藏北羌塘牧民家庭牲畜存出栏权衡及影响因素分析

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.028

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 3591-3601.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.028

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

藏北羌塘牧民家庭牲畜存出栏权衡及影响因素分析

刘增辉¹, 周荣柱², 孙维³, 李少伟³, 张新永¹, 陈林耀¹, 武建双¹

1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所, 北京 100081;
2. 全国畜牧总站, 北京 100125;
3. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2024-03-05 修回日期:2024-04-23 发布日期:2024-11-29
通讯作者: 武建双,E-mail:wujianshuang@caas.cn
作者简介:刘增辉(1997-),男,汉族,山西临汾人,博士研究生,主要从事农业气象与气候变化以及农牧民可持续生计研究,E-mail:liuzhcaas@163.com
基金资助:
第二次青藏高原科学考察研究，任务十专题二《农牧耦合绿色发展的资源基础考察研究》(2019QZKK1002)资助

Livestock Inventory-slaughters Trade-offs and Potential Drivers at Herder Households Across Changtang, North Tibet

LIU Zeng-hui¹, ZHOU Rong-zhu², SUN Wei³, LI Shao-wei³, ZHANG Xin-yong¹, CHEN Lin-yao¹, WU Jian-shuang¹

1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
2. National Animal Husbandry Service, Beijing 100125, China;
3. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academic of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2024-03-05 Revised:2024-04-23 Published:2024-11-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究以藏北牧民家庭为研究对象，通过半结构式访谈调查高寒草甸、高寒草原和荒漠草原区牧户牲畜存出栏规模结构及其影响因素。结果表明：荒漠草原户均牲畜存/出栏规模(254.8 /48.6 SSU)显著高于高寒草甸(191.55 /33.22 SSU)和高寒草原(189.89 /33.49 SSU)；对牧户牲畜存栏规模影响最大的因素依次为单位面积产草量(高寒草甸)、家庭规模(高寒草原)和草畜平衡草场面积(荒漠草原)，可以解释其变异的10.78%，19.40%和15.99%；对牧户牲畜出栏规模影响最大的因素依次为草畜平衡草场面积(高寒草甸)、家庭规模(高寒草原)和劳动力数量(荒漠草原)，可以解释其变异的15.01%，11.20%和23.55%。综上所述，藏北高原牧民户均牲畜存/出栏规模和结构在不同草地类型之间存在明显差异，且受到自然和人文因素的双重影响。在未来制定草原生态保护政策时需要重点考虑资源禀赋和利用方式的差异。

关键词: 藏北羌塘, 牲畜存出栏, 草原生态保护补助奖励政策, 生计多样性, 草地类型

Abstract: Semi-structured questionnaires were employed to investigate the volumes and composition of livestock inventory and slaughter as well as their potential drivers at herder households from alpine meadow,alpine steppe,and desert steppe zones across the northern Tibetan Plateau. The results showed that (1) The volumes of livestock inventory and slaughter (254.8 and 48.6 SSU,Standardized Sheep Unit) at the household level in desert steppes were significantly larger than those in alpine meadows (191.55/33.22 SSU) and alpine steppes (189.89/33.49 SSU). (2) The most important influencing factor for the volumes of livestock inventory varies among alpine grassland types,from forage productivity in alpine meadows,to population per household in alpine steppes,and fenced grassland area in alpine deserts,which correspondingly explained 10.78%,19.40%,and 15.99% of its variance among households within each alpine grassland type. (3) The most important influencing factor for the volumes of livestock slaughter also differs among alpine grassland types,from grazing grassland area per household in alpine meadows,to population per household in alpine steppes,and labors per household in alpine deserts,which correspondingly explained 15.01%,11.20%,and 23.55% of its variance among households within each alpine grassland type. Therefore,the volumes and composition of livestock inventory and slaughter are different at the household level among alpine grassland types,and influenced by different natural and anthropogenic factors across the northern Tibetan Plateau. The spatial differences in endowment and utilization of grassland resources should be emphatically taken into account for the policy-making in the future.

Key words: Changtang,North Xizang, Livestock inventory and slaughter, Grassland Ecological Protection Subsidy and Reward Policy, Livelihood diversity, Grassland type

中图分类号:

F326.3

刘增辉, 周荣柱, 孙维, 李少伟, 张新永, 陈林耀, 武建双. 藏北羌塘牧民家庭牲畜存出栏权衡及影响因素分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(11): 3591-3601.

LIU Zeng-hui, ZHOU Rong-zhu, SUN Wei, LI Shao-wei, ZHANG Xin-yong, CHEN Lin-yao, WU Jian-shuang. Livestock Inventory-slaughters Trade-offs and Potential Drivers at Herder Households Across Changtang, North Tibet[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(11): 3591-3601.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.11.028

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I11/3591

参考文献

[1] TANG L,DONG S K,SHERMAN R,et al. Changes in vegetation composition and plant diversity with rangeland degradation in the alpine region of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. The Rangeland Journal,2015,37(1):107
[2] BONILLA-CEDREZ C,STEWARD P,ROSENSTOCK T S,et al. Priority areas for investment in more sustainable and climate-resilient livestock systems[J]. Nature Sustainability,2023,6(10):1279-1286
[3] WANG Y F,LV W W,XUE K,et al. Grassland changes and adaptive management on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment,2022,3(10):668-683
[4] LI P,BENNETT J. Understanding herders’ stocking rate decisions in response to policy initiatives[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2019,672:141-149
[5] ZHOU W,YANG H,HUANG L,et al. Grassland degradation remote sensing monitoring and driving factors quantitative assessment in China from 1982 to 2010[J]. Ecological Indicators,2017,83:303-313
[6] LI M Q,LIU S L,SUN Y X,et al. Agriculture and animal husbandry increased carbon footprint on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau during past three decades[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,278(1):123963
[7] BARDGETT R D,BULLOCK J M,LAVOREL S,et al. Combatting global grassland degradation[J]. Nature Reviews Earth and Environment,2021,2:720-735
[8] HOU L L,XIA F,CHEN Q H,et al. Grassland ecological compensation policy in China improves grassland quality and increases herders’ income[J]. Nature Communications,2021,12:4683
[9] ZHOU T,YANG H B,QIU X,et al.China’s grassland ecological compensation policy achieves win-win goals in Inner Mongolia[J]. Environmental Research Communications,2023,5(3):031007
[10] ZHANG J,BROWN C,QIAO G H,et al. Effect of eco-compensation schemes on household income structures and herder satisfaction:lessons from the grassland ecosystem subsidy and award scheme in Inner Mongolia[J]. Ecological Economics,2019,159:46-53
[11] 李新一,尹晓飞，周晓丽,等. 我国农牧民补助奖励政策背景与成效[J]. 草业学报,2020,29(7):163-173
[12] 赵晓园,高启杰,黄圣男,等. 组态视角下草原生态补奖政策满意度提升路径研究——基于藏北地区的实证分析[J]. 四川农业大学学报,2023,41(4):737-745
[13] 杨清,南志标,陈强强,等. 草原生态补助奖励政策牧民满意度及影响因素研究——基于甘肃青藏高原区与西部荒漠区的实证[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(4):1436-1444
[14] YIN Y,HOU Y L,LANGFORD C,et al. Herder stocking rate and household income under the Grassland Ecological Protection Award Policy in Northern China[J]. Land Use Policy,2019,82:120-129
[15] HU Y N,HUANG J K,HOU L L. Impacts of the grassland ecological compensation policy on household livestock production in China:an empirical study in Inner Mongolia[J]. Ecological Economics,2019,161:248-256
[16] 董全民,赵新全,李世雄,等. 草地放牧系统中土壤-植被系统各因子对放牧响应的研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志,2014,33(8):2255-2265
[17] LATAWIEC A E,STRASSBURG B B N,VALENTIM J F,et al. Intensification of cattle ranching production systems:socioeconomic and environmental synergies and risks in Brazil[J]. Animal,2014,8(8):1255-1263
[18] VALLENTINE J F. Grazing management[M].2nd edition. San Diego,California:Academic Press,2001:217-264
[19] LI X J,ZHANG X Z,WU J S,et al. Root biomass distribution in alpine ecosystems of the northern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2011,64(7):1911-1919
[20] ZHU Q A,CHEN H,PENG C H,et al. An early warning signal for grassland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Nature Communications,2023,14:6406
[21] 熊定鹏,赵广帅,武建双,等. 羌塘高寒草地物种多样性与生态系统多功能关系格局[J]. 生态学报,2016,36(11):3362-3371
[22] 孙鸿烈,郑度,姚檀栋,等. 青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J]. 地理学报,2012,67(1):3-12
[23] 赵宁宁,李文成,谢聿源,等. 藏北高寒草地放牧模式优化研究——以班戈县多尔格村牧业合作社为例[J]. 高原农业,2023,7(6):621-627
[24] 廖阳慈,李蕊蕊,索朗斯珠,等. 西藏自治区牦牛生产现状和趋势分析[J]. 中国畜禽种业,2023,19(6):72-79
[25] 刘永杰,杨琴. 青藏高原退化草地修复研究进展及展望[J]. 中国草地学报,2023,45(10):131-143
[26] ZHAO G S,SHI P L,WU J S,et al. Foliar nutrient resorption patterns of four functional plants along a precipitation gradient on the Tibetan Changtang Plateau[J]. Ecology and Evolution,2017,7(18):7201-7212
[27] 侯慧新,张雨,李少伟,等. 藏北羌塘牧民家庭人口特征和收入构成之间的关系[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(12):2653-2663
[28] DONGZHI H Q,CHEN X Y,SHI M M,et al. The spatial distribution and driving factors of carbon storage in the grassland ecosystems of the northern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology,2023,14(5):893-902
[29] 格日乐其木格,乌兰图雅,斯琴朝克图,等. 内蒙古草地质量对牧户生计脆弱性的影响评价[J]. 生态学杂志,2024,43(1):216-223
[30] ZHU J P, XU X L, LI T,et al. Foundamental strategic shift required by the expensive ecological policy in Chinese grasslands[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology,2022,13(6):955-963
[31] 冯树林,杜正才,陈功. 对草原生态补奖机制的体会和建议——以西藏自治区八宿县为例[J]. 草业与畜牧,2014(2):46-49
[32] 周升强,赵凯. 草原生态补奖政策对农牧民牲畜养殖规模的影响——基于生计分化的调节效应分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(4):157-165
[33] 祁海萍,申希平. Kruskal-Wallis H检验平均秩多重比较在SPSS软件中的实现[J]. 兰州工业学院学报,2015,22(2):76-78
[34] 张雨珊,周洪,刘秀华,等. 喀斯特地区农村劳动力转移对生态恢复的影响及其区域差异——基于酉阳和沿河的农户调查数据[J]. 生态学报,2023,43(13):5395-5405
[35] 谢先雄,赵敏娟,蔡瑜. 生计资本对牧民减畜意愿的影响分析——基于内蒙古372户牧民的微观实证[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2019,33(6):55-62
[36] 宋连久,孙自保,孙前路,等. 藏北草原牧民可持续生计分析——以班戈县为例[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(6):1287-1294
[37] BRISKE D D,ZHAO M L,HAN G D,et al. Strategies to alleviate poverty and grassland degradation in Inner Mongolia:intensification vs production efficiency of livestock systems[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2015,152:177-182
[38] BYRNE A T,HADRICH J C,ROBINSON B E,et al. A factor-income approach to estimating grassland protection subsidy payments to livestock herders in Inner Mongolia,China[J]. Land Use Policy,2020,91(2):104352
[39] 王丹,王征兵,赵晓锋. 草原生态保护补奖政策对牧户生产决策行为的影响研究——以青海省为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(3):70-76
[40] MAHDAVI S K,SHAHRAKI M,SHARAFATMANDRAD M. Consequences of participatory behavior of pastoralists on rangeland restoration[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management,2024,92:80-89
[41] 斯日乐. 加强草原生态保护促进牧区可持续发展探讨[J]. 科技展望,2015,25(5):237
[42] 黎洁,李树茁,费尔德曼. 山区农户林业相关生计活动类型及影响因素[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(8):8-16

藏北羌塘牧民家庭牲畜存出栏权衡及影响因素分析

Livestock Inventory-slaughters Trade-offs and Potential Drivers at Herder Households Across Changtang, North Tibet

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 10

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王慧, 杜富林. 草地类型异质性视角下牧户经营规模决策的比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(10): 3123-3135.
[2]	霍莉莉, 陈懂懂, 李奇, 张莉, 贺福全, 舒敏, 赵亮. 三江源地区草地植物功能性状与蒸散发关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2182-2190.
[3]	赵文, 尹亚丽, 李世雄, 刘晶晶, 董怡玲, 苏世锋. 祁连山不同类型草地植被群落及牧草营养特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6): 1328-1335.
[4]	姜安静, 董乙强, 阿斯太肯·居力海提, 周时杰, 聂婷婷, 李彩英, 席伟, 安沙舟. 封育对不同草地类型土壤细菌群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10): 2600-2608.
[5]	张豪睿, 付刚. 藏北高寒草地土壤真菌群落系统发育多样性对放牧的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 21-28.
[6]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 李泉林, 王有彬, 马秉云, 雷延民, 周睿, 谢久祥. 青藏高原典型草地牧草营养品质和消化率特征及其相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[7]	祁晓慧, 刘贺贺, 张宝, 乔光华. 补奖政策实施、肉羊价格波动对牧户收入的影响研究——基于内蒙古锡林郭勒盟111户牧户实地调查数据[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(4): 885-892.
[8]	姚喜喜, 宫旭胤, 白滨, 张利平, 郎侠, 吴建平. 祁连山高寒牧区不同类型草地植被特征与土壤养分及其相关性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(2): 371-379.
[9]	胥静, 武红旗, 蒋平安, 盛建东. 新疆典型草地土壤光谱特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(5): 980-985.
[10]	戎郁萍, 韩建国, 王培, 霍成君, 毛培胜, 杨波. 放牧强度和草地类型对育肥羔羊生产性能的影响[J]. , 2000, 8(4): 279-288.