土壤灭菌与水分处理下糙毛以礼草苗期根鞘和根系生长的关系分析

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.05.008

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 1338-1348.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.05.008

土壤灭菌与水分处理下糙毛以礼草苗期根鞘和根系生长的关系分析

张雯露¹, 丁忠阳¹, 汪辉^1,2, 张伟^1,2, 周青平^1,2, 陈有军^1,2

1. 西南民族大学青藏高原研究院, 四川成都 610041;
2. 四川若尔盖高寒湿地生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2022-10-24 修回日期:2023-02-20 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-05-31
通讯作者: 陈有军,E-mail:chenyoujun2005@163.com
作者简介:张雯露(1998-)，女，汉族，四川广元人，硕士研究生，E-mail:zhanghaha_1210@163.com
基金资助:
国家基金委项目(31802123)；西南民族大学研究生创新创业项目(ZD2022964)；西南民族大学青藏高原生态畜牧业协同创新中心专项(2021PTJS30)资助

Analysis of the Relationship between Rhizosheath and Root Growth of Kengyilia hirsuta Seedlings under Soil Sterilization and Moisture Treatments

ZHANG Wen-lu¹, DING Zhong-yang¹, WANG Hui^1,2, ZHANG Wei^1,2, ZHOU Qing-ping^1,2, CHEN You-jun^1,2

1. Institute of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610041, China;
2. Sichuan Zoige Alpine Wetland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610041, China

Received:2022-10-24 Revised:2023-02-20 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-05-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 根鞘是沙地植物根系对干旱和贫瘠条件的适应性特征,受土壤微生物和水分影响。为探究糙毛以礼草苗期根鞘形成与根系生长的关系,采用双因素设计,分别设置2个土壤处理(未灭菌和灭菌)和3个水分处理(田间持水量的10%,25%和40%)。结果显示:灭菌与水分的互作对根系生物量、根冠比、根长、根表面积、根体积、分叉数、根系活力、脱落酸和赤霉素均有极显著影响(P<0.01)。土壤灭菌处理后,10%水分的根系生物量显著增加(P<0.05),25%水分的根长、根表面积和根体积显著增加(P<0.05),40%水分的根系活力显著增加(P<0.05),不同水分处理的脱落酸、吲哚乙酸、赤霉素含量均显著升高(P<0.05)。不同水分处理下,10%水分的根鞘重、根系活力和细胞分裂素含量最低(P<0.05),25%水分的根鞘重最大(P<0.05),40%水分的细胞分裂素含量最高。土壤未灭菌时,根系活力对根鞘重的直接作用最大;土壤灭菌处理后,吲哚乙酸对根鞘重的直接和间接作用均最大。本研究可为揭示根鞘的形成机制提供参考。

关键词: 糙毛以礼草, 根鞘, 土壤灭菌, 水分

Abstract: Rhizosheath is an adaptive feature of sandy plant to drought and infertile conditions affected by soil microorganism and moisture. In order to investigate the relationship between rhizosheath formation and root growth at the seedling stage of Kengyilia hirsuta,a two-way ANOVA design was used with two soil treatments (unsterilized and sterilized) and three moisture treatments (10%,25% and 40% of field capacity),respectively. The results showed that:The interaction between sterilization and moisture treatments had highly significant effects (P<0.01) on the root biomass,root-shoot ratio,root length,root surface area,root volume,root forks,root activity,content of abscisic acid,and content of gibberellin of K. hirsuta. Under the soil sterilization treatment,along with 10% soil moisture treatment,the root biomass increased significantly (P<0.05);the root length,root surface area and root volume under 25% moisture,the root activity under 40% moisture (P<0.05) significantly increased as well;and the content of abscisic acid,indole-3-acetic acid and gibberellin were significantly higher for different moisture treatments (P<0.05). Under moisture treatments,the rhizosheath weight,root activity and cytokinin content of 10% moisture were the lowest (P<0.05),the rhizosheath weight of 25% moisture was the highest (P<0.05),and the cytokinin content of 40% moisture was the highest. When soil was not sterilized,the direct effect of root activity on rhizosheath weight was the largest. The direct and indirect effects of indole-3-acetic acid on rhizosheath weight were the greatest after soil sterilized. This study could provide a reference for revealing the formation mechanism of rhizosheath.

Key words: Kengyilia hirsuta, Rhizosheath, Soil sterilization, Moisture

中图分类号:

Q945.79

张雯露, 丁忠阳, 汪辉, 张伟, 周青平, 陈有军. 土壤灭菌与水分处理下糙毛以礼草苗期根鞘和根系生长的关系分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1338-1348.

ZHANG Wen-lu, DING Zhong-yang, WANG Hui, ZHANG Wei, ZHOU Qing-ping, CHEN You-jun. Analysis of the Relationship between Rhizosheath and Root Growth of Kengyilia hirsuta Seedlings under Soil Sterilization and Moisture Treatments[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1338-1348.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.05.008

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I5/1338

参考文献

[1] MARASCO R,MOSQUEIRA M J,FUSI M,et al. Rhizosheath microbial community assembly of sympatric desert speargrasses is independent of the plant host[J]. Microbiome,2018,6(1):1-18
[2] 邓杰文,石杨,李斌,等. 微生物在沙化土壤修复中的应用研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2022,28(5):1367-1374
[3] NDOUR P M S,HEULIN T,ACHOUAK W,et al. The rhizosheath:from desert plants adaptation to crop breeding[J]. Plant and Soil,2020,456(1):1-13
[4] VOLKENS G. Die flora der aegyptisch-arabischen wtiste auf grundlage anatomisch-physiologischer forschungen[M]. Berlin:Gerbruger Borntraeger,1887:20
[5] HARTNETT D C,WILSON G W,OTT J P,et al. Variation in root system traits among African semi-arid savanna grasses:Implications for drought tolerance[J]. Austral Ecology,2013,38(4):383-392
[6] BROWN L K,GEORGE T S,NEUGEBAUER K,et al. The rhizosheath-a potential trait for future agricultural sustainability occurs in orders throughout the angiosperms[J]. Plant and Soil,2017,418(1):115-128
[7] BASIRAT M,MOUSAVI S M,ABBASZADEH S,et al. The rhizosheath:a potential root trait helping plants to tolerate drought stress[J]. Plant and Soil,2019,445(1):565-575
[8] MAHMOOD T,MEHNAZ S,FLEISCHMANN F,et al. Soil sterilization effects on root growth and formation of rhizosheaths in wheat seedlings[J]. Pedobiologia,2014,57(3):123-130
[9] 安晶,吴楠,张元明. 沙土灭菌对羽毛针禾(Stipagrostis pennata)种子萌发、幼苗生长及根鞘形成的影响[J]. 中国沙漠,2016,36(02):399-405
[10] HALING R E,RICHARDSON A E,CULVENOR R A,et al. Root morphology,root-hair development and rhizosheath formation on perennial grass seedlings is influenced by soil acidity[J]. Plant and Soil,2010,335(1):457-468
[11] ASLAM M M,KARANJA J K,DODD I C,et al. Rhizosheath:An adaptive root trait to improve plant tolerance to phosphorus and water deficits?[J]. Plant,Cell & Environment,2022,45(10):2861-2874
[12] LIU T,CHEN M,ZHANG Y,et al. Comparative metabolite profiling of two switchgrass ecotypes reveals differences in drought stress responses and rhizosheath weight[J]. Planta,2019,250(4):1355-1369
[13] WANG T,LI C,WU Z,et al. Abscisic acid regulates auxin homeostasis in rice root tips to promote root hair elongation[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2017(8):1121
[14] 官纪元. 氮、磷胁迫对刺梨根系的影响及其与内源激素含量的关系[D]. 贵阳:贵州大学,2018:9-11
[15] 赵文武,赵鑫,谢文辉,等. 干旱胁迫下白刺花幼苗根系生长和生理特性的响应[J]. 草地学报,2023,31(1):120-129
[16] 李桂俊. 赤霉素对细胞壁组分以及拟南芥主根伸长的影响[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2015:6
[17] 陈有军,董全民,周青平. 不同水分和土壤处理对糙毛以礼草苗期根系构型和根鞘形成的影响[J]. 草业学报,2020,29(3):60-69
[18] 李春越,薛英龙,王益,等. 长期施肥对黄土旱塬农田土壤氮素生理菌群和解磷菌的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2020,39(11):3658-3667
[19] 杜欢,马彤彤,郭帅,等. 大麦近等基因系苗期根系形态及叶片渗透调节物质对PEG胁迫的响应[J]. 中国农业科学,2017,50(13):2423-2432
[20] DELHAIZE E,JAMES R A,RYAN P R. Aluminium tolerance of root hairs underlies genotypic differences in rhizosheath size of wheat (Triticum aestivum) grown on acid soil[J]. New Phytologist,2012,195(3):609-619
[21] 白宝璋,金锦子,白崧,等. 玉米根系活力TTC测定法的改良[J]. 玉米科学,1994(4):44-47
[22] 王荣. 苹果砧木茎源根系发生中次生代谢、内源激素和转录组差异分析[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学,2016:23
[23] QI Y,WEI W,CHEN C,et al. Plant root-shoot biomass allocation over diverse biomes:A global synthesis[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation,2019,18:e00606
[24] 倪国荣,潘晓华,石庆华,等. 灭菌方式对红壤性水稻土养分及水稻生长的影响[J]. 核农学报,2018,32(12):2431-2437
[25] 武春成,曹霞,李天来. 黄瓜连作土壤及营养基质热处理的生物效应研究[J]. 核农学报,2016,30(6):1178-1185
[26] 王志. 丛枝菌根真菌及根际促生菌对蒲公英生长和铬耐性的影响[D]. 南昌:江西农业大学,2019:8-10
[27] 闫春娟,王文斌,孙旭刚,等. 干旱胁迫对大豆根系发育影响初报[J]. 大豆科学,2012,31(6):924-926
[28] BACHER H,SHARABY Y,WALIA H,et al. Modifying root-to-shoot ratio improves root water influxes in wheat under drought stress[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,2021,73(5):1643-1654
[29] 张咏梅,胡海英,白小明,等. 多年生黑麦草、雀麦根系形态和生长对土壤干旱的适应性[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文),2022,30(11):1784-1794
[30] 樊娅萍,宋柏权,陈芳玲,等. 设施土壤灭菌与摩西球囊霉对黄瓜幼苗生长及养分吸收的影响[J]. 南方农业学报,2022,53(6):1704-1712
[31] 赵国靖. 黄土丘陵区两乡土草混播下根系形态特征及其对土壤水分变化的响应[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2014:11-22
[32] 肖万欣,王延波,叶雨盛,等.生殖生长期干旱对不同耐旱型玉米自交系根系性状及产量的影响[J].玉米科学,2020,28(5):93-101
[33] LIU T Y,YE N,SONG T,et al. Rhizosheath formation and involvement in foxtail millet (Setaria italica) root growth under drought stress[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology,2019,61(4):449-462
[34] 王素素,杜国栋,吕德国. 土壤高温处理对连作草莓根系呼吸代谢及植株发育的影响[J]. 果树学报,2011,28(2):234-239
[35] 王功帅,马子清,潘凤兵,等. 连作对土壤微生物及平邑甜茶幼苗氮吸收、分配和利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(3):481-488
[36] 闫宁,战宇,谢昊臻,等. 不同改土方式对连作人参生长发育的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2022,50(6):120-125
[37] 唐利华,樊华,李阳阳,等. 甜菜叶片、根系含水量及根系活力对干旱胁迫的反应[J]. 新疆农垦科技,2019,42(1):8-10
[38] 王秀波,上官周平. 干旱胁迫下氮素对不同基因型小麦根系活力和生长的调控[J]. 麦类作物学报,2017,37(6):820-827
[39] 杨传杰,罗毅,孙林,等. 水分胁迫对覆膜滴灌棉花根系活力和叶片生理的影响[J]. 干旱区研究,2012,29(5):802-810
[40] 卢玉秋. 微生物群落对作物生长及植物激素的影响[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2019:24-42
[41] ZHANG Q M,GONG M G,LIU K Y,et al. Rhizoglomus intraradices improves plant growth,root morphology and phytohormone balance of Robinia pseudoacacia in arsenic-contaminated soils[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2020,11:1428
[42] 陈传胜,黄从军,赵厚本,等. 南岭小坑常绿阔叶林土壤脱落酸分解特征[J]. 生态环境学报,2015,24(5):767-771
[43] 孙韵雅,陈佳,王悦,等. 根际促生菌促生机理及其增强植物抗逆性研究进展[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(5):1203-1215
[44] 李跃,李振松,苗丽宏,等. 不同生育期干旱对紫花苜蓿生长和根系ABA含量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(6):1245-1250
[45] 王晓娇,蒙美莲,曹春梅,等. 水分胁迫对马铃薯出苗期根系生理特性及内源激素IAA、ABA含量的影响[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版),2018,50(2):103-109
[46] 闫志利,轩春香,牛俊义,等. 干旱胁迫及复水对豌豆根系内源激素含量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2009,17(2):297-301
[47] 刘美玲. 干旱胁迫下吲哚丁酸钾对大豆苗期生长的调控效应[D]. 大庆:黑龙江八一农垦大学,2021:44-47
[48] 赵领军,赵善仓. 干旱胁迫下苹果根系内源激素含量的变化[J]. 山东农业科学,2007(2):48-49
[49] 王清泉,陈云,谢虹,等. 干旱和氮素交互作用对玉米叶片水势、气孔导度及根部ABA与CTK合成的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2004(3):20-21
[50] 刘碧云,叶龙华. 干旱胁迫对植物光合特性及激素含量的影响[J]. 防护林科技,2016(5):64-66

土壤灭菌与水分处理下糙毛以礼草苗期根鞘和根系生长的关系分析

Analysis of the Relationship between Rhizosheath and Root Growth of Kengyilia hirsuta Seedlings under Soil Sterilization and Moisture Treatments

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	倪旺, 梁丹妮, 时兴伟, 王斌, 王腾飞, 李满有, 冯琴, 兰剑. 灌溉次数和施氮量对甜高粱生产性能及光合特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 294-301.
[2]	田伟涛, 张耀丹, 夏江, 李超锋, 李庆伟, 徐井润, 董乙强, 吴淑娟, 袁晓波. 醉马草种子萌发对增温和降雨变化响应的研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2291-2297.
[3]	孟翔, 孙伶俐, 谢开云, 刘伟, 褚皓清, 赵越. 灌溉、施磷量及AM真菌对紫花苜蓿产量和水磷利用效率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2356-2364.
[4]	齐帅, 秦伟娜, 焦婷, 师尚礼, 高永权, 王虎宁, 李淑艳. 甘肃雨养区不同品种青贮玉米生理特性及水分利用率评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2407-2414.
[5]	王云英, 裴薇薇, 郭小伟, 杜岩功. 青藏高原高寒湿地生态系统碳水通量与水分利用效率研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1037-1042.
[6]	刘伟, 贾玉山, 格根图, 王志军, 刘明健, 司强, 包健, 刘逸超, 孙鹏波. 燕麦青贮研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(12): 3175-3183.
[7]	王婷, 王开丽, 豆鹏鹏, 黄晶, 张旭泽, 苗正洲, 王堃. 坝上农牧交错区一年生饲草与主要农作物水分利用效率比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(12): 3184-3190.
[8]	陈国茜, 祝存兄, 李素雲, 周秉荣, 李甫, 曹晓云, 周华坤. 三江源地区土壤水分的地理分区遥感模型构建及时空变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 199-207.
[9]	佟莉蓉, 倪顺刚, 任星远, 刘嘉欣, 闻静, 王娟, 宋雨. 褪黑素对干旱胁迫下达乌里胡枝子幼苗生长及叶片水分生理的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1682-1688.
[10]	裴雯, 陈清, 张洛梓, 贾丽英. 放牧、水分和氮素对内蒙古草原土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1499-1506.
[11]	王佳岚, 李春杰. 不同水分梯度对碱茅农艺性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1584-1588.
[12]	王洪斌, 张煜坤, 张大才. 青藏苔草形态特征及生物量分配沿水分梯度的变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 522-530.
[13]	李宏林, 胡竞格, 肖锋, 梁德飞, 周华坤. 生长季封育和氮添加对退化高寒沼泽湿地土壤水分状况的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2523-2529.
[14]	刘凯强, 刘文辉, 贾志锋, 马祥, 梁国玲. 干旱胁迫对‘青燕1号’燕麦器官生长及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1552-1562.
[15]	徐然然, 常生华, 贾倩民, Shahzad Ali, 张程, 刘永杰, 侯扶江. 施氮和利用方式对黄土高原禾豆混播草地产量、品质和水分利用的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1744-1755.