放牧对陕北黄土丘陵区刺槐林群落特征的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.06.026

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 1826-1833.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.06.026

放牧对陕北黄土丘陵区刺槐林群落特征的影响

王菊¹, 许明祥¹, 孙会², 左振江³, 艾建卫¹

1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 西北农林科技大学林学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
3. 西北农林科技大学资源与环境学院, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2022-12-05 修回日期:2023-01-11 出版日期:2023-06-15 发布日期:2023-06-30
通讯作者: 许明祥,E-mail:xumx@nwafu.edu.cn
作者简介:王菊(1998-)，女，汉族，宁夏固原人，硕士研究生，主要从事林草生态和利用研究，E-mail:orangeW@nwafu.edu.cn
基金资助:
中国科学院“西部之光”交叉团队项目-重点实验室合作研究专项(2019)；国家自然科学基金项目(41830758)资助

Effects of Grazing on Community Characteristics of Robinia pseudoacacia Forest in the Hilly Loess Plateau Region of Northern Shaanxi Province

WANG Ju¹, XU Ming-xiang¹, SUN Hui², ZUO Zhen-jiang³, AI Jian-wei¹

1. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. College of Forestry, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
3. College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China

Received:2022-12-05 Revised:2023-01-11 Online:2023-06-15 Published:2023-06-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 放牧是影响植物群落结构与功能的重要活动。本研究分析了6个放牧强度(G0—G5，以羊粪球密度计)对黄土丘陵区刺槐(Robinia pseudoacacia)林群落特征的影响。结果表明：适度放牧(羊粪球密度不高于13.3 ind·m^-2)对黄土丘陵区刺槐树高和胸径无显著影响，但会降低刺槐枝下高和林下枯落物量。G1强度刺槐枝下高为3.39 m，是G5样地的近2倍。放牧对刺槐林下植物群落的影响有季节差异。适度放牧对秋季林下植物群落总盖度和群落地上生物量无显著影响，但降低植物密度；放牧降低了春季林下植物群落总盖度和群落地上生物量，但增加了植物密度。放牧强度从G1增大到G4，林下植物群落Patrick指数由7.00增至10.42，增幅为48.86%；Shannon-Wiener指数由1.31增至1.80，增幅为37.40%。在黄土丘陵区的近熟刺槐林下实施夏季秋季适度放牧(羊粪球密度不高于13.3 ind·m^-2)，不会造成刺槐林群落退化，但不提倡冬季春季放牧。研究结果可为陕北黄土丘陵区刺槐林适度利用和可持续管理提供科学依据。

关键词: 放牧, 刺槐林, 植物群落, 物种多样性

Abstract: Grazing is an important activity affecting structure and function of plant communities. This study designed 6 grazing intensities (G0—G5，with sheep dung ball density) to analyze the effects of grazing intensity on community characteristics of Robinia pseudoacacia forest in the Hilly Loess Plateau Region. The results showed that moderate grazing (the density of sheep dung ball is no higher than 13.3 ind·m^-2) had no significant effect on tree height and diameter at breast height of R. pseudoacacia,but could reduce clear bole height (H_cb) and litter biomass. The H_cb of R. pseudoacacia with G1 intensity was 3.39 m,nearly twice high as that of G5. There were seasonal differences in the effects of grazing on understory flora. Moderate grazing had no significant effect on the total coverage and aboveground biomass of the understory plant community in autumn,but decreased plant density. Grazing significantly decreased the total coverage and aboveground biomass in spring,but increased plant density. When the intensity increased from G1 to G4,the community Patrick index increased by 48.86% from 7.00 to 10.42,and the Shannon- Wiener index increased by 37.40% from 1.31 to 1.80. Moderate grazing in summer and autumn (the density of sheep dung ball is no higher than 13.3 ind·m^-2) under the near-mature R. pseudoacacia forest will not cause the degradation of the plant community,but grazing in winter or spring is not recommended. The results could provide scientific basis for the appropriate utilization and sustainable management of R. pseudoacacia forest in the Hilly Loess Plateau Region of northern Shaanxi.

Key words: Grazing, Robinia pseudoacacia plantation, Plant community, Species diversity

中图分类号:

S811

王菊, 许明祥, 孙会, 左振江, 艾建卫. 放牧对陕北黄土丘陵区刺槐林群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1826-1833.

WANG Ju, XU Ming-xiang, SUN Hui, ZUO Zhen-jiang, AI Jian-wei. Effects of Grazing on Community Characteristics of Robinia pseudoacacia Forest in the Hilly Loess Plateau Region of Northern Shaanxi Province[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(6): 1826-1833.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.06.026

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I6/1826

参考文献

[1] 赵宏飞,何洪鸣,白春昱,等. 黄土高原土地利用变化特征及其环境效应[J]. 中国土地科学,2018,32(7):49-57
[2] 张长庆,张文辉. 黄土高原不同立地条件下刺槐人工林种群的无性繁殖与更新[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2009,37(1):135-144
[3] HU J,ZHOU D,LI Q,et al. Effects of Long-Term Enclosing on Vertical Distributions of Soil Physical Properties and Nutrient Stocks in Grassland of Inner Mongolia [J]. Agronomy,2021,11(9):1832
[4] CONG S,ZHOU D,LI Q,et al. Effects of Fencing on Vegetation and Soil Nutrients of the Temperate Steppe Grasslands in Inner Mongolia [J]. Agronomy,2021,11(8):1546
[5] 任强,艾鷖,胡健,等. 不同强度牦牛放牧对青藏高原高寒草地土壤和植物生物量的影响[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(17):6862-6870
[6] 郑慧,薛江博,桂建华,等. 放牧强度对华北农牧交错带典型草地土壤化学计量特征的短期影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2021,32(7):2433-2439
[7] 牛钰杰,杨思维,王贵珍,等. 放牧作用下高寒草甸群落物种分布与土壤因子的关系[J]. 应用生态学报,2017,28(12):3891-3898
[8] DASTGHEYB SHIRAZI S S,AHMADI A,ABDI N,et al. Moderate grazing is the best measure to achieve the optimal conservation and soil resource utilization (case study:Bozdaghin rangelands,North Khorasan,Iran) [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2021,193(9):549
[9] FAN J,JIN H,ZHANG C,et al. Grazing intensity induced alternations of soil microbial community composition in aggregates drive soil organic carbon turnover in a desert steppe [J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2021(313):1-12
[10] 侯扶江,杨中艺. 放牧对草地的作用[J]. 生态学报,2006(1):244-264
[11] 贾涛涛,廖李容,王杰,等. 基于Meta分析的放牧对黄土高原草地生态系统的影响[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(10):2772-2781
[12] 费璇,锁才序,向双,等. 青藏东缘高寒草甸植物群落结构及功能群特征对长期季节放牧的响应[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(8):1954-1963
[13] 张树淼,赵志伟,孙晓萍,等. 返青期和盛草期牧场放牧的高山美利奴种公羊营养盈亏监测[J]. 动物营养学报,2021,33(1):409-419
[14] 董乙强,孙宗玖,安沙舟,等. 放牧强度对伊犁绢蒿种群特征及其群落多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(1):22-27
[15] 杨晨晨,陈宽,周延林,等. 放牧对锡林郭勒草甸草原群落特征及生产力的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2021,43(5):58-66
[16] 孙会,赵允格,刘广亮,等. 放牧强度对黄土丘陵区草地植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(4):810-817
[17] 刘国彬,上官周平,姚文艺,等. 黄土高原生态工程的生态成效[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2017,32(1):11-19
[18] CONNELL J H. Diversity in Tropical Rain Forests and Coral Reefs [J]. Science,1978,199(4335):1302-1310
[19] DENG L,SWEENEY S,SHANGGUAN Z. Grassland responses to grazing disturbance:plant diversity changes with grazing intensity in a desert stepp e[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2014,69(3):524-533
[20] HAN G,HAO X,ZHAO M,et al. Effect of grazing intensity on carbon and nitrogen in soil and vegetation in a meadow steppe in Inner Mongolia [J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2007(125):21-32
[21] 马昕昕,赵允格,马宁,等. 放牧对黄土高原退耕草地土壤有机碳储量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2021,33(1):67-75
[22] OÑATIBIA G R,BOYERO L,AGUIAR M R. Regional productivity mediates the effects of grazing disturbance on plant cover and patch-size distribution in arid and semi‐arid communities [J]. Oikos,2018,127(8):1205-1215
[23] FREITAG M,KAMP J,DARA A,et al. Post-Soviet shifts in grazing and fire regimes changed the functional plant community composition on the Eurasian steppe [J]. Global Change Biology,2021,27(2):388-401
[24] 中国科学院中国植物志委员会. 中国植物志[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2004:12-987
[25] 傅坤俊. 黄土高原植物志[M]. 西安:科学出版社,2000:157-537
[26] 马克平,刘玉明. 生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰα多样性的测度方法(下)[J]. 生物多样性,1994(4):231-239
[27] 郝建锋,周润惠,姚小兰,等. 二代野猪放牧对夹金山针阔混交林物种多样性与土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2022,46(2):197-207
[28] 刘建泉,罗永寿,吕海元. 不同封育季节放牧干扰对青海云杉种群结构和动态的影响[J]. 草业科学,2012,29(6):983-988
[29] 肖兴翠,索怀俊,李成勇,等. 不同间伐强度对香椿中龄林生长和干形的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报,2021,41(3):10-17
[30] 马红彬,余治家. 放牧草地植物补偿效应的研究进展[J]. 农业科学研究,2006(1):63-67
[31] MCNAUGHTON S J. Compensatory plant growth as a response to herbivory [J]. Oikos,1983,40(3):329-336
[32] 戎郁萍,韩建国. 华北农牧交错带人工草地放牧系统植物补偿性生长研究[J]. 草地学报,2005(S1):62-66
[33] SATU R,N P K,TOMMY L,et al. Overcompensation:a 30-year perspective [J]. Ecology,2019,100(5):2667
[34] BORER E T,SEABLOOM E W,GRUNER D S,et al. Herbivores and nutrients control grassland plant diversity via light limitation [J]. Nature,2014,508(7497):517-520
[35] 罗方林,张法伟,张光茹,等. 放牧强度对高寒草甸群落特征及植被生存状态的影响[J]. 草业科学,2021,38(11):2097-2105
[36] FUHLENDORF S D,SMEINS F E. Long-term vegetation dynamics mediated by herbivores,weather and fire in a Juniperus-Quercus Savanna [J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,1997,8(6):819-828
[37] FENSHAM R J. The grassy vegetation of the Darling Downs,south-eastern Queensland,Australia. Floristics and grazing effects [J]. Biological Conservation,1998,84(3):301-310
[38] CHENG H,JIN B,LUO K,et al. Vegetation response to goats grazing intensity in semiarid hilly grassland of the Loess Plateau,Lanzhou,China [J]. Sustainability,2021,13(6):3569
[39] 郝建锋,余飞燕,姚小兰,等. 放猪干扰对四川夹金山植物群落特征和生物量的影响[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(24):9645-9654
[40] 郑群英,刘刚,肖冰雪,等. 放牧对川西北高寒草甸植物物种丰富度和生物量的影响[J]. 草业科学,2017,34(7):1390-1396
[41] 李雯. 基于生态化学计量学特征的黄土高原退耕草地适度放牧利用研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2022:12-14
[42] 王力,邵明安,李裕元. 陕北黄土高原人工刺槐林生长与土壤干化的关系研究[J]. 林业科学,2004(1):84-91

放牧对陕北黄土丘陵区刺槐林群落特征的影响

Effects of Grazing on Community Characteristics of Robinia pseudoacacia Forest in the Hilly Loess Plateau Region of Northern Shaanxi Province

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙亚菲, 柴永青. 祁连山西端不同生境孑遗植物裸果木群落物种多样性及其与土壤水分、盐分的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2059-2067.
[2]	周华坤, 李珊, 孙建, 曲家鹏, 张中华, 马丽, 秦瑞敏, 魏晶晶, 常涛, 苏洪烨, 胡雪, 阿的哈则, 袁访, 李宏林. 三江源区高寒草甸植物群落与土壤理化性质沿海拔梯度的变化特征[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1735-1743.
[3]	潘森, 卜嘉玮, 甘安琪, 尚振艳, 郭丁, 杨晓霞, 董全民, 牛得草. 放牧强度对高寒草地土壤微生物胞外酶化学计量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1780-1787.
[4]	柴智慧, 田铭君, 姚凤桐. 数字技术、草地流转与放牧强度——基于内蒙古纯牧户的实证[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1842-1852.
[5]	董克池, 郝媛媛, 董瑞, 蔡新成, 叶国辉, 马义杰, 赵希存, 花立民. 高原鼢鼠鼠丘斑块空间分布格局及对植物群落特征影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1853-1860.
[6]	尹正辉, 陈新丰, 拉多. 模拟增温和放牧对高寒草甸主要植物生态位及种间联结的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1302-1313.
[7]	魏嘉琪, 郑诚, 崔梦莹, 申乔天, 靳向前, 温仲明. 黄土丘陵区生物多样性与生态系统功能响应关系的分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1490-1500.
[8]	赵帅, 杨文权, 蔺宝珺, 乔千洛, 武燕茹, 李钦瑶, 张生祥, 韩显忠, 李希来, 寇建村. 祁连山国家公园不同退化高寒草甸植物与土壤特性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1530-1538.
[9]	王丽君, 吴佳琪, 阿力米日·阿力木江, 赵奕帆, 崔文恺, 孔繁晰, 陈俊. 草地群落中不同植物种在物种多样性中作用大小的探究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 1081-1088.
[10]	王雪松, 贺晶, 马普, 苏德荣. 辉河保护区温性草甸草原植被群落结构和碳储量对盐碱化的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 1154-1162.
[11]	文博瑾, 段高辉, 温仲明. 生物多样性与地形及土壤因素对坡面产流产沙的耦合影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 1186-1197.
[12]	赵坤, 韩国栋. 荒漠草原优势种功能性状对不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 649-656.
[13]	李昕珂, 杨鹤明, 王常慧, 董宽虎, 张晓琳, 刁华杰. 晋北赖草草地生态系统碳通量对不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 819-826.
[14]	朱牛, 孙建, 石凝, 王金牛, 张林, 罗栋梁, 申承, 盖艾鸿. 短期围栏封育对高寒草甸植物群落及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 834-843.
[15]	李艳龙, 石椿珺, 王昊, 武麟, 王亚东, 冷爽, 张佳璐, 李可欣, 李永宏. 放牧强度对内蒙古典型草原群落结构和家畜生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 844-851.