黄河源区退化高寒草甸48种常见植物种子萌发特性及其生态意义

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.04.012

草地学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 744-751.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.04.012

黄河源区退化高寒草甸48种常见植物种子萌发特性及其生态意义

任国华¹, 邓斌², 王彦龙³, 后源²

1. 山西农业大学动物科技学院, 山西太谷 030801;
2. 草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室兰州大学草地农业科技学院, 甘肃兰州 730020;
3. 青海省畜牧兽医科学院, 青海西宁 810016

收稿日期:2014-12-02 修回日期:2015-04-09 出版日期:2015-08-15 发布日期:2015-08-26
通讯作者: 任国华
作者简介:任国华(1983-),男,黑龙江鹤岗人,博士,讲师,主要从事草地生态学的教学与研究工作,E-mail:rengh07@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41171417);山西农业大学科技创新基金(2014014)资助

Seed Germination Characteristics of 48 Common Plant Species of Degraded Alpine Meadow in Yellow River Headwater Area

REN Guo-hua¹, DENG Bin², WANG Yan-long³, HOU Yuan²

1. College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
2. The State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agroecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730000, China;
3. Qinghai Academy of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China

Received:2014-12-02 Revised:2015-04-09 Online:2015-08-15 Published:2015-08-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

本文通过对黄河源区退化高寒草甸48种常见植物种子的萌发特性研究,比较了不同功能群植物萌发行为的异质性,旨在揭示不同植物萌发对策的生态适应机制。结果显示:萌发率超过80%的植物有17种,小于20%的有14种,1种植物未萌发;萌发速率在1以下的有15种,大于10的有21种;萌发起始时间小于5 d的有12种,大于15 d的有5种;有6种植物的萌发持续15 d以上,30种植物的萌发在10 d内结束。种子萌发速率与种子大小呈显著负相关(P <0.05),小种子物种有更高萌发率(P=0.085)和更早萌发起始时间(P=0.093)的趋势。48种植物的萌发划分为爆发型、过渡型、缓萌型和低萌型等4种类型,其中禾本科植物以爆发型为主,莎草科则是低萌型和缓萌型占优势,杂类草在几种萌发类型中均有分布,说明不同功能群植物在生存风险分摊上的异质性策略。

关键词: 黄河源区, 种子大小, 萌发策略, 植被恢复

Abstract:

In order to reveal seed germination countermeasures and its ecological significance of species, seed germination characteristics (germination percentage, germination rate, and germination period) of 48 common plant species of degraded alpine meadow in the Headwater area of Yellow River were studied. The main results were that the seed germination percentages of all tested species displayed a bimodal distribution except for one species that could not germinate.The seed germination percentages of 17 species were more than 80%, and that of 14 species was less than 20%. The germination rates of 15 species were less than 1, while the germination rates of 21 species were more than 10. The starting time of germination was less than 5 days for 12 species, while 5 species failed to germinate over 15 days. The germination period was more than 15 days for 6 species, while 30 species had a germination period of less than 10 days. Seed germination rate increased with the increase of seed size (P <0.05). Both germination percentage (P=0.085) and starting time of germination (P=0.093) had a weak positive relationship with seed size. However, no correlation was observed between germination period and seed size. Principal component analysis and clustering analysis divided 48 species into four germination patterns: rapid, intermediate, slow and low germination. The experiment showed that different plant functional groups of the alpine meadow were heterogeneous in their germination strategies. The gramineous species had a higher proportion of rapid germination pattern, whereas sedge species had a higher proportion of slow and low germination patterns. These results showed that the plants of different functional groups had the heterogeneity strategy of survival risk.

Key words: Yellow River Headwater area, Seed size, Germination strategy, Vegetation recovery

中图分类号:

S812.8

任国华, 邓斌, 王彦龙, 后源. 黄河源区退化高寒草甸48种常见植物种子萌发特性及其生态意义[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(4): 744-751.

REN Guo-hua, DENG Bin, WANG Yan-long, HOU Yuan. Seed Germination Characteristics of 48 Common Plant Species of Degraded Alpine Meadow in Yellow River Headwater Area[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(4): 744-751.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.04.012

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2015/V23/I4/744

参考文献

[1] Valverde T,Quijas S,López-Villavicencio M,et al. Population dynamics of Mammillaria magnimamma Haworth. (Cactaceae) in a lava-field in central Mexico[J]. Plant Ecology,2004,170(2):167-184
[2] Fenner M,Thompson K. The Ecology of Seeds[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005:145-161
[3] Donohue K,de Casas RR,Burghardt L,et al. Germination, postgermination adaptation, and species ecological ranges[J]. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics,2010,41(1):293-319
[4] Gross KL,Smith AD. Seed mass and emergence time effects on performance of Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx. across environments[J]. Oecologia,1991,87(2):270-278
[5] Miller T. Effects of emergence time on survival and growth in an early old-field plant community[J]. Oecologia,1987,72(2):272-278
[6] Donohue K, Dom L, Griffith C,et al. The evolutionary ecology of seed germination of Arabidopsis thaliana: Variable natural selection on germination timing[J]. Evolution,2005,59(4):758-770
[7] Venable DL. The evolutionary ecology of seed heteromorphism[J]. The American Naturalist,1985,126(5):577-595
[8] 赵新全,马玉寿,周华坤,等. 三江源区退化草地生态系统恢复与可持续管理[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2011:1-5
[9] 周华坤,赵新全,温军,等. 黄河源区高寒草原的植被退化与土壤退化特征[J]. 草业学报,2012,21(5):1-11
[10] 金生英,严林,马玉寿,等. 三江源区人工草地中小型土壤动物群落特征及季节变化[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(5):854-860
[11] 李媛媛,董世魁,朱磊,等. 青藏高原高寒草甸退化与人工恢复过程中植物群落的繁殖适应对策[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(15):4683-4691
[12] Handel SN,Robinson GR,Parsons WFJ,et al. Restoration of woody plants to capped landfills: root dynamics in an engineered soil[J]. Restoration Ecology,1997,5(2):178-186
[13] 邓斌,任国华,刘志云,等. 封育三年对三种高寒草地群落土壤种子库的影响[J]. 草业学报,2012,21(5):23-31
[14] 张永超,牛得草,韩潼,等. 补播对高寒草甸生产力和植物多样性的影响[J]. 草业学报,2012,21(2):305-309
[15] 尚占环. 江河源区退化高寒草地土壤种子库及其植被更新[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2006:37-57
[16] 邓自发,谢晓玲,王启基,等. 高寒草甸藏嵩草种群繁殖对策的研究[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2001,7(4):332-334
[17] Zhang Y F,Zhang D Y. Asexual and sexual reproductive strategies in clonal plants[J]. Frontiers of Biology in China,2007,2(3):256-262
[18] Grime JP,Mason G,Curtis AV,et al. A comparative study of germination characteristics in a local floral[J]. Journal of Ecology,1981(69):1017-1039
[19] 卜海燕,任青吉,徐秀丽,等. 青藏高原东部高寒草甸54种禾本科植物种子的萌发特性[J]. 植物生态学报,2006,30(4):624-632
[20] 王桔红,杜国祯,崔现亮,等. 青藏高原东缘61种常见木本植物种子萌发特性及其与生活史的关联[J]. 植物生态学报,2009,33(1):171-179
[21] 张蕾,张春辉,吕俊平,等. 青藏高原东缘31种常见杂草种子萌发特性及其与种子大小的关系[J]. 生态学杂志,2011,30(10):2115-2121
[22] Araki S. Seed dormancy/germination traits of seven Persicaria species and their implication in soil seed bank strategy[J]. Ecological Research,2000,15(1):33-46
[23] Greenberg CH,Smith LM,Levey DJ. Fruit fate, seed germination and growth of an invasive vine-an experimental test of ‘sit and wait’ strategy[J]. Biological Invasions,2001,3(4):363-372
[24] 崔现亮,王桔红,齐威,等. 青藏高原东缘灌木种子萌发特性研究[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(11):5294-5302
[25] 徐秀丽,齐威,卜海燕,等. 青藏高原高寒草甸40种一年生植物种子的萌发特性研究[J]. 草业学报,2007,16(3):74-80
[26] 王桔红,崔现亮,陈学林,等. 中、旱生植物萌发特性及其与种子大小关系的比较[J]. 植物生态学报,2007,31(6):1037-1045
[27] 张佳宁,刘坤,王桔红. 青藏高原东部植物种子萌发能力与其在群落中相对多度的关系[J]. 植物分类与资源学报, 2013,35(3):317-326
[28] 赵建中,彭敏,刘伟,等. 矮嵩草草甸不同功能群主要植物种生长特征与地表温度的相关性分析[J]. 西北植物学报,2012,32(3):0559-0565
[29] Wang J H,Baskin CC,Cui X L,et al. Effect of phylogeny, life history and habitat correlates on seed germination of 69 arid and semi-arid zone species from northwest China[J]. Evolutionary Ecology,2009,23(6):827-846
[30] 刘会良,宋明方,段士民,等. 古尔班通古特沙漠及周缘52种植物种子的萌发特性与生态意义[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(15):4308-4317
[31] 刘会良,宋明方,段士民,等. 古尔班通古特沙漠南缘32种藜科植物种子萌发策略初探[J]. 中国沙漠,2012,32(2):413-420
[32] Eriksson O. Seed size variation and its effect on germination and seedling performance in the clonal herd Convallaria majalis[J]. Acta Oecologia,1999(20):61-66
[33] Bu H Y,Chen X L,Xu X L,et al. Community-wide germination strategies in an alpine meadow on the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: phylogenetic and life-history correlates[J]. Plant Ecology,2007,195(1):87-98
[34] Smith CC,Fretwell SD. The optimal balance between size and number of offspring[J]. The American Naturalist,1974,108:499-506
[35] 董全民,赵新全,李世雄,等. 基于高寒草地放牧系统次级生产力的优化放牧强度研究[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(5):919-923
[36] 邓自发,谢晓玲,周兴民,等. 高寒草甸小嵩草种群繁殖生态学研究[J]. 西北植物学报,2002,22(2):344-349

黄河源区退化高寒草甸48种常见植物种子萌发特性及其生态意义

Seed Germination Characteristics of 48 Common Plant Species of Degraded Alpine Meadow in Yellow River Headwater Area

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨冲, 王文颖, 刘攀, 毛旭峰, 董世魁, 周华坤, 陈哲, 索南吉, 靳磊, 马华清. 黄河源区高寒草地植物营养成分含量特征及营养价值评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 72-79.
[2]	李兰平, 张慧敏, 李宏林, 梁德飞, 武学霞, 李希来. 不同功能群及先锋种在高寒人工草地建植初期的作用[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1513-1521.
[3]	常明. 火烧后亚高山草甸恢复过程中物种组成和群落特征变化规律的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1286-1293.
[4]	卞莹莹, 张志敏, 付镇, 刘文娟. 荒漠草原区不同植被恢复模式土壤微生物菌落分布特征及其与土壤理化性质的相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 655-663.
[5]	姚蒙蒙, 郭琛文, 赫凤彩, 张琦, 任国华. 晋北盐碱草地土壤化学计量特征及其与植物多样性的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2800-2807.
[6]	张慧敏, 李希来, 李兰平, 张静. 草种配置对高寒人工草地群落多样性和生产力的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1436-1443.
[7]	孙华方, 李希来, 金立群, 李成一, 张静. 生物土壤结皮对黄河源区人工草地植被与土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 509-520.
[8]	王锐, 李希来, 张静, 周华坤. 高寒矿区人工种草对露天排土场渣山表层基质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 938-948.
[9]	贾志锋, 马祥, 雷生春, 徐成体, 魏小星, 刘文辉. 施肥对贵南县轻度退化草甸植被特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 987-996.
[10]	李晓娜, 张微微, 赵春桥, 宋进库, 史瑞双, 薛瑞彬, 王超. 延庆区荒滩地土壤理化性质及其对植物多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(3): 695-701.
[11]	杨满元, 杨宁, 欧阳美娟, 万丽, 刘浩, 姜琳, 吴磊. 紫色土丘陵坡地土壤水溶性有机碳对植被恢复的响应及其与土壤因子的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(3): 784-788.
[12]	杨宁, 杨满元, 姜琳, 万丽, 吴磊, 邹冬生. 衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地植被恢复过程中土壤可矿化碳库特征[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 320-325.
[13]	刘昌义, 窦增宁, 胡夏嵩, 徐志闻, 周林虎, 李希来, 朱海丽, 李燕婷. 黄河源区高寒草地植物组合对根-土复合体抗剪强度的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(1): 43-52.
[14]	许亚东, 王涛, 李慧, 杨改河, 韩新辉, 冯永忠, 任广鑫. 黄土丘陵区人工柠条林土壤酶活性与养分变化特征[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(2): 363-370.
[15]	陈学平, 杨艳刚, 尚占环, 陈济丁, 孔亚平, 王九峦. 青藏高原公路两侧草地土壤种子库特征研究—以国道214公路共玉公路段为例[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1): 85-91.