青海湖围栏封育下温性荒漠植被群落长期变化特征

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.03.027

草地学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 929-935.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.03.027

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

青海湖围栏封育下温性荒漠植被群落长期变化特征

蔡海¹, 史倩倩², 王婷³, 杜岩功⁴

1. 武威职业学院现代农业学院, 甘肃武威 733000;
2. 青海湖国家级自然保护区管理局, 青海刚察 812300;
3. 青海师范大学生命科学学院, 青海西宁 810008;
4. 中国科学院西北高原生物研究所, 青海西宁 810001

收稿日期:2024-06-03 修回日期:2024-07-10 发布日期:2025-04-07
通讯作者: 杜岩功,E-mail:ygdu@nwipb.cas.cn
作者简介:蔡海（1984-）,男,汉族,甘肃武威人,硕士,副教授,主要从事群落生态学研究,E-mail：caihai98@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（U21A20186）;河西走廊寒旱区生态环境保护与生态文明建设科研创新团队和武威职业学院校级重点团队-智慧农业大数据应用研究科研团队资助

Impact of Fencing on the Characteristics of the Temperate Desert Vegetation Community in the Qinghai Lake Basin

CAI Hai¹, SHI Qian-qian², WANG Ting³, DU Yan-gong⁴

1. Modern Agriculture College of Wuwei Vocational College, Wuwei, Gansu Province 733000, China;
2. Qinghai Lake National Nature Reserve Administration, Gangcha, Qinghai Province 812300, China;
3. College of Life, Qinghai Normal University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810008, China;
4. Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Science, Xining, Qinghai Province 810001, China

Received:2024-06-03 Revised:2024-07-10 Published:2025-04-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 长期围栏封育对青海湖退化温性荒漠植被群落特征的影响及其调控因素尚不明晰。本研究分析了封育15年温性荒漠的物种丰富度、盖度和生物量变化,并揭示其时间稳定性特征及主要驱动因素。结果表明：封育1年显著提高温性荒漠物种丰富度、盖度和地上生物量,分别为15种,64%和185.65 g·m^-2,增幅依次为66.67%,326.67%和255.24%,15年后相应指标分别为322.22%,233.33%和343.26%,其中丰富度和地上生物量均达到极显著检验水平。封育1~5年,5~10年,11~15年后,青海湖地区温性荒漠地上生物量时间稳定性呈现显著增加趋势,中期和长期围封比短期围封增加27.10%和61.23%。长期封育条件下,物种丰富度受降雨量极显著影响,地上生物量则显著受杂类草生物量的影响。未来降雨量增加的气候情景下,物种丰富度将显著提高,并对植被盖度和地上生物量产生促进作用,本研究为青海湖地区温性荒漠生态系统的恢复与管理提供了科学依据。

关键词: 长期封育, 物种丰富度, 温性荒漠, 生物量时间稳定性, 降雨量

Abstract: The temperate desert exhibits non-zonal distribution in the eastern and northeastern regions of the Qinghai Lake basin. However, the impact of long-term fencing on the characteristics of degraded temperate desert vegetation communities and the controlling factors remained unclear. This study analyzed the monitoring data of species richness, cover, and above-ground biomass of the temperate desert subjected to 15 years of continuous fencing. It elucidated the response characteristics of vegetation community traits and biomass temporal stability to long-term fencing. Based on structural equation modeling, the driving factors behind the changes in the fenced temperate desert vegetation community characteristics were analyzed. These results indicated that one year after fencing, there was a significant increase in species richness, cover, and above-ground biomass of the temperate desert, reaching 15 species, 64%, and 185.65 g·m^-2, respectively, with increases of 66.67%, 326.67%, and 255.24%. After 15 years of fencing, the increases were 322.22%, 233.33%, and 343.26%, respectively, compared to the control. During the 15 years of continuous fencing, both species richness and above-ground biomass of the temperate desert showed a highly significant increasing trend. The temporal stability of above-ground biomass in the Qinghai Lake region’s temperate desert exhibited a significant increasing trend after 1~5 years, 5~10 years, and 11~15 years of fencing, with medium- and long-term fencing showing increases of 27.10% and 61.23% compared to short-term fencing. Long-term fencing significantly influenced species richness, which was highly affected by precipitation. The above-ground biomass was significantly influenced by the biomass of miscellaneous grasses （P<0.05）. In addition, the increased precipitation significantly enhanced species richness in long-term fenced temperate desert and had a positive regulatory effect on vegetation cover and above-ground biomass. This study provides a scientific basis for the restoration and management of the temperate desert ecosystem.

Key words: Long-term fencing, Species richness, Temperate desert, Biomass temporal stability, Precipitation

中图分类号:

S812

蔡海, 史倩倩, 王婷, 杜岩功. 青海湖围栏封育下温性荒漠植被群落长期变化特征[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(3): 929-935.

CAI Hai, SHI Qian-qian, WANG Ting, DU Yan-gong. Impact of Fencing on the Characteristics of the Temperate Desert Vegetation Community in the Qinghai Lake Basin[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(3): 929-935.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.03.027

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2025/V33/I3/929

参考文献

[1] SMITH T,TRAXL D,BOERS N,et al. Empirical evidence for recent global shifts in vegetation resilience[J]. Nature Climate Change,2022,12(5):477-484
[2] 丰吉,刘志扩,李海燕,等.围栏封育和长期刈割对松嫩草地羊草和野古草种群营养繁殖特征的影响[J].草业学报,2023,32(5):50-60
[3] 冶华薇,孙宗玖,刘慧霞,等.封育对蒿类荒漠草地植被地上生物量时间稳定性的影响[J].草地学报, 2023,31(4):1163-1172
[4] 梁勇,郭连东,张林涛.围栏封育对环县北部沙地植被恢复种类数量的影响[J].林业科技通讯,2023(1):93-95
[5] 侯钰荣,柯梅,李超,等.围栏封育和自由放牧对伊犁绢蒿生长规律和内源激素的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2023,60(11):2824-2832
[6] 李旭谦.青海省退化草地治理与恢复的技术措施[J].青海科技, 2018,25(6):34-39
[7] 许宏斌,苏艳龙,张雷,等.围封10年对荒漠草原群落物种多样性与优势种空间分布格局的影响[J].生态学报,2024(10):1-8
[8] 朱新萍,贾宏涛,蒋平安,等.长期围栏封育对中天山草地植物群落特征及多样性的影响[J].草业科学,2012,29(6):989-992
[9] SONG S S,ZHU J L,ZHENG T L,et al. Long-term grazing exclusion reduces species diversity but increases community heterogeneity in an alpine grassland[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution,2020,8:e202266
[10] 秦瑞敏,程思佳,马丽,等.围封和施肥对高寒草甸群落特征和植被碳氮库的影响[J].草业学报,2024,33(4):1-11
[11] DONGS K,SHANG Z H,GAO J X,et al. Enhancing sustainability of grassland ecosystems through ecological restoration and grazing management in an era of climate change on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems& Environment, 2020,287,106684
[12] XIONG D P,SHI P L,ZHANG X Z,et al. Effects of grazing exclusion on carbon sequestration and plant diversity in grasslands of China A meta-analysis[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 94:647-655
[13] 王黎黎,张克斌,程中秋,等.围栏封育对半干旱区植物群落稳定性的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2011,46(5):86-90
[14] 马富龙,韩路,冯秀花,等.封育对昆仑山北坡温性草原植物、土壤及微生物的影响[J].草地学报,2023,31(11):3364-3375
[15] GRMAN E,LAU J A,SCHOOLMASTER D R,et al. Mechanisms contributing to stability in ecosystem function depend on the environmental context[J]. Ecology Letters, 2010,13(11):1400-1410
[16] 周华坤,周立,赵新全,等.围栏封育对轻牧与重牧金露梅灌丛的影响[J].草地学报, 2004,12(2):140-144
[17] 贺慧丹,祝景彬,未亚西,等.高寒草甸土壤贮水量对封育措施的响应[J].水土保持研究, 2018,25(3):210-216
[18] 李璠,周国英,杨路存,等.围栏封育对青海湖流域主要植物群落多样性与稳定性的影响[J].水土保持研究, 2013,20(4):135-140
[19] 王婷,史倩倩,祁得胜,等.青海湖地区紫花针茅型高寒草原群落特征变化[J].草地学报, 2024, 32(4):1204-1209
[20] 辛有俊,吴阿迪,辛玉春.青海省天然草地类型与分类系统[J].青海草业, 2012,21(2):57-61
[21] 苏洪烨,张中华,佘延娣,等.不同管理措施对青海湖流域高寒草地土壤养分的影响[J].草地学报,2022,30(5):1071-1076
[22] 周国英,陈桂琛,王顺忠,等.青海湖地区芨芨草草地土壤种子库的初步研究[J].生态学杂志,2005(7):724-728
[23] ZHANG X S. Effects of grazing exclusion on plant community characteristics in a degraded Mu Us Sandland, Inner Mongolia, northern China[J]. Ecology and Environment Sciences,2011,20(2):233-240
[24] 刘建康,张克斌,冯湘,等.封育方式对荒漠草原群落特征及土壤理化性质的影响[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(3):445-452
[25] LOREAU M,NAEEM S,INCHAUSTI P,et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning:current knowledge and future challenges[J]. Science,2001,294(5543):804-808
[26] 王德利,梁存柱.退化草原的恢复状态:气候顶极或干扰顶极[J].植物生态学报, 2023, 47(10):1464-1470
[27] 杨静,孙宗玖,柴艳.封育对沙质荒漠草地植被特征及稳定性影响[J].中国草地学报, 2017,39(3):65-71
[28] 邓斌,任国华,刘志云,等.封育3年对三种高寒草地群落土壤种子库的影响[J].草业学报,2012,21(5):23-31
[29] BAI Y F,HAN X G,WU J G,et al. Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland[J]. Nature,2004,431(7005):181-184
[30] DEPABLOS L,HOMEM B G C,FERREIRA I M,et al. Nitrogen cycling in tropical grass-legume pastures managed under canopy light interception[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2021,121:51-67
[31] REN G H,WANG C X,DONG K H,et al.Effects of grazing exclusion on soil-vegetation relationships in a semiarid grassland on the Loess Plateau,China[J]. Land Degradation and Development,2018,29:4071-4079
[32] HU Z M,YU G R,FAN J W,et al. Precipitation-use efficiency along a 4500-km grassland transect[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography,2010,19(6):19-24
[33] ZHU G Y,DENG L,ZHANG X B,et al.Effects of grazing exclusion on plant community and soil physicochemical properties in a desert steppe on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Ecological Engineering,2016,90:372-381
[34] 王德利,王岭,韩国栋.草地精准放牧管理:概念、理论、技术及范式[J].草业学报,2022,31(12):191-199

青海湖围栏封育下温性荒漠植被群落长期变化特征

Impact of Fencing on the Characteristics of the Temperate Desert Vegetation Community in the Qinghai Lake Basin

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	惠婷婷, 郑红玉, 范连连, 毛洁菲, 马学喜, 李耀明. 阿勒泰地区草地植物丰度与地上生物量分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(2): 586-595.
[2]	李娅丽, 何国兴, 柳小妮, 张德罡, 徐贺光, 纪童, 姜佳昌. 陇中温性荒漠4种草地型土壤有机碳组分及碳库活度变化特征[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1489-1499.
[3]	王婷, 史倩倩, 祁得胜, 陈克龙, 杜岩功. 青海湖地区紫花针茅型高寒草原群落特征变化[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(4): 1204-1209.
[4]	刘冲, 野起瑞, 李江文, 张晓曦, 邓健, 裴婧宏, 樊慧. 黄土丘陵区撂荒年限和坡向对灌丛生物量及丰富度的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(9): 2826-2833.
[5]	刘玉玲, 王德平, 张泓博, 王国富, 李鹏珍, 戎郁萍. 补播时间和补播草种对退化草甸草原植物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 3098-3105.
[6]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群, 周睿. 放牧对温性荒漠草原植物群落特征与牧草营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[7]	门学慧, 盛建东, 贾宏涛, 王德旺. 北疆温性荒漠类草地生物量空间分布及影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2013, 21(5): 861-868.
[8]	魏伯平, 赵生国, 焦婷. 放牧对温性荒漠草原植物群落及草地土壤肥力的影响[J]. , 2012, 20(5): 855-862.
[9]	李里, 刘伟. 退化草地植物功能群和物种丰富度与群落生产力关系的研究[J]. , 2011, 19(6): 917-921,999.
[10]	宋璐璐, 樊江文, 钟华平, 王宁. 重庆红池坝地区草地群落生物量及物种丰富度沿海拔梯度格局变化[J]. , 2010, 18(2): 160-166.
[11]	张正健, 刘志红, 郭艳芬, 韩建宁, 李扬. 偏最小二乘在遥感监测西藏草地生物量上的应用[J]. , 2009, 17(6): 735-739.
[12]	焦婷, 常根柱, 周学辉, 候彦会, 杨红善, 苗小林, 刘荣堂. 温性荒漠化草原不同放牧强度下土壤酶与肥力的关系[J]. , 2009, 17(5): 581-587.
[13]	朱晓艳, 张英俊, 历卫宏, 朱兴宏, 刘荣堂, 付丽, 袁平. 滇东北山区不同类型植被对水土流失的影响[J]. , 2009, 17(3): 310-314.