柳枝稷根系垂直分布及植株生长对土壤盐分类型的响应

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.04.018

›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 644-651.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.04.018

柳枝稷根系垂直分布及植株生长对土壤盐分类型的响应

李继伟^1,2, 左海涛², 李青丰¹, 范希峰¹, 侯新村¹

1. 内蒙古农业大学生态环境学院, 呼和浩特010019;
2. 北京草业与环境研究发展中心, 北京100097

收稿日期:2011-01-12 修回日期:2011-04-18 出版日期:2011-08-15 发布日期:2011-08-15
通讯作者: 左海涛,E-mail:zuohait@126.com
作者简介:李继伟(1983- ),男,山西省忻州人,博士研究生,主要从事草本能源植物的栽培技术研究,E-mail:lijiwei1983@126.com
基金资助:
北京市科技计划(Z09050600630901)(D101105046410001)资助

Response of Root Spatial Pattern and Growth Characteristics of Switchgrass to Soil Saline Type

LI Ji-wei^1,2, ZUO Hai-tao², LI Qing-feng¹, FAN Xi-feng¹, HOU Xin-cun¹

1. College of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Huhhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 010019, China;
2. Beijing Research & Development Center for Grass and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China

Received:2011-01-12 Revised:2011-04-18 Online:2011-08-15 Published:2011-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用土柱法研究了土壤NaCl(0.40%)、Na₂SO₄(0.80%)和NaHCO₃(0.80%)胁迫对建植当年柳枝稷(Pani-cum virgatum L.)根系垂直分布和植株生长的影响,以期明确不同盐分胁迫下柳枝稷的响应机制,为其在盐渍土地上的栽培管理提供理论依据。结果表明:盐土条件下,柳枝稷的倒三叶尺寸、叶绿素a含量、地上和地下生物量、总生物量、籽粒产量和根冠比均显著低于对照(无盐处理),叶绿素b和总叶绿素含量增加,对总根长、根表面积和根体积的抑制作用显著。土壤盐分类型为NaCl时,柳枝稷的株高与CK差异不显著,根系生物量重心上移至23 cm(CK为50 cm),根系集中分布在0～40 cm土层;土壤盐分类型为Na₂SO₄时,根系生物量重心上移至38 cm,根系分布在0～120 cm土层范围内,且随着土层深度的增加而逐渐减少;土壤盐分类型为NaHCO₃时,根系生物量重心上移至18 cm,根系集中分布在0～80 cm土层。NaCl和NaHCO₃对柳枝稷根系向下延伸的影响较大,而Na₂SO₄对根系向下延伸的影响较小。

关键词: 柳枝稷, 盐分类型, 根系垂直分布

Abstract: Effects of soil saline type on the root spatial distribution pattern and growth characteristics of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) were studied using soil column method to define the response mechanism of switchgrass on different salt stress (NaCl 0.40%,Na₂SO₄ 0.80% and NaHCO₃ 0.80%) and to provide a theoretical basis of cultivation management.Results showed that the size of tope third leaf,leaf chlorophyll-a content,above-and underground root biomass,total biomass,seed yield,and the ratio of root to shoot were significantly decreased under soil salinity treatments,whereas leaf chlorophyll-b and total chlorophyll content increased.Total root length,root surface area,and root volumes were inhibited.Under NaCl treatment,the plant height was not significantly different from that of CK.Roots concentrated growth in 0～40 cm of soil layer with biomass gravity changing to 23 cm from 50 cm (CK) soil layer.Under Na₂SO₄ treatment,root distributed in 0～120 cm of soil layer and gradually decreased along with the increasing of soil depth.Under NaHCO₃ treatment,root concentrated growth in 0～80 cm of soil layer with biomass gravity in 18 cm of soil layer.There were significant influences on root extending of switchgrass in NaCl and NaHCO₃ treatment,but small influences in Na₂SO₄ treatment.

Key words: Switchgrass, Saline type, Root vertical distribution

中图分类号:

李继伟, 左海涛, 李青丰, 范希峰, 侯新村. 柳枝稷根系垂直分布及植株生长对土壤盐分类型的响应[J]. , 2011, 19(4): 644-651.

LI Ji-wei, ZUO Hai-tao, LI Qing-feng, FAN Xi-feng, HOU Xin-cun. Response of Root Spatial Pattern and Growth Characteristics of Switchgrass to Soil Saline Type[J]. , 2011, 19(4): 644-651.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.04.018

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2011/V19/I4/644

参考文献

[1] Lemus R,Charles Brummer E,Moore K J.Biomass yield and quality of 20 switchgrass populations in southern Iowa,USA[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2002,23 (6):433-442
[2] Sanderson M A,Reed R L,McLaughlin S B,et al.Switchgrass as a sustainable bioenergy crop[J].Bioresource Technology,1996,56(1):83-93
[3] 左海涛,李继伟,郭斌,等.盐分和土壤含水量对营养生长期柳枝稷的影响[J].草地学报,2009,17(6):760-766
[4] Boylan D,Bush V,Bransby D I.Switchgrass cofiring:pilot scale and field evaluation[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2000,19 (6):411-417
[5] McLaughlin S B,Kszos L A.Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2005,28(6):515-535
[6] Lewandowskia I,Scurlock J M O,Lindvall E,et al.The development and current status of perennial rhizom-atous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2003,25(4):335-361
[7] Tillman D A.Biomass cofiring:the technology,the experience,the combustion consequences[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2000,19(6);385-394
[8] Ma Z,Wood C W,Bransby D I.Carbon dynamics subsequent to establishment of switchgrass[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,2000,18(2):93-104
[9] Mclaughlin S B,Walsh M E.Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy[J].Biomass and Bioenergy,1998,14(4):317-324
[10] 徐恒刚.中国盐生植被及盐渍化生态治理[M].北京:中国农业技术出版社,2004.10-15
[11] Sanderson M A,Reed R L,Ocumpaugh W R,et al.Switchgrass cultivars and germplasm for biomass feedback production in Texas[J].Bioresource Technology,2000,67(3):209-219
[12] 郭忠升,邵明安.半干旱区人工林草地土壤旱化与土壤水分植被承载力[J].生态学报,2003,23(8):1640-1647
[13] 刘昌明,王会肖.土壤一作物一大气界面水分过程与节水调控[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.194
[14] 李禄军,蒋志荣,车克钧,等.绿洲一荒漠交错带不同沙丘土壤水分时空动态变化规律[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(1):123-127
[15] Mass E V,Poss J A.Salt sensitivity of wheat at various growth stages[J].Irrigation Science,1989,10 (1):29-40
[16] Levitt J.Responses of plants to environmental stress[M].New York:Academic Press,1980.365-434
[17] 黄燕,吴平.SAS统计分析及应用[M].机械工业出版社,2007.67-98
[18] 吴朝晖,周建群,青先国.水稻根系分布形态研究法现状及展望[J].湖南农业科学,2008,(5):11-14
[19] 郝建军,康宗利,于洋.植物生理学实验技术[M].化学工业出版社,2007.71-72
[20] 程广有,许文会,黄永秀,等.水稻品种耐盐碱性的研究[J].延边农学院学报,1995,17(4):195-201
[21] 徐炳成,山仑,黄占斌,等.黄土丘陵区柳枝稷光合生理生态特征的初步研究[J].西北植物学报,2001,21(4):625-630
[22] 秦景,董雯怡,贺康宁.盐胁迫对沙棘幼苗生长与光合生理特征的影响[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(3):1031-1036
[23] 武俊英,刘景辉,李倩.盐胁迫对燕麦幼苗生长,K+、Na+吸收和光合性能的影响[J].西北农业学报,2010,19(2):100-105
[24] 高奔,宋杰,刘金萍,等.盐胁迫对不同生境盐地碱蓬光合及离子积累的影响[J].植物生态学报,2010,34(6):671-677
[25] 黄沆,陈光辉.水稻根系育种的研究现状及展望[J].湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2009,35(1):35-39
[26] 严小龙,廖红,年海.根系生态学原理与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.3-4,72-75
[27] 刘小冰,王光华,金剑,等.作物根际和产量生理研究[M].北京科学出版社,2010.65
[28] Hendrick R L,Pregitzer K S.The demography of fine root in a northern hardwood forest[J].Ecology,1992,73:1094-1104

柳枝稷根系垂直分布及植株生长对土壤盐分类型的响应

Response of Root Spatial Pattern and Growth Characteristics of Switchgrass to Soil Saline Type

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王燕, 赵晓晓, 王伟伟. 柳枝稷PvJAZ1基因的克隆、表达特性与亚细胞定位[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 234-243.
[2]	赵晓晓, 谢坤良, 张舒梦, 张超, 奚亚军, 孙风丽. 柳枝稷TIFY基因家族的鉴定与分析[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(5): 1126-1137.
[3]	王伟伟, 王勇锋, 张舒梦, 王竹林, 孙风丽, 张超, 奚亚军. 柳枝稷PvbZIP8基因的克隆与表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(3): 560-566.
[4]	郑爱泉, 徐开杰, 程亭亭, 张超, 奚亚军, 孙风丽. 柳枝稷分蘖发育调控的生理生化机制研究[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(1): 123-129.
[5]	赵晓晓, 谢坤良, 贾冬冬, 张舒梦, 孟敏, 孙风丽, 张超, 奚亚军. 柳枝稷幼穗分化过程及其分期[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(1): 170-177.
[6]	何学青, 沙亚·海拉提, 张依凡, 黄文静, 邓少军, 呼天明. 不同外源植物生长物质对柳枝稷种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(3): 684-690.
[7]	李敏, 林炎丽, 杨富裕. 白腐真菌预处理对柳枝稷降解的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(6): 1239-1244.
[8]	安勤勤, 高志娟, 刘金彪, 王智, 徐炳成. 黄土丘陵区不同种植行距下柳枝稷根系分布特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(6): 1251-1257.
[9]	何学青, 沙亚·海拉提, 龙明秀, 梁玉生, 陶奇波, 呼天明. 超干处理对柳枝稷种子活力及幼苗生长特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(5): 1055-1060.
[10]	徐鹏, 程亭亭, 张超, 刘曙东, 孙风丽, 奚亚军. 丛枝菌根真菌对柳枝稷苗期生长作用机制的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(5): 1097-1102.
[11]	王勇锋, 李毛, 崔桂宾, 徐开杰, 孙风丽, 张超, 刘曙东, 奚亚军. 柳枝稷体外诱导花器官逆转与非逆转穗芽生理特性差异研究[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(4): 768-776.
[12]	何树斌, 王燚, 程宇阳, 黄文静, 唐驯林, 庞仁江, 李菁, 呼天明, 龙明秀. 从枝菌根真菌与柳枝稷协同固碳机制及对土壤碳氮循环的调控[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(4): 802-806.
[13]	何学青, 陶奇波, 沙亚·海拉提, 郭理想, 龙明秀, 呼天明. 柳枝稷种子活力及幼苗生长对人工老化处理的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(4): 834-840.
[14]	朱毅, 范希峰, 侯新村, 刘吉利, 李钰莹, 武菊英. 中性盐胁迫对柳枝稷苗期生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(2): 352-357.
[15]	柴乖强, 徐开杰, 王勇锋, 孙风丽, 刘曙东, 奚亚军. 农杆菌介导的P_SAG12-IPT基因转化柳枝稷研究[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(6): 1331-1336.