黄土丘陵区不同种植行距下柳枝稷根系分布特征研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.06.014

草地学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (6): 1251-1257.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.06.014

黄土丘陵区不同种植行距下柳枝稷根系分布特征研究

安勤勤^1,3, 高志娟², 刘金彪², 王智^1,2, 徐炳成^1,2

1. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100;
3. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100039

收稿日期:2017-06-21 修回日期:2017-09-19 出版日期:2017-12-15 发布日期:2018-03-30
通讯作者: 徐炳成,E-mail:Bcxu@ms.iswc.ac.cn
作者简介:安勤勤(1992-),女,陕西榆林人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地生态研究,E-mail:anqinqin@foxmail.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41371509）；国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0501703）资助

Characteristics of Switchgrass Root Distribution under Different Row Spacings in Loess Hilly-gully Region of China

AN Qin-qin^1,3, GAO Zhi-juan², LIU Jin-biao², WANG Zhi^1,2, XU Bing-cheng^1,2

1. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China

Received:2017-06-21 Revised:2017-09-19 Online:2017-12-15 Published:2018-03-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

明确旱区作物根系生长与行距的关系可为合理选择种植密度提供依据。以梯田种植第7年的柳枝稷（Pancium virgatum L.）草地为研究对象，采用根钻法于2016年4月和10月对0~150 cm土层进行根系取样，比较研究了3种种植行距下（20 cm，40 cm和60 cm）柳枝稷根系生物量和根长密度分布特征。结果表明：柳枝稷根系主要分布在0~40 cm土层，20 cm和40 cm行距下0~20 cm土层根系生物量显著高于60 cm行距（P<0.05）；在40~150 cm土层，根系生物量和根长密度在20 cm行距下最低。行上与行间根系生物量均随种植行距增大而增大，均以40 cm行距下根长密度较高。细根（d≤0.5 mm）根长密度为40 cm行距下显著最高，20 cm行距下最低（P<0.05）。总体表明，40 cm行距下柳枝稷根系生物量较高，平均根长密度与细根根长密度最高。

关键词: 柳枝稷, 种植行距, 根系生物量, 根长密度, 根系分布

Abstract:

To know the relationship between root growth and row spacing can offer evidence for choosing rational crop density in dry region. The roots of switchgrass (Pancium virgatum L.) were sampled down to 150 cm deepth using soil core method under different row spacings in April and October, 2016. The measurements were conducted on a terrace field under three row spacings (20 cm, 40 cm and 60 cm, respectively) after switchgrass has grown for 6 years in semiarid loess hilly-gully region. Results showed that root biomass of switchgrass mainly distributed in the 0~40 cm soil profile. In the 0~20 cm soil profile, root biomass decreased as the row spacing enlarged and root biomass under 60 cm was significantly higher than that under 20 cm and 40 cm row spacing (P<0.05). In the 40~150 cm soil profile, the root biomass and root length density were the smallest under 20 cm row spacing. Root biomass upon or between rows increased as row spacing enlarged. Root length density upon the row increased with increasing row spacing in April, and the highest root length density under 40 cm row spacing appeared in October. Under 40 cm row spacing, the root length density between rows showed the highest value in both months. Row spacing affected root length density of fine roots (d ≤ 0.5 mm) significantly (P<0.05), and it was the biggest and smallest under 40 cm and 20 cm row spacing, respectively. Our results showed that higher root biomass production and the biggest averaged root and fine root (d ≤ 0.5 mm) length density were obtained under 40 cm row spacing, which would be the appropriate row spacing for planting switchgrass in the region.

Key words: Switchgrass, Row spacing, Root biomass, Root length density, Root distribution

中图分类号:

S543

安勤勤, 高志娟, 刘金彪, 王智, 徐炳成. 黄土丘陵区不同种植行距下柳枝稷根系分布特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(6): 1251-1257.

AN Qin-qin, GAO Zhi-juan, LIU Jin-biao, WANG Zhi, XU Bing-cheng. Characteristics of Switchgrass Root Distribution under Different Row Spacings in Loess Hilly-gully Region of China[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(6): 1251-1257.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.06.014

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2017/V25/I6/1251

参考文献

[1] 李代琼, 梁一民, 刘国彬, 等. 半干旱黄土丘陵区多元化草地建设技术研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2003, 23(7):202-209
[2] 山仑, 徐炳成. 黄土高原半干旱地区建设稳定人工草地的探讨[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(2):1-2
[3] 王力, 邵明安, 张青峰. 陕北黄土高原土壤干层的分布和分异特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(3):436-442
[4] McLaughlin, Samuel B, Kszos A, et al. Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2005, 28(6):515-535
[5] Xu B C, Li F M, Shan L. Seasonal root biomass and distribution of switchgrass and milkvetch intercropping under 2:1 row-replacement in semiarid region, northwest China[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2010, 41:1959-1973
[6] 徐炳成, 山仑, 李凤民. 黄土丘陵半干旱区引种禾草柳枝稷的生物量与水分利用效率[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(9):2206-2213
[7] Gregory P J. Roots, rhizosphere and soil:the route to a better understanding of soil science?[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2006, 57(1):2-12
[8] Hess L, De Kroon H. Effects of rooting volume and nutrient availability as an alternative explanation for root self/non-self discrimination[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2007, 95(2):241-251
[9] 成向荣, 黄明斌, 邵明安, 等. 紫花苜蓿和短花针茅根系分布与土壤水分研究[J]. 草地学报, 2008, 16(2):170-175
[10] 蔡丽平, 吴鹏飞, 侯晓龙, 等. 类芦根系对不同磷胁迫的形态学响应[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(1):137-142
[11] 杨罗锦, 陶洪斌, 王璞. 种植密度对不同株型玉米生长及根系形态特征的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2012, 18(6):1009-1013
[12] Ma Z, Wood C W, Bransby D I. Impacts of soil management on root characteristics of switchgrass[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2000, 18(2):105-112
[13] Comas L H, Becker S R, Cruz V M V, et al. Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2013, 4(2):442
[14] Ning S, Shi J, Zuo Q, et al. Generalization of the root length density distribution of cotton under film mulched drip irrigation[J]. Field Crops Research, 2015, 177:125-136
[15] Hill J O, Simpson R J, Moore A D, et al. Morphology and response of roots of pasture species to phosphorus and nitrogen nutrition[J]. Plant and Soil, 2006, 286(1-2):7-19
[16] Jiang W, Wang K, Wu Q, et al. Effects of narrow plant spacing on root distribution and physiological nitrogen use efficiency in summer maize[J]. The Crop Journal, 2013, 1(1):77-83
[17] 尹宝重, 马燕会, 郭丽果, 等. 冬小麦不同行距配置对麦田温度、根系分布和产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(2):82-86
[18] Gao Z J, Liu J B, An Q Q, et al. Photosynthetic performance of switchgrass and its relation to field productivity:A three-year experimental appraisal in semiarid Loess Platea[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 16(6):1227-1235
[19] 高志娟, 徐炳成, 王京, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同种植行距下柳枝稷光合生理日变化研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2012, 32(6):1222-1228
[20] Fort F, Jouany C, Cruz P. Root and leaf functional trait relations in Poaceae species:implications of differing resource-acquisition strategies[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 6(3):211-219
[21] Hodge A. Plastic plants and patchy soils[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2006, 57(2):401-411
[22] 李邦发. 几个小麦品种根生长发育特性初探[J]. 种子, 2005, 24(5):46-49
[23] 林国林, 赵坤, 蒋春姬, 等. 种植密度和施氮水平对花生根系生长及产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2012, 43(5):1183-1186
[24] 刘金平, 游明鸿. 行距对老芒麦种群地下部及土壤特性的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2012, 34(4):55-60
[25] 王树丽, 贺明荣, 代兴龙, 等. 种植密度对冬小麦根系时空分布和氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(7):1839-1845
[26] Ravenek J M, Mommer L, Visser E J W, et al. Linking root traits and competitive success in grassland species[J]. Plant and Soil, 2016, 407(1-2):39-53
[27] Casper B B, Jackson R B. Plant competition underground[J]. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 1997, 28(4):545-570
[28] Hecht V L, Temperton V M, Nagel K A, et al. Sowing density:A neglected factor fundamentally affecting root distribution and biomass allocation of field grown spring barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.)[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7(442):1-14
[29] Ferchaud F, Vitte G, Bornet F, et al. Soil water uptake and root distribution of different perennial and annual bioenergy crops[J]. Plant and Soil, 2014, 388(1-2):307-322
[30] Meier I C, Leuschner C. Belowground drought response of European beech:fine root biomass and carbon partitioning in 14 mature stands across a precipitation gradient[J]. Global Change Biology, 2008, 14(9):2081-2095
[31] Peek M S, Leffler A J, Ivans C Y, et al. Fine root distribution and persistence under field conditions of three occurring Great Basin species of different life form[J]. New Phytologist, 2005, 165(1):171-180
[32] Gill R A, Burke I C, Lauenroth W K, et al. Longevity and turnover of roots in the shortgrass steppe:influence of diameter and depth[J]. Plant Ecology, 2002, 159(2):241-251

黄土丘陵区不同种植行距下柳枝稷根系分布特征研究

Characteristics of Switchgrass Root Distribution under Different Row Spacings in Loess Hilly-gully Region of China

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王燕, 赵晓晓, 王伟伟. 柳枝稷PvJAZ1基因的克隆、表达特性与亚细胞定位[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 234-243.
[2]	赵晓晓, 谢坤良, 张舒梦, 张超, 奚亚军, 孙风丽. 柳枝稷TIFY基因家族的鉴定与分析[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(5): 1126-1137.
[3]	王伟伟, 王勇锋, 张舒梦, 王竹林, 孙风丽, 张超, 奚亚军. 柳枝稷PvbZIP8基因的克隆与表达分析[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(3): 560-566.
[4]	郑爱泉, 徐开杰, 程亭亭, 张超, 奚亚军, 孙风丽. 柳枝稷分蘖发育调控的生理生化机制研究[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(1): 123-129.
[5]	赵晓晓, 谢坤良, 贾冬冬, 张舒梦, 孟敏, 孙风丽, 张超, 奚亚军. 柳枝稷幼穗分化过程及其分期[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(1): 170-177.
[6]	何学青, 沙亚·海拉提, 张依凡, 黄文静, 邓少军, 呼天明. 不同外源植物生长物质对柳枝稷种子萌发特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(3): 684-690.
[7]	李敏, 林炎丽, 杨富裕. 白腐真菌预处理对柳枝稷降解的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(6): 1239-1244.
[8]	何学青, 沙亚·海拉提, 龙明秀, 梁玉生, 陶奇波, 呼天明. 超干处理对柳枝稷种子活力及幼苗生长特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(5): 1055-1060.
[9]	徐鹏, 程亭亭, 张超, 刘曙东, 孙风丽, 奚亚军. 丛枝菌根真菌对柳枝稷苗期生长作用机制的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(5): 1097-1102.
[10]	王勇锋, 李毛, 崔桂宾, 徐开杰, 孙风丽, 张超, 刘曙东, 奚亚军. 柳枝稷体外诱导花器官逆转与非逆转穗芽生理特性差异研究[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(4): 768-776.
[11]	何树斌, 王燚, 程宇阳, 黄文静, 唐驯林, 庞仁江, 李菁, 呼天明, 龙明秀. 从枝菌根真菌与柳枝稷协同固碳机制及对土壤碳氮循环的调控[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(4): 802-806.
[12]	何学青, 陶奇波, 沙亚·海拉提, 郭理想, 龙明秀, 呼天明. 柳枝稷种子活力及幼苗生长对人工老化处理的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(4): 834-840.
[13]	朱毅, 范希峰, 侯新村, 刘吉利, 李钰莹, 武菊英. 中性盐胁迫对柳枝稷苗期生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(2): 352-357.
[14]	张正, 刘国彬, 李强, 脱登峰. 电容法估测植物根系生物量研究[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(2): 383-386.
[15]	柴乖强, 徐开杰, 王勇锋, 孙风丽, 刘曙东, 奚亚军. 农杆菌介导的P_SAG12-IPT基因转化柳枝稷研究[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(6): 1331-1336.