牧区绵羊精准管理技术体系建立与草畜平衡研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.03.033

草地学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 589-596.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.03.033

牧区绵羊精准管理技术体系建立与草畜平衡研究

杨博¹, 吴建平¹, 杨联¹, 宫旭胤^1,2, David Kemp³, 冯明廷⁴, 孙亮¹

1. 甘肃农业大学动物科学技术学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 甘肃省农业科学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
3. Charles Sturt University New South Wale, Wagga Wagga 2800, Australian;
4. 甘肃省肃南裕固族自治县畜牧局, 甘肃张掖 734400

收稿日期:2012-02-02 修回日期:2012-04-05 出版日期:2012-06-15 发布日期:2012-07-05
作者简介:杨博(1983- ),男,甘肃陇南人,博士,主要从事草地放牧生态系统和家畜生产体系等研究,E-mail:464149749@qq.com
基金资助:
绒毛用羊产业技术体系放牧生态岗位科学家(CARS-40-09B);国家公益性行业科研项目"不同区域草地承载力与家畜配置"(200903060);农业部公益性行业(农业)专项(201003061)(201003019);ACIAR项目(AS2/2001/094)资助

Establishing Precision Management Techniques for Sheep and Feed Balance Research in Pastoral Areas

YANG Bo¹, WU Jian-ping¹, YANG Lian¹, GONG Xu-yin^1,2, David Kemp³, FENG Ming-ting⁴, SUN Liang¹

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070 China;
2. Gansu Provincial Agricultural Academy, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070 China;
3. Charles Sturt University New South Wale, Wagga Wagga 2800, Australian;
4. Animal Husbandry Bureau of Sunan County, Zhangye, Gansu Province 734502, China

Received:2012-02-02 Revised:2012-04-05 Online:2012-06-15 Published:2012-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选择肃南裕固族自治县3户典型牧户(分别代表低、中、高管理水平)进行甘肃高山细毛羊生产性能测定,结合经济效益数据,应用精准管理模型计算分析并对其中的低管理水平和高管理水平典型牧户实施精准管理技术,将经济效益不良绵羊的个体淘汰,存栏量分别下降了7%和26%,而未实施精准管理技术的中等管理水平典型牧户,存栏量上升了18%。结果表明:优化后低管理水平和高管理水平典型牧户的平均产毛量及总产毛量均有所提高,而中等管理水平的典型牧户虽然总产毛量提高,但平均每只产毛量下降了0.55 kg。低管理水平和高管理水平典型牧户存栏母羊的体重较优化前均有提高,收入分别提高了11.39%和4.2%,而中等管理水平的典型牧户成年母羊体重下降,后备母羊体重增加不显著,同时收入降低了7.4%。因此,精准管理技术可有效的应用于指导实践。

关键词: 精准管理, 模型, 甘肃高山细毛羊, 肃南

Abstract: Three typical households were selected in the pastoral area of Sunan county, Gansu province to determine production performance of Gansu fine-wool sheep. Precision management model with economic data was used to analyze the management level of farmers. Stocking rates decreased by 7% with low management level and 26% with high management level due to eliminating sheep of poor quality. In contrast, the stocking rate increased by 18% without using this management model. Results showed that the average wool yield and total wool production volume for farmers with low and high management level increased, whereas the average wool yield decreased by 0.55 kg for those typical farmers with middle management level but with better total wool production. The income increased by 11.39% and 4.2% for farmers with low and high management level with improved ewe weight, whereas income decreased by 7.4% and ewe weight decreased. Reserve ewe weight did not have a significant increase for those farmers with middle management level.

Key words: Precision management, Model, Gansu fine-wool sheep, Sunan county

中图分类号:

杨博, 吴建平, 杨联, 宫旭胤, David Kemp, 冯明廷, 孙亮. 牧区绵羊精准管理技术体系建立与草畜平衡研究[J]. 草地学报, 2012, 20(3): 589-596.

YANG Bo, WU Jian-ping, YANG Lian, GONG Xu-yin, David Kemp, FENG Ming-ting, SUN Liang. Establishing Precision Management Techniques for Sheep and Feed Balance Research in Pastoral Areas[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2012, 20(3): 589-596.

参考文献

[1] 中国国家环境保护局自然保护司.中国生态问题报告[M].北京:中国环境出版社,1999:10-53
[2] David Kemp, Wu Jianping, David Michalk, et al. Chinese grasslands: problems, dilemmas and finding solutions//David Kemp, ed. Development of sustainable livestock systems on grasslands in north-western China.Canberra: ACIAR Proceedings, 2011:12-25
[3] Rowe J B, Atkins K D. Precision sheep production-pipedream or reality?//Pope C E, ed. Conference paper Trangie QPLUS Merinos. Trangie:Trangie Agricultural Research Centre, 2007:40-41
[4] Rowe J B. Potential benefits of precision nutrition to increase reproductive efficiency under grazing condition[J]. Animal Production in Australia,2004,25(1):144-147
[5] 赵有璋.积极发展世纪之交的中国养羊业[J].科技导报,1998(10):46-49
[6] 吴建平,Jones Randall,杨联,等.放牧细毛羊生产体系精准管理研究//中国畜牧兽医学会编写组.第十五次全国动物遗传育种学术讨论会论文集.杨凌:中国畜牧兽医学会,2009:359
[7] 马志愤.草畜平衡与家畜生产体系优化模型建立与实例分析.兰州:甘肃农业大学,2008:29-30
[8] 宁宝英,樊胜岳,赵成章.肃南县草地退化原因分析与分区治理对策[J].中国草地,2004,26(3):65-68
[9] Yang Lian, Wu Jianping, Randall Jones, et al. Changing livestock and grassland management to improve the sustainability and profitability of alpine grasslands in Sunan County, Gansu province//David Kemp, ed. Development of sustainable livestock systems on grasslands in north-western China. Canberra: ACIAR Proceedings,2011:69-79
[10] Caughley G. North American Elk: Ecology, behaviour and management[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1979:159-187
[11] Wilson A D, Leigh J H. Comparison of the productivity of sheep grazing natural pastures of Riverine Plain[J]. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry,1970,10(46):549-554
[12] Harrington G N, Pratchett D. Stocking rate trials in Ankole, Uganda. I. Weight gain of Ankole steers at intermediate and heavy stocking rates under different managements[J].Journal of Agricultural Science,1974,82(3):497-506
[13] Wilson A, Macleod D. Overgrazing: Present or absent?[J].Journal of Range Management,1991,44(5):475-482
[14] Mott G O. Grazing pressure and the measurement of pasture production//C L Skidmore, ed. The 8th International Grassland Congress. Oxford: Alden Press,1960:606-611
[15] Jones R J, Sandland R L. The relation between animal gain and stocking rate: Derivation of the relation from the results of grazing trials[J].Journal of Agricultural Science,1974,83(2):335-342
[16] Hart R H. Stocking rate theory and its application to grazing on rangeland//Hyder D N, ed. The 1st International Rangeland Congress. Denver: Society for Range Management,1978:547-551
[17] Jones R J. Interpreting fixed stocking rate experiments//Wheeler L, Mochrie R D, eds. Forage evaluation: concepts and techniques melbourne. Kentucky: CRIRO,1981:419-430
[18] Wu Jianping, David Michalk, David Kemp, et al. Talking with China’s livestock herders: What was learnt about their attitudes to new practices//David Kemp, ed. Development of sustainable livestock systems on grasslands in north-western China. Canberra:ACIAR Proceedings, 2011:162-176
[19] 李聪.北方草原退化与生产力现状分析及对策.中国畜牧报,2003-11-30(3)

牧区绵羊精准管理技术体系建立与草畜平衡研究

Establishing Precision Management Techniques for Sheep and Feed Balance Research in Pastoral Areas

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李姣姣, 李广, 吴江琪, 徐国荣, 姚瑶, 王帅钧, 王雨媛. DNDC模拟氮形态对盐渍化草地CO₂排放的影响及敏感性[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2912-2920.
[2]	康晓玉, 叶国辉, 孙珊珊, 王海龙, 张治良, 李亚楠, 布仁其其格, 王千成, 袁帅, 付和平. 典型草原过度放牧方式下布氏田鼠种群季节动态与植被特征的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2931-2940.
[3]	靳连武, 赵金, 邵倩影, 纪宝明, 李雪锋, 李凯辉, 隋晓青, 公延明. 气候变化情景下新疆草地类常见植物潜在分布格局模拟[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2973-2991.
[4]	赵佳芮, 王鹏森, 苟扬, 曾园, 金雪梅, 刘刚, 其美拉姆, 周冀琼. 基于MaxEnt模型预测近现代和未来草地早熟禾的适宜分布区[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2992-3002.
[5]	柴智慧, 马丽, 姚凤桐. 草场产权制度改革、气候变化对大牲畜养殖规模的影响——以内蒙古33个纯牧业旗为例[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 3044-3056.
[6]	魏文强, 肖红, 徐长林, 邓明月, 马凯, 王昀, 刘鹏飞. 东祁连山高寒草甸山生柳灌丛地上净初级生产力估测研究[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2596-2602.
[7]	李海铭, 谢文文, 沈邱筱潇, 陈进勋, 申婉青, 党明雨, 王忠斌. MaxEnt模型优化预测气候变化下西藏瑞香狼毒潜在适生区[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2603-2617.
[8]	高宣琳, 苏旭, 刘玉萍, 吕扬, 雷洁琼, 郑莹晖, 才让扎西, 冯旭, 李佳欢. 基于MaxEnt模型预测碱韭在中国的潜在适宜区变化[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2618-2626.
[9]	盖志毅, 黄霞, 马梅, 句芳. 草原生态补奖视域下生计资本对牧户生计策略的影响研究——基于内蒙古牧区1042份牧户的调查数据[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2627-2640.
[10]	雷洁琼, 刘玉萍, 苏旭, 高宣琳, 吕扬, 郑莹晖, 孙成林, 才让扎西, 冯旭, 李佳欢, 董英雯. 气候变化背景下黑紫披碱草和紫芒披碱草在中国的潜在适生区预测[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(7): 2309-2319.
[11]	邵倩影, 阿里木江·卡斯木, 包安明, 王建成, 师玮, 赵金. 基于MaxEnt模型的天山雪莲适宜分布区预测及影响因素分析[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(5): 1544-1556.
[12]	孙成林, 刘玉萍, 苏旭, 李小莉, 张朋辉, 曲荣举, 靳佳瑞, 杨倩, 余明君, 宋昌春. 气候变化背景下青藏高原特有药用植物水母雪兔子的潜在分布区预测[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(3): 910-918.
[13]	张文娥, 谢先雄, 赵银波, 陈帅, 赵敏娟. “粮改饲”试点政策的农户增收效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(3): 919-928.
[14]	吉思融, 李敏, 陈霏璐. 资源禀赋对牧户草地保护意愿与行为悖离的影响研究——基于生态认知的调节效应[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(3): 948-959.
[15]	张立锋, 谢楠, 崔素倩, 孙国通, 冯伟, 石嘉琦, 潘璇, 智健飞, 秦文利, 李建明, 张洪发, 李亚楠, 刘振宇, 刘忠宽. 河北滨海盐碱地雨养旱作紫花苜蓿蒸散特性及其影响因子[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(2): 575-585.