陕北石油区牧草秸秆对油污土壤生物化学性质的修复效应

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.06.010

›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 1101-1108.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.06.010

陕北石油区牧草秸秆对油污土壤生物化学性质的修复效应

王国保¹, 刘增文^1,2, 张晓曦³, 于齐⁴, 张桢尧¹

1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 农业部西北植物营养与农业环境重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
3. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100;
4. 西北农林科技大学林学院, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2013-04-07 修回日期:2013-05-31 出版日期:2013-12-15 发布日期:2013-11-27
通讯作者: 刘增文
作者简介:王国保（1987-），男，河南信阳人，硕士研究生，研究方向为水土保持与生态工程，E-mail：guobao@nwsuaf.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31070630）；西北农林科技大学大学生创新创业训练计划（2013年）资助

Remediation Effects of Forage Straws on the Biochemical Properties of Petroleum-contaminated Soil in the Oil Zone of Northern Shaanxi

WANG Guo-bao¹, LIU Zeng-wen^1,2, ZHANG Xiao-xi³, YU Qi⁴, ZHANG Zhen-yao¹

1. College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-environment in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
3. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
4. College of Forestry, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China

Received:2013-04-07 Revised:2013-05-31 Online:2013-12-15 Published:2013-11-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用牧草秸秆或直接种植绿肥牧草是修复石油污染土壤最经济有效的生物措施。通过采集陕北石油污染区典型荒地土壤，分别以3种石油污染水平油土混合培养后，施入当地6种常见牧草秸秆粉碎样品进行分解培养试验，检测不同牧草秸秆对油污土壤的微生物、酶活性和养分有效性等生物化学性质的修复效应，并利用主成分分析法综合分析修复效果。结果表明：6种牧草秸秆处理均可在一定程度上促进3种水平油污土壤微生物的生长和繁殖，提高土壤脲酶、碱性磷酸酶和脱氢酶活性，增加土壤速效K、有效Mn和有效Zn含量，降低土壤pH值和H₂O₂酶活性。综合而言，轻度污染时，紫羊茅（Festuca rubra）秸秆修复效果最好，其次为小冠花（Coronilla varia）和沙打旺（Astragalus adsurgens）；中度污染时，只有苜蓿（Medicago sativa）具有明显的修复效果；重度污染时，苜蓿的修复效果最好，其次为紫羊茅和小冠花。

关键词: 石油污染土壤, 土壤修复, 牧草秸秆, 土壤微生物, 土壤酶, 土壤养分

Abstract: Utilizing crushed forage straw or planting green manure forage grass is the most economical and effective biological measures for the remediation of petroleum contaminated soil. The remediation effects of nine kinds of forage straws on the biochemical properties of petroleum-contaminated soil including the microbes, soil enzyme activities and nutrient availability were studied in this paper by collecting typical wasteland soil in petroleum-contaminated areas of northern Shaanxi. Results showed that all six kinds of forge straws contributed to the soil respiration and growth of microbes, promoted urease, alkaline phosphatase and dehydrogenase activities, increased the contents of soil available potassium, available Mn and available zinc, and decreased the soil pH value and catalase activity to some extent in three levels of petroleum-contaminated soil. Comprehensive analyses indicated that in light pollution, the straw of Festuca rubra had the best repair effect on the biochemical properties of petroleum-contaminated soil, followed by Coronilla varia and Astragalus adsurgens. In middle pollution, only Medicago sativa straw had significant remediation effect on the biochemical properties of petroleum-contaminated soil. In severe pollution, the straw of Medicago sativa had the best repair effect on the biochemical properties of petroleum-contaminated soil, followed by Festuca rubra and Coronilla varia straws.

Key words: Petroleum-contaminated soil, Soil remediation, Forage straws, Soil microorganisms, Soil enzyme, Soil nutrient

中图分类号:

王国保, 刘增文, 张晓曦, 于齐, 张桢尧. 陕北石油区牧草秸秆对油污土壤生物化学性质的修复效应[J]. , 2013, 21(6): 1101-1108.

WANG Guo-bao, LIU Zeng-wen, ZHANG Xiao-xi, YU Qi, ZHANG Zhen-yao. Remediation Effects of Forage Straws on the Biochemical Properties of Petroleum-contaminated Soil in the Oil Zone of Northern Shaanxi[J]. , 2013, 21(6): 1101-1108.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.06.010

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2013/V21/I6/1101

参考文献

[1] Fismes J, Perrin G C, Empereur B P, et al. Soil-to-root transfer and translocation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by vegetables grown on industrial contaminated soils[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality,2002,31(5):1649-1656
[2] 齐建超,张承东,乔俊,等.微生物与有机肥混合剂修复石油污染土壤的研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2010(1):66-72
[3] 元妙新.固定化细菌增强修复多环芳烃污染土壤及影响因素[D].杭州:浙江大学,2011:9-12
[4] Barker A V, Bryson G M. Bioremediation of heavy metals and organic toxicants by composting[J]. Scientific World Journal,2002,2:407-420
[5] Rodríguez Couto S, Domínguez A, Sanromán A. Utilisation of lignocellulosic wastes for lignin peroxidase production by semi-solid-state cultures of phanerochaete chrysosporium[J]. Biodegradation,2001,12(5):283-289
[6] Verma P, Madamwar D. Production of ligninolytic enzymes for dye decolorization by cocultivation of white-rot fungi pleurotus ostreatus and phanerochaete chrysosporium under solid-state fermentation[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology,2002,102/103(1/6):109-118
[7] Antizar-ladislao B, Lopez-real J, Beck A. Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (pah)-contaminated waste using composting approaches[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology,2004,34(3):249-289
[8] Liu E, Yan C, Mei X, et al. Long-term effect of chemical fertilizer, straw, and manure on soil chemical and biological properties in northwest china[J]. Geoderma,2010,158(3/4):173-180
[9] 程丽娟,薛泉宏.微生物学实验技术[M].北京:世界图书出版公司,2000:63-67,80-83
[10] 金文标,宋莉晖,董晓利,等.油污土壤呼吸作用强度的测定[J].油气田环境保护,1998,8(4):33
[11] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986:294-329
[12] 杨兰芳,曾巧,李海波,等.紫外分光光度法测定土壤过氧化氢酶活性[J].土壤通报,2011,42(1):207-210
[13] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000
[14] 林蔚新.土壤微肥肥效及有效态微量元素分级[J].甘肃科技,2003,19(10):145,106
[15] 贾建丽,李广贺,钟毅.油污土微生态环境非生物因子与微生物活性关系[J].环境科学,2004,25(3):110-114
[16] Margesin R, Schinner F. Bioremediation (natural attenuation and biostimulation) of diesel-oil-contaminated soil in an alpine glacier skiing area[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol,2001,67(7):3127-3133
[17] 廖有贵.高效石油降解菌去除石油污染土壤中的油[D].湘潭:湘潭大学,2007:28-29
[18] 赵静,韩甜甜,谢兴斌,等.酸化梨园土壤酶活性与土壤理化性质之间的关系[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(4):115-120
[19] 黄昌勇.土壤学[M].北京:农业出版社,2000:164-167
[20] Zimmermann S, Frey B. Soil respiration and microbial properties in an acid forest soil: Effects of wood ash[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2002,34(11):1727-1737
[21] Wei S Q, Pan S W. Phytoremediation for soils contaminated by phenanthrene and pyrene with multiple plant species[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments,2010,10(5):886-894
[22] 张松林,董庆士,周喜滨,等.人为石油污染土壤紫花苜蓿田间修复试验[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2008,44(1):47-50
[23] Margesin R, Zimmerbauer A, Schinner F. Monitoring of bioremediation by soil biological activities[J]. Chemosphere, 2000,40(4):339-346
[24] Atagana H I, Haynes R J, Wallis F M. Optimization of soil physical and chemical conditions for the bioremediation of creosote-contaminated soil[J]. Biodegradation,2003,14(4):297-307
[25] Mills S A, Frankenberger W T Jr. Evaluation of phosphorus sources promoting bioremediation of diesel fuel in soil[J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1994,53(2):280-284

陕北石油区牧草秸秆对油污土壤生物化学性质的修复效应

Remediation Effects of Forage Straws on the Biochemical Properties of Petroleum-contaminated Soil in the Oil Zone of Northern Shaanxi

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	石国玺, 王芳萍, 马丽, 张中华, 王弋博, 汪之波, 姚步青, 周华坤. 长期、短期增温对高寒草甸AM真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 179-189.
[2]	王占青, 张杰雪, 杨雪莲, 黄霞, 陈斯亮, 乔有明. 高寒草甸不同斑块草地土壤微生物多样性特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[3]	赵朋波, 邱开阳, 谢应忠, 赵香君, 陈林, 刘王锁, 李海泉, 孟文芬, 虎学琴, 何毅, 黄业芸, 李亚园. 毛乌素沙地南缘不同固沙灌木下土壤养分的空间异质性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2040-2048.
[4]	吴雪梅, 杨雪岩, 林媛媛, 代亦, 曹乐乐, 董文萱, 刘增文. 刺槐和油松枯落叶腐殖质化对气候温湿变化的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1738-1747.
[5]	高志香, 李希来, 张静, 金立群, 周伟. 不同施肥处理对高寒矿区渣山改良土酶活性和理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1748-1756.
[6]	周洋洋, 景媛媛, 徐长林, 鱼小军. 覆膜种植对高寒区土壤水热、养分和苜蓿越冬的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1843-1852.
[7]	于铁峰, 郝凤, 张永亮, 高凯. 沙地豆禾混播草地土壤酶与土壤养分对混播比例的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1217-1223.
[8]	李娜娜, 杨九艳, 贾喆亭, 闫瑞玲, 陈琪. 不同放牧方式对阿拉善左旗主要草场类型群落特征和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 991-1003.
[9]	杨阳, 章妮, 蒋莉莉, 陈克龙. 青海湖高寒草地土壤理化性质及微生物群落特征对模拟降水的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1043-1052.
[10]	卞莹莹, 张志敏, 付镇, 刘文娟. 荒漠草原区不同植被恢复模式土壤微生物菌落分布特征及其与土壤理化性质的相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 655-663.
[11]	吴建波, 王小丹. 藏北高寒草原土壤酶活性对氮添加的响应及其影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 555-562.
[12]	王小燕, 姚宝辉, 张彩军, 王缠, 孙小妹, 苏军虎. 甘南“黑土滩”型退化草甸土壤理化特性及酶活性季节变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 220-227.
[13]	陈白洁, 樊博, 汪新川, 张振华. 不同材质可降解无纺布覆盖种植对高寒人工草地土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2752-2762.
[14]	向雪梅, 德科加, 林伟山, 冯廷旭, 魏希杰, 王伟, 徐成体, 钱诗祎. 氮素添加对高寒草甸植物群落多样性和土壤生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2769-2777.
[15]	李文, 魏廷虎, 阿保地, 永措巴占, 才仁塔次, 周玉海, 李文浩, 郭卫兴, 张雁平. 化肥减施配合有机肥对高寒区燕麦营养品质和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2878-2886.