, WANG Zhi-feng. Comprehensive Evaluation of Germplasm Resources of Leymus Chinensis Based on Grey Correlation Method and DTOPSIS Method [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(2): 599-609.
[3]	NAN Ding-han, GE Gen-tu, WANG Zhi-jun, ZHAO Mu-qi-er, YAN Xing-quan, ZHU Na. Study on Optimal Modeling Method for Nutritional Quality of Multi-Flowered Ryegrass [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(2): 610-619.
[4]	WANG Yu, LI Qi-zheng, MA Xiao-dong, WANG Bin, WANG Teng-fei, LAN Jian, ZHANG Yu. Effects of Different Sowing and Cutting Periods Study on the Production Performance and Nutritional Value of Triticosecale Wittmack in Rain-fed Area of Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(2): 637-645.
[5]	LI Qing-pu, BAI Jian-hai, YAO Tuo, LEI Yang, ZHOU Ze, ZHANG Chen, FU Wei-gang. Effects of the Combined Application of Microbial Inoculant and Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction on the Growth, and Soil Physicochemical Properties of Alfalfa in Hexi Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 314-321.
[6]	ZHENG Ming-li, MAO Pei-chun, TIAN Xiao-xia, ZHANG Su-han, MENG Lin. Effects of Grazed in the Artificial Mixture under Forest on Muscle Nutritional Quality and Intestinal Microflora of Beijing-you Chickens [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(8): 2352-2360.
[7]	ZHOU Li, FU Wei, QING Tao-ying, MENG Jun-jiang, GUI Yong-qing, REN Jian-hua, HAN Yong-fen, DING Lei-lei. Effects of Fertilizer Application on the Yield,Forage Quality and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanense with Dolichos lablab Intercropping System [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1754-1761.
[8]	WANG Yi-bo, CHEN Yi-tong, LIU Xin-di, GUO Yong-zhen, SUN Juan, ZHANG Hui, LI Yuan-yuan, GUO Shan-li. Study on Adaptability of Forage Chenopodium quinoa in Saline-alkali Land of Yellow River Delta [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1810-1817.
[9]	XU Jun-zhao, WANG Qi, HU Zong-fu, WU Bai-yila, NIU Hua-xin. Effects of Different Processing Methods of Corn Straw-as a Based Rations on Growth Performance,Apparent Nutrient Digestibility,Rumen Fermentation and Microbial Composition of Beef Cattle [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1894-1901.
[10]	XIE Le-le, WANG Xiao-li, MA Yuan, MA Yu-shou, WANG Yan-long, ZHOU Xuan-bo. Effect of the No-Grazing practice in Regreening Period on the Quality and Stoichiometric Ratio of C,N,P of Plant Community in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1454-1460.
[11]	LIU Man, QIN Yan, LIU Wen-hui, ZHANG Yong-chao, WU Yu-han, QI Hui-fang. Evaluation on and Screening of Production Performance of Bromus inermis Resources in Alpine Regions of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1469-1480.
[12]	YANG Min, XU Shu-hua, RAO Xiong, GAO Xing-fa, XUE Wei, WU Xin-jia, YAN Yi-dan, XU Li-jun, FU Ting-fei, QIAO Zheng-lin. Evaluation of Agronomic Traits and Nutritional quality of Forage Oats in the Wumeng Mountain Cold Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1071-1080.
[13]	LI Jing, NAN Ming, LIU Yan-ming, ZHANG Cheng-jun, REN Sheng-lan, BIAN Fang. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Yield,Quality and Feeding Performance on Different Oat Varieties [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1089-1098.
[14]	CHEN San-dong, GUN Hai-qiang, YIN Guo-li, SHI Shang-li. Nutrient Quality and Bacterial Community Diversity of Silage Corn During Aerobic Exposure [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(2): 388-395.
[15]	YAO Jin, HE Yun, LU Jia-ding, ZHANG Xiao-xia, CUI Ya-lei, MA Sen, WANG Zhi-chang, ZHU Xiao-yan, SHI Ying-hua, LI De-feng, SUN Hao. Winter Survival Rate,Tillering Characteristics,and Production Performance of Autumn-Sown Forage Oats in Henan Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(2): 528-539.