长江源区草地覆盖变化对土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.03.026

草地学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 801-807.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.03.026

长江源区草地覆盖变化对土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响

韩贞贵¹, 毛天旭¹, 屠丹¹, 张涛², 王根绪³

1. 贵州大学林学院, 贵州贵阳 550025;
2. 贵州大学新农村发展研究院, 贵州贵阳 550025;
3. 中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所, 四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2019-11-18 修回日期:2020-03-17 出版日期:2020-06-15 发布日期:2020-05-30
通讯作者: 毛天旭
作者简介:韩贞贵(1995-),男,贵州遵义人,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤物理与水土保持研究,E-mail:HAN10291918@163.com;
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41701037，41701081）；贵州大学人才引进项目（贵大人基合字（2016）21号）；贵州省生态学国内一流学科建设项目（GNYL[2017]007）共同资助

Effects of Vegetation Change on the Distribution and Stability of Soil Aggregate in the Source of the Yangtze River

HAN Zhen-gui¹, MAO Tian-xu¹, TU Dan¹, ZHANG Tao², WANG Gen-xu³

1. College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province 550025, China;
2. Institute of New Rural Development, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province 550025, China;
3. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610041, China

Received:2019-11-18 Revised:2020-03-17 Online:2020-06-15 Published:2020-05-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了明确长江源区草地覆盖变化对土壤结构的影响，本研究以高寒草甸和沼泽草甸2种草地为研究对象，分析了不同植被覆盖度下土壤团聚体分布和稳定性特征。结果显示：高寒草甸土壤团聚体主要分布在2~0.25 mm和0.25~0.053 mm粒径范围内，沼泽草甸土壤团聚体在不同粒径范围内分布相对均匀；高寒草甸土壤大于0.25 mm团聚体含量（WR_0.25）表现为高覆盖度草地高于中覆盖度草地，随土层加深，低覆盖度草地WR_0.25显著高于高覆盖度草地和中覆盖度草地，除表层0~10 cm土壤外，高覆盖度沼泽草甸土壤WR_0.25显著高于中覆盖度和低覆盖度土壤；不同植被覆盖度下高寒草甸表层0~10 cm土壤团聚体平均重量直径（Mean weight diameter，MWD）和几何平均直径（Geometric mean diameter，GMD）无显著差异，在10~20 cm和20~40 cm土层差异显著，表现为低覆盖度 > 高覆盖度 > 中覆盖度，沼泽草甸土壤团聚体MWD和GMD则随草地植被覆盖度降低和土层加深而逐渐减小；中覆盖度草地土壤团聚体破坏率（Aggregate destruction rate，PAD）最大，其稳定性最差；高覆盖度草地土壤团聚体稳定性最好；在不同土层深度上，高寒草甸土壤团聚体稳定性无显著差异，沼泽草甸土壤随土层加深团聚体稳定性变差。本研究结果表明WR_0.25和PAD能够更好地评价土壤团聚体稳定性，而沼泽草甸土壤团聚体对植被覆盖变化的响应更为敏感。本研究结果有利于加强植被覆盖变化背景下对长江源区土壤保护机制的认识。

关键词: 植被覆盖度变化, 土壤团聚体稳定性, 高寒草甸, 沼泽草甸, 长江源区

Abstract: In order to charity the influence of grassland cover change on soil structure in the source area of the Yangtze River,this study analyzed the distribution and stability characteristics of soil aggregates under different vegetation coverage in alpine and swamp meadow. The results showed that the soil aggregates in alpine meadow were mainly distributed in the range of 2~0.25 mm and 0.25~0.053 mm,and the soil aggregates in swamp meadow were relatively uniform distributed among different particle size. In this alpine meadow,the content of soil aggregates of >0.25 mm (WR_0.25) in high coverage grassland was higher than that in moderate coverage grassland,and the WR_0.25 of low coverage grassland was significantly higher than that of high and moderate coverage grassland along with the deepening of soil layer. Besides the surface soil of 0~10 cm,WR_0.25 of high coverage grassland was significantly higher than that of moderate and low coverage grassland in swamp meadow. There were no significant differences in the mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) of the soil aggregates in 0~10 cm depth in alpine meadow under different vegetation coverage,while significant differences were found in the 10~20 cm and 20~40 cm depth with low coverage > high coverage > moderate coverage. The MWD and GMD of soil aggregates in swamp meadow gradually decreased with the decreasing of vegetation coverage and the deepening of soil layers. The soil aggregates destruction rate (PAD) of moderate coverage grassland was the largest,and its stability was the worst. The stability of soil aggregates of high coverage grassland was the best. There was no significant difference in the stability of soil aggregates in alpine meadow among different soil layers,while the stability of the soil aggregates of swamp meadow declined with the deepening of soil layers. These results showed that WR_0.25 and PAD can better evaluate the stability of soil aggregates;the response of soil aggregates in swamp meadow to vegetation cover change is more sensitive than that of alpine meadow. The results are helpful to strengthen the understanding of soil protection mechanism in the source area of the Yangtze River under the background of vegetation cover change.

Key words: Vegetation coverage change, Soil aggregate stability, Alpine meadow, Swamp meadow, The source region of the Yangtze River

中图分类号:

S152.4

韩贞贵, 毛天旭, 屠丹, 张涛, 王根绪. 长江源区草地覆盖变化对土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 801-807.

HAN Zhen-gui, MAO Tian-xu, TU Dan, ZHANG Tao, WANG Gen-xu. Effects of Vegetation Change on the Distribution and Stability of Soil Aggregate in the Source of the Yangtze River[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(3): 801-807.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.03.026

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2020/V28/I3/801

参考文献

[1] 时龙,郭艳菊,于双,等. 不同补播模式对荒漠草原土壤团聚体稳定性的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2019,41(3):83-89
[2] 张鹏,贾志宽,王维,等. 秸秆还田对宁南半干旱地区土壤团聚体特征的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2012,45(8):1513-1520
[3] 王文鑫,王文龙,郭明明,等. 黄土高塬沟壑区植被恢复对沟头土壤团聚体特征及土壤可蚀性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2019,52(16):2845-2857
[4] 耿韧,张光辉,洪大林,等. 黄土高原农地草地林地土壤团聚体稳定性沿降水梯度的变化特征[J]. 农业工程学报,2019,35(3):141-148
[5] 祁迎春,王益权,刘军,等. 不同土地利用方式土壤团聚体组成及几种团聚体稳定性指标的比较[J]. 农业工程学报,2011,27(1):340-347
[6] 王甜,徐姗,赵梦颖,等. 内蒙古不同类型草原土壤团聚体含量的分配及其稳定性[J]. 植物生态学报,2017,41(11):1168-1176
[7] 田慎重,王瑜,张玉凤,等. 旋耕转深松和秸秆还田增加农田土壤团聚体碳库[J]. 农业工程学报,2017,33(24):133-140
[8] 陈玉真,王峰,吴志丹,等. 林地转变为茶园对土壤团聚体及渗透性能的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2018,32(5):134-139
[9] 王国会,王建军,陶利波,等. 围封对宁夏荒漠草原土壤团聚体组成及其稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(1):76-81
[10] 王谋,李勇,黄润秋,等. 气候变暖对青藏高原腹地高寒植被的影响[J]. 生态学报,2004,25(6):1275-1281
[11] Piao S L,Fang J Y,He J S. Variations in vegetation net primary production in the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau,China,from 1982 to 1999[J]. Climatic Change,2006,74:253-267
[12] Huang K,Zhang Y J,Zhu J T,et al. The influences of climate change and human activities on vegetation dynamics in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Remote Sensing,2016,8(10):876
[13] 周华坤,赵新全,周立,等. 青藏高原高寒草甸的植被退化与土壤退化特征研究[J]. 草业学报,2005,14(3):31-40
[14] 韩炳宏,周秉荣,颜玉倩,等. 2000-2018年间青藏高原植被覆盖变化及其与气候因素的关系分析[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(6):1651-1658
[15] 肖桐,王昌佐,冯敏,等. 2000-2011年青海三江源地区草地覆盖度的动态变化特征[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(1):39-45
[16] 侯扶江,南志标,肖金玉,等. 重牧退化草地的植被、土壤及其耦合特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2002,13(8):915-922
[17] 张永强,唐艳鸿,姜杰. 青藏高原草地生态系统土壤有机碳动态特征[J]. 中国科学:地球科学,2006,36(12):1140-1147
[18] 王根绪,程国栋,沈永平,等. 土地覆盖变化对高山草甸土壤特性的影响[J]. 科学通报,2002,47(23):1771-1777
[19] 王启基,李世雄,王文颖,等. 江河源区高山嵩草(Kobresia pygmaea)草甸植物和土壤碳、氮储量对覆被变化的响应[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(3):885-894
[20] Wang G X,Liu G S,Li C J,et al. The variability of soil thermal and hydrological dynamics with vegetation cover in a permafrost region[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2012,162-163:44-57
[21] 李娜,王根绪,高永恒,等. 模拟增温对长江源区高寒草甸土壤养分状况和生物学特性的影响研究[J]. 土壤学报,2010,47(6):1214-1224
[22] Six J,Elliott E T,Paustian K. Soil structure and soil organic matter:II. A normalized stability index and the effect of mineralogy[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2000,64(3):1042-1049
[23] 王展,张玉龙,虞娜,等. 冻融作用对土壤微团聚体特征及分形维数的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2013,50(1):83-88
[24] 江仁涛,李富程,沈凇涛. 川西北高寒草地退化对土壤团聚体组成及稳定性的影响[J]. 水土保持研究,2018,25(4):36-42
[25] 于宝政,彭岳林,蔡晓布. 藏北高原退化高寒草甸土壤团聚体有机碳变化特征[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(6):1212-1220
[26] 马盼盼. 退化高寒草地土壤团聚体稳定性及其养分特征[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2019:15-16
[27] 孙飞达,郭正刚,尚占环,等. 高原鼠兔洞穴密度对高寒草甸土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2010,47(2):378-383
[28] 陈奇,刘育红,魏卫东. 退化紫花针茅草原土壤团聚体稳定性分析[J]. 环境科学与技术,2019,42(6):35-43

长江源区草地覆盖变化对土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响

Effects of Vegetation Change on the Distribution and Stability of Soil Aggregate in the Source of the Yangtze River

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	许静, 李文龙, 吴鑫悦, 罗佳宁, 廖元成. 青藏高原高寒草甸种子萌发行为沿海拔梯度的分异特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 10-18.
[2]	佘延娣, 杨晓渊, 马丽, 张中华, 王党军, 黄小涛, 马真, 姚步青, 周华坤. 退化高寒草甸植物群落和土壤特征及其相互关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[3]	姚喜喜, 才华, 李长慧. 封育和放牧对高寒草甸植被群落特征和土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 128-136.
[4]	张振华, 刘振杰, 陈白洁, 李以康. 枯落物添加对三江源区退化高寒草甸土壤碳矿化的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 156-164.
[5]	黄彩霞, 芦光新, 李欣, 范月君, 周华坤, 王英成, 王志慧, 姚世庭. 产漆酶真菌对高寒草甸土壤有机质矿化特性的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 173-178.
[6]	石国玺, 王芳萍, 马丽, 张中华, 王弋博, 汪之波, 姚步青, 周华坤. 长期、短期增温对高寒草甸AM真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 179-189.
[7]	姚喜喜, 肖锋, 祁守忠, 陈国明, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群. 高寒草甸植被群落特征及其营养品质对围栏封育的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[8]	姚世庭, 芦光新, 周华坤, 张海娟, 颜珲璘, 王军邦. 模拟增温对高寒草甸土壤性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 218-224.
[9]	王占青, 张杰雪, 杨雪莲, 黄霞, 陈斯亮, 乔有明. 高寒草甸不同斑块草地土壤微生物多样性特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[10]	向雪梅, 德科加, 冯廷旭, 魏希杰, 王伟, 徐成体. 三江源区高寒草甸草场植被和土壤对外源氮素输入的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2010-2016.
[11]	刘晶晶, 尹亚丽, 李世雄, 赵文, 董怡玲, 苏世锋. 不同调控措施对中度退化高寒草甸植被及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2074-2080.
[12]	段丽辉, 刘晓丽, 韩冰, 位晓婷, 才仁措, 邵新庆. 乡土物种补播对青藏高原高寒草甸群落稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1793-1800.
[13]	王明涛, 方江平, 包赛很那, 苗彦军, 王向涛, 赵玉红, 谢文栋, 仓木德吉. 藏北燕麦草地持续利用与撂荒对高寒草甸土壤特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1801-1808.
[14]	张万通, 李超群, 于露, 邵新庆. 植物根际促生菌菌肥在高寒草甸替代化肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1423-1429.
[15]	刘玉祯, 刘文亭, 冯斌, 时光, 孙彩彩, 李彩弟, 张小芳, 董全民. 坡向和海拔对高寒山地草甸植被分布格局特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1166-1173.