玉米/大豆不同种植模式对土壤有机质和全氮空间分布的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.07.022

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 1801-1810.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.07.022

玉米/大豆不同种植模式对土壤有机质和全氮空间分布的影响

肖特^1,2, 崔阔澍³, 黄文娟⁴, 张文博⁵

1. 四川农业大学农学院, 四川成都 611130;
2. 四川省中医药科学院, 四川成都 610041;
3. 四川省农业技术推广总站, 四川成都 610041;
4. 四川省植物工程研究院, 四川成都 611730;
5. 内蒙古赤峰市松山区农牧局, 内蒙古赤峰 024000

收稿日期:2021-11-30 修回日期:2022-02-07 出版日期:2022-07-15 发布日期:2022-08-02
通讯作者: 肖特,E-mail:xiaote1986@163.com
作者简介:肖特(1986-)，男，汉族，四川资阳人，博士研究生，副研究员，主要从事作物栽培学与耕作学研究，E-mail：xiaote1986@163.com
基金资助:
国家大豆产业技术体系项目(CARS-04-PS19)；国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFD0300209,2016YFD0300602)；中央引导地方科技发展专项(2018SZYD0003)；中央本级重大增减支项目(2060302)；苗子工程(2016RZ0061)；重点研发计划(2022YFN0045)资助

Effects of Different Maize/Soybean Planting Patterns on Spatial Distribution of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nitrogen

XIAO Te^1,2, CUI Kuo-shu³, HUANG Wen-juan⁴, ZHANG Wen-bo⁵

1. College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 611130, China;
2. Sichuan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610041, China;
3. Sichuan General Popularization Centre of Agricultural Technique, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610041, China;
4. Sichuan Academy of Botanical Engineering, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 611730, China;
5. Inner Mongolia Chifeng Songshan District Bureau of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia 024000, China

Received:2021-11-30 Revised:2022-02-07 Online:2022-07-15 Published:2022-08-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 土壤中有机质和全氮的空间分布，及其在土壤微生态、养分循环和农业可持续发展等方面有着巨大的现实意义。因此，本试验于2018—2020年，研究了土壤有机质和全氮在带状套作玉米/大豆连作(MS1)、带状套作玉米/大豆轮作(MS2)、传统套作玉米/大豆(MS3)、玉米单作(M)、大豆单作(S)和休闲地(FL)6个模式下的含量及空间分布。结果表明，套作土壤全氮大豆行含量大于玉米，不同种植模式下有机质含量存在显著差异(P<0.05)。土壤有机质(29.19 g·kg^-1)和全氮(10.19 g·kg^-1)以MS2含量最高。FL土壤有机质含量(1.69 g·kg^-1)和全氮含量(0.64 g·kg^-1)最低。本研究认为，MS2是较好的带状套作种植模式，该模式能增加土壤有机质和全氮的空间分布，从而提高土壤肥力和C∶N比。

关键词: 种植模式, 土壤有机质和全氮, 空间分布

Abstract: The spatial distribution of organic matter and total nitrogen in soil has great practical significance in soil microbiology,nutrient cycling and agricultural sustainable development. Therefore,this field experiment was conducted in 2018-2020 to study the effect of different planting patterns arrangements of maize and soybean inter-cropping on spatial distribution of soil total nitrogen and organic matter contents. The planting patterns included continuous maize/soybean relay strip inter-cropping (MS1),maize/soybean relay strip inter-cropping in rotations (MS2),Traditional maize/soybean inter-cropping (MS3),sole maize (M),sole soybean (S),and fallow land (FL). The results showed that the total nitrogen content of soybean row in intercropping soil was higher than that of maize,and the organic matter content was significantly different under different cropping patterns (P<0.05). MS2 had the highest soil organic matter and total nitrogen,29.19 g·kg^-1 and 10.19 g·kg^-1,respectively. In contrast,FL's soil organic matter content was 81.69 g·kg^-1 and total nitrogen content was 0.64 g·kg^-1,both of which were the lowest. It indicated that MS2 was the best planting pattern for strip relay inter-cropping,which could increase spatial distribution of soil organic matter and total nitrogen,consequently,improve the soil fertility and C:N ratio.

Key words: Planting patterns, Soil organic matter and total nitrogen, Spatial distribution

中图分类号:

肖特, 崔阔澍, 黄文娟, 张文博. 玉米/大豆不同种植模式对土壤有机质和全氮空间分布的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(7): 1801-1810.

XIAO Te, CUI Kuo-shu, HUANG Wen-juan, ZHANG Wen-bo. Effects of Different Maize/Soybean Planting Patterns on Spatial Distribution of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nitrogen[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(7): 1801-1810.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.07.022

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I7/1801

参考文献

[1] ROBERTA B,ANDREA F,STEFANO S,et al.Cover crops during transition to no-till maintain yield and enhance soil fertility in intensive agro-ecosystems[J].Field Crops Research,2020:255
[2] STRUIJK M,WHITMORE A P,MORTIMER S R,et al.Obtaining more benefits from crop residues as soil amendments by application as chemically heterogeneous mixtures[J].SOIL,2020,6(2):9
[3] FAN M S,SHEN J B,YUAN L X,et al.Improving crop productivity and resource use efficiency to ensure food security and environmental quality in China[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,2012,63(1):13-24
[4] 孟宣辰,马鹏程,马杰,等.黄土高原半干旱区紫花苜蓿覆膜垄沟和施肥效应研究[J].草地学报,2021,29(09):2098-2106
[5] 王静,刘晓静,程甜甜,等.不同氮效率紫花苜蓿叶特征及其产量效应研究[J].草地学报,2021,29(09):1941-1949
[6] 周丽,付智丹,杜青,等.减量施氮对玉米/大豆套作系统中作物氮素吸收及土壤氨氧化与反硝化细菌多样性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2017,50(06):1076-1087
[7] 王萍萍,韩一军,张益.中国农业化肥施用技术效率演变特征及影响因素[J].资源科学,2020,42(09):1764-1776
[8] 谭丽丽,潘英华,谷晓岩,等.土壤理化性质空间变异性研究进展[J].鲁东大学学报(自然科学版),2016,32(04):372-378
[9] 雷志栋,杨诗秀,许志荣,等.土壤特性空间变异性初步研究[J].水利学报,1985(09):10-21
[10] 张智峰,张卫峰.我国化肥施用现状及趋势[J].磷肥与复肥,2008,23(06):9-12
[11] SANTIAGO N,TOURN C C,VIDELA G,et al.Ecological agriculture intensification through crop-pasture rotations does improve aggregation of Southeastern-Pampas Mollisols[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2019,195
[12] INGRID A V P,JOSE N T,ÁNGEL T.Piñeiro Vázquez,et al.Potential for organic conversion and energy efficiency of conventional livestock production in a humid tropical region of Mexico[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2019,241
[13] MUPANGWA W,NYAGUMBO I,LIBEN F,et al.Maize yields from rotation and inter-cropping systems with different legumes under conservation agriculture in contrasting agro-ecologies[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,2021,306(1),107170
[14] 罗华,王杰,宋勇,等.玉米-大豆间套作模式研究现状及其展望[J].作物研究,2020,34(05):502-506
[15] GITARI H I,NYAWADE S O,KAMAU S,et al.Revisiting inter-cropping indices with respect to potato-legume inter-cropping systems[J].Journal of Geodesy,2020,258
[16] 杨文钰,杨峰.发展玉豆带状复合种植,保障国家粮食安全[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(21):3748-3750
[17] 李春杰.种内/种间互作调控小麦/蚕豆间作体系作物生长与氮磷吸收的机制[D].中国农业大学,2018
[18] YAO X,YU K,DENG Y,et al.Spatial variability of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in the hilly red soil region of Southern China[J].Forestry Research.2019,31:2385-2394
[19] DU J B,HAN T F,GAI J Y,et al.Maize-soybean strip inter-cropping:Achieved a balance between high productivity and sustainability[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2018,17(4):747-754
[20] 耿增超,戴伟主编.土壤学[M].北京:科学出版社,2020:30-32
[21] 吴礼树.土壤肥力学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2004:95-96
[22] 张福锁,王激清,张卫峰,等.中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J].土壤学报,2008(05):915-924
[23] 刘玲玲.耕地土壤养分空间插值与等级划分方法解析[D].合肥:安徽大学,2020
[24] 闫湘,金继运,梁鸣早.我国主要粮食作物化肥增产效应与肥料利用效率[J].土壤,2017,49(06):1067-1077
[25] YASIN D,MERVE E M.Effect of Land Use and Topographic Factors On Soil Organic Carbon Content and Mapping of Organic Carbon Distribution Using Regression Kriging Method[J].Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences,2020,15(2):311-322
[26] GAURAV M,AVISHEK S,JURI D.Changes in soil organic carbon lability along the altitudinal variations in three land use types of Meghalaya,India[J].Environmental Sustainability,2020,3:325-331
[27] HANIEH E,GHANIMAT A,PHILIPPE L,et al.Impact of Land Use Changes on Soil and Vegetation Characteristics in Fereydan,Iran[J].Agriculture,2019,9:58
[28] JAVIER H S,MATS B N,TOBIAS S,et al.Boreal tree species affect soil organic matter composition and saprotrophic mineralization rates[J].Plant Soil,2019,441(1-2):173-190
[29] LAI Z R,ZHANG Y Q,LIU J B,et al.Fine-root distribution,production,decomposition,and effect on soil organic carbon of three revegetation shrub species in northwest China[J].Forest Ecology and Management,2016,359:381-388
[30] LIU M YMLIU M M,LI P,PENG LI,et al.Variations in soil organic carbon decompositions of different land use patterns on the tableland of Loess Plateau[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2020,27(4):1-16
[31] MENG T T.Effects of Tillage Methods on Soil Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen Content in the Loess Plateau[J].Asian Agricultural Research,2020,12(02):25-27
[32] LI Z L,ZENG Z Q,TIAN D S,et al.Global patterns and controlling factors of soil nitrification rate[J].Global Change Biology,2020,26(7):4147-4157
[33] HUA W,LUO P Y,AN N,et al.Manure application increased crop yields by promoting nitrogen use efficiency in the soils of 40-year soybean-maize rotation[J].Scientific reports,2020,10(1):14882
[34] TA T C,FARIS M A.Species variation in the fixation and transfer of nitrogen from legumes to associated grasses[J].Plant and Soil,1987(2):7-9
[35] BROADBENT F E.Methodology for nitrogen transformation and balance in soil[J].Plant and Soil,1981,58(1):383-399
[36] MUHAMMAD A R,LING Y F,WOPKE VAN D W,et al.Optimum leaf defoliation:A new agronomic approach for increasing nutrient uptake and land equivalent ratio of maize soybean relay inter-cropping system[J].Field Crops Research,2019,244:107647
[37] CHEN P,SONG C,LIU X M,et al.Yield advantage and nitrogen fate in an additive maize-soybean relay inter-cropping system[J].The Science of the total environment,2019,657:987-999
[38] BEWKER W,STROOSNIJDER L.Effects of agroecological land usesuccession on soil properties in Chemoga watershed,Blue Nile basin,Ethiopia[J].Geoderma,2003,111:85-95
[39] VERONIKA J,PETRA S,JAN F.Foliage C:N ratio,stage of organic matter decomposition and interaction with soil affect microbial respiration and its response to C and N addition more than C:N changes during decomposition[J].Applied Soil Ecology,2020,152:103568

玉米/大豆不同种植模式对土壤有机质和全氮空间分布的影响

Effects of Different Maize/Soybean Planting Patterns on Spatial Distribution of Soil Organic Matter and Total Nitrogen

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张丽, 王铁娟, 郭金停, 李晓田, 张慧, 刘雅洁, 刘晓婷. 西鄂尔多斯珍稀濒危植物四合木种群分布格局分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(2): 551-557.
[2]	邢云飞, 施建军, 德科加, 王伟, 王晓丽, 唐俊伟, 李思瑶. 多年生人工草地矮生嵩草(Kobresia humilis)种群空间格局与种内关联性[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 253-258.
[3]	门欣洋, 吕世杰, 侯东杰, 王梓晗, 李治国, 韩国栋, 孙海莲, 王保林, 王忠武. 放牧强度对荒漠草原无芒隐子草密度及空间分布的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 3106-3112.
[4]	赵朋波, 邱开阳, 谢应忠, 赵香君, 陈林, 刘王锁, 李海泉, 孟文芬, 虎学琴, 何毅, 黄业芸, 李亚园. 毛乌素沙地南缘不同固沙灌木下土壤养分的空间异质性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2040-2048.
[5]	张峰, 郑佳华, 赵天启, 乔荠瑢, 赵萌莉, 张心玥, 吴建新. 放牧强度对荒漠草原一年生植物刺穗藜种群特征及空间分布的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1507-1512.
[6]	逯玉兰, 李广, 闫丽娟, 董莉霞, 李杰, 聂志刚, 王钧. 甘肃农牧交错带1971—2019年降水量变化研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2556-2565.
[7]	韩冰, 武瑞鑫, 张慧, 董全民, 吕进英, 邵新庆. 不同管理措施对高寒草甸群落结构和披针叶黄华空间分布格局的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1083-1089.
[8]	欧翔, 玉柱, 许庆方, 杨国义, 高新中, 熊乙, 马菱艺, 梁琪, 史悦, 李金俐. 山西省三种饲草作物种植模式的效益分析[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(6): 1520-1524.
[9]	邓东周, 贺丽, 鄢武先, 陈德朝. 川西北高寒区不同沙化类型草地优势种群空间格局分析[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(3): 492-498.
[10]	贾美清, 黄静, 孟元, 韩国栋, 孙胜, 张国刚, 杨英花. 内蒙古荒漠草原土壤可培养真菌的群落结构和空间分布分析[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(2): 315-321.
[11]	陈珂璐, 余欣超, 姚步青, 马真, 王文颖, 王慧春, 周华坤, 赵新全. 不同放牧强度下门源草原毛虫在高寒草甸上的空间分布[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(1): 191-197.
[12]	刘洪来, 毛林灿, 靳瑰丽, 姚红艳, 陈超. 伊犁绢蒿荒漠不同退化阶段草地土壤种子库分析[J]. 草地学报, 2012, 20(3): 413-418.
[13]	杜广明, 沈向群, 杨智明, 吕世海, 常学礼, 叶生星. 辉河国家自然保护区草地植物区系及多样性空间分布研究[J]. , 2011, 19(2): 202-206.
[14]	贾彦霞, 贺奇, 王新谱. 宁夏荒漠草原白星花金龟成虫空间分布型的初步研究[J]. , 2011, 19(1): 177-180.
[15]	李武斌, 何丙辉, 钟章成, 王力, 齐代华, 张兴华, 娄方海, 苟小军. 九寨沟马脑壳金矿山优势草本植物生物量的垂直分布格局[J]. , 2010, 18(5): 643-650.