燕麦萌发期耐盐性综合评价

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.014

草地学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 1717-1736.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.014

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

燕麦萌发期耐盐性综合评价

陈佳敏^1,2, 徐世锐^1,4, 贾蓓蓓², 崔硕祯², 魏广智², 张威^2,3,4, 张美俊^2,3,4, 贾举庆^2,3,4, 刘龙龙^1,4

1. 山西农业大学农业基因资源研究中心, 山西太原 030031;
2. 山西农业大学农学院, 山西太谷 030801;
3. 山西省后稷实验室, 山西太原 030031;
4. 农业农村部种质创新与分子育种重点实验室(部省共建), 山西太原 030031

收稿日期:2025-06-03 修回日期:2025-08-09 发布日期:2026-05-08
通讯作者: 刘龙龙，E-mail:lllong781211@sina.com;贾举庆，E-mail:jiajuqing@126.com
作者简介:陈佳敏（1999-），女，汉族，山西吕梁人，硕士研究生，主要从事作物遗传育种研究，E-mail:19834542925@163.com；
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2023YFD1202703）；财政部和农业农村部国家现代农业产业技术体系建设专项（CARS-07-A）；国家自然科学基金（32572378）；山西省重点研发计划项目（2022ZDYF110）；山西省后稷实验室自主立项课题（202304010930003-11）资助

Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of Oat （Avena sativa L.） Germplasm during the Germination Stage

CHEN Jia-min^1,2, XU Shi-rui^1,4, JIA Bei-bei², CUI Shuo-zhen², WEI Guang-zhi², ZHANG Wei^2,3,4, ZHANG Mei-jun^2,3,4, JIA Ju-qing^2,3,4, LIU Long-long^1,4

1. Center for Agricultural Genetic, Resources Research, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province 030031, China;
2. College of Agriculture, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
3. Houji Laboratory in Shanxi Province, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province 030031, China;
4. Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Innovation and Molecular Breeding (Co-construction by Ministry and Province), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province 030031, China

Received:2025-06-03 Revised:2025-08-09 Published:2026-05-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究旨在建立高效的燕麦（Avena sativa L.）萌发期耐盐性鉴定方法，并为耐盐育种筛选优良亲本。采用培养皿纸上发芽法，以0.80%（136.89 mmol·L-1）NaCl溶液对332份燕麦种质进行盐胁迫处理，测定发芽势等8项指标，结合加权隶属函数法与聚类分析综合评价其耐盐性并划分等级。盐胁迫对8项指标均产生抑制；相关性分析显示各指标间存在极显著正相关；332份种质被划分为5个等级，包括34份高耐盐、83份耐盐、116份中等耐盐、51份盐敏感及48份高盐敏感种质；通过回归分析确定根长耐盐指数、芽鲜重耐盐指数为萌发期耐盐性评价的关键指标；根据两年评价结果，6份材料的耐盐性稳定，可作为耐盐育种亲本；比较分析显示，耐盐性皮燕麦的比率高于裸燕麦。34份高耐盐种质为耐盐育种与基因挖掘提供了优异资源。

关键词: 燕麦, 萌发期, 加权隶属函数分析, 耐盐指数

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to establish an efficient method for identifying the salt tolerance of oats （Avena sativa L.） during the germination stage， and to screen our excellent parents for salt-tolerant breeding. Using the petri dish paper germination method， 332 oat germplasms were subjected to a salt stress treatment with 0.80% （136.89 mmol·L^-1） NaCl solution. Eight indicators such as germination potential were measured. The salt tolerance was comprehensively evaluated and classified by combining the weighted membership function method with cluster analysis. Salt stress significantly inhibited all eight measured indicators. Correlation analysis revealed that highly significant positive correlations among these indicators. The 332 germplasms were classified into five salt tolerance grades： 34 highly salt-tolerant， 83 salt-tolerant， 116 moderately salt-tolerant， 51 salt-sensitive， and 48 highly salt-sensitive accessions. Regression analysis identified the salt tolerance index of root length （STI-RL） and the salt tolerance index of bud fresh weight （STI-BFW） as key indicators for evaluating salt tolerance during germination. Based on two-year evaluations， six materials demonstrated stable salt tolerance and can be utilized as parents in salt-tolerant breeding programs. Comparative analysis indicated that a higher proportion of Avena sativa L. accessions exhibited stronger salt tolerance compared to Avena nuda L. accessions. The 34 highly salt-tolerant germplasms provided excellent resources for salt-tolerant breeding and gene mining.

Key words: Oats, Germination stage, Weighted membership function analysis, Salt tolerance index

中图分类号:

S512.6

陈佳敏, 徐世锐, 贾蓓蓓, 崔硕祯, 魏广智, 张威, 张美俊, 贾举庆, 刘龙龙. 燕麦萌发期耐盐性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1717-1736.

CHEN Jia-min, XU Shi-rui, JIA Bei-bei, CUI Shuo-zhen, WEI Guang-zhi, ZHANG Wei, ZHANG Mei-jun, JIA Ju-qing, LIU Long-long. Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of Oat （Avena sativa L.） Germplasm during the Germination Stage[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(5): 1717-1736.

参考文献

[1] LI Z J, SUN W Y, MA W P, et al. Review and prospects of improvement technology for saline-alkali soil[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2010(2):73-77 李志杰, 孙文彦, 马卫萍, 等. 盐碱土改良技术回顾与展望[J]. 山东农业科学, 2010(2):73-77
[2] PITMAN M G, LAUCHLI A. Global impact of salinity and agricultural ecosystems[J]. Salinity:Environment-Plants-Molecules, 2002(3):20
[3] TUTEJA N. Mechanisms of high salinity tolerance in plants[J]. Methods in Enzymology, 2007, 428(7):419-438
[4] ZUO Z J, ZHANG R M, GAO Y, et al. Advances in plant cell ion flux with salt stress: a review[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2014, 31(5):805-811 左照江, 张汝民, 高岩. 盐胁迫下植物细胞离子流变化的研究进展[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31(5):805-811
[5] ARSHAD ULLAH M, MAHMOOD I ALI, SARWAR M, et al. Screening of Oat (Avena sativa) varieties in saline-sodic soil[J]. American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research, 2019, 4(2):104-106
[6] YANG H P, SUN Z M. Oats in China[M]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 1989:3-5 杨海鹏, 孙泽民. 中国燕麦[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 1989:3-5
[7] YUAN B, XU L J, ZHAO Y R, et al. Selection and evaluation of multiple cropping oats for suitable varieties in a farming-pastoral ecotone in northern China[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2024, 41(3):652-663 袁波, 徐丽君, 赵雅茹, 等. 北方农牧交错区复种燕麦品种的筛选与评价[J]. 草业科学, 2024, 41(3):652-663
[8] CHEN X, Xu Z, ZHAO B, et al. Physiological and proteomic analysis responsive mechanisms for salt stress in oat[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13:891674
[9] LUO Z N, ZHAO G Q, LIU H. The comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance for 24 oat cultivars[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2012, 32(1):34-38, 41 罗志娜, 赵桂琴, 刘欢. 24个燕麦品种种子萌发耐盐性综合评价[J]. 草原与草坪, 2012, 32(1):34-38, 41
[10] AGNIHOTRI R K, PALNI L M S, PANDEY D K. Screening of landraces of rice under cultivation in Kumaun Himalaya for salinity stress during germination and early seedling growth[J]. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2006, 11(3):266-272
[11] QUAMRUZZAMAN M, MANIK S M N, LIVERMORE M, et al. Multidimensional screening and evaluation of morpho-physiological indices for salinity stress tolerance in wheat[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2022, 208:454-471
[12] KINGSBURY R W, EPSTEIN E. Selection for salt-resistant spring wheat[J]. Crop Science, 1984, 24:310-315
[13] RASEL M, TAHJIB-UL-ARIF M, HOSSAIN M A, et al. Screening of salt-tolerant rice landraces by seedling stage phenotyping and dissecting biochemical determinants of tolerance mechanism[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2021, 40:1853-1868
[14] SUN L, ZHOU Y F, WANG C, et al. Screening and identification of sorghum cultivars for salinity tolerance during germination[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(9):1714-1722 孙璐, 周宇飞, 汪澈, 等. 高粱品种萌发期耐盐性筛选与鉴定[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(9):1714-1722
[15] GIAVENO C D, RIBEIRO R V, SOUZA G M, et al. Screening of tropical maize for salt stress tolerance[J]. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 2007, 7:304-313
[16] LI C H, YAO X D, JU B T, et al. Analysis of shade-tolerance and determination of shade-tolerance evaluation indicators in different soybean genotypes[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47:2927-2939 李春红, 姚兴东, 鞠宝韬, 等. 不同基因型大豆耐荫性分析及其鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47:2927-2939
[17] SIRIGULENG, ZHANG Y X, MA Q, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance of 8 forage oat varieties[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2020, 40(6):118-123 斯日古楞, 张玉霞, 马群, 等. 8个饲用燕麦品种萌发期耐盐性综合评价[J]. 草原与草坪, 2020, 40(6):118-123
[18] YANG X, ZHANG X Q, WANG Y Q, et al. Salt-Tolerance appraisal and comprehensive evaluation of wild Arrhenatherum elatius L. seedling[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 2006, 34(23):6105-6108 阳曦, 张新全, 王运琦, 等. 高燕麦草苗期耐盐性鉴定及综合评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006, 34(23):6105-6108
[19] WU J Y, LIU J H, ZHAI L J, et al. Salt tolerance of seed germination and seedling growth of different oat varieties[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(10):1960-1965 武俊英, 刘景辉, 翟利剑, 等. 不同品种燕麦种子萌发和幼苗生长的耐盐性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(10):1960-1965
[20] CHEN X, ZHANG Z W, WU B. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance and screening for salt tolerant accessions of naked oat (Avena nuda L.) at germination stage[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(10):2038-2046 陈新, 张宗文, 吴斌. 裸燕麦萌发期耐盐性综合评价与耐盐种质筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(10):2038-2046
[21] LAI D L, FAN Y, ZHU H L, et al. Network analysis of physiological and biochemical indexes of salt tolerance in oats[J]. Crops, 2020(2):147-155 赖弟利, 范昱, 朱红林, 等. 燕麦耐盐性的生理生化指标网络分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(2):147-155
[22] ZHANG J, GAO W B, YAN L, et al. Identification and evaluation of salt-alkali tolerance and screening of salt-alkali tolerant germplasm of oat (Avena sativa L.)[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(6):1551-1561 张静, 高文博, 晏林, 等. 燕麦种质资源耐盐碱性鉴定评价及耐盐碱种质筛选[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6):1551-1561
[23] LIU F Q, LIU J L, ZHU R F, et al. Physiological responses and tolerance of four oat varieties to salt stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(1):183-189 刘凤歧, 刘杰淋, 朱瑞芬, 等. 4种燕麦对NaCl胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(1):183-189
[24] LU Q, NIU X, ZHANG M, et al. Genome-wide association study of seed dormancy and the genomic consequences of improvement footprints in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 8:2213
[25] WU H, GUO J, WANG C, et al. An effective screening method and a reliable screening trait for salt tolerance of Brassica napus at the germination stage[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10:530
[26] TESTER M, DAVENPORT R. Na⁺ tolerance and Na⁺ transport in higher plants[J]. Annals of Botany, 2003, 91(5):503-527
[27] SHAABAN M M, EL-FOULY M M. Nutrient contents and salt removal potential of some wild plants grown in salt affected soils[C]//International Symposium on Techniques to Control Salination for Horticultural Productivity, 2000:377-385
[28] ZHANG M, ZHOU J M, Ma W, et al. A comprehensive evaluation on salt tolerance of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) as rootstock in seed germination stage[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2023, 36(1):26-34 张蒙, 周经明, 马玮, 等. 砧用中国南瓜种子萌发期耐盐性鉴定评价[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(1):26-34
[29] ZHANG D, MIAO X F, WANG Y T. Evaluation and screening of salt tolerance in 100 foxtail millet at germination stage[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6):43-49 张笛, 苗兴芬, 王雨婷. 100份谷子品种资源萌发期耐盐性评价及耐盐品种筛选[J]. 作物杂志, 2019, 35(6):43-49
[30] LIU H J, WANG J H, GONG Z L, et al. Identification of salt tolerance of 197 upland cotton varieties at germination stage[J]. XinJiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7):1574-1581 刘慧杰, 王俊豪, 龚照龙, 等. 197份陆地棉品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(7):1574-1581
[31] LI Z, YUN L, ZHANG Y X, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of saline-alkaline resistance in 10 forage oat varieties during seed germination[J]. Seed, 2019, 38(11):90-95 李珍, 云岚, 张玉霞, 等. 10个饲用燕麦品种种子萌发期耐盐碱性的综合评价[J]. 种子, 2019, 38(11):90-95
[32] TRACHSEL S, MESSMER R, STAMP P, et al. QTLs for early vigor of tropical maize[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2010, 25(1):91-103
[33] ZHOU G L, YANG H X. An analysis and review of physiological and biochemical indexes about wheat drought resistance identification[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 1996, 14(2):65-71 周桂莲, 杨慧霞. 小麦抗旱性鉴定的生理生化指标及其分析评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 1996, 14(2):65-71
[34] FU L H, YU S, YU L H, et al. Analysis of salt-alkali tolerance and screening of identification indexes of different oat at germination stage[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6):27-35, 174 付鸾鸿, 于崧, 于立河, 等. 不同基因型燕麦萌发期耐盐碱性分析及其鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, 34(6):27-35, 174
[35] LI C Q, LIU X Y, YAN P, et al. Physiological identification and comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of different maize varieties[J]. Crops, 2024, 40(4):253-262 李春情, 刘翔宇, 闫鹏, 等. 不同玉米品种抗旱性的生理鉴定与综合评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2024, 40(4):253-262
[36] CHANG M J, CHU Z Y, DU Y B, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the physiological indices in wheat under high temperature resistance[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University, 2023, 49(1):1-11 常明娟, 楚宗艳, 杜玉倍, 等. 高温胁迫下小麦生理指标的主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 湖南农业大学学报, 2023, 49(1):1-11
[37] YANG G L, YANG M N, LI S L, et al. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance indices of rice at germination stage[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2015, 36(2):1-5 杨瑰丽, 杨美娜, 李帅良, 等. 水稻萌芽期抗旱指标筛选与抗旱性综合评价[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2015, 36(2):1-5
[38] WANG B, SONG F B. Physiological responses and adaptive capacity of oats to saline-alkali stress[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2006, 15(3):625-629 王波, 宋凤斌. 燕麦对盐碱胁迫的反应和适应性[J]. 生态环境, 2006, 15(3):625-629
[39] TA N, LU X P, ZHANG Y H, et al. Character performance and genetic diversity of Avena sativa and naked oat[J]. Inner Mongolia Agricultural Science and Technology, 2010, 38(2):33-35, 41 塔娜, 逯晓萍, 张雅慧, 等. 皮、裸燕麦种质资源的性状表现和遗传差异分析[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2010, 38(2):33-35, 41

燕麦萌发期耐盐性综合评价

Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of Oat （Avena sativa L.） Germplasm during the Germination Stage

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘进娣, 陈仕勇, 李进, 梁国玲, 周青平. 燕麦SWEET基因家族的鉴定及其响应干旱和盐碱胁迫的表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1568-1583.
[2]	廖万奇, 汪辉, 王沛, 陈有军, 周青平, 雷映霞. 不同燕麦品种苗期形态、生理对低磷胁迫的响应及耐低磷评价[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1701-1716.
[3]	张金凤, 张婷, 张运婷, 左爱玲, 杨子森, 侯东来, 赵祥, 高鹏. 晋北黄土旱塬区38个饲用燕麦品种的适应性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1262-1274.
[4]	马翔宇, 刘家佳, 段博文, 张琮滟, 胡晓炜, 周青平. 水磷限制对燕麦生长发育的影响及综合评价指标筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1335-1346.
[5]	牛浴林, 仝宗永, 陈鹏伟, 秦燕. 土壤改良剂对柴达木盐碱地燕麦生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1483-1491.
[6]	卫纪, 高杨淼, 汪辉, 陈有军, 周青平, 王沛, 雷映霞. 465份燕麦种质资源表型遗传多样性分析及优异资源筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 840-852.
[7]	余泓毅, 张一桦, 刘丽仙, 李乔仙, 李思源, 何胤茜, 边之懿, 赵志丽, 段新慧. 不同比例饲用燕麦与红花茎叶混合青贮品质研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 1094-1105.
[8]	詹圆, 崔琪, 虞应乾, 方嘉琪, 汪辉. 花后干旱胁迫对燕麦穗部器官光合生理及糖代谢的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 415-423.
[9]	何世佳, 成华强, 刘鹏, 杨轩. 高温干旱复合事件对晋北饲用燕麦生产的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 424-436.
[10]	魏孔涛, 曹铨, 张正社, 张春平, 俞旸, 周泽, 张雪, 王鑫鑫, 岳思玉, 董全民. 不同燕麦品种的干草产量和种子产量相关特性及影响因素研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 531-542.
[11]	马祥, 琚泽亮, 贾志锋, 刘凯强, 王小军. 贮藏前含水量及贮藏方式对燕麦种子活力的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 687-701.
[12]	李香, 邹丽, 杨巽喆, 张海琴. 50份多花黑麦草种质耐盐性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(1): 239-253.
[13]	王杰, 刘欣悦, 金鑫, 傅云洁, 鲍奎, 全志秀, 党玉红, 徐成体, 王伟, 张海娟, 芦光新. 施用黄腐酸钾对柴达木盆地盐碱地燕麦生长和土壤质量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 3118-3128.
[14]	靳建刚, 郑敏娜, 康佳惠, 杨富, 田再芳, 王远东. 98份燕麦品种（系）茎秆抗倒伏性状的综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2567-2574.
[15]	徐双鹏, 赵永琦, 董晓慧, 梁文斌, 尹国丽, 鱼小军. 乳酸菌添加剂对高寒牧区燕麦与箭筈豌豆混合青贮品质及酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2694-2702.