抑制黄曲霉乳酸菌的筛选与鉴定

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.02.033

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 587-595.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.02.033

• 技术研发 • 上一篇

抑制黄曲霉乳酸菌的筛选与鉴定

巩海强¹, 柴继宽¹, 陈三冬¹, 尹国丽¹, 邓秀霞¹

甘肃农业大学草业学院/草业生态系统教育部重点实验室/中-美草地畜牧业可持续研究中心, 甘肃兰州 730070

收稿日期:2022-09-05 修回日期:2022-10-16 发布日期:2023-02-28
通讯作者: 柴继宽,E-mail:chaijilk@gsau.edu.cn
作者简介:巩海强(1998-),男,河北张家口人,硕士研究生,主要从事饲草学研究,E-mail:2719893343@qq.com
基金资助:
国家现代农业产业技术体系(cars-34)资助

The Screening and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria Against Aspergillus flavus

GONG Hai-qiang¹, CHAI Ji-kuan¹, CHEN San-dong¹, YIN Guo-li¹, DENG Xiu-xia¹

Pratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University/Sino-US Research Centersfor Sustainable Grassland andlivestock Management, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2022-09-05 Revised:2022-10-16 Published:2023-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 黄曲霉是玉米(Zea mays L.)青贮过程的主要污染物之一，本研究旨在从玉米青贮饲料中分离筛选出能够抑制黄曲霉菌生长的乳酸菌，为改善和提高青贮饲料品质提供优良菌种。本试验采用双层平板法，从玉米青贮饲料中筛选抑制黄曲霉的菌株，并对其进行生理生化鉴定及同源性分析，构建系统发育树，明确各菌株的分类地位。结果表明：从青贮发酵不同阶段筛选得到50株乳酸菌，其中有7株乳酸菌对黄曲霉有明显抑制作用(P<0.05)，抑菌圈直径均大于3.60 cm，均为革兰氏阳性同型发酵乳酸菌，7株乳酸菌中Q39(49.40%)和Q40(49.60%)抑菌效果最好，抑菌圈直径为4.15 cm和4.17 cm，显著高于其他5株乳酸菌(P<0.05)；菌株Q11，Q28，Q40，Q44与22种碳水化合物作用均呈阳性，菌株Q39和Q49与鼠李糖作用呈阴性，与松三糖反应呈弱阳性，菌株Q13相较于其他6株菌株对于碳源的利用情况较弱；经16S rDNA鉴定确定菌株Q39和Q49为植物乳杆菌，Q11，Q13，Q29，Q40，Q44为戊糖乳杆菌。菌株Q39和Q40可作为全株玉米青贮发酵的备选添加菌株。

关键词: 全株玉米青贮, 乳酸菌, 黄曲霉, 抑菌, 16S rDNA

Abstract: Aspergillus flavus is one of the main pollutants in the process of corn silage. Lactic acid bacteria which can inhibit the growth of Aspergillus flavus were isolated and screened from corn silage to provide excellent strains for improving the quality of silage. The strains inhibiting Aspergillus flavus were screened from corn silage by double-layer plate method,and their physiological and biochemical identification and homology analysis were carried out. The phylogenetic tree was constructed to clarify the taxonomic status of each strain. Fifty strains of lactic acid bacteria were screened from different stages of silage fermentation,among which 7 strains showed significant inhibition against Aspergillus flavus (P<0.05),and the diameter of inhibition zone of the strains was greater than 3.60 cm. All of them were Gram-positive homofermentative lactic acid bacteria. Among the 7 strains of lactic acid bacteria,Q39(49.40%) and Q40 (49.60%) had the best antibacterial effect,and the diameter of inhibition zone was 4.15 cm and 4.17 cm respectively,which was significantly higher than that of the other 5 strains of lactic acid bacteria (P<0.05)；Strains Q11,Q28,Q40,and Q44 were positive to 22 types of carbohydrates. Strains Q39 and Q49 were negative to rhamnose and weakly positive to triose. Strain Q13 had weaker utilization of carbon sources than the other 6 strains. Strains Q39 and Q49 were identified as Lactiplantibacillus plantarum by 16S rDNA identification,and strains Q11,Q13,Q29,Q40 and Q44 were identified as Lactiplantibacillus pentosus. Strains Q39 and Q40 can be selected as alternative strains for whole-plant corn silage fermentation.

Key words: Whole-plant corn silage, Lactic acid bacteria, Aspergillus flavus, Bacteriostasis, 16S rDNA

中图分类号:

S939.11+7

巩海强, 柴继宽, 陈三冬, 尹国丽, 邓秀霞. 抑制黄曲霉乳酸菌的筛选与鉴定[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(2): 587-595.

GONG Hai-qiang, CHAI Ji-kuan, CHEN San-dong, YIN Guo-li, DENG Xiu-xia. The Screening and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria Against Aspergillus flavus[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(2): 587-595.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.02.033

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I2/587

参考文献

[1] 饶胜其,陈素雅,魏永峰,等. 解淀粉芽孢杆菌F1对黄曲霉的拮抗条件优化及其抑霉特性研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2015,41(12):6-12
[2] ZHU Y L,XU Y N,YANG Q L,et al. Antifungal Properties and AFB1 Detoxification Activity of a New Strain of Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2021,414:125569-125569
[3] 王后苗,廖伯寿,雷永,等. 黄曲霉主要真菌毒素次级代谢与调控的研究进展[J]. 微生物学通报,2014,41(7):1425-1438
[4] 高秀芬,荫士安,张宏元,等. 中国部分地区玉米中4种黄曲霉毒素污染调查[J]. 卫生研究,2011,40(1):46-49
[5] 陈梦言,白洁,柯文灿,等. 青贮饲料微生物群落组成与功能研究进展[J]. 生物技术通报,2021,37(9):11-23
[6] 田吉鹏,刘蓓一,顾洪如,等. 乳酸菌及丙酸钙对全株玉米和燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和霉菌毒素含量的影响[J]. 草业学报,2022,31(8):157-166
[7] 张瑾,余祖华,丁轲,等. 黄曲霉毒素B_(1)降解菌的筛选及生物学特性分析[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2022,48(14):175-180
[8] THEDDEUS M K,ETHEL O M,PAUL O O,et al. Efficacy of Selected Medicinal Plants from Eastern Kenya against Aspergillus flavus[J]. Journal of Plant Sciences,2014,2(5):226-231
[9] SCHAMANN A,SCHMIDTHEYDT M,GEISEB R,et al. Formation of B-and M-group Aflatoxins and Precursors by Aspergillus Flavus on Maize and its Implication for Food Safety.[J]. Mycotoxin research,2022,38(2):79-92
[10] LYNCH J P,O'KIELY P,WATERS S M,et al. Conservation Characteristics of Corn Ears and Stover Ensiled with the Addition of Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum MTD-1,Lactiplantibacillus Plantarum 30114,or Lactiplantibacillus buchneri 11A44[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2012,95(4):2070-2080
[11] WENINBERG Z G,SHATZ O,CHEN Y,et al. Effect of Lactic Acid Bacteria Inoculants on In Vitro Digestibility of Wheat and Corn Silages[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2007,90(10):4754-4762
[12] 尹雪,郭雪峰,刘俊峰,等. 抑制黄曲霉菌的乳酸菌的分离及鉴定[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2018,46(5):16-22
[13] WABF Y L,WANG W K,WU Q C,et al. The Effect of Different Lactic Acid Bacteria Inoculants on Silage Quality,Phenolic Acid Profiles,Bacterial Community and In Vitro Rumen Fermentation Characteristic of Whole Corn Silage[J]. Fermentation,2022,8(6):285
[14] HU S,DOU X,ZHANG L,et al. Rapid Detection of Aflatoxin B 1 in Medicinal Materials of Radix and Rhizome by Gold Immunochromatographic assay[J]. Toxicon,2018,150:144-150
[15] 李利红,刘海荣,贺莹. 抑制曲霉菌的乳酸菌分离及鉴定[J].安徽农学通报,2020,26(16):40-42
[16] 张玉琳,杨寒珺,李超程,等. 杂交构树青贮饲料中优良乳酸菌的分离与鉴定[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(1):38-45
[17] 杨旭洲,陈佩瑶,张富新. 抗氧化乳酸菌的筛选及其益生特性评价[J/OL]. 食品与发酵工业.https://doi.org/10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.033146
[18] 张龙翔,张庭芳,李令媛. 生化实验方法和技术[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,1997:17-20
[19] 李院,魏新元,王静,等. 抑制青霉菌乳酸菌的分离、鉴定及抑菌物质分析[J]. 食品科学,2015,36(21):150-155
[20] 马欢欢,林洋,吕欣然,等. 96孔板法筛选抗黑曲霉性乳酸菌及抑菌机理研究[J]. 食品工业科技,2017,38(12):171-175
[21] 刘悦,字学娟,陈婷,等. 海南岛天然饲草青贮饲料中乳酸菌分离鉴定及优良菌株筛选[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(10):2819-2826
[22] PARVIN S,WANG C,LI Y,et al. Effects of Inoculation with Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Bacterial Communities of Italian Ryegrass,whole Crop Maize,Guinea Grass and Rhodes Grass Silages[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2010,160(3):160-166
[23] 宫安东,董飞燕,吴楠楠,等. 吡咯伯克霍尔德菌WY6-5产二甲基二硫对储藏期花生黄曲霉及毒素的抑制作用[J]. 中国农业科学,2019,52(17):2972-2982
[24] 蔺豆豆,琚泽亮,柴继宽,等. 青藏高原燕麦附着耐低温乳酸菌的筛选与鉴定[J]. 草业学报,2022,31(5):103-114
[25] 宗亚倩,鲁洪智,段新慧,等. 青贮玉米中乳酸菌的分离和鉴定[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学),2021,36(6):1071-1075
[26] XIA Y,HE R,SUN Y,et al. Food-Grade Expression of Manganese Peroxidases in Recombinant Kluyveromyces lactis and Degradation of Aflatoxin B1 Using Fermentation Supernatants [J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2022,12:821230-821230
[27] 郭刚,霍文婕,刘强,等. 玉米秸秆青贮饲料发酵早期优良乳酸菌的分离和鉴定[J]. 畜牧与兽医,2016,48(7):60-64
[28] 马妙莲. 抑霉菌乳酸菌的分离和鉴定及抑菌物质的分析[D]. 合肥:安徽农业大学,2011:37-38
[29] 崔棹茗,郭刚,原现军,等. 青稞秸秆青贮饲料中优良乳酸菌的筛选及鉴定[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(3):607-615
[30] 杨晓丹,原现军,郭刚,等. 西藏豆科牧草青贮饲料中耐低温优良乳酸菌的筛选[J]. 草业学报,2015,24(6):99-107
[31] BERNARDES T F,DANIEL J L P,ADESOGAN A T,et al. Silage Review:Unique Challenges of Silages made in Hot and Cold Regions[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2018,101(5):4001-4019
[32] 严萍,张永辉,麦热姆妮萨·艾麦尔,等. 饲料玉米中优质乳酸菌的分离和鉴定[J]. 安徽农业科学,2011,39(10):5926-5928,5970
[33] 王洋,姚权,孙娟娟,等. 乳酸菌添加剂对苜蓿青贮品质和黄酮含量的影响[J].中国草地学报,2018,40(2):48-53
[34] 张红梅,段珍,李霞,等. 青贮饲料乳酸菌添加剂的应用现状[J].草业科学,2017,34(12):2575-2583
[35] 章昱,周云芳,曹清,等. 植物乳杆菌CMCC-P0002代谢产物中抑菌物质的研究[J]. 中国微生态学杂志,2016,28(3):263-266,270
[36] 陆春波,毛银,李国辉,等. 植物乳杆菌DY6主要抑菌代谢物的分析和鉴定[J]. 微生物学通报,2019,46(9):2258-2271
[37] 薄礼娟. 戊糖乳杆菌S1-4的抑菌特性及饲料中的应用研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2016:20-30
[38] 杜贺超,蒋加进,王楠楠,等. 产抑菌物质乳酸菌的筛选及其抑菌特性研究[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报,2021,12(21):8543-8550
[39] 王昌禄,刘彤,李王强,等. 微生物对黄曲霉毒素的抑制机制研究进展[J]. 食品科学技术学报,2021,39(1):27-36
[40] 郭艳萍,盛海圆,陈晓琳,等. 抑黄曲霉乳酸菌的筛选及菌种鉴定[J]. 中国微生态学杂志,2010,22(7):583-586
[41] 杨泽敏,李双,金正雨,等. 1株鲤鱼源植物乳杆菌的分离鉴定及其生物学特性分析[J].中国畜牧兽医,2022,49(7):2805-2811

抑制黄曲霉乳酸菌的筛选与鉴定

The Screening and Identification of Lactic Acid Bacteria Against Aspergillus flavus

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙蓉, 刘悦, 陈婷, 吕仁龙, 周汉林, 李茂, 字学娟. 乳酸菌和糖蜜对构树叶青贮品质和细菌多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 280-286.
[2]	李海萍, 关皓, 贾志锋, 刘文辉, 陈仕勇, 徐美玲, 陈生翠, 严东海, 蒋永梅, 甘丽, 张珈敏, 周青平. 添加麦麸和乳酸菌对川西北高寒地区燕麦裹包青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 302-310.
[3]	杨泽毅, 张玉琳, 杨寒珺, 车冰, 张凡凡, 马春晖. 葡萄枝叶自然青贮中优选乳酸菌的分离与鉴定[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(7): 1918-1924.
[4]	马淑敏, 焦婷, 师尚礼, 秦伟娜, 王正文, 赵生国, 祁娟. 混合型乳酸菌制剂对不同品种青饲玉米青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(6): 1558-1568.
[5]	金艳丽, 姚拓, 兰晓君, 李昌宁, 马亚春. 燕麦根腐病拮抗菌的筛选及抑菌特性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1095-1101.
[6]	张海铉, 霍文婕, 陈雷, 刘强, 张拴林, 王聪, 许庆方, 郭刚. 添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮品质及小肠可吸收氨基酸的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1302-1309.
[7]	田吉鹏, 韦青, 刘蓓一, 许能祥, 丁成龙, 顾洪如. 复合添加剂对花生秧青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 464-470.
[8]	李彦飞, 杨双双, 初晓辉, 马向丽, 段新慧, 韩博, 段佳鑫, 单贵莲. 昆明优质本土乳酸菌的筛选及其对全株玉米青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(12): 3215-3224.
[9]	刘悦, 字学娟, 陈婷, 孙蓉, 李茂, 汤凯. 海南天然饲草青贮饲料中乳酸菌分离鉴定及优良菌株筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10): 2819-2826.
[10]	赵小雪, 王仕玉, 郭凤根, 罗富成. 乳酸菌及纤维素酶对不同藜麦秸秆青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10): 2827-2833.
[11]	张玉琳, 杨寒珺, 李超程, 张凡凡, 马春晖. 杂交构树青贮饲料中优良乳酸菌的分离与鉴定[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 38-45.
[12]	陈雷, 暴雪艳, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 李清宏, 许庆方, 王聪, 刘强. 单宁酸和乳酸菌对紫花苜蓿青贮品质和体外瘤胃发酵的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1853-1858.
[13]	吕竑建, 邹璇, 吴硕, 李云, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加辣木叶和香肠乳杆菌对玉米秸秆青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[14]	郑明扬, 吴硕, 郭香, 陈晓阳, 张庆. 添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对砂仁叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1113-1117.
[15]	任璐, 刘晓峰, 周建波, 殷辉, 张宝俊, 赵晓军. 醉鱼草内生细菌ZJ1的抑菌作用及其脂肽类抑菌代谢产物鉴定[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 434-442.