Analysis on Economic and Ecological Benefit of Black-soil-beach Sown Grassland

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.02.003

›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 195-201.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.02.003

Previous Articles Next Articles

Analysis on Economic and Ecological Benefit of Black-soil-beach Sown Grassland

DONG Quan-min, SHI Jian-jun, MA Yu-shou, WANG Yan-long, SHENG Li, YANG Shi-hai, LI Shi-xiong, WANG Liu-ying

Qinghai Academy of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China

Received:2010-07-01 Revised:2011-01-13 Online:2011-04-15 Published:2011-04-15

人工调控措施下黑土滩人工草地的经济及生态效益分析

董全民, 施建军, 马玉寿, 王彦龙, 盛丽, 杨时海, 李世雄, 王柳英

青海省畜牧兽医科学院, 西宁, 810016

作者简介:董全民(1972- ),男,甘肃天水人,博士,研究员,主要从事草地放牧生态及青藏高原"黑土型"退化草地的恢复与重建研究,E-mail:dqm850@sina.comqmDong@qhmky.com
基金资助:
国家“十一五”科技支撑计划重大项目(2006BAC01A-02);国家科技支撑计划项目(2007BAC30B04)(2009BAC61B02);国家自然基金项目(30960074);青海省科技厅重点项目(2009-N-502)资助

Abstract

Abstract: Economic and ecological benefits of nine years sown grassland in black-soil-beach were assessed for providing useful databases of better management and decision-making on the sown grasslands.Results show: total yield of 9-year old sown grassland under management was 40993.00 kg·hm^-2,while that was,21685.0 kg·hm^-2 under natural succession.Economic benefit of sown grassland under management was 5406.42 RMB·hm^-2 higher than that under nature succession.Ecological service and property value were 15685.5$·hm^-2·a^-1 and 31224.5$·hm^-2·a^-1 for mix-sown grassland,13087.5$·hm^-2·a^-1 and 26036.8$·hm^-2·a^-1 for singly-sown grassland,125.5$·hm^-2·a^-1 and 340$·hm^-2·a^-1 for black-soil-beach degraded grassland respectively.Ecological service and property value of black-soil-beach degraded grassland ecosystem were 1/5and 1/3 of non-degraded natural grassland respectively,1/104 and 1/76 of singly-sown grassland respectively,1/125 and 1/92 of mix-sown grassland respectively.Therefore,we suggest that value calculation should be considered during decision-making of compensatory conservation and recovery of grassland ecosystem.

Key words: Black-soil-beach, Sown grassland, Human control, Economic benefit, Ecological benefit

摘要： 从经济和生态效益2方面对青海省果洛州大武镇9龄黑土滩人工草地在人工调控下的效益进行核算,旨在为相关管理和决策部门就黑土滩建植人工草地的必要性和可行性提供参考依据。结果表明:人工调控下黑土滩人工草地9年内牧草的干草总产量为40993.0 kg·hm^-2,自然演替下为21685.0 kg·hm^-2,人为调控的经济效益较自然演替高5406.32 RMB.hm^-2;混播人工草地生态系统服务价值和生态资产分别为15685.50$·hm^-2·a^-1和31224.5$·hm^-2·a^-1,单播人工草地生态系统分别为13087.50$·hm^-2·a^-1和26036.80$·hm^-2·a^-1,"黑土滩"退化草地生态系统分别为125.50$·hm^-2·a^-1和340.0$·hm^-2·a^-1;黑土滩退化草地生态服务价值和生态资产分别为未退化天然草地的1/5和1/3,为单播人工草地生态系统的1/104和1/76,为混播人工草地生态系统的1/125和1/92。因此,建议将人工草地生态系统的价值核算纳入草地生态系统补偿性保护和恢复的决策过程之中。

关键词: 黑土滩人工草地, 人工调控, 经济效益, 生态效益

CLC Number:

S812.8

DONG Quan-min, SHI Jian-jun, MA Yu-shou, WANG Yan-long, SHENG Li, YANG Shi-hai, LI Shi-xiong, WANG Liu-ying. Analysis on Economic and Ecological Benefit of Black-soil-beach Sown Grassland[J]. , 2011, 19(2): 195-201.

董全民, 施建军, 马玉寿, 王彦龙, 盛丽, 杨时海, 李世雄, 王柳英. 人工调控措施下黑土滩人工草地的经济及生态效益分析[J]. , 2011, 19(2): 195-201.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.02.003

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2011/V19/I2/195

References

[1] 胡自治.人工草地在我国21世纪草业发展和环境治理中的重要意义[J].草原与草坪,2000,(1):12-15
[2] 董全民,马玉寿,赵新全.江河源区"黑土型"退化人工草地管理技术研究[J].草业科学,2007,24(8):9-15
[3] 尚占环,龙瑞军,马玉寿.江河源区"黑土型"退化草地特征、危害及治理思路探讨[J].中国草地学报,2006,28(1):69-74
[4] 曹广民,龙瑞军.三江源区"黑士型"型退化草地自然恢复的瓶颈及解决途径[J].草地学报,2009,17(1):4-6
[5] 施建军,邱正强,马玉寿."黑土型"退化草地上建植人工草地的经济效益分析[J].草原与草坪,2007,(1):60-64
[6] Dong S K,M Y Kang,X J Yun,et al.Economic comparison of forage production from annual crops,perennial pasture and native grassland in the alpine region of the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau,China[J].Grass and Forage Science,2007,62:405-415
[7] 姜恕.试论草业系统工程结构[J].草地学报,2005,13(3):248-252
[8] 康玲玲,王云璋,吴卿,等.水土保持生态效益评价方法探讨[J].中国水土保持,2004,(9):22-24
[9] 赵同谦,欧阳志云,郑华,等.草地生态系统服务功能分析及其评价指标体系[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(6):155-160
[10] 赵同谦,欧阳志云,贾良清,等.中国草地生态系统服务功能间接价值评价[J].生态学报,2004,24(6):1101-1110
[11] 闵庆文,谢高地,胡聃,等.青海草地生态系统服务功能的价值评估[J].资源科学,2004,26(3):56-60
[12] 刘敏超,李迪强,温琰茂,等.三江源地区生态系统生态功能分析及其价值评估[J].环境科学学报,2005,25(9):1280-1286
[13] 张耀生,赵新全,黄德清.青藏高寒牧区多年生人工草地持续利用的研究[J].草业学报,2003,12(3):22-27
[14] 董全民,赵新全,马玉寿.放牧强度对混播草地群落数量特征的轻响[J].草地学报,2007,15(4):394-397
[15] 董全民,赵新全,马玉寿,等.高寒地区暖季草场放牧牦牛的生产性能及其土壤养分变化[J].草地学报,2009,17(5):629-635
[16] 王刚,吴明强,蒋文兰.人工草地杂草生态学研究Ⅰ杂草入侵与放牧率之间的关系[J].草业学报,1995,4(2):75-80
[17] 黄琦,莫炳国,陈朝勋,等.人工草地主要杂草发生规律及防除技术[J].草业科学,2003,20(1):42-44
[18] 施建军,洪绂曾,马玉寿,等.人工调控对禾草混播草地群落特征的影响[J].草地学报,2009,17(6):745-751
[19] 陈敏,宝音陶格涛,盂慧君,等.人工草地施肥试验研究[J].中国草地,2000,22(1):20-25
[20] Waman D,Fisher A.Effects of interval between harvests andapplication of ertilizer N in spring on the growth of perennial ryegrass on a grasswhiledover sward[J].Grass Forage Science,1996,(51):52-57
[21] 施建军,马玉寿,董全民,等."黑土型"退化草地人工植被施肥试验研究[J].草业学报,2007,12(2):25-31
[22] 施建军,马玉寿,董全民,等."黑土型"退化草地人工植被杂草防除试验报告[J].杂草科学,2007,(2):24-26
[23] 景增春,王文翰,王长庭,等.江河源区退化草地鼠害的治理研究[J].中国草地,2003,25(6):36-40

Analysis on Economic and Ecological Benefit of Black-soil-beach Sown Grassland

人工调控措施下黑土滩人工草地的经济及生态效益分析

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 12

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHANG Hui-hui, ZHANG Xue-zhou, ASIYA, Manlike, LIANG Wei-wei, ZHU Hao, WANG Lu, LI Xue-sen, JING Jun-peng. Analysis on Economic Benefits of Grain-Grass Rotation in Desert Area of Northern Xinjiang Plain [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1107-1112.
[2]	DONG Shan, WANG Hao, JIA Qian-min, CHANG Sheng-hua, Shahzad Ali, LIU Yong-jie, ZHANG Cheng, HOU Fu-jiang. Effects of Irrigation Modes and Planting Patterns on the Growth,Yield and Economic Benefits of Silage Maize in Hexi Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 1111-1120.
[3]	WANG Gui-zhen, HUA Li-min, YANG Si-wei, ZHAO Hai-zhong. The Preliminary Development of Alpine Meadow Family Pasture Management Model [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(4): 991-1003.
[4]	DONG Xiao-bing, HAO Ming-de, GUO Sheng-an, SHI Xue-jun, MA Tian, LIU Gong-she. The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Phosphate Fertilizer Rates on the Yield, Nutrient uptake and Quality of Leymus Chinensis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(6): 1232-1238.
[5]	LI Bing, CUI Guo-wen, HU Guo-fu, JI Guo-xu, WANG Yan-qing, NIU Zhuang, LIU Shou-jiang, QI Yong-sheng, LI Fang, LI Ji-kai. Effects of Different Roughage Diets on the Growth Performance and Economic Benefits of Dairy Cows [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(6): 1375-1380.
[6]	LI Fang, CUI Guo-wen, HU Guo-fu, WENG Yue, LI Bing, NIU Zhuang, LIU Shou-jiang, QI Yong-sheng, HE Wen-hua. Feeding Effects of Dietary Combinations on Growing Ewe and Benefit Comparison [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(5): 1117-1121.
[7]	DONG Quan-min, ZHAO Xin-quan, MA Yu-shou, SHI Jian-jun, SHENG Li, WANG Yan-long, YANG Shi-hai, WANG Liu-ying. Study on Grazing Yak Performance and Soil Nutrient Changes in Warm-season Pastures of Alpine Region [J]. , 2009, 17(5): 629-635.
[8]	LIU Fang, LI Xiang-lin, BAI Jing-ren, HE Feng, YANG Chun-hua . Analysis on the Economic Benefits of Six Forage Production Systems in Southwest of Sichuan Province [J]. , 2008, 16(3): 289-292.
[9]	DONG Quan-min, ZHAO Xin-quan, MA Yu-shou. Study on Community Quantity Character in Alpine Mixed-sown Grassland under Different Grazing Intensities [J]. , 2007, 15(4): 394-397.
[10]	OUYANG Ke-hui, WANG Kun. Studies on the Energy and Material Use Efficiency of Cultivated Grassland and Farmland Ecosystem in the Hilly Regions of Southern China [J]. , 2007, 15(1): 35-38,75.
[11]	JIE Dong-mei, ZHU Ting-cheng, ZHOU Shuo-biao, GUO Ji-xun. Steppe Zone of China and Sand-Dust Storm [J]. , 2003, 11(1): 3-9.
[12]	Wei Zhijun, Han Guodong, Zhaohesitu. Influence of Grazing Intensity on Production Performance of Sheep in Stipa Breviflora Steppe [J]. , 1995, 3(1): 22-28.