Studies on the Production Performance and Nutritional Value of Forage Sorghum Varieties in the Semiarid Area of South Ningxia

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.06.015

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 1615-1625.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.06.015

Studies on the Production Performance and Nutritional Value of Forage Sorghum Varieties in the Semiarid Area of South Ningxia

SUN Yu-qin¹, CHEN Cai-jin¹, WU Juan¹, ZENG Yan-xia¹, ZHANG Xiao-juan¹, CHEN Zhi-long¹, SHANG Ji-hong¹, GAO Ting², ZHANG Rong³, MA Jian-hua³

1. Guyuan Branch, Ningxia Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Guyuan, Ningxia 756000 China;
2. Institute of Animal Science, Ningxia Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Science, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750002, China;
3. Institute of Plant Protection, Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750002, China

Received:2020-04-20 Revised:2020-07-08 Online:2020-12-15 Published:2020-12-02

宁南半干旱区饲用高粱品种生产性能和营养价值比较研究

孙玉琴¹, 陈彩锦¹, 吴娟¹, 曾燕霞¹, 张晓娟¹, 陈志龙¹, 尚继红¹, 高婷², 张蓉³, 马建华³

1. 宁夏农林科学院固原分院, 宁夏固原 756000;
2. 宁夏农林科学院动物科学研究所, 宁夏银川 756002;
3. 宁夏农林科学院植物保护研究所, 宁夏银川 756002

通讯作者: 陈彩锦
作者简介:孙玉琴(1970-),女,宁夏西吉人,经济师,主要从事牧草育种与栽培研究,E-mail:1328594266@qq.com
基金资助:
现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金（CARS-34）；宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划项目（2017BY082）；固原市科技计划项目（2019GKNS002）；宁夏回族自治区农业科技自主创新专项科技创新引导项目（NKYG-20-02）；甘肃省科技计划项目（19ZD2NA002）资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to solve the problem of high quality and high yield herbage shortage in the development of grass and livestock industry in the semiarid area of south Ningxia,the grey relational degree method was used to comprehensively evaluate the yield,nutritional value and agronomic traits of 16 forage sorghum varieties in 2018-2019. The results showed that the best variety of fresh hay was ‘Dalong’. The neutral detergent fiber,the acid detergent fiber and the relative feeding value of the ‘American Giant’ and ‘Manna 400’ varieties were better than the control variety which was the Local Sorghum. Meanwhile,the highest crude protein content of variety was the ‘Green Giant’,and the variety with the highest soluble carbohydrate content was ‘Sea Lion’. The results of comprehensive analysis showed that the five varietie,‘Dalong’,‘Sea Lion’,‘Hercules’,‘F10’ and ‘Hainiu’ were suitable for spreading and planting in the semiarid area of Southern Ningxia.

Key words: Forage sorghum, Grass yield, quality, Grey relational analysis

摘要： 为解决当前宁南半干旱区草畜产业发展中优质、高产牧草紧缺的问题，本试验利用灰色关联度法对2018-2019年16个饲用高粱（Sorghum bicolor（L.）Moench）品种的农艺性状、产量及营养价值进行了评价。结果表明：鲜干草产量表现最优品种是‘大龙’，中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维、相对饲用价值表现最优品种是‘美洲巨人’、‘甘露400’，粗蛋白含量表现最优品种是‘绿巨人’，水溶性碳水化合物表现最优品种是‘海狮’。综合分析结果显示，‘大龙’、‘海狮’、‘大力士’、‘F10’、‘海牛’5个品种表现最优，适合在宁南半干旱区进行推广种植。

关键词: 饲用高粱, 草产量, 品质, 灰色关联度

CLC Number:

S514

SUN Yu-qin, CHEN Cai-jin, WU Juan, ZENG Yan-xia, ZHANG Xiao-juan, CHEN Zhi-long, SHANG Ji-hong, GAO Ting, ZHANG Rong, MA Jian-hua. Studies on the Production Performance and Nutritional Value of Forage Sorghum Varieties in the Semiarid Area of South Ningxia[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1615-1625.

孙玉琴, 陈彩锦, 吴娟, 曾燕霞, 张晓娟, 陈志龙, 尚继红, 高婷, 张蓉, 马建华. 宁南半干旱区饲用高粱品种生产性能和营养价值比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1615-1625.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.06.015

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2020/V28/I6/1615

References

[1] 高树琴,胡兆民,韩勇,等. 生态草牧业在我国精准扶贫中的作用和潜力-中国科学院植物研究所科技扶贫实践与模式探索[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2019,34(2):223-230
[2] 黄亚玲,达海莉. 宁夏草畜产业生产状况及高质量发展思考[J]. 宁夏农林科技,2019,60(5):43-47
[3] 王和山. 宁夏南部山区草畜产业发展研究[M]. 银川:宁夏人民出版社,2006:18-21
[4] 莫负涛,张万祥,曹蕾,等. 不同品种饲用高粱农艺性状及草产量比较试验[J]. 中国草食动物科学,2020,40(1):17-22
[5] 马有祥. "十三五"规划解读:新常态下我国畜牧业发展战略分析[J]. 中国猪业,2016,11(1):16-21
[6] 安永平,虎久强,张小勤. 宁夏南部山区生态环境现状及生态治理对策[C]//宁夏回族自治区林学会第六届学术年会论文集. 银川:宁夏人民出版社,2005:105-109
[7] Corredor D Y,Salazar J M,Hohn K L,et al. Evaluation and characterization of forage sor-ghum as feedstock for fermentable sugar production[J]. Applied Biochemistry & Biotechnology,2009,158(1):164-179
[8] 崔凤娟,田福东,王振国,等. 饲用高粱品种品质性状的比较及评价[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(6):1112-1116
[9] 朱鸿福,王丽慧,林语梵,等. 宁夏黄灌区国外饲用高粱品种生产性能及饲用价值研究[J].中国草地学报,2019,41(5):40-46
[10] 李嵩博,唐朝臣,陈峰,等. 中国粒用高粱改良品种的产量和品质性状时空变化[J]. 中国农业科学,2018,51(2):246-256
[11] 李珊珊,李飞,白彦福,等. 甜高粱的利用技术[J]. 草业科学,2017,34(4):831-845
[12] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,1997:12-53
[13] Rohweder DA,Barnes RF,Jorgensen N. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1978,47:747-759
[14] 李玉珠,吴芳,师尚礼,等. 河西走廊13个引进紫花苜蓿品种生产性能和营养价值评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2019,37(5):119-129
[15] 温方,陶雅,孙启忠. 用灰色关联系数法对26个苜蓿品种生产性能的综合评价[J]. 华北农学报,2006,21(专辑):66-71
[16] 杨曌,张新全,李向林,等.应用灰色关联度综合评价17个不同秋眠级苜蓿的生产性能[J].草业学报,2009,18(5):67-72
[17] 梁天刚,蒋文兰,樊晓冬. 北大营示范场黑麦草引种与品比试验研究[J]. 草业学报,2001,12(4):77-84
[18] 郑敏娜,李荫藩,梁秀芝,等. 晋北地区引种苜蓿品种的灰色关联度分析与综合评价[J].草地学报,2014,22(3):631-637
[19] 谭学瑞,邓聚龙. 灰色关联分析:多因素统计分析新方法[J]. 统计研究,1995,65(3):46-48
[20] 肖雪君,周青平,陈有军,等. 播种量对高寒牧区林纳燕麦生产性能及光合特性的影响[J]. 草业科学,2017,34(4):761-771
[21] 魏臻武,符昕,曹致中,等.苜蓿生长特性和产草量关系的研究[J]. 草业学报,2007,16(4):1-8
[22] Vaughn D L,Viands D R,Lowe C C. Nutritive value and forage yield of alfalfa synthetics under three harvest-management systems[J]. Crop Science,1990,30(3):699-703
[23] 腾峰.玉米株高主效QTL,qPH3.1的克隆及其功能验证[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学,2013:9-20
[24] 杨晓,赵海燕,马淑梅,等. 陇东旱塬区饲用甜高粱品种的农艺性状比较[J]. 中国草食动物科学,2018,38(4):23-27
[25] 张文毅. 高粱品质性状的遗传研究[J]. 辽宁农业科学,1980(2):37-43
[26] 梁永良. 四个甜高粱品种引种试验及青贮的初步研究[D]. 南宁:广西大学,2017:18-25
[27] 伏兵哲,常巍,李泽亚,等. 宁夏引黄灌区饲用高粱品种比较研究[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(6):1751-1758
[28] 何敏. 不同品种高粱饲用价值的研究[D]. 广州:华南农业大学,2016:15-32
[29] 张光雨,王江伟,张豪睿,等. 西藏日喀则地区8个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(4):1117-1125
[30] 刘庭玉,成启明,张玉霞,等. 科尔沁沙地饲用高粱品种比较试验[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2018,(24):130-134
[31] 刘贵波,乔仁甫. 几种饲草作物的饲用品质及产草量比较试验[J]. 作物杂志,2005,3(4):20-22
[32] 霍成君,韩建国,洪绂曾,等. 刈割期和留茬高度对新麦草产草量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2000,8(4):319-327
[33] 彭安琪,李小梅,王红,等. 8种一年生饲料作物生产性能及相对饲用价值[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(2):510-521
[34] Smith K F,R J Simpson,R N Oram,et al.Increasing the nutritive value of perennial ryegrass in dairy pastures of temperate Australia in'Breeding for a Multi-functional Agriculture[M]. Proceedingsof the 21th Eucarpia Fodder Crops and Amenity Grasses Section meeting,1998,16-19
[35] 裴彩霞,董宽虎,范华.不同刈割期和干燥方法对牧草营养成分含量的影响[J]. 中国草地,2001,24(1):32-37
[36] 梁丹妮,靳巧红,李明雨,等. 10个高粱属品种在宁夏引黄灌区的适应性[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(2):490-501

Studies on the Production Performance and Nutritional Value of Forage Sorghum Varieties in the Semiarid Area of South Ningxia

宁南半干旱区饲用高粱品种生产性能和营养价值比较研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, LI Quan-lin, WANG You-bin, MA Bing-yun, LEI Yan-min, ZHOU Rui, XIE Jiu-xiang. Characteristics of Forage Nutritional Quality and Digestibility in Different Types of Grassland in Qinghai Tibet Plateau and their Correlation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[2]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun, ZHOU Rui. Effects of Grazing on Vegetation Characteristics and Forage Nutrientional Quality in a Temperate Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[3]	YAN He-piao, LI Wen-long, LIANG Tian-gang, ZHOU Hua-kun, CAO Ya-peng, LIAO Yuan-cheng. Effects of Different Restoration Measures on Degraded Alpine Grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau: A meta-analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.
[4]	YAO Xi-xi, XIAO Feng, QI Shou-zhong, CHEN Guo-ming, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun. Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[5]	MENG Xuan-chen, MA Peng-cheng, MA Jie, DUAN Zhen, HAN Yang-yang, ZHANG Ji-yu. Study on the Effect of Mulching Furrow and Fertilization of Alfalfa in Semi-arid Areas of Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[6]	MA Ran-ran, YUAN Jie, ZHANG Wen-jie, XU Neng-xiang, GU Hong-ru. Effects of Stacking Time on Feeding and Fermentation Quality of Broccoli Waste [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[7]	YAO Xi-xi, CAI Hua, LIU Hao-dong, LI Chang-hui. Analysis of Rumen Fermentation Characteristics and In Vitro Digestibility of Alpine Meadow Forage in Different Seasons [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1729-1737.
[8]	HE Zhen-fu, HE Chun-gui, WANG Fei, CHEN Ping. Analysis of Production Performance and Quality of Different Types of Forage Sorghum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1446-1453.
[9]	DU Zhao-chang, WANG Hong, YAN Yan-hong, MUHAMMAD Tahir, WEI Xiao, ZENG Tai-ru, LI Hong-liang. Effects of Rice Husk and Wheat Bran Addition on Silage Quality of Fresh Corn Straw [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[10]	SONG Jian-chao, YU Xiao-jun, WEI Kong-tao, WANG Peng-bin, TONG Yong-shang, LI Zhen, HE You-long, WANG Hai-bo. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Elymus nutans in Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564.
[11]	WU Shuo, ZOU Xuan, WANG Ming-ya, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Chenpi Citrus Juice on Fermentation Quality of Stylo and Rice Straw Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[12]	DONG Zhi-xiao, HE Run-hao, KUANG Jian-yang, NIE Cong, YANG Jian, ZHANG Jian-bo, GOU Wen-long, MA Xiao. Effects of Sweet Sorghum Intercropping with Lablab Purpureus on Yield and Quality of Mixed Forage in Chengdu Plain,China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1578-1583.
[13]	LYU Hong-jian, ZOU Xuan, WU Shuo, LI Yun, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing. Effect of Adding Moringa Oleifera Leaves and Lactobacillus farciminis on Quality of Corn Stover Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[14]	QIN Wei-na, JIAO Ting, SHI Shang-li, LI Xiong-xiong, GAO Xue-mei, ZHAO Sheng-guo, QI Juan, WANG Zheng-wen. Evaluation of Silage Quality of 10 Green-fed Corn Varieties under Different Hydrothermal Rescource Conditions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.
[15]	LI Wen, MA Lin-feng, CAO Xi-min, YU Feng-fang, SHE Zhi-hui, XU Zhan-yun, LIU Gui-he, LYU Ai-zhi. Effect of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Zea mays L. in Bashang Agro-pastoral Ecotone in Northwest Hebei Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.