青海草地生态系统水分利用效率特征及其影响因素分析

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.09.026

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 2814-2825.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.09.026

青海草地生态系统水分利用效率特征及其影响因素分析

苏淑兰^1,2, 姬海娟^1,2, 张东^1,2, 张帅旗^1,2, 李晓东^1,2, 苏文将^1,2

1. 青海省气象科学研究所, 青海西宁 810001;
2. 青海省防灾减灾重点实验室, 青海西宁 810001

收稿日期:2023-02-23 修回日期:2023-04-14 出版日期:2023-09-15 发布日期:2023-10-07
通讯作者: 张帅旗,E-mail:zshuaiqi@126.com
作者简介:苏淑兰(1989-),女,回族,宁夏固原人,工程师,主要从事高寒生态气象研究,E-mail:sushla@163.com
基金资助:
青海省气象局重点项目(QXZ2020-09)；国家自然科学基金项目(41961012)资助

Characteristics of Water Use Efficiency and its Influencing Factors of Grassland Ecosystem in Qinghai Province

SU Shu-lan^1,2, JI Hai-juan^1,2, ZHANG Dong^1,2, ZHANG Shuai-qi^1,2, LI Xiao-dong^1,2, SU Wen-jiang^1,2

1. Qinghai Institute of Meteorological Science, Xining, Qinghai Province 810001, China;
2. Key Laboratory for Disaster Prevention and Mitigation in Qinghai Province, Xining, Qinghai Province 810001, China

Received:2023-02-23 Revised:2023-04-14 Online:2023-09-15 Published:2023-10-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 水分利用效率(Water use efficiency,WUE)是深入理解生态系统碳水耦合的重要指标。本研究基于卫星遥感数据及青海草地系统分类数据,分析2000-2018年青海草地生态系统WUE变化特征,探讨净初级生产力(Net primary production,NPP)、蒸散(Evapotranspiration,ET)和气候因子对WUE年际和年内的变化影响。结果显示:2000-2018年,青海草地WUE均值为0.48 g·kg^-1,其中,62.0%的区域WUE显著减小(P<0.05)。年际尺度上,WUE受ET、降水量、风速和地表温度的影响,其中与ET呈显著负相关关系(P<0.1,R²=0.45)。月尺度上,WUE受ET,NPP、水热等气象条件影响,其中WUE与ET和NPP呈极显著正相关关系(P<0.01),其相关系数R²分别为0.90和0.49;月WUE与气温、降水量、地表温度、水汽压、空气相对湿度极显著正相关(P<0.01),其相关系数R²均大于0.55。本研究将为青海草地生态系统碳水耦合过程及其对气候变化的响应研究提供一定的数据支撑。

关键词: 水分利用效率, 草地生态系统, 蒸散, 净初级生产力

Abstract: Water use efficiency (WUE) is an important inducator to characterize the coupling process between carbon and water cycle in terrestrial ecosystem. Based on MODIS 8-day composite net primary production data (MOD17A2),evapotranspiration heat flux product data (MOD16A2) and grassland classification data of Qinghai,the WUE changes in different grassland types from 2000-2018 were analyzed. We also stuied the impacts of ET and NPP,climatic factors on the WUE changes at annually and monthly time scales. The results showed that the average annually WUE of grassland ecosystems in the Province was 0.48 g·kg^-1. The spatial variation trend significance test on the WUE in Qinghai Province showed that there was 62.0% grassland ecosystems had significantly reduced their WUE (P<0.05). At the annual time scale,there was a quite significant negative correlation (P<0.1,R²=0.45) between WUE and Evapotranspation(ET) in the grassland ecosystem,affected mainly by ET,precipitation,wind speed and surface temperature. At the monthly time scale,WUE was affected by meteorological conditions such as ET,NPP and hydrothermal conditions,and WUE significantly positive correlated with ET and NPP (P<0.01),with the coefficients R² of 0.90 and 0.49. The monthly WUE was significantly positively correlated with hydrothermal conditions,including air temperature,precipitation,surface temperature,vapor pressure,and relative humidity (P<0.01),the correlation coefficients Rsup>2 are all greater than 0.55. This research would provide a certain data support for the study of the coupling process between carbon and water cycle and its response to climate changes of grassland ecosystems in the Qinghai Province.

Key words: Water use efficiency, Grassland ecosystem, Evapotranspiration, Net primary productivity

中图分类号:

S153

苏淑兰, 姬海娟, 张东, 张帅旗, 李晓东, 苏文将. 青海草地生态系统水分利用效率特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2814-2825.

SU Shu-lan, JI Hai-juan, ZHANG Dong, ZHANG Shuai-qi, LI Xiao-dong, SU Wen-jiang. Characteristics of Water Use Efficiency and its Influencing Factors of Grassland Ecosystem in Qinghai Province[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(9): 2814-2825.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.09.026

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I9/2814

参考文献

[1] TIAN H Q,CHEN G S,LIU M L,et al. Model estimates of net primary productivity, evapotranspiration,and water-use efficiency in the terrestrial ecosystems of the southern United States during 1895-2007[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2010,259(7):1311-1327
[2] 王庆伟,于大炮,代力民,等. 全球气候变化下植物水分利用效率研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报,2010,21(12):3255-3265
[3] 王会肖,刘昌明. 作物水分利用效率内涵及研究进展[J]. 水科学进展,2000,11(1):99-104
[4] 张岁岐,山仑. 植物水分利用效率及其研究进展[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2002,20(4):1-5
[5] 李荣生,许煌灿,尹光天,等. 植物水分利用效率的研究进展[J]. 林业科学研究,2003,16(3):366-371
[6] MU Q Z,ZHAO M S,RUNNING S W. Evolution of hydrological and carbon cycles under a changing climate[J]. Hyrological Processes,2011,25(26):4093-4102
[7] KLEIN T,SHPRINGER I,FIKLER B,et al. Relationships between stomatal regulation,water use,and water use efficiency of two coexisting key Mediterranean tree species[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2013,302(8):34-42
[8] HUANG G,LI Y,MU X H,et al. Water use efficiency in response to simulated increasing precipitation in a temperate desert ecosystem of Xinjiang,China[J]. Journal of Arid Land,2017,9(6):823-836
[9] ITO A,INATOMI M. Water-use efficiency of the terrestrial biosphere:a model analysis focusing on interactions between the global carbon and water cycles[J]. Journal of Hydrometeorology,2012,13(2):681-694
[10] 卢玲,李新,黄春林,等. 中国西部植被水分利用效率的时空特征分析[J]. 冰川冻土,2007,29(5):777-784
[11] 李辉东,关德新,袁凤辉,等. 科尔沁草甸生态系统水分利用效率及影响因素[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(2):478-488
[12] 位贺杰,张艳芳,董孝斌,等. 渭河流域植被WUE遥感估算及其时空特征[J]. 自然资源学报,2016,31(8):1275-1288
[13] BRÜMMER C,BLACK T A,JASSAL R S,et al. How climate and vegetation type influence evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in Canadian forest,peatland and grassland ecosystems[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2012,153:14-30
[14] LU X,ZHUANG Q. Evaluating evapotranspiration and water-use efficiency of terrestrial ecosystems in the conterminous United States using MODIS and AmeriFlux data[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment,2010,114(9):1924-1939
[15] ARNETH A,VEENENDAAL E,BEST C,et al. Water use strategies and ecosystem-atmosphere exchange of CO₂ in two highly seasonal environments[J]. Biogeosciences,2006,3(4):421-437
[16] REICHSTEIN M,CIAIS P,PAPALE D,et al. Reduction of ecosystem productivity and respiration during the European summer 2003 climate anomaly:A joint flux tower,remote sensing and modelling analysis[J]. Global Change Biology,2010,13(3):634-651
[17] BALDOCCHI D. A comparative study of mass and energy exchange over a closed C₃ (wheat) and an open C₄ (corn) canopy:I. The partitioning of available energy into latent and sensible heat exchange[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,1994,67(3-4):191-220
[18] MARKUS R,JOHN D T,OLIVIER R,et al. Severe drought effects on ecosystem CO₂ and H₂O fluxes at three Mediterranean evergreen sites:Revision of current hypotheses?[J]. Global Change Biology,2002,8(10):999-1017
[19] 邹杰,丁建丽,杨胜天. 近15年中亚及新疆生态系统水分利用效率时空变化分析[J]. 地理研究,2017,36(9):1742-1754
[20] 李明旭,杨延征,朱求安,等. 气候变化背景下秦岭地区陆地生态系统水分利用率变化趋势[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(4):936-945
[21] 宫菲,杜灵通,孟晨,等. 宁夏陆地生态系统水分利用效率特征及其影响因子分析[J]. 生态学报,2019,39(24):9068-9078
[22] 刘长雨,谢保鹏,杨洁,等. 青藏高原不同退化梯度下植被蒸散发的时空格局研究[J].草地学报,2023,31(1):252-262
[23] 孙树娇,周秉荣,周华坤,等. 青藏高原典型高寒荒漠生长季蒸散及水分消耗特征研究[J].草地学报,2021,29(S1):137-145
[24] 冯松,汤懋苍,王冬梅. 青藏高原是我国气候变化启动区的新证据[J]. 科学通报,1998,43(6):633-636
[25] 辛玉春,杜铁瑛,辛有俊. 青海天然草地生态系统服务功能价值评价[J]. 中国草地学报,2012,34(5):5-9
[26] 李旭谦. 青海草地生态系统碳汇功能初探[J]. 青海草业,2012,21(2):28-31
[27] CHAPIN III F S,CARPENTER S R,KOFINAS G P,et al. Ecosystems tewardship:sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution,2010,25(4):241-249
[28] ARES A,HARRINGTON C A,TERRY T A,et al. Vegetation control effects on untreated wood,crude cellulose and holocellulose δ13C of early and latewood in 3 to 5 year-old rings of Douglas-fir[J]. Trees,2008,22(5):603-609
[29] ZHOU S,DUURSMA R A,MEDLYN B E,et al. How should we model plant responses to drought? An analysis of stomatal and non-stomatal responses to water stress[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2013,182-183:204-214
[30] LAVERGNE A,GRAVEN H,KAUWE M G D,et al. Observed and modelled historical trends in the water-use efficiency of plants and ecosystems[J]. Global Change Biology,2019,25(7):2242-2257
[31] UMAIR M,KIM D,CHOI M. Impact of climate,rising atmospheric carbon dioxide,and other environmental factors on water-use efficiency at multiple land cover types.[J]. Scientific Reports,2020,20(1):11644
[32] 陈蔚. 森林、草原和耕地水分利用效率的变化趋势及其气候响应[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学,2021:39-40
[33] 张远东,庞瑞,顾峰雪,等. 西南高山地区水分利用效率时空动态及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(6):1515-1525
[34] 张良侠,胡中民,樊江文,等. 区域尺度生态系统水分利用效率的时空变异特征研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展,2014,29(6):691-699
[35] 王云英,裴薇薇,辛莹,等. 放牧对中国北方草地生态系统水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草原与草坪,2021,41(4):49-55
[36] BAI Y F,WU J G,XING Q,et al. Primary production and rain use efficiency across a precipitation gradient on the Mongolia Plateau[J]. Ecology,2008,89(8):2140-2153
[37] 夏磊. 全球陆地生态系统水分利用效率及人为用地植被缺失热效应估算[D]. 西安:中国科学院研究生院(教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心),2015:5-6
[38] ZHOU M,ZHOU S S,WANG J X,et al. Research advance on influencing factors of crop water use efficiency[J]. Angricultural Science and Technology,2014,15(11):1967-1976
[39] 肖春旺. 模拟降水量对毛乌素沙柳幼苗蒸发蒸腾的潜在影响[J]. 草地学报,2001,9(2):121-127

青海草地生态系统水分利用效率特征及其影响因素分析

Characteristics of Water Use Efficiency and its Influencing Factors of Grassland Ecosystem in Qinghai Province

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	闫丽娟, 谈燕, 马维伟, 常海刚, 谢明君, 陆燕花, 张建喜. 节水减氮对甘肃河西灌区青贮玉米生长及水氮利用效率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(8): 2545-2553.
[2]	丁玎, 任亮. 基于外部性理论构建草地生态产品价值实现制度体系[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1539-1545.
[3]	张雪, 张春平, 杨晓霞, 刘文亭, 俞旸, 曹铨, 刘玉祯, 李彩弟, 高婕, 董全民. 草地和荒漠生态系统生物土壤结皮对土壤养分及酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 632-640.
[4]	刘长雨, 谢保鹏, 杨洁, 陈英, 裴婷婷. 青藏高原不同退化梯度下植被蒸散发的时空格局研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 252-262.
[5]	倪旺, 梁丹妮, 时兴伟, 王斌, 王腾飞, 李满有, 冯琴, 兰剑. 灌溉次数和施氮量对甜高粱生产性能及光合特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 294-301.
[6]	李佳秀, 张青松, 杜子银. 减畜对草地植被生长和土壤特性的影响研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2280-2290.
[7]	孟翔, 孙伶俐, 谢开云, 刘伟, 褚皓清, 赵越. 灌溉、施磷量及AM真菌对紫花苜蓿产量和水磷利用效率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2356-2364.
[8]	陈琦, 李富翠, 彭钰梅, 刘卓成, 汪梦寒, 贾辰雁, 韩烈保. 青藏公路对沿线草地生态系统土壤可溶性有机碳及其特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2158-2166.
[9]	霍莉莉, 陈懂懂, 李奇, 张莉, 贺福全, 舒敏, 赵亮. 三江源地区草地植物功能性状与蒸散发关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2182-2190.
[10]	王云英, 裴薇薇, 郭小伟, 杜岩功. 青藏高原高寒湿地生态系统碳水通量与水分利用效率研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1037-1042.
[11]	巴桑参木决, 温仲明, 刘洋洋, 周荣磊, 任涵玉, 林子琦, 张志新, 王亦波, 张格语. 西藏草地净初级生产力的时空格局演变及其驱动机制分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 778-789.
[12]	韩福松, 余成群, 付刚, 彭依. 低温和干旱胁迫下牧草的抗逆性机制[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 2856-2864.
[13]	兰云飞, 李传华. 近16年祁连山植被NPP时空格局及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 188-195.
[14]	金艳霞, 陈哲, 周华坤, 付京晶. 草地生态系统中植被冠层截留的研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 1-9.
[15]	黄小涛, 姚步青, 马真, 周华坤. 青海高原草地净初级生产力和降水利用效率时空特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 19-26.