灭菌处理对不同含水量玉米青贮影响的研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.02.034

草地学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 512-519.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.02.034

灭菌处理对不同含水量玉米青贮影响的研究

史悦¹, 丁婉³, 许庆方¹, 玉柱², 王璐娜¹, 赵愉风¹, 温盛慧¹

1. 山西农业大学动物科技学院, 山西太谷 030801;
2. 中国农业大学动物科学院, 北京 100193;
3. 山西农业科学院高寒区作物研究所, 山西大同 037008

收稿日期:2017-09-29 修回日期:2018-04-16 出版日期:2018-04-15 发布日期:2018-07-05
通讯作者: 许庆方
作者简介:史悦(1992-),女,汉,山西长治人,在读研究生,E-mail:18935445642@163.com
基金资助:
十三五国家重点研究计划（2017YFD0502103）；公益性行业（农业）科研专项（201303061）资助

Study on the Effect of Sterilization on Corn Silage with Different Water Content

SHI Yue¹, XU Qing-Fang³, DING Wan¹, YU Zhu², WANG Lu-na¹, ZHAO Yu-feng¹, WEN Shen-hui¹

1. College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
2. College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China;
3. High Latitude Crops Institute to Shanxi Academy of Agriculture Science, Datong, Shanxi Province 037008, China

Received:2017-09-29 Revised:2018-04-16 Online:2018-04-15 Published:2018-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究灭菌与否和不同含水量对玉米（Zea mays L.）青贮的营养成分、发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响，以阴干的全株玉米为试验原料，罐装后分别进行灭菌与不灭菌处理，处理后添加至四个梯度（25%，40%，55%，70%）的含水量。青贮42 d后取样分析样品的发酵品质、营养成分和有氧稳定性。结果表明：不同含水量的青贮玉米发酵品质差异较大，但不同处理组间营养成分差异不显著；不灭菌组含水量为70%的玉米青贮发酵品质最佳，含水量为25%的青贮发酵品质最差；灭菌处理可以抑制所有微生物的繁殖；在有氧暴露过程中，不灭菌组含水量70%玉米青贮有氧稳定性高于含水量25%玉米青贮。

关键词: 玉米青贮, 灭菌, 含水量

Abstract:

In order to study the effect of sterilization on the nutrient composition, fermentative quality and aerobic stability of corn silage with different water Content, the dried corn was used as the raw material,and then sterilized and non-sterilized separately after bottling. The materials were adjusted to four moisture level(25%,40%,55% and 70%). The fermentation quality, nutrient composition and aerobic stability of corn silage were analyzed after 42 days of ensile. The results showed that the fermentation quality of corn silage was different,but the nutrient content of each group was not significantly affected. The fermentation quality of 70% moisture content corn silage was the best, and corn silage of 25% moisture content was the worst. Sterilization treatments inhibited the propagation of all microorganisms. The aerobic stability of 70% moisture content corn silage without sterilization was higher than that of 25% moisture content.

Key words: Corn silage, Sterilization, Moisture content

中图分类号:

Q816.5

史悦, 丁婉, 许庆方, 玉柱, 王璐娜, 赵愉风, 温盛慧. 灭菌处理对不同含水量玉米青贮影响的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(2): 512-519.

SHI Yue, XU Qing-Fang, DING Wan, YU Zhu, WANG Lu-na, ZHAO Yu-feng, WEN Shen-hui. Study on the Effect of Sterilization on Corn Silage with Different Water Content[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(2): 512-519.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.02.034

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2018/V26/I2/512

参考文献

[1] 郑洪梅. 青贮玉米秸秆饲料的调制技术[J]. 畜牧与兽医,2015,47(06):142-144
[2] 张英来. 影响青贮饲料质量的因素[J]. 中国乳业,2002(5):14-16
[3] 孙启忠,丁国庆,王育青,等. 有机肥SustainGro对牧草产量的影响[J]. 草业科学,2007,24(9):42-47
[4] 吴晓杰. 不同处理方式对青贮饲料质量影响的试验研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学,2005
[5] Kung L,Grieve D B,Thomas J W,et al. Added ammonia or microbial inocula for fermentation and nitrogenous compounds of Alfalfa ensiled at various percents of dry matter[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1984, 67(2):299-306
[6] Fussell R J. Determination of volatile fatty acids (C2-C5) and lactic acid in silage by gas chromatograpHy[J]. Analyst,1987,112(9):1213-1216
[7] Broderick G A,Kang J H. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1980,63(1):64-75
[8] AOAC. Official methods of analysis,I,15th ed. Association of official analytical chemists, arlington,VA.1990
[9] AOAC. Official methods of analysis,16th ed. Association of official analytical chemists,arlington,VA,USA.1997
[10] AOAC. Official methods of analysis,I, 15th ed. Association of official analytical chemists,arlington,VA.1990
[11] AOAC. Official methods of analysis,17th ed. International,arlington,VA. 2002
[12] Soest P J V,Robertson J B,B A Lewis. Methods for dietary fiber,neutral detergent fiber,and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1991,74(10):3583-97
[13] Dubois M,Gilles K A,Hamilton J K,et al. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances[J]. Analytical Chemistry,2002,28(3):350-356
[14] Herrera-Saldana R E,Huber J T,Poore M H. Dry matter,crude protein,and starch degradability of five cereal grains[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1990,73(9):2386-2393
[15] Sofyan A,Utomo R,Yusiati L M,et al. Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria and saccharomyces cerevisiae from natural sources as feed-silage inoculants[J]. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture,2011
[16] Seale D R,Pahlow G,Spoelstra S F,et al. Methods for the microbiological analysis of silage[J]. Heart Lung&Circulation,2008,17(2):1486-1489
[17] 王旭哲,张凡凡,唐开婷,等. 密度对玉米青贮发酵品质、微生物和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2018,40(01):80-86
[18] 范华,董宽虎. 不同保存方法对玉米秸营养价值的影响[J]. 山西农业大学学报:自然科学版,2002,22(2):106-108
[19] Mcdonald P,Henderson A R,Heron S J E. The biochemistry of silage.[J]. Ed Chalcombe Publ,1991
[20] 覃方锉,赵桂琴,焦婷,等. 含水量及添加剂对燕麦捆裹青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2014,23(6):119-125
[21] 樊兆艳. 全株青贮玉米饲料的制作与利用[J]. 山东畜牧兽医,2017,38(12):23-24
[22] Kung L,Robinson J R,Ranjit N K, et al. Microbial populations,fermentation end-products,and aerobic stability of corn silage treated with ammonia or a propionic acid-based preservative[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(7):págs.1479-1486
[23] 许冬梅,张萍,柯文灿,等. 青贮微生物及其对青贮饲料发酵品质影响的研究进展[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(03):460-465
[24] Hajmeer M,Basheer I,Cliver D O. Survival curves of Listeria monocytogenes in chorizos modeled with artificial neural networks[J]. Food Microbiology,2006,23(6):561
[25] 马迪,梁慧慧,邵文强,等. 不同乳酸菌添加剂对青贮黑麦草和青贮玉米发酵产物和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(06):1365-1370

灭菌处理对不同含水量玉米青贮影响的研究

Study on the Effect of Sterilization on Corn Silage with Different Water Content

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王新宇, 申晨, 霍文婕, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 陈雷, 许庆方, 王永新, 郭刚. 雁北地区不同品种玉米全株青贮发酵品质及细菌群落结构分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1087-1093.
[2]	李彤, 张宇, 赵晋灵, 闫瑞瑞, 辛晓平, 王旭, 陈金强, 吴冬秀, 李凌浩, 赵曼. 放牧对草甸草原土壤水热状况和地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2577-2582.
[3]	夏洪泽, 张琳琳, 王银梦, 孙璐, 王磊, 刘书杰, 崔占鸿, 刘明莲. 体外产气法评价不同分级指数玉米青贮—苜蓿干草组合发酵特性[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1136-1144.
[4]	达布希拉图, 彭菲, 林杉. 内蒙古典型草原主要物种-土壤互反馈初探[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6): 1184-1191.
[5]	罗永忠, 李广, 闫丽娟, 张芮, 马维伟, 刘小娥, 马敏. 水分胁迫下新疆大叶苜蓿水分代谢指标变化及相互关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(5): 981-987.
[6]	杨超, 李宛姝, 黄丹, 戎郁萍. 贮藏温度对不同含水量草木樨种子活力影响的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(2): 251-257.
[7]	侯宪宽, 芦光新, 董全民, 郑伟, 宋磊. 施肥对环青海湖地区草甸群落生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(3): 488-492.
[8]	付京晶, 周华坤, 赵新全, 姚步青, 陈哲, 金艳霞, 温军. 青海海北不同类型高寒草地的克隆植物及其重要性[J]. , 2013, 21(6): 1065-1072.
[9]	李颖, 王明亚, 毛培胜. 抗氧化剂处理对不同劣变程度的羊草种子生理特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2013, 21(5): 945-949.
[10]	朱慧森, 刘生强, 刘强, 董宽虎. 中度盐碱化草地混播牧草替代玉米青贮对绵羊生产性能的影响[J]. , 2013, 21(1): 202-206.
[11]	张晓媛, 赵利, 阿那尔, 毛培胜. 控制劣变对不同含水量羊草种子生理特性的影响[J]. , 2012, 20(5): 899-906.
[12]	袁飞, 赵敏, 戎郁萍, 白可喻. 刈割耙除对草地土壤呼吸的影响[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 637-642.
[13]	吴兆海, 梁超, 王永新, 高文俊, 玉柱, 孙启忠, 白春生, 许庆方. 晾晒和添加剂对白羊草青贮的影响[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 768-771.
[14]	梁超, 吴兆海, 许庆方, 玉柱, 白春生, 石永红, 刘建宁, 乔羽. 晾晒与添加剂对反枝苋青贮饲料品质的影响[J]. , 2012, 20(2): 373-377.
[15]	刘玲, 陈新, 许庆方, 玉柱, 王保平, 孙启忠, 石永红, 刘建宁. 添加剂对红豆草鲜贮或晾晒后青贮品质的影响[J]. , 2011, 19(6): 995-999.