增温和氮添加对高寒草甸土壤微生物氮素生理群的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.03.003

草地学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 606-612.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.03.003

增温和氮添加对高寒草甸土壤微生物氮素生理群的影响

张慧敏¹, 李希来^1,2, 杨帆^1,2

1. 青海大学农牧学院, 青海西宁 810016;
2. 青海-广东自然资源监测与评价联合重点实验室, 青海西宁 810016

收稿日期:2019-11-11 修回日期:2019-12-20 出版日期:2020-06-15 发布日期:2020-05-30
通讯作者: 李希来
作者简介:张慧敏(1996-),女,山东菏泽人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地生态与环境保护研究,E-mail:704894804@qq.com;
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFC0504803）；青海省科技厅项目（2018-ZJ-788，2017-HZ-802）；高等学校学科创新引智计划资助（D18013）项目；教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划（IRT_17R62）共同资助

Effects of Warming and Nitrogen Fertilization on Soil Microbial Nitrogen Physiology Groups in Alpine Meadow

ZHANG Hui-min¹, Li Xi-lai^1,2, Yang Fan^1,2

1. College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016;
2. Qinghai-Guangdong joint key laboratory of natural resources monitoring and evaluation, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016

Received:2019-11-11 Revised:2019-12-20 Online:2020-06-15 Published:2020-05-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了揭示高寒草甸土壤微生物氮素生理群对增温和氮素添加的响应机制，本研究采用模拟增温和添加不同形态氮素的方法，研究了增温和氮素添加对三江源区高寒草甸土壤中硝化细菌﹑反硝化细菌﹑自生固氮菌﹑氨化细菌的影响。结果表明：各处理中土壤微生物氮素生理群的数量分布呈现自生固氮菌 > 反硝化细菌 > 氨化细菌 > 硝化细菌；增温和氮添加处理均显著增加0~15 cm和15~30 cm土壤氮素生理群数量，硝态氮处理下4种氮素生理群数量均高于铵态氮处理，且硝化细菌和自生固氮菌的数量在添加的不同氮素之间差异极显著（P<0.01），而反硝化细菌和氨化细菌的数量差异不显著；增温和添加氮素交互影响土壤微生物氮素生理群数量分布特征，具体表现为促进作用。本研究结果为揭示高寒草甸在全球气候变暖和氮沉降的背景下的响应规律提供数据支撑。

关键词: 铵态氮, 硝态氮, 硝化细菌, 反硝化细菌, 自生固氮菌, 氨化细菌

Abstract: This study analyzed the changes of nitrifying bacteria,denitrifying bacteria,nitrogen fixing bacteria and ammonifying bacteria in alpine meadow in the Sanjiangyuan affected by warming and nitrogen fertilization.. The results showed that the quantity distributions of soil microbial nitrogen physiology groups were presented as abiogenous azotobacter > denitrifying bacteria > ammoniated bacteria > nitrifying bacteria. The number of soil microbial nitrogen physiological groups in warming and adding nitrogen treatment was increased significantly in the soil levels of 0~15 cm and 15~30 cm. The number of four physiological groups of nitrate nitrogen addition was higher than that of ammonium nitrogen addition,and the number of nitrifying bacteria and abiogenous azotobacter was significantly different in different types of nitrogen addition,but the numbers of denitrifying bacteria and ammonifying bacteria were close;There was an interaction between warming and adding nitrogen,which could be affected by the quantitative distribution characteristics of soil microbial nitrogen physiological groups. Its specific performance is the role of promotion. The results provide data revealing the response of alpine meadow to global warming and nitrogen deposition.

Key words: Ammonium nitrogen, Nitrate nitrogen, Nitrifying bacteria, Denitrifying bacteria, Abiogenous azotobacter, Ammoniated bacteria

中图分类号:

S154

张慧敏, 李希来, 杨帆. 增温和氮添加对高寒草甸土壤微生物氮素生理群的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 606-612.

ZHANG Hui-min, Li Xi-lai, Yang Fan. Effects of Warming and Nitrogen Fertilization on Soil Microbial Nitrogen Physiology Groups in Alpine Meadow[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(3): 606-612.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.03.003

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2020/V28/I3/606

参考文献

[1] Didi Sun,Yuejiao Li,Wenqiang Zhao,et al. Effects of experimental warming on soil microbial communities in two contrasting subalpine forest ecosystems,eastern Tibetan Plateau,China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science,2016,13(8):1442-1452
[2] Zhenzhen Zhao,Shikui Dong,Xiaoman Jiang,et al. Effects of warming and nitrogen deposition on CH₄,CO₂ and N₂O emissions in alpine grassland ecosystems of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2017,592(1):565-572
[3] 温小成,芦光新. 模拟增温和氮素添加对高寒草地植物群落的影响[J]. 草业与畜牧,2015,1(2):38-43
[4] Changting Wang,Xinquan Zhao,Hongbiao Zi,et al. The effect of simulated warming on root dynamics and soil microbial community in an alpine meadow of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2017,116(1):30-41
[5] Yong Zhang,Shikui Dong,Qingzhu Gao,et al. Soil bacterial and fungal diversity differently correlated with soil biochemistry in alpine grassland ecosystems in response to environmental changes[J]. Nature,2017,7(43077):1-10
[6] 吴楚,芦光新,德科加,等. 人工增温条件下不同氮素形态比对重齿风毛菊气体交换及其群落生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(6):1129-1135
[7] Sheik C S,Beasley W H,Elshahed M S,et al. Effect of warming and drought on grassland microbial communities[J]. ISME Journal,2011,5(10):1692-1700
[8] Haugwitz M S,Bergmark L,Priemé A,et al. Soil microorganisms respond to five years of climate change manipulations and elevated atmospheric CO₂ in a temperate heath ecosystem[J]. Plant and Soil,2014,374(1/2):211-222
[9] Xu G,Jiang H,Zhang Y B,et al. Effect of warming on extracted soil carbon pools of abies faxoniana forest at two elevations[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2013,310:365-367
[10] Shen S M,Hart P B S. The nitrogen cycle in the Broadbalk wheat experiment:¹⁵N-labelled fertilizer residues in soil and in the soil microbial biomass[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1989,21:529-533
[11] 于树,汪景宽,李双异. 应用PLFA方法分析长期不同施肥处理对玉米地土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(9):4221-4227
[12] 卢虎,李显刚,姚拓,等. 高寒生态脆弱区"黑土滩"草地植被与土壤微生物数量特征研究[J]. 草业学报,2014,23(5):214-222
[13] 姚拓,龙瑞军,师尚礼,等. 高寒草地不同扰动生境土壤微生物氮素生理群数量特征研究[J]. 土壤学报,2007,44(1):122-129
[14] 赵志山,单志萍,惠慧. 吉林西部羊草草原牧草根际固氮菌的研究[J]. 中国草原,1984,6(3):70-73
[15] 张建贵,蒋永梅,姚拓,等. 不同管理措施对高寒草甸土壤微生物氮素生理群数量影响研究[J]. 草业学报,2017,26(8):65-73
[16] 宗宁,段呈,耿守保,等. 增温施氮对高寒草甸生产力及生物量分配的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2018,29(1):59-67
[17] 郭红玉,德科加,芦光新,等. 模拟增温和添加氮素对高寒草甸草地生产力影响的初步研究[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(2):322-327
[18] 李欣,李峰科,芦光新,等. 模拟增温对高寒草甸土壤三大类微生物数量的影响[J]. 青海畜牧兽医杂志,2017,47(2):6-11
[19] 刘琳,朱霞,孙庚,等. 模拟增温与施肥对高寒草甸土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 草业科学,2011,28(08):1405-1410
[20] 周华坤,周兴民,赵新全. 模拟增温效应对矮松草草甸影响的初步研究[J]. 植物生态学,2000,24(5):547-553
[21] 权欣,卢光新,李希来,等. 三江源区高寒草甸OTCs模拟增温效应的研究[J]. 草业与畜牧,2016,1(01):19-24
[22] 许光辉,郑洪元. 土壤微生物分析方法手册[M]. 北京:农业出版社,1986:110-122
[23] 王蓓,孙庚,罗鹏,等. 模拟升温和放牧对高寒草甸土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2011,17(2):151-157
[24] 郭继勋,祝廷成. 羊草草原土壤微生物的数量和生物量[J]. 生态学报,1997,17(1):78-82
[25] 谭成玉. 松嫩草原微生物活性对模拟增温及施氮的响应[D]. 吉林:东北师范大学,2010:9-10
[26] 隋鑫,刘丽贾,美清,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原土壤细菌数量及多样性对气候变干、变暖的响应[J]. 天津农业科学,2019,25(5):22-27
[27] 阮维斌,王敬国,张福锁. 连作障碍因素对大豆养分吸收和固氮作用的影响[J]. 生态学报,2003,23(1):22-29
[28] 朱瑞芬,唐凤兰,刘杰淋,等. 羊草草甸草原土壤微生物生物量碳氮对短期施氮的响应[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(3):553-558
[29] 陈松鹤,徐开未,樊高琼,等. 长期施氮对饲草玉米产量、土壤养分和微生物数量的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报,2019,37(03):314-320
[30] 李昊骏,曹莉,秦舒浩. 缓释尿素对土壤微生物氮素生理群、理化性质及辣椒产量的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2017,52(04):58-66

增温和氮添加对高寒草甸土壤微生物氮素生理群的影响

Effects of Warming and Nitrogen Fertilization on Soil Microbial Nitrogen Physiology Groups in Alpine Meadow

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李梦, 胡容, 蒲玉琳, 张世熔, 李婷, 贾永霞, 李云. 若尔盖不同退化程度高寒沼泽湿地土壤氮矿化特征及温度效应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1025-1033.
[2]	白春生, 佟明昊, 赵萌萌, 孙娟娟, 薛艳林, 玉柱. 施氮量和留茬高度对高丹草青贮发酵品质及饲用价值的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1421-1426.
[3]	王玉强, 沈宇, 钱进, 刘文涛, 赵国琦, 孙盛楠. 不同形态氮肥对紫花苜蓿生长、硝酸盐转运蛋白基因MtNRT1.3表达及氮吸收的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(5): 1172-1180.
[4]	刘春阳, 李占台, 刘东霞, 王激清, 刘贵河. 速效氮肥和缓释肥配施对高羊茅草坪质量及土壤硝态氮动态的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(5): 1248-1254.
[5]	张金玲, 于丽, 赵建宁, 李刚, 杨殿林. 贝加尔针茅草原土壤无机氮含量对氮素添加的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(5): 958-965.
[6]	薛晓辉, 赵常万, 张嵩. 黔西北不同土地利用类型下土壤全氮及硝态氮的分布与残留[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(4): 819-824.
[7]	张晓艳, 刘锋, 王风云, 张吉旺, 叶梅, 董树亭. 施氮对杂交苏丹草植株硝态氮累积及产量的影响[J]. , 2009, 17(3): 327-332.