Effects of Different Grazing Patterns on Community Characteristics and Soil Nutrients in the Main Pasture Types of Alxa Zuoqi

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.05.016

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 991-1003.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.05.016

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Different Grazing Patterns on Community Characteristics and Soil Nutrients in the Main Pasture Types of Alxa Zuoqi

LI Na-na¹, YANG Jiu-yan^1,2, JIA Zhe-ting¹, YAN Rui-ling¹, CHEN Qi¹

1. School of Ecology & Environmental, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010021, China;
2. The Key Laboratory of Mongolian Plateau Ecology and Resource Utilization of the Ministry of Education and Joint Key National Laboratory of Provincial Departments Establish the Grassland Ecology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010021, China

Received:2020-09-28 Revised:2020-11-20 Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-06-02

不同放牧方式对阿拉善左旗主要草场类型群落特征和土壤养分的影响

李娜娜¹, 杨九艳^1,2, 贾喆亭¹, 闫瑞玲¹, 陈琪¹

1. 内蒙古大学生态与环境学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010021;
2. 内蒙古大学蒙古高原生态学与资源利用教育部重点实验室暨省部共建草地生态学国家重点实验室培育基地, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010021

通讯作者: 杨九艳,E-mail:yangjy1122@163.com
作者简介:李娜娜(1993-)，女，汉族，内蒙古呼和浩特人，硕士研究生，主要从事草地生态研究，E-mail:lnn5028@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0501006）资助

Abstract

Abstract: To explore the impact of different grazing patterns on the Alxa Zuoqi pastures,four main pasture types,including Potaninia mongolica,Haloxylon ammodendron,Reaumuria soongorica+Caragana tibetica and Reaumuria soongorica+Salsola passerina,were selected to analyze the differences of community characteristics,species diversity and soil nutrients under three grazing patterns,covering non-grazing,grazing from 2016 and long-term grazing.The results showed that non-grazing had a significant effect on the vegetation restoration,while species diversity was reduced by the long-term non-grazing. The community characteristics and soil nutrients were obviously improved under the pattern of grazing from 2016. On the whole,we conclude that the combination pattern of non-grazing and moderate grazing is scientific and rational to protect pastures and obtain economic benefits in Alxa Zuoqi.

Key words: Alxa pasture, Grazing pattern, Community characteristics, Species diversity, Soil nutrient

摘要： 为探究不同放牧方式对阿拉善左旗草场的影响，本试验选取绵刺（Potaninia mongolica）、梭梭（Haloxylon ammodendron）、红砂+藏锦鸡儿（Reaumuria soongorica+Caragana tibetica）和红砂+珍珠猪毛菜（Reaumuria soongorica+Salsola passerina）4种主要的草场类型，分析长期禁牧、2016年政策允许开始放牧及长期放牧3种放牧方式下草场群落数量特征、群落物种多样性和土壤养分的差异。结果表明：禁牧对于草场植被恢复有显著效果，但长期禁牧会降低群落物种多样性；长期禁牧后于2016年开始放牧的草场生长状况更好，群落的高度、盖度、密度和生物量等数量特征显著提高，并且改善了土壤养分状况。综上所述，阿拉善目前所制定的禁牧与放牧相结合的放牧利用方式是科学合理的，既能保护草地又可获得经济收益。

关键词: 阿拉善草场, 放牧方式, 群落特征, 物种多样性, 土壤养分

CLC Number:

S812

LI Na-na, YANG Jiu-yan, JIA Zhe-ting, YAN Rui-ling, CHEN Qi. Effects of Different Grazing Patterns on Community Characteristics and Soil Nutrients in the Main Pasture Types of Alxa Zuoqi[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 991-1003.

李娜娜, 杨九艳, 贾喆亭, 闫瑞玲, 陈琪. 不同放牧方式对阿拉善左旗主要草场类型群落特征和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 991-1003.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.05.016

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2021/V29/I5/991

References

[1] 高英志,韩兴国,汪诗平. 放牧对草原土壤的影响[J]. 生态学报,2004,24(4):790-797
[2] 任继周. 放牧,草原生态系统存在的基本方式:兼论放牧的转型[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(8):1259-1275
[3] 许志信,李永强. 草地退化对水土流失的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2003,17(1):65-68
[4] 朱国栋,郭娜,王成杰,等. 围封对内蒙古荒漠草原土壤理化性质及稳定碳氮同位素的影响[J]. 土壤,2020,52(4):840-845
[5] 廖晗茹,Indree Tuvshintogtokh,赵景学,等.围封对蒙古荒漠草原和高山草原植物群落组成及稳定性的影响[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2020,56(3):471-478
[6] 贾志锋,马祥,雷生春,等.短期封育对贵南县轻度退化高寒草甸植被特征的影响[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(11):2766-2774
[7] 郑群英,刘刚,肖冰雪,等. 放牧对川西北高寒草甸植物物种丰富度和生物量的影响[J]. 草业科学,2017,34(7):1390-1396
[8] 姚喜喜,宫旭胤,张利平,等. 放牧和长期围封对祁连山高寒草甸优势牧草营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(6):1354-1362
[9] 杜凯,康宇坤,张德罡,等.不同放牧方式对祁连山高寒草甸有机碳、氮库的影响[J].草地学报,2020,28(5):1412-1420
[10] 杨蜻,褚鹏飞,白永飞,等. 基于牧场生产力的内蒙古典型草原载畜率研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(1):76-81
[11] 苏楞高娃.不同利用方式对鄂尔多斯典型草原植物群落与土壤碳储量的影响[J].草原与草业,2016,28(4):49-55
[12] 刘铁军,杨劼,董智,等.围封对荒漠草原植物群落与土壤养分变化的影响[J].中国草地学报,2019,41(5):86-93
[13] 别尔达吾列提·希哈依,董乙强,刘慧敏,等.封育对盐生假木贼荒漠和博乐绢蒿荒漠群落特征的影响[J].中国草地学报,2020,42(1):76-83
[14] 石红霄,范月君,李鹏,等.三江源区围栏与放牧高山嵩草草甸植物群落特征分析[J].中国草地学报,2014,36(3):67-72
[15] 程磊磊,郭浩,卢琦. 荒漠生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠,2013,33(1):281-287
[16] 张睿洋,王忠武,韩国栋,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原α多样性对绵羊载畜率的响应[J].生态学报,2017,37(3):906-914
[17] 裴世芳. 放牧和围封对阿拉善荒漠草地土壤和植被的影响[D].兰州:兰州大学,2007:1-2
[18] 裴洁,敖艳红,李运鹏,等. 内蒙古阿拉善地区气候区划研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2000,14(3):47-55
[19] 包根晓,张向柱,照日格图. 阿拉善左旗草畜平衡推广工作的迫切性[J]. 内蒙古草业,2003,15(2):40-41
[20] 张锦春,王继和,赵明,等. 库姆塔格沙漠南球荒漠植物群落多样性分析[J]. 植物生态学报,2006,30(3):375-382
[21] 马克平. 生物多样性的测度方法α多样性的测度方法(上)[J]. 生物多样性,1994,2(3):162-168
[22] 王雪峰,王琛,胡敬萍,等.家庭牧场不同放牧方式对草甸草原植物群落的影响[J].草地学报,2017,25(3):466-473
[23] 瞿王龙,裴世芳,傅华,等. 放牧与围封对阿拉善荒漠草地土壤有机碳和植被特征的影响[J]. 甘肃林业科技,2004,29(2):4-6,40
[24] 赵生龙,左小安,张晶,等. 乌拉特荒漠草原群落物种多样性和生物量关系对放牧强度的响应[J]. 干旱区研究,2020,37(1):168-177
[25] 王向涛,张世虎,杜国祯,等. 不同放牧强度下高寒草甸植被特征和土壤养分变化研究[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(4):510-516
[26] 戴新刚,熊喆,赵登海,等. 羊啃食动力学模拟与内蒙古西部气候变化适应[J]. 中国沙漠,2012,32(5):1442-1450
[27] 王天乐,卫智军,吕世杰,等.不同放牧强度下荒漠草原土壤养分和植被特征变化研究[J].草地学报,2017,25(4):711-716
[28] Bernhardt-RömermannM,Römermann C,Sperlich S,et al. Explaining grassland biomass-the contribution of climate,species and functional diversity depends on fertilization and mowing frequency[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2011,48(5):1088-1097
[29] David Tilman,David Wedin,Johannes Knops. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems[J]. Nature,1996,379(2):718-720
[30] Belsky A J. Effects of grazing,competition,disturbance and fire on species composition and diversity in grassland communities[J]. Journal ofVegetationScience,2010,3(2):187-200
[31] 通乐嘎,赵斌,吴玲敏. 放牧对内蒙古荒漠草原土壤理化性质和有机碳组分的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2018,27(9):1602-1609
[32] 江小蕾,张卫国,王刚,等. 不同干扰类型对高寒草甸群落结构和植物多样性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2003,23(9):1479-1485
[33] 段敏杰,高清竹,洛桑加措,等. 放牧对藏北紫花针茅高寒草原植物群落特征的影响[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(14):3892-3900
[34] 杨利民,韩梅,李建东. 中国东北样带草地群落放牧干扰植物多样性的变化[J]. 植物生态学报,2001,25(1):110-114
[35] 刘颖,王德利,王旭,等. 放牧强度对羊草草地植被再生性能的影响[J]. 草业学报,2004,13(6):39-44
[36] 郑淑华,郭慧清,王堃,等. 草甸草原草地基况与生物多样性关系的研究[J]. 中国草地学报,2007,29(4):9-14
[37] 刘娜,白可喻,韩国栋,等. 放牧对内蒙古荒漠草原草地植被及土壤养分的影响[J]. 草业科学,2018,35(6):1323-1331
[38] 席军强,杨自辉,王多泽,等.人工梭梭林对沙地土壤理化性质和微生物的影响[J].草业学报,2015,24(5):44-52
[39] 孙海燕,万书波,刘登望,等. 放牧对荒漠草原土壤养分及微生物量的影响[J]. 水土保持通报,2015,35(2):82-88,93
[40] 丁海君,韩国栋,张新杰,等. 短花针茅荒漠草原不同载畜率对土壤的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2016,24(4):524-531
[41] 杨阳,贾丽欣,赵萌莉,等. 重度放牧对荒漠草原土壤养分及微生物多样性的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2019,41(4):72-79
[42] Courtney J D,James R M,David M E. Adapting the fire-grazing interaction to small pastures in a fragmented landscape for grassland bird conservation[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management,2016,69(4):300-309
[43] Reeder J D,Schuman G E. Influence of livestock grazing on C sequestration in semi-arid mixed-grass and short-grass rangelands[J].Environmental Pollution,2002,116(3):457-463
[44] 孙世贤,卫智军,王敏,等. 放牧强度季节调控对短花针茅荒漠草原土壤养分的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2013,22(5):748-754
[45] 任海,彭少麟. 恢复生态学导论[M].北京:科学出版社,2001:36-40
[46] 杜子银,蔡延江,张斌,等.放牧牦牛行为及其对高寒草地土壤特性的影响研究进展[J].草业学报,2019,28(7):186-197
[47] 戎郁萍,韩建国,毛培胜,等. 放牧强度对草地土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国草地,2001,23(4):42-48

Effects of Different Grazing Patterns on Community Characteristics and Soil Nutrients in the Main Pasture Types of Alxa Zuoqi

不同放牧方式对阿拉善左旗主要草场类型群落特征和土壤养分的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	SHE Yan-di, YANG Xiao-yuan, MA Li, ZHANG Zhong-hua, WANG Dang-jun, HUANG Xiao-tao, MA Zhen, YAO Bu-qing, ZHOU Hua-kun. Study on the Characteristics and Interrelationship of Plant Community and Soil in Degraded Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[2]	YAO Xi-xi, CAI Hua, LI Chang-hui. Effects of Fencing and Grazing on Vegetation Community Characteristics and Soil Properties in An Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 128-136.
[3]	LYU Ting, LIU Yu-ping, KANG Jun-hua, LIU Tao, LIANG Rui-fang, SU Xu. Studies on Composition and Diversity of Species Based on Different Habitats along the Delingha-Hala Lake [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 146-155.
[4]	YAO Xi-xi, XIAO Feng, QI Shou-zhong, CHEN Guo-ming, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun. Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[5]	WANG Zhan-qing, ZHANG Jie-xue, YANG Xue-lian, HUANG Xia, CHEN Si-liang, QIAO You-ming. Characteristics of Soil Microbial Diversity in Different Patches of Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[6]	ZHAO Peng-bo, QIU Kai-yang, XIE Ying-zhong, ZHAO Xiang-jun, CHEN Lin, LIU Wang-suo, LI Hai-quan, MENG Wen-fen, HU Xue-qin, HE Yi, HUANG Ye-yun, LI Ya-yuan. Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Nutrients under Different Sand-fixing Shrubs in Southern Mu Us Sandy Land, China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2040-2048.
[7]	SUN Yu, ZHANG Feng, ZHENG Jia-hua, ZHAO Tian-qi, ZHAO Meng-li, ZHANG Bin. Effects of Mowing Stubble Height on Species Diversity and Aboveground Biomass of Stipa grandis Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1859-1864.
[8]	YU Tie-feng, HAO Feng, ZHANG Yong-liang, GAO Kai. Response of Soil Enzyme and Soil Fertility of Artificial Grassland in Sandy Soil to Different Mixture Ratio of Alfalfa and Smooth Brome [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1217-1223.
[9]	CHANG Ming. Study on the Species Composition and Community Characteristics of Subalpine Meadow during Restoration after a Fire [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1286-1293.
[10]	YANG Yang, ZHANG Ni, JIANG Li-li, CHEN Ke-long. Effects of Simulated Precipitation on Soil Edaphic Physicochemical Factors and Microbial Community Characteristics in Bird Island of Qinghai Lake on The Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1043-1052.
[11]	WANG Xiao-fen, MA Yuan, ZHANG Ge-fei, LIN Dong, ZHANG De-gang. Relationship between Plant Community Diversity and Ecosystem Multifunctionality During Alpine Meadow Degradation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1053-1060.
[12]	WANG Chao, WANG Xiao-li , SHI Jian-jun , WU Jian-li , XING Yun-fei ,Cairenqiuji, Yixicuomao. Effect of Rest-grazing in Regreen-up Period on Plant Community Characteristics of Maduo Alpine Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 763-771.
[13]	WANG Yu-qin, SONG Mei-ling, WANG Hong-sheng, YIN Ya-li, MA Yu-shou. Effects of Nitrogen Addition on Vegetation and Forage Nutritional Quality of Degraded Alpine Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2742-2751.
[14]	CHEN Bai-jie, FAN Bo, WANG Xin-chuan, ZHANG Zhen-hua. Effects of Different Degradable Material Non-woven on the Soil Stoichiometric Characteristics of Carbon,Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Alpine Artificial Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2752-2762.
[15]	XIANG Xue-mei, DE Ke-jia, LIN Wei-shan, FENG Ting-xu, WEI Xi-jie, WANG wei, XU Cheng-ti, QIAN Shi-yi. Effects of Nitrogen Addition on Plant Community Diversity and Soil Ecological Chemometric Characteristics in Alpine Meadows [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2769-2777.