河北滨海盐碱地14个苜蓿品种光合性能与产量性状分析

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.07.021

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 2107-2115.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.07.021

河北滨海盐碱地14个苜蓿品种光合性能与产量性状分析

石嘉琦¹, 刘忠宽¹, 王东奎², 张立锋¹, 于合兴³, 智健飞¹, 李洁鑫⁴, 李敏¹, 刘振宇¹, 谢楠¹, 刘惠芝⁵

1. 河北省农林科学院农业资源环境研究所, 河北石家庄 050051;
2. 南皮县农业农村局, 河北沧州 061500;
3. 黄骅市农业农村发展局, 河北沧州 061199;
4. 上海市浦东新区航头镇经济发展服务中心, 上海 201316;
5. 乐亭县农业农村局, 河北唐山 063600

收稿日期:2022-12-28 修回日期:2023-02-27 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2023-08-01
通讯作者: 刘振宇,E-mail:Zhenyu416@126.com;谢楠,xnhd0070@126.com
作者简介:石嘉琦(1995-),女,汉族,河北沧州人,硕士研究生,主要从事植物生理生态研究,E-mail:664791032@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2021YFD19009)；河北省农林科学院科技创新专项课题(2022KJCXZX-ZHS-7)；国家牧草产业技术体系(CARS-34)；河北省农林科学院农业资源环境研究所自立项目(ZHS-ZLXM-2022-07)资助

Analysis of Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield Traits of Fourteen Alfalfa Varieties in Coastal Saline-alkali Soil in Hebei Province

SHI Jia-qi¹, LIU Zhong-kuan¹, WANG Dong-kui², ZHANG Li-feng¹, YU He-xing³, ZHI Jian-fei¹, LI Jie-xin⁴, LI Min¹, LIU Zhen-yu¹, XIE Nan¹, LIU Hui-zhi⁵

1. Institute of Agricultural Recourses and Environment, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province 050051, China;
2. Nanpi County Agricultural and Rural Bureau, Cangzhou, Hebei Province 061500, China;
3. Huanghua Agricultural and Rural Development Bureau, Cangzhou, Hebei Province 061199, China;
4. Shanghai Pudong New Area Hangtou Town Economic Development Service Center, Shanghai 201316, China;
5. Leting County Agricultural and Rural Bureau, Tangshan, Hebei Province 063600, China

Received:2022-12-28 Revised:2023-02-27 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2023-08-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究不同苜蓿(Medicago sativa)品种在河北滨海盐碱区的光合性能及产量性状的变化差异，本研究以14个苜蓿品种为材料，运用冗余分析和灰色关联度法对不同苜蓿品种叶绿素含量、荧光参数、光合参数、株高及生物产量进行评价。结果表明：不同苜蓿品种间产量性状和光合生理差异较大，其中'WL440HQ'叶片的实际光合效率Y(II)、光化学淬灭系数(qP)和表观光合电子传递速率(ETR)最高，且非光化学淬灭系数(NPQ)、光系统调节性能量耗散的量子产量Y(NPQ)和非调节性能量耗散的量子产量Y(NO)均最低，光合作用强，有利于植株干物质积累；冗余分析显示苜蓿干草产量易受株高、叶绿素a(Chla)、最大光合效率(Fv/Fm)、潜在最大相对电子传递速率(ETR_max)、Y(II)，l_k，qP，NPQ，Y(NPQ)及ETR等因素的影响，其中Y(NPQ)和NPQ为负向影响，其余因素为正向影响。'WL440HQ''甘农9号''WL358HQ''中苜1号'和'WL525HQ'综合排名靠前，光合性能和产量性状表现均较好，适宜在河北滨海盐碱区栽种。

关键词: 滨海盐碱地, 苜蓿品种, 光合性能, 产量性状, 叶绿素荧光参数

Abstract: To reveal the difference of photosynthetic characteristics and yield traits of different Medicago sativa varieties in coastal saline-alkali soil in Hebei Province,14 varieties of alfalfa were used as the tested material,Redundancy analysis and grey correlation method were used as comprehensive evaluate methods to analyze chlorophyll content,fluorescence parameters,photosynthetic parameters,plant height and biomass of different alfalfa varieties. The results showed that there were significant differences in yield characters and photosynthetic physiological characters among different alfalfa varieties. The actual photosynthetic efficiency Y(II),photochemical quenching (qP) and apparent electron transfer rate (ETR) of 'WL440HQ' leaves were the highest,and the non photochemical quenching (NPQ),Quantum yield of regulatory energy dissipation in photosystem Y(NPQ) and Quantum yield of non-regulatory energy dissipation in photosystem Y(NO) were the lowest,so its photosynthesis was strong and the dry matter of the plant was accumulated more. Redundancy analysis showed that alfalfa hay yield was affected by plant height,chlorophyll a(Chla),maximum photosynthetic efficiency(Fv/Fm),potential maximum relative electron transfer rate (ETR_max),Y(II),l_k,photochemical quenching(qP),NPQ,Y(NPQ) and ETR. Y(NPQ) and NPQ have negative effects on yield,and other factors have positive effects. Under the conditions of this study,'WL440HQ','Gannong No.9','WL358HQ','Zhongmu No.1' and 'WL525HQ' were ranked at the top,and their photosynthetic performance and yield traits were better. Therefore,these five varieties were suitable for plant in coastal saline alkali areas of Hebei Province.

Key words: Coastal saline-alkali soil, Alfalfa varieties, Photosynthetic characteristics, Yield traits, Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters

中图分类号:

S322
S541

石嘉琦, 刘忠宽, 王东奎, 张立锋, 于合兴, 智健飞, 李洁鑫, 李敏, 刘振宇, 谢楠, 刘惠芝. 河北滨海盐碱地14个苜蓿品种光合性能与产量性状分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7): 2107-2115.

SHI Jia-qi, LIU Zhong-kuan, WANG Dong-kui, ZHANG Li-feng, YU He-xing, ZHI Jian-fei, LI Jie-xin, LI Min, LIU Zhen-yu, XIE Nan, LIU Hui-zhi. Analysis of Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield Traits of Fourteen Alfalfa Varieties in Coastal Saline-alkali Soil in Hebei Province[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7): 2107-2115.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.07.021

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I7/2107

参考文献

[1] 姜慧新,柏杉杉,吴波,等. 22个燕麦品种在黄淮海地区的农艺性状与饲草品质综合评价[J]. 草业学报,2021,30(1):140-149
[2] 李兵,刘广明,杨劲松,等. 农艺措施对黄淮海平原盐碱障碍农田土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2015,34(6):35-38
[3] 余世鹏,杨劲松,杨晓英. 不同调控措施对黄淮海平原盐碱障碍农田作物及土壤质量动态的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(8):150-154
[4] 王晓春,朱得新,杨天辉,等. 宁夏引黄灌区不同苜蓿品种主要农艺性状关联分析及草产量比较[J]. 作物杂志,2022(4):32-36
[5] 熊雪,罗建川,魏雨其,等. 不均匀盐胁迫对紫花苜蓿生长特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2018,51(11):2071-2083
[6] 王茜,李志坚,李晶,等. 不同类型燕麦农艺和饲草品质性状分析[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(12):149-158
[7] 王建丽,马利超,申忠宝,等. 基于遗传多样性评估燕麦品种的农艺性状[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(2):133-141
[8] 吕会刚,康俊梅,龙瑞才,等. 河北地区22个紫花苜蓿品种的生产性能比较研究[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(4):948-958
[9] 谢楠,刘振宇,冯伟,等. 沧州地区29个紫花苜蓿品种生产性能评价[J]. 河北农业科学,2016,20(6):19-26
[10] IVAN J M. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa spp. sativa) population improvement:genetic diversity within and among species and trait-associations with molecular markers[M]. MI:University of Wisconsin-Madison,2005:139-154
[11] 涂淑萍,黄航,杜曲,等. 不同品种茶树叶片光合特性与叶绿素荧光参数的比较[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2021,43(5):1098-1106
[12] 耿瑜欣,刘泽,仲连青,等. 不同品种杜仲生长动态和光合,叶绿素荧光参数的差异[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2021(6):44
[13] 陈科元,贾倩民,陈彦云,等. 品种与施肥对次生盐碱地牧草光合特性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(2):196-202
[14] 张则宇,李雪,王焱,等. 59份苜蓿种质材料苗期耐盐性评价及耐盐指标筛选[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(1):112-121
[15] CHEN Y E,CUI J M,SU Y Q,et al. Comparison of phosphorylation and assembly of photosystem complexes and redox homeostasis in two wheat cultivars with different drought resistance[J]. Scientific Reports,2017,7:12718-12716
[16] CHEN Y E,MAO J J,SUN L Q,et al. Exogenous melatonin enhances salt stress tolerance in maize seedlings by improving antioxidant and photosynthetic capacity[J]. Physiologia Plantarum,2018,164(3):349-363
[17] 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2000:134-137
[18] EILERS P,PEETRS J. A model for the relationship between light intensity and the rate of photosynthesis in phytoplankton[J]. Ecological Modelling,1988,42:199-215
[19] 王蕾,王艳玲,李欢,等. 长期施肥下红壤旱地磷素有效性影响因子的冗余分析[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2021(1):17-25
[20] VENTRONI L M,VOLENEC J J,CANGIANO C A. Fall dormancy and cutting frequency impact on alfalfa yield and yield components[J]. Field Crop Research,2010,119(2-3):252-259
[21] 林洪鑫,袁展汽,肖运萍,等. 不同株型木薯品种干物质生产和氮素累积及利用特征比较[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(7):1328-1338
[22] KLUGHAMMER C,SCHREIBER. Complementary PSII quantum yields calculated from simple fluorescence parameters measured by PAM fluorometry and the Saturation Pulse method[J]. PAM Application Notes,2008,1:27-35
[23] LIN S,SONG X F,MAO H T,et al. Exogenous melatonin improved photosynthetic efficiency of photosystem II by reversible phosphorylation of thylakoid proteins in wheat under osmotic stress[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2022,13:966181
[24] GRAβES T,PESARESI P,SCHIAVON F,et al. The role of DpH-dependent dissipation of excitation energy in protecting photosystem II against light-induced damage in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,2002,40:41-49
[25] 梁晓,祁永,吝亚杰,等. 应用综合指标法和灰色关联度法对10个紫花苜蓿品种进行耐盐性评价[J]. 作物杂志,2017(4):44-49
[26] 彭艳,马素洁,孙晶远,等. 西藏12份野生豆科牧草种质资源综合性状评价[J]. 草业科学,2021,38(12):2429-2439
[27] 张海燕,解备涛,姜常松,等. 不同抗旱性甘薯品种叶片生理性状差异及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报,2022,48(2):518-528
[28] 郑敏娜,梁秀芝,韩志顺,等. 不同苜蓿品种在雁门关地区的生产性能和营养价值研究[J]. 草业学报,2018,27(5):97-108
[29] 孙强,伊丽君,张云玲,等. 呼图壁县引种10个紫花苜蓿品种的灰色关联度分析与综合评价[J]. 草学,2021(2):31-35,50
[30] 童永尚,鱼小军,徐长林,等. 天祝高寒区播期对7个燕麦品种饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(5):1094-1106
[31] 张金屯. 数量生态学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2018:199-222
[32] 刘书颖,张翔,徐晶,等. 基于冗余分析的城市河湖水污染成因及尺度效应[J]. 中国环境科学,2022,42(10):4768-4779

河北滨海盐碱地14个苜蓿品种光合性能与产量性状分析

Analysis of Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield Traits of Fourteen Alfalfa Varieties in Coastal Saline-alkali Soil in Hebei Province

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	顾雪丹, 张正中, 吕东, 赵祜, 王立, 车波, 曹蓉, 闫克林, 张宏斌. 光周期和光质对红砂幼苗生长及光化学反应的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(6): 1720-1727.
[2]	张浩阳, 刘美君, 卫丹丹, 苗宇, 张丽佳. 不同秋眠级苜蓿越冬前后叶片光合作用的比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 983-991.
[3]	王凯, 杨宝钰, 陈水红, 席琳乔. 碱胁迫下内生真菌对布顿大麦光合性能和生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 362-369.
[4]	秦金萍, 刘颖, 马玉寿, 王彦龙, 李世雄. 返青期休牧对退化高寒草地植被特征及优势种光合生理的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1034-1042.
[5]	王军, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 王苗苗, 贾雪洁, 郭志飞, 孙雷雷, 聂秀美. 大麦黄矮病毒侵染对燕麦光合及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 923-931.
[6]	杨艳婷, 石凤翎, 徐舶, 张雨桐, 闫伟. 苜蓿品种鉴定及其遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1060-1067.
[7]	周艳春, 刘建, 徐安凯, 邱红梅, 王英哲, 任伟. 93份无芒雀麦种质资源产量性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 623-632.
[8]	梁欢, 韦宝, 陈静, 宫文龙, 马琳, 王学敏, 王赞. 基于叶绿素荧光参数的紫花苜蓿种质苗期抗旱性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 45-55.
[9]	方婷, 苏浩天, 尹淑霞. 苜蓿斑点病病原菌分离鉴定及紫花苜蓿品种的抗性筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(3): 697-704.
[10]	赵丽丽, 吴佳海, 王普昶, 马林, 杨春燕, 卢立娜. 高羊茅种质光合及叶绿素荧光参数对高温胁迫的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(4): 811-817.
[11]	杨玉平, 蔡丽艳, 李志勇, 王成海, 师文贵, 李鸿雁, 刘磊. NaCl胁迫对扁蓿豆叶片膜透性和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2013, 21(5): 913-920.
[12]	夏方山, 毛培胜, 闫慧芳, 王明亚, 于晓丹, 张文旭, 黄莺, 贾婉. 植物花后光合性能与物质转运的研究进展[J]. , 2013, 21(3): 420-427.
[13]	武德功, 贺春贵, 刘长仲, 杜军利, 胡桂馨, 王森山. 不同苜蓿品种对豌豆蚜的生化抗性机制[J]. , 2011, 19(3): 497-501.
[14]	武德功, 王森山, 刘长仲, 胡桂馨, 杜军利, 贺春贵. 豌豆蚜刺吸胁迫对不同苜蓿品种体内单宁含量及生理活性的影响[J]. , 2011, 19(2): 351-355.
[15]	李志华, 沈益新, 刘信宝, 于静, 赵芳芳, 罗涛. 开花期10个苜蓿品种水浸提液中酚酸类化感物质含量研究[J]. , 2009, 17(6): 799-802.