Evaluation on Physiological Characteristics and Water Use Efficiency for Different Silage Maize Varieties in Gansu Rain-Fed Area

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.09.021

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 2407-2414.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.09.021

Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluation on Physiological Characteristics and Water Use Efficiency for Different Silage Maize Varieties in Gansu Rain-Fed Area

QI Shuai, QIN Wei-na, JIAO Ting, SHI Shang-li, GAO Yong-quan, WANG Hu-ning, LI Shu-yan

College of Pratacultural Science, Gansu Agricultural University/Key Laboratory for Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Educartion/Sino-US Grassland Animal Husbandry Sustainable Development Research Center, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2022-03-01 Revised:2022-04-23 Online:2022-09-15 Published:2022-09-30

甘肃雨养区不同品种青贮玉米生理特性及水分利用率评价

齐帅, 秦伟娜, 焦婷, 师尚礼, 高永权, 王虎宁, 李淑艳

甘肃农业大学草业学院/草业生态系统教育部重点实验室/中-美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心, 甘肃兰州 730070

通讯作者: 焦婷,E-mail:jiaoting207@126.com
作者简介:齐帅(1998-),男,汉族,河南内乡人,硕士研究生,主要从事饲料加工与反刍动物营养研究,E-mail:1262489942@qq.com
基金资助:
农业农村部农牧交错带优质青粗饲料资源开发利用技术集成示范项目（16200157）；现代农业产业技术体系（CARS-40-09B）资助

Abstract

Abstract: To provide a theoretical basis for selecting excellent drought-resistant silage maize varieties, 20 silage maize(Zea mays) varieties were planted in Huining. The physiological characteristics during milk stage telophase of silage maize were analyzed and the water use efficiency was compared. The results showed as follows:Under drought conditions, ‘Yu silage 23’, ‘Longdan No.10’ and ‘Hejiayuan tieyan 53’ all had a higher content of soluble sugar (SS), superoxide dismutase activity (SOD), fresh weight water use efficiency (WUE_f) and dry weight water use efficiency (WUE_d) and lower malondialdehyde (MDA) content. The WUE_f of ‘Yu silage 23’ and ‘Longdan No.10’ were 76.66%, 76.35% higher than that of ‘Jindan 73’ respectively, and the MDA content of ‘Yu silage 23’ and ‘Longdan No.10’ were 34.44%, 41.69% lower than ‘Yanke 288’ respectively. In summary, ‘Yu silage 23’, ‘Longdan No.10’ and ‘Hejiayuan tieyan 53’ have good drought resistance in the arid area.

Key words: Silage maize, Physiological characteristics, Drought resistance, Water use efficiency, Rain-fed area

摘要： 本试验以在会宁（雨养区）种植的20个青贮玉米（Zea mays）品种为研究对象，分析比较20个玉米品种乳熟末期的生理特性，并对不同玉米品种水分利用率进行评价，为进一步选取优良抗旱的青贮玉米品种提供一定的理论依据。结果表明：干旱条件下，‘豫青贮23’‘陇单10号’和‘禾佳源铁研43’均具有高的可溶性糖（Soluble suger，SS）含量、超氧化物歧化酶（Superoxide dismutase，SOD）活性、鲜重水分利用率（Fresh weight water use efficiency，WUE_f）、干重水分利用率（Dry weight water use efficiency，WUE_d）以及低的丙二醛（Malondialdehyde，MDA）含量。‘豫青贮23’和‘陇单10号’的WUE_f较‘晋单73’分别提高了76.66%，76.35%，其MDA含量较‘延科288’分别降低了34.44%，41.69%。综上所述，在干旱区种植‘豫青贮23’‘陇单10号’和‘禾佳源铁研43’具有好的抗旱性。

关键词: 青贮玉米, 生理特性, 水分利用率, 抗旱性, 雨养区

CLC Number:

S816.53

QI Shuai, QIN Wei-na, JIAO Ting, SHI Shang-li, GAO Yong-quan, WANG Hu-ning, LI Shu-yan. Evaluation on Physiological Characteristics and Water Use Efficiency for Different Silage Maize Varieties in Gansu Rain-Fed Area[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2407-2414.

齐帅, 秦伟娜, 焦婷, 师尚礼, 高永权, 王虎宁, 李淑艳. 甘肃雨养区不同品种青贮玉米生理特性及水分利用率评价[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2407-2414.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.09.021

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2022/V30/I9/2407

References

[1] 苏天增, 任伟, 丁光省, 等. 青贮玉米杂交种大京九26的选育及应用[J]. 山西农业科学, 2019, 47(4):514-517
[2] 刘杭, 侯乐新, 王方明, 等. 我国青贮玉米育种现状和遗传改良策略[J]. 玉米科学, 2021, 29(1):1-7
[3] 汤晓洁, 张文盛, 冯广垚, 等. 全株青贮玉米利用技术[J]. 养殖与饲料, 2021, 20(4):46-47
[4] 刘建宁, 石永红, 吴欣明, 等. 晋中盆地15个青贮玉米品种生产性能及营养价值评价[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4):1043-1049
[5] 赵小强, 徐明霞, 陆晏天, 等. 甘肃省近年来玉米品种主要性状的演化及育种方向分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(2):526-537
[6] 张亚宁, 张明军, 王圣杰, 等. 气候变化对河西走廊主要农作物的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2017, 26(8):1325-1335
[7] 许小明, 徐玉霞, 董奇, 等. 甘肃省河东地区玉米种植适宜性评价和区划[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(3):230-235, 243
[8] 蔡福, 米娜, 纪瑞鹏, 等. 关键发育期干旱及复水过程对春玉米主要生理参数的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(11):3643-3652
[9] 葛选良, 钱春荣, 于洋, 等. 不同种植模式玉米生长发育和产量形成的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(36):12-17
[10] 江云, 马友华, 陈伟, 等. 作物水分利用率的影响因素及其提高途径探讨[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(9):269-273
[11] 魏孝荣, 郝明德, 张春霞, 等. 土壤干旱条件下外源锌、锰对夏玉米光合特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(8):1101-1104
[12] 张仁和, 郑友军, 马国胜, 等. 干旱胁迫对玉米苗期叶片光合作用和保护酶的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(5):1303-1311
[13] 杨娟, 姜阳明, 周芳, 等. PEG模拟干旱胁迫对不同抗旱性玉米品种苗期形态与生理特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021(1):82-89
[14] 于文颖, 纪瑞鹏, 冯锐, 等. 不同生育期玉米叶片光合特性及水分利用效率对水分胁迫的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(9):2902-2909
[15] 高杰, 张仁和, 王文斌, 等. 干旱胁迫对玉米苗期叶片光系统Ⅱ性能的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(5):1391-1396
[16] 李娇, 韩鹏, 穆云森, 等. 玉米灌浆期干旱胁迫对产量性状及生理生化的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(18):107-110
[17] 刘欢欢, 王艳, 陈婉莹, 等. 玉米穗位叶快速叶绿素荧光参数及产量相关性状QTL定位[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022(6):1872-1882
[18] 韩学琴, 邓红山, 普天磊, 等. 金沙江干热河谷区青贮玉米品种农艺性状分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6):1327-1335
[19] BRADFORD M M. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-dyeBinding[J]. Academic Press, 1976, 72(1-2):248-254
[20] 丁雪梅, 张晓君, 赵云, 等. 蒽酮比色法测定可溶性糖含量的试验方法改进[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2014(23):230-233
[21] 赵世杰, 许长成, 邹琦, 等. 植物组织中丙二醛测定方法的改进[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1994(3):207-210
[22] GIANNOPOLITIS C N, RIES S K. Superoxide Dismutases:I. Occurrence in Higher Plants[J]. Plant Physiology, 1977, 59(2):309-314
[23] CHANCE B, MAEHLY A C. Assay of Catalases and Peroxidases[J]. Methods Enzymol, 1955, 2:764-775
[24] 王雅楠. 不同滴灌量对青贮玉米光合特性及产量品质的影响研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学, 2020:11
[25] 何文铸, 杨勤, 高强, 等. 主成分分析对青贮玉米材料综合评价与筛选的研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2008, 16(3):26-29
[26] SHEORAN S, THAKUR V, NARWAL S, et al. Differential Activity and Expression Profile of Antioxidant Enzymes and Physiological Changes in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Under Drought[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2015, 177(6):1282-1298
[27] 李丽杰, 顾万荣, 孟瑶, 等. 干旱胁迫下亚精胺对玉米幼苗抗旱性影响的生理生化机制[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(2):554-564
[28] 王智威, 牟思维, 闫丽丽, 等. 水分胁迫对春播玉米苗期生长及其生理生化特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2013, 33(2):343-351
[29] 田小磊, 吴晓岚, 李云, 等. 盐胁迫条件下γ-氨基丁酸对玉米幼苗SOD、POD及CAT活性的影响[J]. 实验生物学报, 2005(1):77-81
[30] 鲁晓民, 曹丽茹, 张新, 等. PEG胁迫下玉米自交系苗期抗旱性鉴定及评价[J]. 河南农业科学, 2017, 46(5):39-44
[31] 辛慧慧, 李防洲, 侯振安, 等. 低温胁迫下棉花幼苗对外源水杨酸的生理响应[J]. 植物生理学报, 2014, 50(5):660-664
[32] 袁远爽, 肖娟, 胡艳. 模拟酸雨对白簕叶片抗氧化酶活性及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2014, 50(6):758-764
[33] 朴明鑫, 李成, 金峰学, 等. 玉米耐旱鉴定研究进展[J]. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(4):89-93
[34] 庄克章, 吴荣华, 张春艳, 等. 苗期干旱及复水对玉米生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(10):56-61
[35] 杨娟, 姜阳明, 周芳, 等. PEG模拟干旱胁迫对不同抗旱性玉米品种苗期形态与生理特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (1):82-89
[36] 杜彩艳, 段宗颜, 潘艳华, 等. 干旱胁迫对玉米苗期植株生长和保护酶活性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(3):124-129
[37] 王仲林, 谌俊旭, 程亚娇, 等. 干旱胁迫下玉米叶片可溶性糖光谱估测研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2018, 36(4):436-443
[38] 张旭东, 王智威, 韩清芳, 等. 玉米早期根系构型及其生理特性对土壤水分的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(10):2969-2977
[39] 张旭东. 覆膜种植和施肥对半干旱地区资源高效利用及玉米生产持续性的影响机制[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2019:57-58

Evaluation on Physiological Characteristics and Water Use Efficiency for Different Silage Maize Varieties in Gansu Rain-Fed Area

甘肃雨养区不同品种青贮玉米生理特性及水分利用率评价

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	MENG Xiang, SUN Ling-li, XIE Kai-yun, LIU Wei, CHU Hao-qing, ZHAO Yue. Effects of Irrigation, Phosphorus Application and AM Fungi on Yield and Water and Phosphorus Use Efficiency of Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2356-2364.
[2]	ZHANG Yu-juan, GUO Rui, ZHANG Zhao-heng, ZHANG Yan, MA Hui-ling, DONG Wen-ke. Effect of Clod Plasma Treatment on Salt Resistance of Poa pratensis Seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2365-2374.
[3]	ZHANG Hui-hui, SHI Shang-li, WU Bei, LI Zi-li, LI Xiao-long, WU Fang, KANG Wen-juan, CHEN Xin-dong. Physiological Characteristics of Alfalfa Mixed with Perennial Gramineous Forages with Different Life Forms [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8): 2144-2157.
[4]	ZHANG Shu-xing, WANG Xiao, MA Lin, WU Xin-ming, SHI Yong-hong, WANG Xue-min, ZHAO Wei. Comprehensive Evaluation of Performance and Forage Quality of Silage Maize in Farming-pastoral Ecotone [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(6): 1517-1524.
[5]	WANG Yun-ying, PEI Wei-wei, GUO Xiao-wei, DU Yan-gong. Study on Carbon-Water Flux and Water Use Efficiency of Alpine Wetland Ecosystem in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1037-1042.
[6]	GAO Zhi-hao, LI Xue-ying, LAN Jian, HU Hai-ying. Comparison and Evaluation of Seed Germination Indexes of Different Forage-Type Oat Cultivars under PEG-6000 Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1210-1218.
[7]	MA Zhi-qiang, SHI Yi, ZHONG Pei-fang. Effects of Exogenous Methyl Jasmonate on Growth and Physiological Indexes of Festuca elata under Cadmium Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(4): 974-982.
[8]	WANG Kai, YANG Bao-yu, CHEN Shui-hong, XI Lin-qiao. Effects of Endophytic Fungi on Photosynthetic Performance and Physiological Characteristics of Hordeum bogdanii Under Alkali Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 362-369.
[9]	SONG Jian-chao, YANG Hang, JING Yuan-yuan, CHEN Yan-zhu, YU Xiao-jun. Effects of Exogenous GABA on Seed Germination and Physiological Characteristics of Elymus nutans under NaCl Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 403-411.
[10]	DUAN Lian-xue, MA Xiang, JU Ze-liang, LIU Kai-qiang, HE Ji-tong, JIA Zhi-feng. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Avena sativa ‘Qinghai’ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 471-478.
[11]	DU Jian-xiong, REN Yu-xiang, YUAN Juan-wen, HUANG Hui-qiong, LIU Jie, XIAO Yu. Effects of Mercury Stress on Seedling Growth and Physiology of Four Turfgrass and Forage Varieties [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1712-1718.
[12]	LI Chun-pin, QIU Yi-hui, XIA Hou-yin, TAN Lu-na, XU Huan-yu, ZHANG Han-wen, GAO Jing-hui. Membership Function Analysis of Low Transpiration and Yield Traits in Alfalfa Multi-paternal Hybrid F₁Generation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1416-1422.
[13]	FAN Bo-bo, ZHANG Xue-feng, YU Zhuo, ZHAO Yan, MA Yan-hong. Bioinformatics and Expression Analysis of NAC Transcription Factors Related to Drought Resistance of Agropyron mongolicum Keng [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1183-1192.
[14]	WANG Wen-jing, MA Dong-mei, ZHAO Li-juan, MA Qiao-li. Effects of 2,4-table Brassinolide on Enzyme Activity and Root ion Distribution and Absorption in Alfalfa Seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1363-1368.
[15]	QIN Wei-na, JIAO Ting, SHI Shang-li, LI Xiong-xiong, GAO Xue-mei, ZHAO Sheng-guo, QI Juan, WANG Zheng-wen. Evaluation of Silage Quality of 10 Green-fed Corn Varieties under Different Hydrothermal Rescource Conditions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.