盐胁迫对枸杞属2种植物幼苗生理指标的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.06.021

›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6): 1010-1017.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.06.021

盐胁迫对枸杞属2种植物幼苗生理指标的影响

王龙强^1,2, 蔺海明^1,2, 米永伟¹

1. 甘肃农业大学农学院, 甘肃兰州730070;
2. 甘肃省干旱生境作物学重点实验室, 甘肃兰州730070

收稿日期:2011-06-03 修回日期:2011-07-26 出版日期:2011-12-15 发布日期:2012-07-09
通讯作者:
作者简介:王龙强(1980- ),男,甘肃永昌人,讲师,博士研究生,研究方向为药用植物栽培与生理生态,E-mail:wanglq@gsau.edu.cn
基金资助:
甘肃省自然科学基金项目(1010RJZA203);兰州市科技计划项目(2010-1-236)资助

Effects of Salt Stress on Physiological Indices of Two Lycium Seedlings

WANG Long-qiang^1,2, LIN Hai-ming^1,2, MI Yong-wei¹

1. College of Agronomy, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. Gansu Key Lab of Crop Improvement&Germplasm Enhancement, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2011-06-03 Revised:2011-07-26 Online:2011-12-15 Published:2012-07-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以枸杞属的黑果枸杞(Lycium ruthenicum Murr.)和宁夏枸杞(Lycium barbarum L.)幼苗为试验材料,采用不同浓度NaCl溶液进行胁迫,对其叶片相对含水量、叶绿素含量、质膜透性、丙二醛(MDA)含量及渗透调节物质的积累特征进行研究。结果表明:50和150mmol·L^-1 NaCl浓度下,2种植物叶片相对含水量较对照增加,而随着盐胁迫程度的加重,叶片相对含水量迅速下降;盐处理组中2种植物叶绿体各光合色素含量显著高于对照,且随盐浓度升高而增加,但Chl a/Chl b比值在低盐时增加,而后随胁迫程度的加重快速下降;叶片质膜透性和各器官MDA含量随胁迫浓度的增加呈逐渐升高趋势,且在中、高盐胁迫下,黑果枸杞各器官中的MDA含量显著低于同浓度胁迫下的宁夏枸杞;在对照及盐处理组,2种植物脯氨酸和可溶性糖含量在各器官中的分布规律为根>茎>叶,同时,盐处理组中2种植物各器官中的脯氨酸和可溶性糖含量随着盐胁迫浓度的增加呈逐渐增加趋势,其中,同一盐浓度下,黑果枸杞叶片中积累的脯氨酸含量显著低于宁夏枸杞,而茎及根中的含量却显著高于宁夏枸杞。相对而言,黑果枸杞比宁夏枸杞具有更强的耐盐能力。

关键词: 盐胁迫, 黑果枸杞, 宁夏枸杞, 生理指标, 耐盐能力

Abstract: Relative water content,photosynthetic pigment,membrane permeability,MDA and organic osmotica content were studied using Lycium ruthenicum Murr.and Lycium barbarum L.seedlings under different NaCl stresses.Relative water content for seedlings of both species increased compared with control(CK) under 50 and 150 mmol·L^-1 NaCl stresses,but decreased rapidly with increased salt concentration.Photosynthetic pigment contents of both species under salt stress were obviously higher than those of control,and gradually enhanced with increased salt concentration.Chl a/Chl b ratio in leaf of both species increased under lower salt conditions then decreased rapidly with the degree of salt stress increased.Leaf membrane permeability and MDA content of both species elevated gradually with increased NaCl concentration.However,MDA content of L.ruthenicum was lower than those of L.barbarum under either moderate or severe salt stress.Proline and soluble sugar of both species were elevated gradually with increased salinity.Distribution of different organs in both species were ranked as root>shoot>leaf.The accumulation of proline in the leaves of L.ruthenicum was significantly lower than that in L.barbarum,but was higher in the root and stem of L.ruthenicum than that in L.barbarum.Results suggested that L.ruthenicum has stronger salt tolerance than L.barbarum.

Key words: Salt stress, Lycium ruthenicum Murr., Lycium barbarum L., Physiological indices, Salt tolerance

中图分类号:

Q945.78

王龙强, 蔺海明, 米永伟. 盐胁迫对枸杞属2种植物幼苗生理指标的影响[J]. , 2011, 19(6): 1010-1017.

WANG Long-qiang, LIN Hai-ming, MI Yong-wei. Effects of Salt Stress on Physiological Indices of Two Lycium Seedlings[J]. , 2011, 19(6): 1010-1017.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.06.021

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2011/V19/I6/1010

参考文献

[1] Yeo A R.Predicting the interaction between the effects of salinity and climate change on crop plants[J].Scientia Horticulturae,1999,78:159-174
[2] 杨劲松.中国盐渍土研究的发展历程与展望[J].土壤学报,2008,45(5):837-845
[3] 刘吉祥,吴学明,何涛,等.盐胁迫下芦苇叶肉细胞超微结构的研究[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(6):1035-1040
[4] Smith M M,Hodson M J.Salt induced ultrastructural damage to mitochondria in root tips of a salt-sensitive ecotype ofAgrostis stolonifera[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,1982,23(5):886-895
[5] Koyro H W.Ultrastructural and physiological changes in root cells of sorghum plants (Sorghum bicolor.·S.sudamensis cv.Sweet Sioux) induced by NaCl[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,1997,48(3):693-706
[6] 陈阳,王贺,郗金标,等.盐渍生境下两种生态型芦苇的形态结构及矿质元素分布[J].土壤学报,2010,47(2):334-340
[7] 章英才,张晋宁.两种盐浓度环境中的黑果枸杞叶的形态结构特征研究[J].宁夏大学学报(自然科学版),2004,25(4):365367
[8] 刘锦川,云锦凤,张磊.氯化钠胁迫下3种披碱草属牧草生理特性的研究[J].草地学报,2010,18(5):694-697
[9] 王标,虞木奎,孙海菁,等.盐胁迫对不同种源麻栎叶片光合特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(8):1817-1824
[10] 葛江丽,石雷,谷卫彬,等.盐胁迫条件下甜高粱幼苗的光合特性及光系统Ⅱ功能调节[J].作物学报,2007,33(8):1272-1278
[11] 宁建凤,郑青松,杨少海,等.高盐胁迫对罗布麻生长及离子平衡的影响[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(2):325-330
[12] 董秋丽,夏方山,董宽虎.盐胁迫对芨芨草种子萌发苗Na⁺,K⁺含量与质膜H⁺ ATPase活性的影响[J].草地学报,2010,18(6):823-828
[13] 简令成,王红.逆境植物细胞生物学[M].北京:科学出版社,2009:177,249-250
[14] Rodriguez H G,Boberts J K M,Jordan W R,et al.Growth,water relations,and accumulation of organic and inorganic solutes in roots of Maize seedlings during salt stress[J].Plant Physiology,1997,113:881-893
[15] 刘家尧,衣艳君,赵可夫.盐分对碱蓬幼苗离子含量、甜菜碱水平和BADH活性的效应[J].植物学报,1994,36(8):622-626
[16] 刘会超,孙振元,彭镇华.NaCl胁迫对五叶地锦生长及某些生理特性的影响[J].林业科学,2004,40(6):64-67
[17] 郑国琦,许兴,邓西平,等.盐分和水分胁迫对枸杞幼苗渗透调节效用的研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2002,20(2):56-59
[18] 米海莉,郑国琦,许兴,等.NaCl胁迫对宁夏枸杞幼苗根系质膜和液泡膜H⁺-ATPase活性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2006,26(4):748-752
[19] 陈海魁,蒲凌奎,倪志婧,等.不同浓度NaCl胁迫对黑果枸杞种子萌发的影响(英文)[J].农业科学与技术,2010,11(4):37-38
[20] 张治安,陈展宇.植物生理学实验技术[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,2008:22-23,66-68,100-102,178-179,192-195
[21] 赵可夫.植物抗盐生理[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1993:24-32
[22] 韩志平,郭世荣,冯吉庆,等.盐胁迫对西瓜幼苗生长、叶片光合色素和脯氨酸含量的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2008,31(2):32-36
[23] Rao G G,Rao G R.Pigment composition and chlorophyllase activity in pigment pea and gingelley under NaCl salinity[J].Indian Journal of Experimental Biology,1981,19:768 770
[24] 刘志华,时丽冉,白丽荣,等.盐胁迫对獐毛叶绿素和有机溶质含量的影响[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报,2007,33(2):165-172
[25] 王素平,郭世荣,胡晓辉,等.盐胁迫对黄瓜幼苗叶片光合色素含量的影响[J].江西农业大学学报,2006,28(1):32-38
[26] Ott J C,Clarke J,Birks K,et al.Regulation of the photosynthetic electron transport chain[J].Planta,1999,209:250 258
[27] Moran J F,Becana M.Drought induces oxidative stress in pea plants[J].Planta,1994,94:346-352
[28] Aspinall D,Paleg L.Proline accumulation:physiological aspects[M].London:Academic Press,1981:205-259
[29] 王康,刘艳香,董洁,等.盐胁迫对菊苣幼苗脯氨酸积累及其代谢途径的影响[J].草地学报,2011,19(1):102-106
[30] Urban L A,Sheman J M,Moyer J M.Higher frequence shoot regeneration and Agrobacterium mediated transformation of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora)[J].Plant Science,1994,98:69-76
[31] Murashige M,Skoog F.A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture[J].Physiologia Plantarum,1962,15:473-497
[32] Hare P D,Cress W A,Van Staden J.Proline synthesis and degradation:a model system for elucidating stress-related signal transduction[J].Journal of Experimental Botany,1990,50:413-434
[33] Maggio A,Reddy M P,Joly R J.Leaf gas exchange and solute accumulation in the halophyte Salvadora persica grow at moderate salinity[J].Environmental and Experimental Botany,2000,44:31-38
[34] 王耀晶,郭修武,王英.盐胁迫下硅对草莓生长发育的影响[J].北方园艺,2008(1):22-24

盐胁迫对枸杞属2种植物幼苗生理指标的影响

Effects of Salt Stress on Physiological Indices of Two Lycium Seedlings

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张韦钰, 王春勇, 杜红梅. 富氢水对草地早熟禾耐盐性的影响以及与抗氧化酶活性的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1436-1445.
[2]	尹玉林, 马文馨, 李亚娟, 田新会, 杜文华. 甘肃省中部地区猫尾草新品系的抗寒性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 625-630.
[3]	潘平新, 倪强, 马瑞, 杨永义, 马彦军. 不同盐分处理对黑果枸杞种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 342-348.
[4]	张银翠, 姚拓, 赵桂琴, 徐茜, 王振龙, 包康, 撖冬荣. 耐盐促生菌筛选鉴定及对盐胁迫燕麦生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2645-2652.
[5]	万婷, 段钧译, 李蒙, 陈智勇. 南荻MlNAC2基因差异表达与耐盐生理响应的相关性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2685-2693.
[6]	叶晓倩, 刘瑞曦, 冯金慧, 邓仕明, 李吉涛, 邓志军. 车前种子黏液对其劣变和萌发抗逆性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2728-2732.
[7]	王菲, 谭怡, 吕亚茹, 苏文欣, 姜宛彤, 刘宇乐, 严俊鑫. 水杨酸和赤霉素预处理对NaCl胁迫下神香草种子萌发的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2862-2870.
[8]	余淑艳, 周燕飞, 黄薇, 王星, 高雪芹, 伏兵哲. 干旱、盐及旱盐复合胁迫对沙芦草光合和生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2399-2406.
[9]	齐晨汐, 易观涛, 付晓璇, 王海龙, 王佳琳, 吴建慧. 丛枝菌根真菌对干旱胁迫下鹅绒委陵菜生理指标的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2407-2412.
[10]	朱依晗, 刘宁芳, 胡龙兴, 徐倩. 8份绿穗苋种子萌发期耐盐碱性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2176-2183.
[11]	李波, 刘畅, 李红, 杨曌. 外源氯化钙对‘龙牧807’苜蓿幼苗干旱缓解效应分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 990-997.
[12]	卫昭君, 牛冰洁, 王永新, 赵祥, 朱慧森, 郭秀萍, 乔栋. 茉莉酸甲酯对盐胁迫下偏关苜蓿种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 998-1005.
[13]	贾会丽, 王学敏, 高涛, 石永红, 王运琦, 吴欣明, 刘建宁, 方志红, 董宽虎. 转MsLEA4-4基因拟南芥株系的耐盐性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 597-605.
[14]	卢锐, 李培英. 偃麦草盐胁迫下转录组分析[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 31-44.
[15]	马彦军, 祝小娟, 何瑞雪. 盐爪爪种子萌发期抗盐性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(5): 1237-1242.