Effects of Irrigation Modes and Planting Patterns on the Growth,Yield and Economic Benefits of Silage Maize in Hexi Region

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.04.030

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 1111-1120.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.04.030

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Irrigation Modes and Planting Patterns on the Growth,Yield and Economic Benefits of Silage Maize in Hexi Region

DONG Shan, WANG Hao, JIA Qian-min, CHANG Sheng-hua, Shahzad Ali, LIU Yong-jie, ZHANG Cheng, HOU Fu-jiang

State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems;Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs;Engineering Research Center of Grassland Industry, Ministry of Education;College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730020, China

Received:2020-02-26 Revised:2020-03-30 Online:2020-08-15 Published:2020-07-28

灌溉模式与种植方式对河西地区青贮玉米生长、产量和经济效益的影响

董姗, 王皓, 贾倩民, 常生华, Shahzad Ali, 刘永杰, 张程, 侯扶江

兰州大学草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室; 兰州大学农业农村部草牧业创新重点实验室; 兰州大学草地农业教育部工程研究中心; 兰州大学草地农业科技学院; 甘肃兰州 730020

通讯作者: 贾倩民
作者简介:董姗(1996-),女,陕西榆林人,硕士研究生,主要从事农业水肥管理研究,E-mail:dongsh19@lzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
长江学者和创新团队发展计划（IRT_17R50）；国家自然科学基金（31901389，31672472）；兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（lzujbky-2019-33）；兰州大学“双一流”引导专项-队伍建设-科研启动费（561119204）；973国家重点基础研究计划课题（2014CB138706）；2018年度甘肃省科技重大专项计划项目（18ZD2FA009）资助

Abstract

Abstract: The field study was carried out in Hexi area,to explore the effects of irrigation mode and planting patterns on forage growth,yield and economic benefits of silage corn. Three planting patterns (S:single sown of silage maize,SM:mixed sowing of silage maize and fodder soybean,SL:mixed sowing of silage maize and dolichos lablab) and six irrigation modes (W1:irrigation at the 6 leaves stage,W2:irrigation at 6 and 12 leaves stage,W3:irrigation at 6 leaves stage and pollen dispersal stage,W4:irrigation at the 6,12 leaves stage and pollen dispersal stage,W5:irrigation at the 6 leaves,pollen dispersal and grain filling stage,W6:irrigation at all stages) were set. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the plant height,stem diameter and relative chlorophyll content between SM,SL and S treatments,while SM and SL significantly increased the leaf area index as compared with S treatment. And the fresh grass yield,hay yield and net income of SM and SL treatment were significantly higher than that of S treatment. At the grain filling and harvesting stages,the plant height,stem diameter,relative chlorophyll content and leaf area index of W5 and W6 treatments were significantly higher than those of W1 treatment. The fresh grass yield,hay yield and net income of W5 and W6 treatments were significantly higher than those of W1,W2 and W3 treatments. Among all the treatments,SM-W5 treatment obtained the highest hay yield and net income,resulted to be one of the suitable cultivation modes for silage maize in Hexi region.

Key words: Deficit irrigation, Silage maize, Legume crops, Mixed sowing, Grass yield, Economic benefits

摘要： 为探究灌溉模式与种植方式对青贮玉米（Zea mays L.）生长、产量和经济效益的影响，本研究在河西地区设置3个种植方式（S：青贮玉米单播；SM：青贮玉米与秣食豆（Glycine max L.Merr）混播；SL：青贮玉米与拉巴豆（Lablab purpureus L.Sweet）混播）和6种灌溉模式（W1：6叶期灌溉；W2：6叶期和12叶期灌溉；W3：6叶期和散粉期灌溉；W4：6叶期、12叶期和散粉期灌溉；W5：6叶期、散粉期和灌浆期灌溉；W6：6叶期、12叶期、散粉期和灌浆期灌溉）进行田间试验。结果表明：SM、SL和S种植下玉米的株高、茎粗和相叶绿素含量差异不显著，但SM和SL较S显著提高了叶面积指数；SM和SL的鲜干草产量和净收益显著高于S；在灌浆期和收获期，W5和W6的株高、茎粗、相对叶绿素含量和叶面积指数显著高于W1；W5、W6的鲜干草产量和净收益显著高于W1，W2和W3。所有处理中，SM-W5获得了最高的干草产量和净收益，是河西地区青贮玉米适宜的栽培模式。

关键词: 调亏灌溉, 青贮玉米, 豆科作物, 混播, 产量, 经济效益

CLC Number:

S816.5+3

DONG Shan, WANG Hao, JIA Qian-min, CHANG Sheng-hua, Shahzad Ali, LIU Yong-jie, ZHANG Cheng, HOU Fu-jiang. Effects of Irrigation Modes and Planting Patterns on the Growth,Yield and Economic Benefits of Silage Maize in Hexi Region[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 1111-1120.

董姗, 王皓, 贾倩民, 常生华, Shahzad Ali, 刘永杰, 张程, 侯扶江. 灌溉模式与种植方式对河西地区青贮玉米生长、产量和经济效益的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1111-1120.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.04.030

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2020/V28/I4/1111

References

[1] 张雪婷,王新永,杨文雄,等. 河西绿洲灌区节水抗旱型玉米品种的评价方法探讨[J]. 草业学报,2020,29(2):134-148
[2] 杨君林,马忠,张立勤,等. 甘肃省河西绿洲干旱灌区施氮量对小麦-玉米间作水分利用和产量的影响[J]. 土壤与作物,2016,5(3):176-180
[3] 李晓婧,白艳萍,李萌,等. 河西走廊水资源变化与生态环境时空关联分析[J]. 水土保持通报,2019,39(2):275-280
[4] 潘艳花,马忠明,吕晓东,等. 河西绿洲灌区不同耕作方式对春小麦土壤水分和产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报,2012,21(11):53-59
[5] 花立民,杨思维,周建伟,等. 气候变化和干扰对河西走廊北部风沙源区NDVI的影响[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(6):995-1003
[6] 杨静敬,路振广,潘国强,等. 亏缺灌溉对冬小麦耗水规律及产量的影响[J]. 节水灌溉,2013(4):8-11
[7] 王亚东,焦健,苏德荣. 调亏度及调亏历时对苜蓿生物量分配与水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(6):1287-1293
[8] 田育丰,张富仓,刘小刚. 内陆石羊河灌区灌溉和施氮对夏玉米苗期生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2008,26(4):125-130
[9] 张鹏,张富仓,吴立峰,等. 不同灌水和施氮对河西绿洲春玉米生长、产量和水分利用的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2011,29(4):137-143
[10] 高亚军,李生秀,田霄鸿,等. 不同供肥条件下水分分配对旱地玉米产量的影响[J]. 作物学报,2006,32(3):415-422
[11] Bekele S,Tilahun K. Regulated deficit irrigation scheduling of onion in a semiarid region of Ethiopia[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2007,89(1-2):148-152
[12] Cakir R. Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn[J]. Field Crops Research,2004,89(1):1-16
[13] Farré I,Faci J M. Deficit irrigation in maize for reducing agricultural water use in a Mediterranean environment[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2009,96(3):383-394
[14] 邢英英,张富仓,王秀康. 不同生育期水分亏缺灌溉和氮营养对玉米生长的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2010,28(6):1-6,11
[15] 张芮,成自勇,李有先. 水分亏缺对膜下滴灌制种玉米生长及产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(2):125-128
[16] 张永亮,张丽娟,于铁峰,等. 禾豆组合与间作方式对牧草产量及产量稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(5):1410-1418
[17] Walker S,Ogindo H O. The water budget of rainfed maize and bean intercrop[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth，2003,28(20):919-926
[18] 包兴国,杨文玉,曹卫东,等. 豆科与禾本科绿肥饲草作物混播增肥及改土效果研究[J]. 中国草地学报,2012,34(1):43-47
[19] 李晶,李伟忠,吉彪,等. 混播方式对青贮玉米产量和饲用品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志,2010(3):100-103
[20] 崔超,王海燕,王靖,等. 青贮玉米与饲用扁豆混播对群体产量形成的影响[J]. 中国种业,2017(3):37-40
[21] 高飞,高洪雷,王丽霁,等. 不同成熟期青贮玉米混播对产量和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2009,17(4):490-494
[22] 张淑艳,战海云,李强,等. 玉米秣食豆混播比例对群体产量及产量构成的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2014,30(3):205-208
[23] 李洪影,高飞,刘昭明,等. 青贮玉米不同混播方式对饲料作物产量和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2011,19(5):825-829
[24] 连露,胡国富,李冰,等. 青贮玉米种植密度及与秣食豆混播比例对青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(1):178-183
[25] 姜胜男,张淑艳,刘殿鹏. 青贮玉米和秣食豆混播比例对群体生产机能的影响[J]. 安徽农业科,2018,46(26):38-40,43
[26] 顾雪莹,玉柱,郭艳萍,等. 全株玉米与秣食豆单贮混贮效果的研究[J]. 草地学报,2011,19(1):132-136
[27] Jia Q M,Xu Y Y,Ali S,et al. Strategies of supplemental irrigation and modified planting densities to improve the root growth and lodging resistance of maize (Zea mays L.) under the ridge-furrow rainfall harvesting system[J]. Field Crops Research,2018,224:48-59
[28] Jia Q M,Sun L F,Wang J J,et al. Limited irrigation and planting densities for enhanced water productivity and economic returns under the ridge-furrow system in semi-arid regions of china[J]. Field Crops Research,2018,221:207-218
[29] 石喜,王密侠,姚雅琴,等. 水分亏缺对玉米植株干物质累积、水分利用效率及生理指标的影响[J]. 干旱区研究,2009,26(3):396-400
[30] 贾倩民. 半干旱区集雨补灌与种植密度对玉米生长及光合生理特性的影响[D]. 杨凌,西北农林科技大学,2018:124-126
[31] 张智郡,刘海军,张立伟,等. 玉米生理生态指标及产量对不同生育期水分亏缺的响应[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2018,37(4):9-17
[32] 张振华,蔡焕杰. 水分亏缺对覆膜玉米生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 灌溉排水,2001,20(2):13-16
[33] 刘学军,刘平,翟汝伟,等. 宁夏南部雨养农业区玉米生育期土壤含水率控制阈值研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报,2013,32(1):1-4,68
[34] Kang S Z,Zhang L,Liang Y L,et al. Effects of limited irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat on the loess plateau of china [J]. Agricultural Systems,2003,78:355-367
[35] Liu H J,Wang X M,Zhang X,et al. Evaluation on the responses of maize (zea mays,L.) growth,yield and water use efficiency to drip irrigation water under mulch condition in the hetao irrigation district of china[J]. Agricultural Water Manage,2016,173:144-157
[36] 姬承东,史卉玲,周芸芸. 青贮玉米SC704与拉巴豆混播后的青贮品质测定[J]. 安徽农业科学,2015,43(26):151-154
[37] 谢开云,赵云,李向林,等. 豆-禾混播草地种间关系研究进展[J]. 草业学报,2013,22(3):284-296
[38] 郭郁频,任永霞,李亚奎,等. 青贮玉米与扁豆混播栽培技术及营养价值评定研究[J]. 河北北方学院学报(自然科学版),2015,31(3):14-17
[39] 毛凯,周寿荣. 一年生豆禾牧草混播种群研究[J]. 草业科学,1995,(2):32-34,40
[40] 师尚礼. 紫花苜蓿根瘤菌研究进展[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2005,40(2):262-267

Effects of Irrigation Modes and Planting Patterns on the Growth,Yield and Economic Benefits of Silage Maize in Hexi Region

灌溉模式与种植方式对河西地区青贮玉米生长、产量和经济效益的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	HE Zhen-fu, HE Chun-gui, WANG Fei, CHEN Ping. Analysis of Production Performance and Quality of Different Types of Forage Sorghum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1446-1453.
[2]	LI Wen, MA Lin-feng, CAO Xi-min, YU Feng-fang, SHE Zhi-hui, XU Zhan-yun, LIU Gui-he, LYU Ai-zhi. Effect of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Zea mays L. in Bashang Agro-pastoral Ecotone in Northwest Hebei Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.
[3]	LI Man-you, MA Zhong-ren, WANG Bing, YANG Yu-qi, SHEN Xiao-tian, CAO Li-juan, LI Xiao-yun, LAN Jian. Study on the Mixed Planting Mode of Two Alfalfa Varieties in Different Row Ratios in the Yellow River Irrigation Area in Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 798-804.
[4]	WANG Bin, DONG Xiu, LI Man-you, YANG Yu-qi, LAN Jian. Effects of Mixed Planting of Dolichos Lablab with Different Sowing Rates and Silage Corn on Grassland Productivity and Forage Quality [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 828-834.
[5]	HOU Pai, CHEN Cai-jin, ZHANG Jing-ni, FAN Long, DING Wang. Study on Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Different Silage Maize in Guyuan Area of Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2346-2354.
[6]	XIE Kai-yun, SUN ling-li, ZHANG Li-wen, ZHENG Wan-ju, WAN Jiang-chun, ZHAO Yun. Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Rhizobium Inoculation on the Biomass of Alfalfa and Smooth Brome in Mixed Culture [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 182-188.
[7]	SUN Yu-qin, CHEN Cai-jin, WU Juan, ZENG Yan-xia, ZHANG Xiao-juan, CHEN Zhi-long, SHANG Ji-hong, GAO Ting, ZHANG Rong, MA Jian-hua. Studies on the Production Performance and Nutritional Value of Forage Sorghum Varieties in the Semiarid Area of South Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1615-1625.
[8]	QIN Yan, LIU Yong, ZHANG Yong-chao, LIANG Guo-ling, LIU Wen-hui. Effects of Mixed Ratios on Plant Growth Characteristics in Mixed Grassland of the Oat and Vetch Pea [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1768-1774.
[9]	ZHANG Yong-liang, YU Tie-feng, HAO Feng. Responses of Stoichiometric Characteristics of Carbon,Nitrogen,and Phosphorus in Legume-grass Mixture Forages to Fertilization and Mixed Sowing Ratio [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1386-1394.
[10]	YU Lu, WANG Xun, CHAI Sha-tuo, LIU Shu-jie. Application of BP Neural Network in Natural Grassland Yield Estimation in the Area Around Qinghai Lake [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1427-1435.
[11]	YAO Ze-ying, LI Jun, SONG Lian-zhao, LIU Chun-yang, YAO Ze-jun, LIU Gui-he. Study on the Effect of Cross Sowing of Elymus nutans and Medicago sativa in Different Periods [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1454-1459.
[12]	SUN Ying-long, QIAN Shuan, YAN Hao, XU Ling-ling, CAO Yun. Monitoring and Assessment of the Grassland Ecological Meteorology in China in the Spring,2020 [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 869-872.
[13]	LIU Jian-ning, SHI Yong-hong, WU Xin-ming, FANG Zhi-hong, JIA Hui-li, WANG Yun-qi, ZHANG Yan, GUO Pu, CHI Hui-wu, LI Lian-fen. Comprehensive Evaluation and Analysis of the Performance and Nutritional Value of 15 Silage Maize Varieties in Jinzhong Basin [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 1043-1049.
[14]	YAO Ze-ying, LI jun, SOGN Lian-zhao, LIU Chun-yang, YAO Ze-jun, LIU Gui-he. Study on the Leguminous-Gramineous Grass Mixed Sowing in Bashang Area of Zhangjiakou [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 1076-1082.
[15]	ZHANG Qian, ZHANG Zhong-hua, MA Li, YANG Xiao-yuan, GUO Jing, XU Wen-hua, ZHOU Bing-rong, SHAO Xin-qing, WANG Fang, JIA Yong-zhong, HE You-long, JIN Xin, ZHOU Hua-kun. Effects of Mixed Sowing of Different Pasture Grasses on Soil Nutrients and Biomass in Degraded Alpine Meadows [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(6): 1659-1666.