披碱草与老芒麦苗期抗旱性综合评价

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2009.01.008

›› 2009, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 36-42.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2009.01.008

披碱草与老芒麦苗期抗旱性综合评价

祁娟^1,2, 徐柱², 王海清², 马玉宝², 李临杭²

1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 兰州, 730070;
2. 中国农业科学院草原研究所, 内蒙古, 呼和浩特, 010010

收稿日期:2008-03-21 修回日期:2008-08-25 出版日期:2009-02-15 发布日期:2009-02-15
通讯作者: 徐柱,Author for correspondence,E-mail:yxuzhu@yahoo.com
作者简介:祁娟(1972- ),女,甘肃省镇原县人,在读博士,主要研究方向为牧草种质资源与育种,E-mail:qijuan0622@163.com
基金资助:
“973”计划项目子课题(2007CB106806)

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Drought Resistance of Elymus dahuricus Turcz. and Elymus sibiricus L. at Seedling Stage

QI Juan^1,2, XU Zhu², WANG Hai-qing², MA Yu-bao², LI Lin-hang²

1. Pratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. Grassland Research Institute, CAAS, Huhhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 010010, China

Received:2008-03-21 Revised:2008-08-25 Online:2009-02-15 Published:2009-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 盆栽模拟土壤干旱条件,对采自我国不同生境的披碱草(Elymus dahuricus Turcz.)与老芒麦(Elymus sibiricus L.)10份野生种质材料苗期形态学和生理生化指标进行研究,旨在了解干旱胁迫下苗期抗旱特征及其抗旱能力,为披碱草属种质材料抗旱新品种选育、种质资源的开发利用提供理论依据。结果表明,随干旱胁迫日数增加,植株高度、叶面积、相对含水量和叶绿素都明显下降,而电导率、脯氨酸、SOD和POD都明显上升。经抗旱隶属度分析,10份材料抗旱性可分为3类:第一类为相对抗旱,包括SXD1、XJD2、NMD3、NMD4、GSD5、GSS1和JLS2共7份材料;第二类为中等抗旱,包括NMD6和SXS3共两份材料;第三类NMS4为相对易感。经相关分析筛选出对抗旱性影响显著的指标为:相对含水量、叶面积、相对电导率和叶绿素含量。

关键词: 披碱草, 老芒麦, 苗期抗旱性, 生理生化指标

Abstract: Elymus dahuricus Turcz.and Elymus sibiricus L.,as the major forages in the world,often suffer from drought to some degree during their growing season.Therefore,the drought-resistant breeding and drought-resistant culture of them should be paid with high attention.At present,the researches in such field mainly concentrate on the collection,identification of the materials and so on,while seldom on the ability of drought resistance.In this study,the drought resistance of 10 wild E.dahuricus and E.sibiricus L germplasms from different habitats were investigated using potted plants to simulate soil drought condition.The dynamic indicators related to drought resistance were comprehensive evaluated by the jurisdiction of function law under 21 d of stress.The results show that the plant height,leaf area,relative water content and chlorophyll decreased significantly along with the days of drought stress increased,while the relative electrical conductivity,proline content,SOD,and POD increased distinctly.According to the values of jurisdiction degree,the 10 germplasms were divided into the following three categories.The germplasms with strong drought resistance included SXD1,XJD2,NMD3,NMD4,GSD5,GSS1,and JLS2;the germplasms with medium drought resistance included NMD6 and SXS3;the drought sensitive one was NMS4.Correlation analysis indicate the indices which had significant impact on drought resistance were the relative water content,leaf area,chlorophyll content,and relative electrical conductivity.The results of this experiment could help us understand the characteristics and abilities of their drought resistance and also provide a basis for new species selection and the exploitation and utilization of Elymus germplasm.

Key words: Elymus dahuricus Turcz., Elymus sibiricus L., Drought resistance at seedling stage, Physiological and biochemical index

中图分类号:

祁娟, 徐柱, 王海清, 马玉宝, 李临杭. 披碱草与老芒麦苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. , 2009, 17(1): 36-42.

QI Juan, XU Zhu, WANG Hai-qing, MA Yu-bao, LI Lin-hang. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Drought Resistance of Elymus dahuricus Turcz. and Elymus sibiricus L. at Seedling Stage[J]. , 2009, 17(1): 36-42.

参考文献

[1] 刘祖祺,张石城.植物抗性生理学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,1994,121-124.
[2] von Bothmer R,Seberg O,Jacobsen N.Genetic resources in the Triticeae[J]. Hereditas,1992,116:141-150.
[3] Sharma H C,Gill B S,Uyemoto J K.High level of resistance in Agropyron species to barely yellow dwarf and wheat streak mosaic viruses[J]. Theor.Appl.Genet,1984,67:235-243.
[4] 孙彦,杨青川,张英华.不同草坪草种及品种苗期抗旱性比较[J]. 草地学报,2001,9(1):16-20.
[5] 华孟,王坚.土壤物理学试验指导[M]. 北京:北京农业大学出版社,1993,44.
[6] 张治安,张美善,蔚荣海.植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2004,54-138.
[7] 孙海霞,祖朝龙,徐经年.干旱对植物影响的研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学,2004,32 (2):365-367.
[8] 王洪春.植物生理学专题讲座[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1987,336-341.
[9] 祁云枝,杜勇军.干旱胁迫下黄瓜及蚕豆叶片膜透性改变及其机理研究[J]. 陕西农业科学,1997(4):6-7.
[10] 任安芝,高玉葆,梁宇,等.白草和赖草无性系生长对干旱胁迫的反应[J]. 中国沙漠,1999,(19):31-34.
[11] 周瑞莲.应用生物化学技术进行牧草抗逆性鉴定的原理与方法[J]. 中国草地,1999,(3):56-59.
[12] 史晓霞,毛培春,张国芳,等.15份马蔺材料苗期抗旱性比较[J]. 草地学报,2007,15(4):352-358.
[13] 张力君,易津,贾光宏,等.9种禾草对干旱胁迫的生理反应[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报,2000,21(4):21-23.
[14] Huang B,Fry J,Wang B.Water relations and canopy characteristics of tall fescue cultivars during and after drought stress[J]. Hort.science,1998,33:837-840.
[15] 李俊庆.水分胁迫对不同抗旱型花生生长发育及生理特征的影响[J]. 中国农业气象,1996,17(1):11-17.
[16] 胡小文,王彦荣,武艳培.荒漠草原植物抗旱生理生态研究进展[J]. 草业学报,2007,13(3):9-15.
[17] 马智宏,李征,王北洪,等.冷季型草坪草耐旱及耐寒性比较[J]. 草地学报,2002,10(4):318-21.
[18] Xu S J,An L Z,Feng H Y,et al.The seasonal effects of water stress on Ammopiptanthus mongolicus in dester environment[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2002,51:437-447.
[19] 周瑞莲,孙国钧,王海鸥.沙生植物渗透调节物对干旱、高温的响应及其在逆境中的作用[J]. 中国沙漠,1999,19:18-22.
[20] Levitt J.Responses of plants to environmental stress[M]. 2ed.Vol I,II,Academic Press.1998,56-57.
[21] 王继和.民勤沙区主要乔灌木体内水分状况及其抗旱特点的探讨[C]. 中国植物生理学会第三次全国会议论文摘要汇编,1982,272-273

披碱草与老芒麦苗期抗旱性综合评价

Comprehensive Evaluation of the Drought Resistance of Elymus dahuricus Turcz. and Elymus sibiricus L. at Seedling Stage

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋建超, 鱼小军, 魏孔涛, 汪鹏斌, 童永尚, 李珍, 贺有龙, 汪海波. 施氮对高寒区垂穗披碱草饲草生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564.
[2]	其美拉姆, 普布卓玛, 崔彤彤, 张新飞, 姜惠娜, 付娟娟, 呼天明. 外源钙对低温胁迫下西藏野生垂穗披碱草生理及相关基因表达的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 919-928.
[3]	秦金萍, 刘颖, 马玉寿, 王彦龙, 李世雄. 返青期休牧对退化高寒草地植被特征及优势种光合生理的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1034-1042.
[4]	张荟荟, 梁维维, 张学洲, 阿斯娅·曼力克, 朱昊, 魏鹏, 康帅, 李学森. 新疆野生老芒麦种质资源形态及生长特性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 701-708.
[5]	李倩, 李长慧, 孙启忠, 王有良. 门源县越冬成功的3种紫花苜蓿抗寒性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 631-634.
[6]	宿敬龙, 祁娟, 刘艳君, 杨航, 李明. 不同氮素水平及施氮方式对老芒麦根际土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 259-269.
[7]	韩梦丽, 白史且, 孙盛楠, 鄢家俊, 张传杰, 张昌兵, 张靖雪, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 严学兵. 基于MaxEnt模型青藏高原老芒麦适生区模拟预测[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 374-382.
[8]	岳丽楠, 师尚礼, 祁娟, 杨培志, 刘刚, 刘文辉, 张英俊, 荆晶莹. 免耕补播对北方退化草地生产力及营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2583-2590.
[9]	姜惠娜, 敬松, 李晗玉, 佘木子, 张新飞, 呼天明, 付娟娟, 苗彦军. 西藏野生垂穗披碱草EnPLA1基因克隆与表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2141-2148.
[10]	杨航, 祁娟, 刘文辉, 刘艳君, 宿敬龙, 李明. 异龄老芒麦根际土壤中脂肪酸类物质检测及根际土壤的自毒效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 52-59.
[11]	单旭东, 高娅楠, 张桐瑞, 程锦, 许立新. 保温和浇水处理对结缕草冬季胁迫的缓解作用[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 202-210.
[12]	唐嘉, 毛春力, 黄琪, 唐俊, 宋玉梅, 孙铭, 毛培胜. 不同贮藏年限老芒麦种胚线粒体抗氧化功能的变化规律[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1226-1232.
[13]	刘敏洁, 刘文辉, 张永超, 吴瑞, 秦燕. 聚乙二醇模拟干旱胁迫对老芒麦幼苗生长及次生代谢部分产物的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1355-1362.
[14]	姚泽英, 李军, 宋连昭, 刘春阳, 姚泽军, 刘贵河. 垂穗披碱草与紫花苜蓿不同时期交叉混播效果研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1454-1459.
[15]	杨航, 祁娟, 李玉英, 刘艳君, 吴召林, 金鑫. 外源激素与磷素配施对老芒麦生长特性及营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1015-1023.