青贮饲料有氧稳定性测定装置的设计与验证

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.01.030

草地学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 238-243.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.01.030

青贮饲料有氧稳定性测定装置的设计与验证

郑毅, 唐鸿宇, 李天宇, 蔡茂, 陈豪, 张嘉保, 王鹏

吉林大学动物科学学院, 长春 130062

收稿日期:2017-05-22 修回日期:2018-03-26 出版日期:2018-02-15 发布日期:2018-05-25
通讯作者: 王鹏
作者简介:郑毅(1995-),男,吉林长春人,硕士研究生,主要从事粗饲料加工与肉牛繁育研究,E-mail:724523796@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31702178）；吉林省科技发展计划资助项目（20160520058JH）；吉林大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目（2016A85375）；国家肉牛牦牛产业技术体系（CARS-38）资助

Design and Verification of Measurement Equipment for Analysis of Silage Aerobic Stability

ZHENG Yi, TANG Hong-yu, LI Tian-yu, CAI Mao, CHEN Hao, ZHANG Jia-bao, WANG Peng

College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province 130062, China

Received:2017-05-22 Revised:2018-03-26 Online:2018-02-15 Published:2018-05-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为解决温度检测法测定青贮饲料有氧稳定性时存在发酵容器材质、性能不统一等问题，本研究设计并制造了一款青贮饲料有氧稳定性测定装置。并以新鲜刈割后进行填压处理后密度为600 kg·m^-3 的全株玉米（Whole-plant corn）和密度为500 kg·m^-3的玉米青秸秆（Green-corn straw）为原料，设计常规塑料容器的对照组和本研究设计制造测定装置的两个试验组，用以验证该装置的可靠性。结果表明，本研究制造的测定装置较传统容器有以下优点：不受外界温度影响，容器内部中心温度较传统容器高，具有良好的保温隔热性能；透气性良好，保证容器内部符合有氧发酵条件；操作简便，成本低廉，具有推广价值。

关键词: 青贮饲料, 有氧稳定性, 测定装置, 设计

Abstract:

New measurement equipment was designed and manufactured in this research to solve the problem in the analysis of silage aerobic stability such as the fermentation container with non-uniform texture and performance. Then its performance was tested. A control group and a treatment group were respectively installed. The control group used the traditional fermentation container and the treatment group used the new equipment. Each group used two kinds of material, 600 kg m^-3 whole-plant corn and 500 kg m^-3 green corn straw, which was dealt with fill compaction after fresh harvest. The results showed the new equipment had the following advantages. First, it had better heat preservation function. As the core temperature of new equipment was higher than that of traditional container. Second, it had great breathability, which is important to keep aerobic fermentation realistic. Third, it is easy to be handled with low cost, which make it is worth to be popularized.

Key words: Silage, Aerobic stability, Measurement equipment, Design

中图分类号:

S548

郑毅, 唐鸿宇, 李天宇, 蔡茂, 陈豪, 张嘉保, 王鹏. 青贮饲料有氧稳定性测定装置的设计与验证[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1): 238-243.

ZHENG Yi, TANG Hong-yu, LI Tian-yu, CAI Mao, CHEN Hao, ZHANG Jia-bao, WANG Peng. Design and Verification of Measurement Equipment for Analysis of Silage Aerobic Stability[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(1): 238-243.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.01.030

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2018/V26/I1/238

参考文献

[1] 刘祯,李胜利,余雄,等. 青贮添加剂对全株玉米青贮有氧稳定性的影响[J].中国奶牛,2012,319(20):26-29
[2] 王超,西野直树. 贮存温度和贮存期间对TMR青贮的发酵产物、有氧稳定性和微生物群态的影响[C]//中国畜牧兽医学会. 中国畜牧兽医学会2013年学术年会论文集. 北京.中国畜牧兽医学会,2013:13-13
[3] 刘贤,韩鲁佳,原慎一郎,等. 不同添加剂对全株玉米和青玉米秸青贮饲料质量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2004,20(4):246-249
[4] 张淑枝,周振明,孟庆翔. 不同生物添加剂对于全株玉米青贮发酵品质及消化率的影响[J]. 中国畜牧杂志,2007,43(1):53-56
[5] 王保平,董晓燕,董宽虎,等. 有机酸对全株玉米青贮有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(5):991-997
[6] 郭旭生,丁武蓉,玉柱. 青贮饲料发酵品质评定体系及其新进展[J]. 中国草地学报,2008,16(04):100-106
[7] Seppälä A,Heikkilä T,Mäki M,et al. Effects of additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of grass silages and total mixed rations[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2016,71(3):458-471
[8] Conaghan P,O'Kiely P,O'Mara F P. Possibilities of increasing the residual water-soluble carbohydrate concentration and aerobic stability of low dry-matter perennial ryegrass silage through additive and cultivar use[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2012,6(2):177-198
[9] 高国臣,齐宝林. 日本青贮饲料的生产与防止二次发酵的技术[J]. 吉林农业科学,2005,30(4):51-52
[10] Moselhy M A,Borba J P,Borba A E S. Improving the nutritive value, in vitro, digestibility and aerobic stability of Hedychium gardnerianum, silage through application of additives at ensiling time[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2015,206(6):8-18
[11] 卜庆云. 如何防止青贮饲料的二次发酵[J]. 中国畜禽种业,2009,5(10):68-69
[12] Wilkinson J M,Davies D R. The aerobic stability of silage:key findings and recent developments[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2013,68(1):1-19
[13] Gang G,Yuan X,Li L,et al. Effects of fibrolytic enzymes, molasses and lactic acid bacteria on fermentation quality of mixed silage of corn and hulless-barely straw in the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Grassland Science,2014,60(4):240-246
[14] 全国畜牧总站体系建设与推广处. 青贮品质评定[J]. 中国畜牧业,2015,388(17):39-42
[15] 郭旭生,周禾,玉柱. 不同添加剂对青贮饲料有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 中国奶牛,2006,7(9):18-21
[16] 李翠霞. 青贮发酵菌对全株玉米青贮品质与微生物消长的影响[D]. 中国农业科学院,2009:10-10
[17] Ashild T R,Gismervik K,Andersen A,et al. Effect of invasive slug populations (Arion vulgaris) on grass silage:Fermentation quality, in-silo, losses and aerobic stability[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2015,199(6):10-19
[18] 王勇,原现军,郭刚,等. 西藏不同饲草全混合日粮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的研究[J]. 草业学报,2014,23(6):95-102
[19] Ashbell G,Weinberg Z G. The Effect of Microbial inoculants applied at ensiling on sorghum silage characteristics and aerobic stability[J]. Agricultural Sciences in China,2002,1(10):1174-1179
[20] Yuan X,Wen A,Jian W,et al. Effects of ethanol, molasses and Lactobacillus plantarum, on the fermentation quality, in vitro, digestibility and aerobic stability of total mixed ration silages in the Tibetan plateau of China[J]. Animal Science Journal,2015,8(5):681-689
[21] 王慧丽. TMR在发酵过程中及有氧状态下酵母菌群落演替规律研究[D]. 中国农业大学,2015:33-35
[22] 刘祯,李胜利,余雄,等. 青贮添加剂对全株玉米青贮有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 中国奶牛,2012,13(20):26-29
[23] Li Y,Nishino N. Effects of inoculation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Lactobacillus buchneri, on fermentation, aerobic stability and microbial communities in whole crop corn silage[J]. Grassland Science,2011,57(4):184-191
[24] 许庆方,玉柱,李志强,等. 苜蓿、玉米青贮饲料有氧稳定性研究[J]. 草地学报,2007,15(6):519-524

青贮饲料有氧稳定性测定装置的设计与验证

Design and Verification of Measurement Equipment for Analysis of Silage Aerobic Stability

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吕竑建, 邹璇, 吴硕, 李云, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[2]	朱九刚, 张健, 邵涛, 董志浩, 李君风, 唐露, 冉启凡, 刘秦华. 添加剂对全株燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1756-1761.
[3]	梁龙飞, 王飞, 董祥, 郝俊. ‘热研4号’王草替代紫花苜蓿对TMR发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 703-711.
[4]	商振达, 谭占坤, 李家奎, 卓嘎, 王宏辉, 谢国平, 刘锁珠. 种植时间对西藏地区青贮玉米发酵品质和微生物多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 488-496.
[5]	袁仕改, 陈超, 张明均, 杨丰, 申露露, 张滔滔, 郝俊. 添加剂对温湿生境青贮玉米发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(4): 942-947.
[6]	司华哲, 刘晗璐, 南韦肖, 金春爱, 李光玉. 不同发酵类型乳酸菌对低水分粳稻秸秆青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(6): 1294-1299.
[7]	李文, 曹文侠, 李小龙, 徐长林, 师尚礼. 一种高寒草地草产量快速测定工具的设计和试验[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(4): 892-894.
[8]	王旭哲, 张凡凡, 马春晖. 青贮饲料中真菌、真菌毒素及其检测方法的研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(3): 509-517.
[9]	郭海玉, 罗明, 何媛, 李卫军. 新疆紫花苜蓿根瘤菌XGL026发酵条件的响应面法优化筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(3): 624-631.
[10]	关皓, 郭旭生, 干友民, 白慧娟, 宋珊. 添加剂对不同含水量多花黑麦草青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(3): 669-675.
[11]	梁万鹏, 赫春杰, 高钰, 梁雪, 徐振飞, 朱正生, 刘雨田, 张金霞. 裂区设计下分析影响欧洲菊苣产量的因素[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(3): 703-706.
[12]	李平, 张文芝, 白史且, 沈益新. 不同添加剂对老芒麦青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(3): 711-714.
[13]	陈明霞, 刘秦华, 张建国. 耐低温乳酸菌的筛选鉴定及其对黑麦草青贮的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(2): 409-415.
[14]	靳晓丽, 田新会, 杜文华. 鹰嘴豆ISSR反应体系的正交优化[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(6): 1303-1309.
[15]	辛鹏程, 原现军, 郭刚, 闻爱友, 肖慎华, 参木有, 陈裕祥, 邵涛. 添加丙酸对青稞秸秆和多年生黑麦草混合青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(3): 594-600.