Value Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Golf Course

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.06.008

›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 1085-1092.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.06.008

Previous Articles Next Articles

Value Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Golf Course

DAI Zi-yun¹, PUYANG Xue-hua¹, GAO Chen-hao¹, MENG Jian-zhong²

1. Turfgrass Institute of Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Shanghai Sheshan Golf Course, Shanghai 201602, China

Received:2013-04-12 Revised:2013-06-20 Online:2013-12-15 Published:2013-11-27

高尔夫球场生态系统服务价值评价研究

戴子云¹, 濮阳雪华¹, 高晨浩¹, 孟建忠²

1. 北京林业大学草坪研究所, 北京 100083;
2. 上海佘山高尔夫球场, 上海 201602

通讯作者: 韩烈保
作者简介:戴子云（1985-），男，湖北武穴人，博士研究生，主要从事高尔夫球场生态与环境评价研究，E-mail：daiziyun1985@163.com
基金资助:
北京市教育委员会-北京市重点学科建设项目；国家林业局林业科学技术推广项目（[2011]31）资助

Abstract

Abstract: The ecosystem services of Shanghai Sheshan golf course were valuated by market valuation method, shadow engineering method, product cost method and substitute expense method in order to raise the ecological awareness of the role and status of golf course, and provide a frame of reference for golf course maintenance and management. Results showed that the total ecological value of Sheshan golf course was estimated up to 3319.25×10⁴ yuan (RMB) per annum including the CO₂/O₂ balance value of 201.36×10⁴ yuan, the water holding of 28.66×10⁴ yuan, the soil conservation of 14.71×10⁴ yuan, the air purifying of 13.85×10⁴ yuan, the biodiversity conservation of 51.52×10⁴ yuan, the fish production of 9.45×10⁴ yuan and the trade income of 3000×10⁴ yuan. These results indicated that golf courses as open green spaces improved urban living environment, and played a vital role in meeting the cultural and spiritual needs of urban dwellers.

Key words: Ecosystem services, Function, Valuation, Golf course

摘要： 应用市场价值法、影子工程法、生产成本法和替代花费法等对上海佘山高尔夫球场生态系统服务功能价值进行评价，以期提高人们对高尔夫球场的生态作用和地位的认识，并对高尔夫球场的养护管理提供一定的参考依据。结果表明：佘山高尔夫球场生态系统服务的年总价值为 3319.25万元，其中固碳释氧价值201.36万元，涵养水源价值28.66万元，水土保持价值14.71万元，净化大气价值13.85万元，生物多样性保护价值51.52万元，物质生产价值9.45万元，娱乐休闲价值3000万元。娱乐休闲、固碳释氧和生物多样性保护这3项的价值量占总价值量的98.00%。综上可知，高尔夫球场作为城市的开敞绿色空间，在改善城市居住环境以及在满足城市居民文化和精神生活方面具有重要的作用。

关键词: 生态系统服务, 功能, 价值, 高尔夫球场

CLC Number:

F062.2

DAI Zi-yun, PUYANG Xue-hua, GAO Chen-hao, HAN Lie-bao, MENG Jian-zhong. Value Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Golf Course[J]. , 2013, 21(6): 1085-1092.

戴子云, 濮阳雪华, 高晨浩, 韩烈保, 孟建忠. 高尔夫球场生态系统服务价值评价研究[J]. , 2013, 21(6): 1085-1092.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.06.008

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2013/V21/I6/1085

References

[1] Tanner R A, Gange A C. Effects of golf courses on local biodiversity[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2005,71(2):137-146
[2] 尹世昌. 我国禁止建设高尔夫球场7年间仍建成400多家[N]. 人民日报,2011-06-20(18)
[3] 阳承胜,马宗仁. 高尔夫球场树木设计及选择[J]. 北方园艺,2002(3):32-33
[4] 袁华莹,韩烈保. 从土地资源看高尔夫的发展[J]. 草业科学,2006,23(4):105-110
[5] Maas J, van Dillen S M E, Groenewegen P P. Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space next term and health[J]. Heath Place,2009,15(2):586-595
[6] NGF. The golf economy report. USA:National Golf Foundation,2005:11-13
[7] Minelli A, Carnevali M, Lobietti R. Golf and landscape:suggestions for special planning in urban areas[M]//Crews D, Lutz R, eds. Science and golf V. Mesa:Energy in Motion Inc., 2008:502-508
[8] Mitchell R, Popham F. Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: An observational population study[J]. Lancet,2008,372(9650):1655-1660
[9] Raymond D S, Miehelle D B, Bodie J R. Golf courses could bolster Amphibian communities[J].USGA Green Section Record,2007,6(1):1-16
[10] Tratalos J, Fuller R A, Warren P H, et al. Urban form,biodiversity potential and ecosystem services[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2007,83(4):308-317
[11] NGF. Golf industry overview[R]. US:National Golf Foundation, 2010:10-11
[12] 何莽,许陈生. 国际金融危机对中美高尔夫运动的影响[J]. 体育学刊,2010,17(1):33-36
[13] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2005
[14] 李酉开.土壤农业化学常规分析方法[M].北京:科学出版社,1983
[15] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. The millennium ecosystem assessment[M]. Washington:Island Press,2005
[16] 王兵,杨锋伟,郭浩,等. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范(LY/T 1721-2008)[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2008
[17] Goulder L H, Kennedy D. Valuing ecosystem services: philosophical bases and empirical methods[M]//Daily G C, ed. Nature's services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington: Island Press,1997:23-47
[18] Farber S C, Costanza R, Wilson M A. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Economics,2002,41(3):375-392
[19] Ragland K W, Aerts D J, Baker A J. Properties of wood for combustion analysis[J].Bioresource Technology,1991,37(2):161-168
[20] Zhao T Q, Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H, et al. Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2004,19(4):480-491
[21] 余新晓,鲁绍伟,靳芳,等. 中国森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 生态学报,2005,25(8):2096-2102
[22] Fluck R C. Energy in farm production[M]//Fluck R C, ed. Energy in world agriculture. 6th ed. New York:Elsevier,1992:218-267
[23] Defra. Guidelines to Defra/DECC's GHG conversion factors for company reporting[R]. www.defra.gov.uk/environment/business/reporting/conversion - factors.htm. 2010
[24] Williams A, Audsley E, Sandars D. Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities[R]. www.defra.gov.uk,2006
[25] Lal R. Carbon emissions from farm operations[J]. Environment International,2004,30(7):981-990
[26] 任志远. 区域生态环境服务功能价值评价的理论与方法[J]. 经济地理,2003(1):1-4
[27] 赵同谦,欧阳志云,郑华,等. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J]. 自然资源学报,2004,19(4):480-491
[28] 愈继灿,缪绅裕. 广州白云山风景区森林资源的环境效益价值评价[J]. 广州环境科学,1998,13(3):26-28
[29] 王幼臣,张晓静. 湖南省张家界森林公园社会效益评价[J]. 林业经济,1996(5):44-54
[30] 中国生物多样性国情研究报告编写组. 中国生物多样性国情研究报告[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,1998
[31] Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature,1997,387(15):253-260
[32] 邓培雁,陈桂珠. 湿地价值及其有关问题探讨[J]. 湿地科学,2003,1(2):136-140
[33] 薛达元,包浩生,李文华. 长白山自然保护区生物多样性旅游价值评估研究[J]. 自然资源学报,1999,14(2):140-145
[34] 薛达元. 长白山自然保护区生物多样性非使用价值研究评估[J]. 中国环境科学,2000,20(2):141-145
[35] 赵欣胜,崔保山,杨志峰. 红树林湿地生态效益能值分析:以南沙地区十九涌红树林湿地为案例[J]. 生态学杂志,2005,24(7):841-844

Value Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Golf Course

高尔夫球场生态系统服务价值评价研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YAO Xi-xi, XIAO Feng, QI Shou-zhong, CHEN Guo-ming, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun. Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[2]	ZHANG Zhong-hua, MA Li, ZHOU Bing-rong, SONG Ming-hua, XU Wen-hua, DENG Yan-fang, WANG Fang, SHE Yan-di, ZHANG Qian, YAO Bu-qing, MA Zhen, ZHOU Hua-kun. Esponse of the Functional Diversity of Dominant Plants to Warming and Simulated Grazing in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 225-232.
[3]	WANG Jian-xun, LIU Yan, REN Liang. Study on the Current Situation, Existing Problems and Countermeasures of Green Development in Zhangjiakou City [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2017-2022.
[4]	SUN Wei, LIU Yu-ling, WANG De-ping, ZHAO Min, YANG He-long, SONG Qian, XIAO Hong, WANG Kai-li, CAO Jing, RONG Yu-ping. Effects of Reseeding Leymus Chinensis (Trin.)Tzvel. and Medicago Falcata L. on Plant Community Characteristics of Degraded Meadow Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1809-1817.
[5]	LI Chun-pin, QIU Yi-hui, XIA Hou-yin, TAN Lu-na, XU Huan-yu, ZHANG Han-wen, GAO Jing-hui. Membership Function Analysis of Low Transpiration and Yield Traits in Alfalfa Multi-paternal Hybrid F₁Generation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1416-1422.
[6]	LI Hong, LI Bo, FANG Zhi-jian, YANG Zhao, ZHANG Chao, FENG Cheng-long, JIN Shan-shan, WANG Si-qi, SHI Wan-ying. Physiological Response of Alfalfa Seedlings to Freeze-thaw or Freeze-thaw Versus Soda Saline-alkali Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1469-1476.
[7]	SUN Cai-cai, FENG Bin, DONG Quan-min, LIU Wen-ting, SHI Guang, LIU Yu-zhen, ZHANG Xiao-fang, YU Yang, ZHANG Chun-ping, YANG Xiao-xia. Effects of Mixed Grazing of Yak and Tibetan Sheep on the Functional Characteristics of Stipa purpurea in an Alpine Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1477-1483.
[8]	LI Lan-ping, ZHANG Hui-min, LI Hong-lin, LIANG De-fei, WU Xue-xia, LI Xi-lai. The Effects of Different Functional Groups and Pioneer Species on the Early Establishment of Alpine Artificial Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1513-1521.
[9]	LI Zhi-dong, LIU Mou-cheng. Research Progress in the Evaluation of Policy of Subsidy and Reward for Grassland Ecological Protection in China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1125-1135.
[10]	WANG Xiao-fen, MA Yuan, ZHANG Ge-fei, LIN Dong, ZHANG De-gang. Relationship between Plant Community Diversity and Ecosystem Multifunctionality During Alpine Meadow Degradation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1053-1060.
[11]	LI Man-you, MA Zhong-ren, WANG Bing, YANG Yu-qi, SHEN Xiao-tian, CAO Li-juan, LI Xiao-yun, LAN Jian. Study on the Mixed Planting Mode of Two Alfalfa Varieties in Different Row Ratios in the Yellow River Irrigation Area in Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 798-804.
[12]	LI Bo, LI Chen-yang, LI Hong, YANG Zhao. Effects of Short-term Low Temperature Stress on Physiological Metabolism in ‘Longmu 807’ Alfalfa Seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 515-521.
[13]	SUN Yi-mei, TIAN Qing, GUO Ai-xia, ZHANG Sen-xi, LV Peng, ZUO Xiao-an. Effects of Grazing and Nitrogen Addition on Functional Traits of Dominant Species Cleistogenes squarrosa and Community in Semi-arid Sandy Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 563-571.
[14]	CHANG Hong, ZHAI Xiu, SHI Lei, LIU Ya-hong, XIE Yu, WANG Yang, SUN Hai-lian. Temporal and Spatial Changes of Ecosystem Services Based on Land Use in Pastoral Areas of Inner Mongolia(2000-2015) [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 583-592.
[15]	YIN Yu-lin, MA Wen-xin, LI Ya-juan, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua. Study on the Cold Resistance of New Strains of Timothy Grass from the Central Part of Gansu Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 625-630.