Effects of Different Processing Methods of Corn Straw-as a Based Rations on Growth Performance,Apparent Nutrient Digestibility,Rumen Fermentation and Microbial Composition of Beef Cattle

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.06.034

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 1894-1901.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.06.034

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Different Processing Methods of Corn Straw-as a Based Rations on Growth Performance,Apparent Nutrient Digestibility,Rumen Fermentation and Microbial Composition of Beef Cattle

XU Jun-zhao, WANG Qi, HU Zong-fu, WU Bai-yila, NIU Hua-xin

College of Animal Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia Minzu University, Tongliao, Inner Mongolia 028000, China

Received:2022-12-16 Revised:2023-02-23 Online:2023-06-15 Published:2023-06-30

不同加工方式玉米秸秆型饲粮对肉牛生长性能、养分表观消化率、瘤胃发酵和菌群结构的影响

徐均钊, 王琦, 胡宗福, 吴白乙拉, 牛化欣

内蒙古民族大学动物科技学院, 内蒙古通辽 028000

通讯作者: 牛化欣,E-mail:niuhx@imun.edu.cn
作者简介:徐均钊(1996-)，男，汉族，内蒙古赤峰市人，硕士研究生，从事反刍动物营养与饲料利用，E-mail:xujunzhao1124@163.com
基金资助:
内蒙古自治区关键技术攻关项目(2020GG0108和2021GG0035)；内蒙古民族大学研究生科研创新项目(NMDSS2144);内蒙古自治区高等学校青年科技英才支持计划(NJYT22054)；内蒙古民族大学博士启动基金(BS635)；内蒙古民族大学肉牛科技创新团队项目资助

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the effects of various pretreated corn straw-as a based total mixed rations (TMR) on the performance and rumen microbial flora structure of beef cattle. Twenty-eight Simmental crossbred steers (350.23±23.17 kg) were randomly assigned to four groups,each containing seven steers. The groups were fed TMR as the containing kneaded straw (JG group),the puffed straw (PH group),the straw yellow silage (HZ group),and the whole corn silage (QZ group) for a pretest period of 10 days followed by a positive test period of 56 days. The results showed that the average daily weight gain,dry matter intake,dry matter digestibility,acid detergent fiber digestibility,rumen propionic acid content,and relative abundance of Prevotella_1 of beef cattle in the QZ and HZ groups were significantly higher (P<0.05) than those in the JG and PH group. Additionally,the relative abundance of Ruminococcaceae_NK4A214_group was significantly lower (P<0.05) in the HZ and QZ groups compared to the JG and PH groups. Prevotella _1 showed a significant positive correlation with propionic acid (P<0.05),and Ruminococcaceae_NK4A214_group exhibited a significant positive correlation with acetic acid and A/P ratio (P<0.05). Thus,whole corn silage and bacteria-enzyme synergism yellow silage significantly improved the nutritional value and apparent digestibility of stover,effectively enhanced rumen fermentation and cellulose-degrading bacterial composition,and ultimately led to better productive performance in beef cattle.

Key words: Corn straw, Corn silage, Beef cattle, Production performance, Rumen microbes

摘要： 为探究不同预处理玉米秸秆型全混合日粮(TMR)对肉牛生产性能和菌群结构的影响，本研究选取28头(350.23±23.17)kg西门塔尔杂交公牛，随机分为4组，每组7头，分别饲喂含揉丝秸秆(Containing kneaded straw group,JG组)、膨化微贮秸秆(Puffed straw group,PH组)、菌酶协同秸秆黄贮(Straw yellow silage group,HZ组)和全株玉米青贮(Whole corn silage group,QZ组)的TMR，预试期10 d，正试期56 d。结果表明：较JG和PH组，QZ和HZ组肉牛的平均日增重、干物质采食量、干物质消化率、酸性洗涤纤维消化率、瘤胃丙酸含量和普雷沃氏菌属_1(Prevotella_1)相对丰度显著提高(P<0.05)；而瘤胃球菌NK4A214群(Ruminococcaceae_NK4A214_group)的相对丰度显著降低(P<0.05)。普雷沃氏菌属_1与丙酸呈显著正相关(P<0.05)，瘤胃球菌NK4A214群与乙酸和乙丙比(A/P)呈显著正相关(P<0.05)。因此，全株玉米青贮和菌酶协同玉米秸秆黄贮能显著提高秸秆的营养价值和表观消化率，有效改善瘤胃发酵和纤维素降解菌组成，提高肉牛的生产性能。

关键词: 玉米秸秆, 青贮玉米, 肉牛, 生产性能, 瘤胃微生物

CLC Number:

S548

XU Jun-zhao, WANG Qi, HU Zong-fu, WU Bai-yila, NIU Hua-xin. Effects of Different Processing Methods of Corn Straw-as a Based Rations on Growth Performance,Apparent Nutrient Digestibility,Rumen Fermentation and Microbial Composition of Beef Cattle[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1894-1901.

徐均钊, 王琦, 胡宗福, 吴白乙拉, 牛化欣. 不同加工方式玉米秸秆型饲粮对肉牛生长性能、养分表观消化率、瘤胃发酵和菌群结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1894-1901.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.06.034

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2023/V31/I6/1894

References

[1] 司丙文. 开发农副饲料资源助力草食畜牧业快速发展[J]. 中国畜牧业,2021(17):23-24
[2] 陈浩铭. 龙井地区玉米青贮生产情况和质量情况调查研究报告[D]. 延边:延边大学,2022:6-7
[3] 梁运祥,胡宝娥,陈宏声,等. 利用生物技术，加快秸秆“高值饲料化”转化，促进草食畜牧业发展[J]. 饲料工业,2022,43(12):1-9
[4] 李彦军,郑楠,王加启,等. 秸秆饲料的蒸汽爆破预处理技术研究进展[J]. 动物营养学报,2021,33(12):6676-6683
[5] NIE D,YAO L,XU X,et al. Promoting corn stover degradation via sequential processing of steam explosion and cellulose/ lactic acid bacteria-assisted ensilag [J]. Bioresources Technology,2021,33(7):125392-125392
[6] 冉福,焦婷,雷赵民,等.不同汽爆处理下玉米秸秆品质综合评价[J].草地学报,2020,28(3):835-843
[7] 王玉婷. 膨化微贮玉米秸秆营养价值的评定及其对肉牛生产性能的影响[D]. 长春:吉林农业大学,2019:19-20
[8] GUO G,SHEN C,LIU Q,et al. The effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculums on in vitro rumen fermentation,methane production,ruminal cellulolytic bacteria populations and cellulase activities of corn stover silage [J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2020,19(3):838-847
[9] 白大洋,温媛媛,李艺,等. 玉米秸秆黄贮为主型粗饲料的饲粮能量水平对西门塔尔杂交牛生长性能、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响[J]. 动物营养学报,2021,33(9):5064-5075
[10] 孙雪丽,李秋凤,刘英财,等. 全株青贮玉米对西门塔尔杂交牛生产性能、表观消化率及血液生化指标的影响[J]. 草业学报,2018,27(9):201-209
[11] 孟庆翔,周振明,吴浩. 肉牛营养学要[M]. 第8版.北京:科学出版社,2018:136-138
[12] 张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 第2版.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2007:20-68
[13] 张义顺. 植物生理学实验教程[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2009:21-23
[14] VAN SOEST P J,ROBERTSON J B,LEWIS B A. Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-3597
[15] 王晋莉,杨瑞娥,高照平. 不同处理玉米秸育肥肉牛效果比较[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2008(3):320-323，337
[16] 肖蕊,赵祥,岳勇伟,等. 肉牛饲喂不同处理玉米秸秆日粮营养物质消化和生产效益的差异比较[J]. 中国农学通报,2009,25(3):8-12
[17] 薛宵,牛岩,蔡阿敏,等. 不同类型玉米青贮的粗饲料组合对肉牛生长性能、营养物质表观消化率及血清生化指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报,2019,31(9):4070-4079
[18] 陈跃鹏. 全株玉米与玉米秸秆青贮品质评价及对肉牛生长性能和瘤胃微生物区系的影响[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2018:23-24
[19] 张智安,周文静,潘发明,等. 粗饲料中不同全株玉米青贮比例对湖羊生长性能、养分表观消化率、肉品质及血液生理指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报,2021,33(9):4998-5006
[20] KING K J,BERGEN W G,SNIFFEN C J,et al. An assessment of absorbable lysine requirements in lactating cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(8):2530-2539
[21] 毛建红. 酶—菌制剂发酵玉米秸秆对其瘤胃降解及微观结构的影响[D]. 阿拉尔:塔里木大学,2018:39-40
[22] 王红梅,屠焰,司丙文,等. 不同配伍酶制剂处理玉米秸秆对肉用绵羊生长性能和营养物质消化率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2016,49(24):4806-4813
[23] 冯鹏,吴宏达,孟凡坤,等. 外源生物制剂对玉米秸秆青贮质量及肉羊瘤胃降解率的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2022,27(1):134-144
[24] 吕竑建,邹璇,吴硕,等. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(6):1343-1349
[25] 张祖立,朱永文,刘晓峰,等. 螺杆挤压膨化机加工农作物秸秆的试验研究[J]. 农业工程学报,2001,17(6):97-101
[26] 赵国宏,王世琴,王芬,等. 湖羊育肥期饲粮添加酵母培养物对营养物质表观消化率及瘤胃发酵参数的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报,2019,50(10):2156-2165
[27] 张兴夫,钱英红,李国东,等. 不同粗饲料日粮对西门塔尔繁殖母牛瘤胃发酵和血液指标的影响[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学,2022,43(5):22-28
[28] 李岚捷,成述儒,刁其玉,等. 不同NFC/NDF水平饲粮对犊牛瘤胃发酵参数和微生物区系多样性的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报,2017,48(12):2347-2357
[29] ORSKOV E R,GRUBB D A,SMITH J S,et al. Efficiency of utilization of volatile fatty acids for maintenance and energy retention by sheep [J]. British Journal of Nutrition,1979,41(3):541-51
[30] 屈雷宇,金楚砚,李可人,等. 富硒乳酸菌发酵秸秆对延边黄牛瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 饲料工业,2022,43(23):44-50
[31] 姚喜喜,陈永珑,徐成体,等. 日粮能量水平对牦牛生产性能、肉品质和瘤胃菌群的影响[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(2):432-439
[32] REN Z,YAO R,LIU Q,et al. Effects of antibacterial peptides on rumen fermentation function and rumen microorganisms in goats [J]. PLoS One,2019,14(8):e0221815
[33] CUI Y,LIU H,GAO Z,et al. Whole-plant corn silage improves rumen fermentation and growth performance of beef cattle by altering rumen microbiota[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2022,106(11):4187-4198
[34] 张洁,张力莉,徐晓锋. 反刍动物瘤胃内普雷沃氏菌的研究进展[J]. 中国饲料,2020(7):17-21
[35] VAN GYLSWYK N O. Succiniclasticum ruminis gen. nov.,sp. nov.,a ruminal bacterium converting succinate to propionate as the sole energy-yielding mechanism [J]. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology,1995,45(2):297-300
[36] 庞凯悦,柴沙驼,王迅,等. 饲粮精粗比对牦牛瘤胃菌群结构的影响[J]. 草业科学,2022,39(10):1-10
[37] LI J,LIAN H,ZHENG A,et al. Effects of different roughages on growth performance,nutrient digestibility,ruminal fermentation,and microbial community in weaned Holstein calves[J]. Frontiers in Veterinary Science,2022,9:864320
[38] 王亚玲,孔鹏辉,袁冬冬,等. 饲粮添加乙酸钠对奶山羊泌乳性能和瘤胃微生物区系的影响[J]. 动物营养学报,2023,35(1):428-438

Effects of Different Processing Methods of Corn Straw-as a Based Rations on Growth Performance,Apparent Nutrient Digestibility,Rumen Fermentation and Microbial Composition of Beef Cattle

不同加工方式玉米秸秆型饲粮对肉牛生长性能、养分表观消化率、瘤胃发酵和菌群结构的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WANG Yi-bo, CHEN Yi-tong, LIU Xin-di, GUO Yong-zhen, SUN Juan, ZHANG Hui, LI Yuan-yuan, GUO Shan-li. Study on Adaptability of Forage Chenopodium quinoa in Saline-alkali Land of Yellow River Delta [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1810-1817.
[2]	LIU Man, QIN Yan, LIU Wen-hui, ZHANG Yong-chao, WU Yu-han, QI Hui-fang. Evaluation on and Screening of Production Performance of Bromus inermis Resources in Alpine Regions of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1469-1480.
[3]	LI Jing, NAN Ming, LIU Yan-ming, ZHANG Cheng-jun, REN Sheng-lan, BIAN Fang. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Yield,Quality and Feeding Performance on Different Oat Varieties [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1089-1098.
[4]	YAO Jin, HE Yun, LU Jia-ding, ZHANG Xiao-xia, CUI Ya-lei, MA Sen, WANG Zhi-chang, ZHU Xiao-yan, SHI Ying-hua, LI De-feng, SUN Hao. Winter Survival Rate,Tillering Characteristics,and Production Performance of Autumn-Sown Forage Oats in Henan Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(2): 528-539.
[5]	GONG Hai-qiang, CHAI Ji-kuan, CHEN San-dong, YIN Guo-li, DENG Xiu-xia. The Screening and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria Against Aspergillus flavus [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(2): 587-595.
[6]	JIA Xiao-hui, ZHANG Feng-ju, XIE Xiao-wei, WANG Bin, WANG Teng-fei, NI Wang, CHEN Yue-juan, XU Xing. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizers on Performance and Nutrient Uptake of Echinochloa frumentacea in Saline-alkali Land [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(1): 272-279.
[7]	GUO Chang-ying, WANG Wei, PU Xiao-jian, DUAN Na-ning, WEI Xiao-li, PENG Dan, XU Cheng-ti. Effects of Sowing Method and Row Spacing on Production Performance and Interspecific Relationship of Oat/Forage Pea Mixed Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2483-2491.
[8]	SUN Yan-liang, LIU Xuan-shuai, LI Sheng-yi, ZHAO Jun-wei, MA Chun-hui, ZHANG Qian-bing. Comprehensive Evaluation of Production Performance with different Fall Dormancy Rates of Alfalfa in Shihezi,Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1227-1236.
[9]	SONG Jian-chao, YANG Hang, YU Xiao-jun, WEI Kong-tao, ZHANG Xiao-juan, WANG Hai-bo, HE You-long. Effect of Combined Application of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer on the Forage Yield and Nutritional Quality of Elymus nutans in Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(3): 731-742.
[10]	HAN Yan-long, LIU Xiao-jing, WANG Jing, WANG Xue, LI Jia-qi. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Root Characteristics and Productivity of Different Alfalfa Cultivars [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 379-384.
[11]	YAO Xi-xi, CHEN Yong-long, XU Cheng-ti, HAI Cun-xiu, LIU Hao-dong. Effects of Dietary Energy Level on Production Performance,Meat Quality and Rumen Microbes of Yak (Bos grunniens) [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 432-439.
[12]	LI Pei, ZHANG Hao, GUO Tong-tian, XU Heng-kang, WEI Bin, ZHANG Ying-jun, LIU Nan. Effects of Companion Crop on Weed Suppression and Forage Growth in the Early Establishment Stage of Legume-Grass Mixture in Hulunbuir Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(12): 3423-3432.
[13]	FENG Qin, WANG Bin, WANG Teng-fei, NI Wang, DENG Jian-qiang, LAN Jian. Effects of Mixed Sowing of Vetch and Oat on Production Performance and Nutrient Quality of Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(12): 3439-3446.
[14]	WEI Xiao-li, XU Cheng-ti, PU Xiao-jian, DUAN Na-ning, WANG Wei. Analysis of Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Mixed Seeding of Triticale and Forage Peas in Haibei Prefecture [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(1): 236-244.
[15]	WANG Jing, LIU Xiao-jing, Cheng Tian-tian, Tong Chang-chun, WANG Xue. Study on Leaf Characteristics and Yield Effect of Alfalfa with Different Nitrogen Efficiency [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1941-1949.