荒漠草原沙漠化对土壤养分与植被根冠比的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.03.005

草地学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3): 463-468.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.03.005

荒漠草原沙漠化对土壤养分与植被根冠比的影响

唐庄生¹, 安慧², 上官周平¹

1. 西北农林科技大学黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨陵 712100;
2. 宁夏大学西北退化生态系统恢复与重建教育部重点实验室, 宁夏银川 750021

收稿日期:2014-06-20 修回日期:2014-09-29 出版日期:2015-06-15 发布日期:2015-07-02
通讯作者: 安慧
作者简介:唐庄生(1989-),男,甘肃武威人,硕士生,主要从事恢复生态学研究, E-mail: tzsxzl@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31260125)(41390463);科技基础性工作专项(2014FY210100)资助

Effects of Desertification on Soil Nutrients and Root-shoot Ratio in Desert Steppe

TANG Zhuang-sheng¹, AN Hui², SHANGGUAN Zhou-ping¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Restoration and Reconstruction of Degraded Ecosystem in North-western China of Ministry of Education, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia Province 750021, China

Received:2014-06-20 Revised:2014-09-29 Online:2015-06-15 Published:2015-07-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以空间代替时间的方法,通过对宁夏中北部荒漠草原不同沙漠化阶段草地土壤养分与植被生产力的研究,探讨土壤养分和植被根冠比对草地沙漠化的响应特征,以期为干旱与半干旱地区荒漠草原的生态恢复与重建提供科学依据。结果表明:随着荒漠草原沙漠化程度的增加,植被地上、地下生物量呈现减小的趋势,但是轻度沙漠化阶段植被地上、地下生物量均大于潜在沙漠化阶段。植物根冠比随着草地沙漠化程度加剧而减小,而重度沙漠化阶段植物根冠比比中度沙漠化阶段增加了36%;随着草地沙漠化程度的加剧,土壤有机碳、全磷、全氮、速效钾和速效氮含量均呈降低趋势;在草地沙漠化过程中,土壤养分的积累减弱导致土壤肥力降低,草地生产力下降。

关键词: 荒漠草原, 沙漠化, 土壤养分, 根冠比

Abstract:

The changes of soil nutrients and plant biomass were analyzed by spatial method instead of time method in different desertification stages in order to discuss the response of soil nutrient and root-shoot ratio to desertification in the north-central Ningxia, China. The results showed that decreased from light desertification stage to very severe desertification stage with the development of grassland desertification, while aboveground and belowground biomass in light desertification stage was higher than in potential desertification stage. The change trend of root-shoot ratio gradually declined with the development of grassland desertification, while the root-shoot ratio in severe desertification stage increased by 36% compared to moderate desertification stage. The organic carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, available nitrogen and available potassium of soil decreased from potential desertification stage to very severe desertification stage; while soil available phosphorus decreased from potential desertification stage to moderate desertification stage, and increased at severe desertification stage, then decreased at very severe desertification stage. Compared with moderate desertification stage, the soil available phosphorus of severe desertification stage increased by 4%, but there was no significant difference between moderate desertification and severe desertification stage. There was significantly positive correlation between total phosphorus and aboveground biomass, belowground biomass, root-shoot ratio. The desertification reduced soil fertility and caused grassland productivity decline.

Key words: Desert steppe, Desertification, Soil Nutrient, Root-shoot ratio

中图分类号:

S812.2

唐庄生, 安慧, 上官周平. 荒漠草原沙漠化对土壤养分与植被根冠比的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(3): 463-468.

TANG Zhuang-sheng, AN Hui, SHANGGUAN Zhou-ping. Effects of Desertification on Soil Nutrients and Root-shoot Ratio in Desert Steppe[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(3): 463-468.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.03.005

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2015/V23/I3/463

参考文献

[1] Zhou R L, Li Y Q, Zhao H L, et al. Desertification effects on C and N content of sandy soils under grassland in Horqin, northern China [J]. Geoderma,2008,145(3/4):370-375
[2] 刘新平,张铜会,赵哈林,等. 干旱半干旱区沙漠化土地水分动态研究进展[J]. 水土保持研究,2005,12(1):63-68
[3] 赵哈林,周瑞莲,苏永中,等. 我国北方半干旱地区土壤的沙漠化演变过程与机制[J]. 水土保持学报,2007,21(3):1-5
[4] Schlesinger W H, Abrahams A D, Parsons A J, et al. Nutrient losses in runoff from grassland and shrubland habitats in Southern New Mexico: I. rainfall simulation experiments [J]. Biogeochemistry,1999,45(1):21-34
[5] Carreira J A, Niell F X. Mobilization of nutrients by fire in a semiarid gorse-scrubland ecosystem of southern Spain [J]. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation,1995,9(1):73-89
[6] 安慧,李国旗. 放牧对荒漠草原植物生物量及土壤养分的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(3):705-712
[7] 陈玉富,董鸣. 毛乌素沙地景观的植被与土壤特征空间格局及其相关分析[J]. 植物生态学报,2001,25(3):265-269
[8] Zuo X A, Zhao X Y, Zhao H L, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of soil properties and vegetation-soil relationships following vegetation restoration of mobile dunes in Horqin Sandy Land, Northern China [J]. Plant and Soil,2009,318(1/2):153-167
[9] Zhou Z Y, Sun O J X, Luo Z K, et al. Variation in small scale spatial heterogeneity of soil properties and vegetation with different land use in semiarid grassland ecosystem [J]. Plant and Soil,2008,310(1/2):103-112
[10] 丁国栋. 区域荒漠化评价中植被的指示性及盖度分级标准研究:以毛乌素沙区为例[J]. 水土保持学报,2004,18(1):158-160
[11] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤理化分析[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978
[12] 苏永中,赵哈林,张铜会,等. 科尔沁沙地旱作农田土壤退化的过程和特征[J]. 水土保持学报,2002,16(1):25-28
[13] Dong Z B, Wang X M, Liu L Y. Wind erosion in arid and semiarid China an overview[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation,2000,55(4):439-444
[14] Lowery B, Swan J, Schumacher T, et al. Physical properties of selected soils by erosion class[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation,1995,50(3):306-311
[15] 苏永中,赵哈林. 农田沙漠化过程中土壤有机碳和氮的衰减及其机理研究[J]. 中国农业科学,2003,36(8):928-934
[16] Lopez M V. Wind erosion in agricultural soils: an example of limited supply of particles available for erosion [J]. Catena,1998,33(1):17-28
[17] Schlesinger W H, Pilmanis A M, Breemen N V. Plant-soil interactions in deserts [J]. Biogeochemistry,1998,42(1/2):169-187
[18] 王玉辉,周广胜. 内蒙古羊草草原植物群落地上初级生产力时间动态对降水变化的响应[J]. 生态学报,2004,24(6):1140-1145
[19] Grainger A, Smith S M, Squires V R, et al. Desertification and climate change: the case for greater convergence [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change,2000,5(4):361-377
[20] 朴起亨,丁国栋,吴斌,等. 呼伦贝尔沙地植被演替规律研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2008,22(6):180-186
[21] Zhou R L, Li Y Q, Zhao H L, et al. Desertification effects on C and N content of sandy soils under grassland in Horqin, northern China [J]. Geoderma,2008,145(3/4):370-375
[22] Wang Y H, Zhou G S. Responses of temporal dynamics of aboveground net primary productivity of Leymus chinensis community to precipitation fluctuation in Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2004,24(6):1140-1145
[23] Ding G D. Study on indicative feature and cover classification of vegetation in regional desertification assessment: Taking Mu Us sandland as an example [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2004,18(1):158-160,188
[24] Schmid B. Some ecological and evolutionary consequences of modular organization and clonal growth in plants [J]. Evolutionary Trends in Plants,1990,4(1):25-34
[25] Watson M A, Geber M A, Jones C S. Ontogenetic contingency and the expression of plant plasticity [J]. Trend in Evolution and Ecology,1995,10(12):474-475
[26] Geber M A, Waston M A, De Kroon H. Development and resource allocation in perennial plants: the significance of organ preformation [M]//Bazzaz F A, Grace J. Plant Resource Allocation. New York:Academic Press,1997
[27] De K H, Hutchings M J. Morphological plasticity in clonal plants:the foraging concept reconsidered [J]. Journal of Ecology,1995,83(1):143-152
[28] Smith N S. Variation in response to defoliation between population of Bouteloua curti pendula var. caespitosa with different livestock grazing histories [J]. American Journal of Botany,1998,85(9):1266-1272
[29] Geiger D R, Servaites J C. Carbon allocation and response to stress [M]//Mooney H A,Winner W E,Pell E J,eds. Response of plants to multiple stresses. CA:Academic Press,San Diego,1991:103-127
[30] Mooney H A, Winner W E. Partitioning response of plants to stress [M]//Mooney H A, W inner W E, Pell E J, eds. Response of plants to multiple stresses. CA:Academic Press,San Diego,1991:129-141
[31] 李旭东,张春平,傅华. 黄土高原典型草原草地根冠比的季节动态及其影响因素[J]. 草业学报,2012,21(4):307-312
[32] Bassirirad H. Kinetics of nutrient uptake by roots: Responses to global change [J]. New Phytologist,2000,147(1):155-169
[33] Garkoti S C, Singh S P. Variation in net primary productivity and biomass of forests in the high mountains of Central Himalay [J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,1995,6(1):23-28
[34] 贺海波,李彦. 干旱、盐胁迫条件下两种盐生植物生物量分配对策的研究[J]. 干旱区研究,2008,25(2):242-247

荒漠草原沙漠化对土壤养分与植被根冠比的影响

Effects of Desertification on Soil Nutrients and Root-shoot Ratio in Desert Steppe

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群, 周睿. 放牧对温性荒漠草原植物群落特征与牧草营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[2]	王占青, 张杰雪, 杨雪莲, 黄霞, 陈斯亮, 乔有明. 高寒草甸不同斑块草地土壤微生物多样性特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[3]	郭文章, 井长青, 王公鑫, 侯志雄, 赵苇康. 天山北坡荒漠草原土壤呼吸和生态系统呼吸对降水的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2031-2039.
[4]	赵朋波, 邱开阳, 谢应忠, 赵香君, 陈林, 刘王锁, 李海泉, 孟文芬, 虎学琴, 何毅, 黄业芸, 李亚园. 毛乌素沙地南缘不同固沙灌木下土壤养分的空间异质性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2040-2048.
[5]	张峰, 郑佳华, 赵天启, 乔荠瑢, 赵萌莉, 张心玥, 吴建新. 放牧强度对荒漠草原一年生植物刺穗藜种群特征及空间分布的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1507-1512.
[6]	于铁峰, 郝凤, 张永亮, 高凯. 沙地豆禾混播草地土壤酶与土壤养分对混播比例的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1217-1223.
[7]	张峰, 高峰, 孙嘉伟, 孙宇, 赵萌莉, 张心玥, 赵胜利. 不同载畜率对荒漠草原建群种短花针茅种群时空变异性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1369-1374.
[8]	李娜娜, 杨九艳, 贾喆亭, 闫瑞玲, 陈琪. 不同放牧方式对阿拉善左旗主要草场类型群落特征和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 991-1003.
[9]	卞莹莹, 张志敏, 付镇, 刘文娟. 荒漠草原区不同植被恢复模式土壤微生物菌落分布特征及其与土壤理化性质的相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 655-663.
[10]	张鹏, 李毅, 单立山, 解婷婷. 降水变化对混生红砂-珍珠生物量及分配的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 478-487.
[11]	杨建强, 曹梦琪, 王袼, 胡姝娅, 王常慧. 内蒙古不同类型草地土壤氨氧化细菌和古菌的比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2664-2669.
[12]	陈白洁, 樊博, 汪新川, 张振华. 不同材质可降解无纺布覆盖种植对高寒人工草地土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2752-2762.
[13]	向雪梅, 德科加, 林伟山, 冯廷旭, 魏希杰, 王伟, 徐成体, 钱诗祎. 氮素添加对高寒草甸植物群落多样性和土壤生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2769-2777.
[14]	李文, 魏廷虎, 阿保地, 永措巴占, 才仁塔次, 周玉海, 李文浩, 郭卫兴, 张雁平. 化肥减施配合有机肥对高寒区燕麦营养品质和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2878-2886.
[15]	刘麟, 沙栢平, 高雪芹, 伏兵哲. 宁夏引黄灌区水肥耦合对苜蓿地土壤分形特征和养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2538-2546.