不同混播方式下豆禾混播草地种间竞争动态研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.04.016

›› 2010, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (4): 568-575.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.04.016

不同混播方式下豆禾混播草地种间竞争动态研究

郑伟^1,2, 朱进忠^1,2, 库尔班^1,2, 张强强^1,2, 加娜尔古丽^1,2, 李海³

1. 新疆农业大学草业与环境科学学院, 乌鲁木齐, 830052;
2. 新疆维吾尔自治区草地资源与生态重点实验室, 乌鲁木齐, 830052;
3. 新疆昭苏马场草原站, 昭苏, 834500

收稿日期:2010-04-15 修回日期:2010-07-02 出版日期:2010-08-15 发布日期:2010-08-15
通讯作者: 朱进忠,E-mail:xjauzjz@126.com
作者简介:郑伟(1978- ),男,湖北武汉市人,博士,在读博士后,研究方向为草地生态及植物生态,E-mail:zw065@sina.com.
基金资助:
“十一五”农业部公益性行业科研专项(3-36);新疆草地资源与生态自治区重点实验室开放课题(XJDX0209-2008-04)资助

Dynamics of Interspecific Competition of Legume-Grass Mixture under Different Mixed Sowing Patterns

ZHENG Wei^1,2, ZHU Jin-zhong^1,2, Kuerban^1,2, ZHANG Qiang-qiang^1,2, Jianaerguli^1,2, LI Hai³

1. College of Pratacultural and Environmental Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 830052, China;
2. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 830052, China;
3. Grassland Station of Zhaosu Horse Farm, Zhaosu, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 834500, China

Received:2010-04-15 Revised:2010-07-02 Online:2010-08-15 Published:2010-08-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以红豆草(Onobrychis viciaefolia)、紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)、红三叶(Trifolium pratense)、鸭茅(Dactylis glomerata)、无芒雀麦(Bromus inermis)和猫尾草(Phleum pratense)6种豆禾牧草在混播种类为6、5、4、3及豆禾比为5:5、4:6、3:7的条件下建立混播草地,测定株高、相对密度(RD)、相对产量总和(RYT)及竞争力(CR),比较其种间竞争的相对激烈程度及种间竞争关系动态,探讨不同混播方式豆禾混播草地稳定持续利用的可能途径。结果表明:各混播处理禾草、红三叶株高均低于单播处理,混播红豆草、紫花苜蓿则高于单播,2009年5月16日~7月1日是株高增长的快速期;各混播处理下RD₁和RD_g值在各测定时期均显著高于1(P<0.05),5月16日~6月1日期间RD_l和RD_g值出现了峰值,豆禾比越高则RD_l值越低、RD_g值越高;各混播处理下RYT值仅在5月16日显著高于1(P<0.05),且出现了明显的夏季低谷期;5月1日~6月16日禾草CR_i值逐渐下降,豆科牧草CR_j值逐渐上升,之后禾草CR_i值上升,豆科牧草CR_j值下降,禾草竞争力大部分时期大于豆科牧草。说明不同混播种类和混播比例组合主要通过光资源竞争改变种间竞争关系,而温度对豆禾混播牧草种间竞争关系也有明显影响。

关键词: 豆禾混播草地, 混播种类, 混播比例, 种间竞争

Abstract: The relative intensity of interspecific competition was investigated to reveal the approach of sustainable utilization and community stability in legume-grass mixed sowing patterns.The dynamics of interspecific relationship in four legume-grass combinations: 6 species mixture,5 species mixture,4 species mixture,3 species mixture at three rowing ratios: 5:5,4:6,3:7 were studied.Stem height,relative density(RD),relative yield total(RYT) and interspecific competition rate(CR) were measured under different legume-grass mixed sowing patterns.The results showed that the stem height of both grass and red clover(Trifolium pratense) under mixed sowing patterns was lower than that of each under singled sowing patterns.However,the forage height of both alfalfa(Medicago varia) and sainfoin(Onobrychis viciaefolia) was higher than that of each under singled sowing patterns.The forage height was increased rapidly during May 16 to July 1.Both RD_l and RD_g was significant higher than 1(P<0.05) for all the checked points and reached the highest during May 16 to June 1.RD_l decreased with increasing row ratio of legume,whereas RD_g increased.RYT was significant higher than 1(P<0.05) only at one check point May 16.In summer,RYT was lower than other period.Grass CR_i gradually decreased during the period from May 1 to June 16,then increased after June 16.However,legume CR_j gradually increased and then decreased during the same time.Grass CR_i was stronger than that of legume at the most period.The interspecific competition was affected by light resources under different mixed sowing species and ratios,while temperature was another significant factor.

Key words: Legume-grass mixture, Mixed sowing species, Mixed sowing ratios, Interspecific competition

中图分类号:

S812.4

郑伟, 朱进忠, 库尔班, 张强强, 加娜尔古丽, 李海. 不同混播方式下豆禾混播草地种间竞争动态研究[J]. , 2010, 18(4): 568-575.

ZHENG Wei, ZHU Jin-zhong, Kuerban, ZHANG Qiang-qiang, Jianaerguli, LI Hai. Dynamics of Interspecific Competition of Legume-Grass Mixture under Different Mixed Sowing Patterns[J]. , 2010, 18(4): 568-575.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2010.04.016

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2010/V18/I4/568

参考文献

[1] 韩德梁,何胜江,陈超,等.豆禾混播草地群落稳定性的比较[J].生态环境2008,17(5):1974-1979
[2] Russelle M P.Nitrogen cycling in pasture and range[J].Journal of Production Agriculture,1992,5:13-23
[3] 常生华,侯扶江,于应文.黄土丘陵沟壑区三种豆科人工草地的植被与土壤特征[J].生态学报,2004,24(5):932-937
[4] 刘洪岭,李香兰,梁一民.禾本科及豆科牧草对黄土丘陵区台田土壤培肥效果的比较研究[J].西北植物学报,1998,18(2):287-291
[5] 王平,王天慧,周道玮.松嫩地区禾-豆混播草地生产力研究[J].中国科技论文在线,2007,2(2):121-128
[6] 王平,周道玮,张宝田.禾-豆混播草地种间竞争与共存[J].生态学报,2009,29(5):2560-2567
[7] 马春晖,韩建国,李鸿祥,等.冬牧70黑麦+箭舌豌豆混播草地生物量、品质及种间竞争的动态研究[J].草业学报,1999,8(4):56-64
[8] 杨春华,李向林,张新全,等.扁穗牛鞭草+红三叶混播草地生物量及种间竞争的动态研究[J].四川农业大学学报,2006,24(1):32-36
[9] 石永红,符义坤,李阳春,等.半荒漠地区绿洲混播牧草群落稳定性与调控研究[J].草业学报,2000,9(3):1-7
[10] 李博.普通生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1999:233-237
[11] 张全国,张大勇.生物多样性与生态系统功能研究与进展[J].生物多样性,2002,10(1):49-60
[12] 樊江文,钟华平,杜占池,等.在不同压力和干扰条件下黑麦草和其他六种植物的竞争研究[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(4):522-530
[13] 董世魁,胡自治,龙瑞军,等.高寒地区多年生禾草混播草地的群落学特征研究[J].生态学杂志,2003,22(5):20-25
[14] Jonathan W S.Introduction to plant population ecology[M].Published in the United States of America.1982.147-155
[15] Wit C T de.On Competition[J].Versl.Londbouwk Orderzoek,Wageningen,1960,66(8):1-82
[16] Keddy P A,Twolan-strutt L,Shipley B.Experimental evidence that interspecific competitive asymmetry increaseswith soil production[J].Oikos,1997,80:253-256
[17] Goldberg D E.Competitive Ability:Definitions,Contingency and Correlated Traits[J].Philosophical Transactions:Biological Sciences,1996,351(1345):1377-1385
[18] Grace J B.On themeasurement ofplant competition intensity.Ecology,1995,76(1):305-308
[19] Weigelt A,Jolleffe P.Indices ofplant competition[J].Journal of Ecology,2003,91:707-720
[20] Gibson D J,Connolly J,HarnettC D,et al.Designs forgreenhouse studies of interactions between plants[J].Journal of Ecology,1999,87:1-16
[21] Wit C T de,Bergh J P van den.Competition between herbage plants[J].Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science,1965,13:212-221
[22] 张永亮,王建丽,胡自治.杂花苜蓿与无芒雀麦混播群落种间竞争及稳定性[J].草地学报,2007,15(1):43-49
[23] 张宏宇,杨恒山,李春辉,等.不同混播方式下苜蓿+无芒雀麦人工草地生产力动态研究[J].内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版),2008,23(1):55-58
[24] 顾梦鹤,杜小光,文淑均,等.施肥和刈割对垂穗披碱草(Elymus nutans)、中华羊茅(Festuca sinensis)和羊茅(Festuca ovina)种间竞争力的影响[J].生态学报,2008,28(6):2472-2479
[25] Harris W,Forde B J.Temperature and cutting effects on the growth and competitive interaction of ryegrass and paspalum.II.Interspecific competition[J].New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research,1981,24:309-320

不同混播方式下豆禾混播草地种间竞争动态研究

Dynamics of Interspecific Competition of Legume-Grass Mixture under Different Mixed Sowing Patterns

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李兴龙, 师尚礼, 黄宗昌, 李革革, 吴芳, 张辉辉. 黄土丘陵区不同饲草混播模式对种间关系的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1318-1326.
[2]	潘越, 周冀琼, 郭川, 杨喆, 刘琳, 闫艳红, 赵艳兰, 刘珊, 孙飞达. 丛枝菌根真菌与根瘤菌对3种豆禾混播植物种间互作的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 644-654.
[3]	张永亮, 于铁峰, 郝凤. 豆禾混播牧草碳氮磷钾生态化学计量特征对施肥与混播比例的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1386-1394.
[4]	龙会英, 张德, 曾丽萍, 何光熊, 赵秀梅. 间作与施氮对牧草生物量、种间竞争和氮磷吸收的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 571-576.
[5]	刘金彪, 王世琪, 康继月, 徐炳成. 水磷供应对柳枝稷和达乌里胡枝子生物量、水分利用效率及种间关系的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1545-1552.
[6]	苟文龙, 李平, 董臣飞, 李达旭, 白史且, 师尚礼. 混播比例和刈割茬次对多花黑麦草+箭筈豌豆混播草地土壤细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(5): 1222-1230.
[7]	连露, 胡国富, 李冰, 崔国文, 冀国旭, 阎南南. 青贮玉米种植密度及与秣食豆混播比例对青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(1): 178-183.
[8]	郑伟, 加娜尔古丽, 唐高溶, 朱进忠. 氮素添加对豆禾牧草种间竞争力与生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(2): 422-425.
[9]	丁文利, 舒佳礼, 徐伟洲, 徐炳成. 水分胁迫和组合比例对白羊草与达乌里胡枝子叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. , 2014, 22(1): 94-100.
[10]	王京, 徐炳成, 高志娟, 段东平, 牛富荣, 徐伟洲. 黄土丘陵区白羊草与达乌里胡枝子混播的光合生理日变化研究[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 692-698.
[11]	李洪影, 高飞, 刘昭明, 崔国文. 青贮玉米不同混播方式对饲料作物产量和品质的影响[J]. , 2011, 19(5): 825-829.
[12]	左胜鹏, 王会梅, 李凤民, 程积民, 夏传俊. 渭北旱塬苜蓿和沙打旺生产力对种间竞争的响应[J]. , 2008, 16(2): 181-185.
[13]	张永亮, 王建丽, 胡自治. 杂花苜蓿与无芒雀麦混播群落种间竞争及稳定性[J]. , 2007, 15(1): 43-49.
[14]	张永亮, 胡自治, 赵海新, 王健丽. 刈割对混播当年生物量及再生速率的影响[J]. , 2004, 12(4): 308-312.
[15]	韩建国, 马春晖, 毛培胜, 牛忠联, 孙瑞臣. 播种比例和施氮量及刈割期对燕麦与豌豆混播草地产草量和质量的影响[J]. , 1999, 7(2): 87-94.