Comparative Research on the Drought Resistance of Four Flower Plants of Ground Cover in the Common Garden of Lanzhou

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.04.017

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 780-784.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.04.017

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparative Research on the Drought Resistance of Four Flower Plants of Ground Cover in the Common Garden of Lanzhou

LIU Wen-lan^1,2, SHI Shang-li¹, MA Hui-ling¹, TANG Hong²

1. Pratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2014-05-06 Revised:2014-09-09 Online:2015-08-15 Published:2015-08-26

兰州市4种常见园林观花地被植物抗旱性比较研究

刘文兰^1,2, 师尚礼¹, 马晖玲¹, 唐红²

1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 甘肃农业大学林学院, 甘肃兰州 730070

通讯作者: 师尚礼
作者简介:刘文兰(1976-),女,宁夏中卫人,博士研究生,讲师,主要从事园林学的教学和科研工作,E-mail:liuwl@gsau.edu.cn
基金资助:
甘肃农业大学盛彤笙科技创新基金项目(GSAU-STS-1243)资助

Abstract

Abstract:

The drought resistant capability of 4 ground cover plants in the common garden of Lanzhou were studied based on the water-controlled pot experiment. The effects of drought stress on the heights, chlorophy, proline and malondialdehyde(MDA) contents of tested plants were measured.Results showed that the heights and chlorophy contents of the plants decreased comparing with the control group with the increase of drought stress.Height of Calendula officinalis decreased obviously, the chlorophyll content of Tagetes erecta decreased more than other materials. The contents of proline and malondialdehyde increased with the raise of drought degree, and the proline content of Tagetes erecta increased more than others. The orders of subordinate function values from strong to weak were Calendula officinalis >Petunia hybride >Salvia splendens >Tagetes erecta. The comprehensive analyses of the drought resistance of these plants indicated that the heights, proline and MDA contents of plants were the effective indexes of drought resistance of garden ground cover plants.

Key words: Garden ground cover plant, Drought resistance, Height, Physiological indices

摘要：

以兰州市4种常见园林观花地被植物为研究对象,通过采用人工模拟不同土壤水分胁迫,分组测定各参试植物的株高、叶绿素、脯氨酸、丙二醛含量等指标, 并用隶属函数法对其抗旱性进行综合评价。结果表明:随着干旱胁迫的加剧,植物的株高、叶绿素含量与对照相比呈不同程度的下降趋势,金盏菊(Calendula officinalis)株高降幅最大,叶绿素含量万寿菊(Tagetes erecta)下降高于其他植物;叶片脯氨酸和丙二醛的含量随干旱程度的增加而升高,万寿菊脯氨酸含量增幅较大,丙二醛含量金盏菊增幅较大;4种地被植物的抗旱性强弱顺序依次为金盏菊> 矮牵牛(Petunia hybrida)> 一串红(Salvia splendens)> 万寿菊。研究表明,植物的株高、脯氨酸含量、丙二醛含量与其实际抗旱性密切相关,可作为评价园林地被植物抗旱性的有效指标。

关键词: 园林地被植物, 抗旱性, 株高, 生理指标

CLC Number:

Q945.78

LIU Wen-lan, SHI Shang-li, MA Hui-ling, TANG Hong. Comparative Research on the Drought Resistance of Four Flower Plants of Ground Cover in the Common Garden of Lanzhou[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(4): 780-784.

刘文兰, 师尚礼, 马晖玲, 唐红. 兰州市4种常见园林观花地被植物抗旱性比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(4): 780-784.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.04.017

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2015/V23/I4/780

References

[1] 李秀玲,刘开强,杨志民,等.干旱胁迫对4种观赏草枯叶率及生理指标的影响[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(1):76-82
[2] 柴素荣. 地被植物在兰州园林中的应用现状及前景初探[J]. 甘肃林业科技,2006,31(1):36-40
[3] 王兰兰. 兰州城区园林地被植物资源调查[J]. 甘肃林业科技,2013,38(2):34-37
[4] 高飞翔. 兰州本土地被植物调查与白草生态生物学特性研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2008
[5] 岳鑫. 适宜兰州园林绿化构图的木本地被植物[J]. 植树造林,2012(17):57-58
[6] 王梅,徐正茹,吴永华,等. 兰州市园林缀花地被植物种类及应用研究[J]. 甘肃林业科技,2011, 36(3):32-37
[7] 吴永华,许宏刚,廖伟彪,等. 10种地被植物的耐阴性比较研究[J]. 甘肃林业科技,2010,35(3):47-50
[8] 吴永华,廖伟彪,许宏刚,等. 10种地被植物叶片气孔特征及其耐阴性研究[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2011,46(5):95-100
[9] 江迪,肖雯,丁品,等. 14种耐荫植物对兰州市特殊空间的适应性研究[J]. 西北林学院学报,2007,22(2):28-32
[10] 李星耀, 杨永花. 适宜兰州地区推广应用的五种优良抗旱地被植物[J]. 北方园艺,2012(17):76-78
[11] 杨永花,汉梅兰,吴永华. 适宜兰州市栽培的节水型缀花地被植物[J]. 甘肃农业科技,2007(12):44-46
[12] 杨治宙. 9种地被植物的抗旱性评价[J]. 甘肃农业科技,2011(11):26-28
[13] 张梅花,张建生,李云霞. 干旱胁迫下5种园林地被植物叶片保水力、质膜相对透性和脯氨酸含量的变化[J]. 甘肃科技,2010,26(10):145-148
[14] 许宏刚,吴永华,张建旗,等. 8种缀花地被植物水分状况与抗旱性的关系[J]. 甘肃林业科技,2013,38(2):14-16
[15] 李云霞,张建生,吴永华,等. 5种景天科地被植物抗旱性比较研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(2):183-186
[16] 罗永忠,成自勇. 水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿叶水势、蒸腾速率和气孔导度的影响[J]. 草地学报,2011,19(2):215-221
[17] 柴素荣,吴振国. 适宜兰州新区绿化种植的节水型草坪地被植物[J]. 农业科技与信息,2012(13):28-29
[18] 田治国,王飞,张文娥,等. 万寿菊属不同品种初花期抗旱特性分析[J]. 西北植物学报,2011,31(7):1390-1399
[19] 杨建玉,刘克锋,王红利,等. 一串红对水分胁迫的生理响应[J]. 北方园艺,2010(9):86-89
[20] 谷文众,刘杨,谷振军. 干旱胁迫对金盏菊膜脂过氧化及保护酶活性的影响[J]. 经济林研究,2009,27(3):79-81
[21] 李宁毅,宋妍,韩晓芳. 干旱胁迫下烯效唑对矮牵牛幼苗水分状况和光合特性的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2011,33(6): 1062-1066
[22] 邹琦. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2000
[23] 许桂芳. PEG胁迫对2种过路黄抗性生理生化指标的影响[J]. 草业学报,2008,17(1):66-70
[24] Blum A,Ebercon A.Genotypic responses in sorghum to drought stress 3 free proline accumulation and drought resistance[J]. Crop Science,1976,16(2):428-431
[25] 史燕山,骆建霞,王煦,等. 5种草本地被植物抗旱性研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2005,33(5):130-134
[26] 初晓辉,刀丽琼,谢堂民,等. 马蹄金草坪草对干旱胁迫的生理响应研究[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(1):134-138
[27] 朱新强,张新颖,师尚礼,等. 干旱胁迫下4个苜蓿品种根系抗旱性的比较[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2012,47(1):103-107
[28] 南丽丽,师尚礼,朱新强,等. 不同根型苜蓿苗期对干旱胁迫的生理耐受性分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2011,29(5):106-110

Comparative Research on the Drought Resistance of Four Flower Plants of Ground Cover in the Common Garden of Lanzhou

兰州市4种常见园林观花地被植物抗旱性比较研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	SUN Yu, ZHANG Feng, ZHENG Jia-hua, ZHAO Tian-qi, ZHAO Meng-li, ZHANG Bin. Effects of Mowing Stubble Height on Species Diversity and Aboveground Biomass of Stipa grandis Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1859-1864.
[2]	LI Chun-pin, QIU Yi-hui, XIA Hou-yin, TAN Lu-na, XU Huan-yu, ZHANG Han-wen, GAO Jing-hui. Membership Function Analysis of Low Transpiration and Yield Traits in Alfalfa Multi-paternal Hybrid F₁Generation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1416-1422.
[3]	FAN Bo-bo, ZHANG Xue-feng, YU Zhuo, ZHAO Yan, MA Yan-hong. Bioinformatics and Expression Analysis of NAC Transcription Factors Related to Drought Resistance of Agropyron mongolicum Keng [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1183-1192.
[4]	DUAN Meng-qi, PENG Chun, ZHANG Rui, GAO Ya-nan, LI Li-jing, ZHAO Zhi-wei, XU Li-xin. Effects of Ethephon on Physiological Indexes of Perennial Ryegrass under Drought Conditions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 333-341.
[5]	QIN Yan, LIU Yong, ZHANG Yong-chao, LIANG Guo-ling, LIU Wen-hui. Effects of Mixed Ratios on Plant Growth Characteristics in Mixed Grassland of the Oat and Vetch Pea [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1768-1774.
[6]	LI Jia-huan, LIU Xi-qiang, LV Jin-ying, REN Cheng, WANG Kai-li, HUANG Ding, DENG Bo, WANG Kun. Drought Resistance Evaluation of 12 Alfalfa Varieties Based on Physiological Response of Four Plant Organs [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1319-1328.
[7]	BAI Chun-sheng, TONG Ming-hao, ZHAO Meng-meng, SUN Juan-juan, XUE Yan-lin, YU Zhu. The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization and Cutting Height on Silage Fermentation Quality and Forage Value of Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanense [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1421-1426.
[8]	WU Rui-xin, Li Yuan, YOU Yong-liang, LIU Gui-bo, ZHAO Hai-ming. Study on Drought Resistance Identification and Evaluation Methods of Alfalfa during Whole Growth Period [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1444-1453.
[9]	WANG Ya-nan, ZHAO Si-ming, CAO Bing. Study on Drought Resistance of Ten Herbaceous Plants under PEG-6000 Simulated Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 983-989.
[10]	LI Lin, YANG Pei-long, LI Xiu-mei, WEN Zhi-guo, WANG Jian-ying, YAN Hai-jie. Comparison of Nutritive Value in different parts、height and Silage Time of Arundo donax [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 1168-1172.
[11]	Saimilakezi·TAIWAIKULI, JIN Gui-li, AN Sha-zhou, DONG Yi-qiang, YUE Yong-huan, HAN Wan-qiang. Effects of Different Plant Height on Biomass Allocation of Achnatherum inebrians [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(3): 863-868.
[12]	WANG Ping, WANG Pei, SUN Wan-bin, CHEN Jiu-hong, ZHANG Wei, ZHOU Qing-ping. Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Eight Elymus Germplasms at Seedling Stage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 397-404.
[13]	LI Pei-pei, LI Yi, SU Shi-ping, CHONG Pei-fang, LI Zhen. Screening and Analysis of Drought Resistance Indexes for 18 Families of Reaumuria soongorica [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 412-419.
[14]	LIANG Huan, WEI Bao, CHEN Jing, GONG Wen-long, MA Lin, WANG Xue-min, WANG Zan. Evaluation of the Drought Resistance in Alfalfa Germplasm by Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters at Seedling Stage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(1): 45-55.
[15]	YANG Dan, ZHANG Shu-yun, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua. Morphological Adaptability of Different Rye Varieties (Lines) to Persistent Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(1): 122-129.