Response of Growth Characteristics and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Ephemeral Plants to Different Soil Types

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.12.017

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 3308-3316.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.12.017

Response of Growth Characteristics and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Ephemeral Plants to Different Soil Types

DING Si-jia¹, CHENG Mo-xiang¹, XIE Shuang-quan¹, WANG Xiu-suang¹, HAO Xing-ming², ZHUANG Li¹

1. College of Life Sciences, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang Province 832003, China;
2. Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, Xinjiang Province 830011, China

Received:2022-06-01 Revised:2022-07-21 Published:2023-01-04

短命植物生长特性及叶绿素荧光特性对不同土壤类型的响应

丁思佳¹, 程模香¹, 谢双全¹, 王秀爽¹, 郝兴明², 庄丽¹

1. 石河子大学生命科学学院, 新疆石河子 832003;
2. 中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830011

通讯作者: 庄丽,E-mail:792463801@qq.com
作者简介:丁思佳(1997-),女,汉族,新疆伊犁人,硕士研究生,主要从事干旱区生物多样性研究,E-mail:1549569170@qq.com
基金资助:
荒漠与绿洲国家重点实验室开放基金(KH0054)资助

Abstract

Abstract: In this study,we measured the biomass,nutrient content,chlorophyll fluorescence,and soil factors of dominant ephemeral plants in two soil types (sandy soil and grey desert soil) in the Mosuowan area,to clarify the response of ephemeral plants to different soil types and the relationship between soil and plants. The results showed that pH value and soil available potassium (SAK) were significantly different between the two soils (P<0.01). The total biomass (TB),total nitrogen (PTN),and N∶P of plants in grey desert soil were significantly higher than those in sandy soil (P<0.05). The actual photochemical efficiency of PSⅡ (Φ_PSⅡ) and relative electron transport rate (rETR) in grey desert soil were significantly higher than those in sandy soil (P<0.01). There was a certain correlation between soil and plant indexes. For example,SAK was negatively correlated with TB and maximum fluorescence (F_m) (P<0.01) and positively correlated with PTN. In conclusion,different soils have significant effects on the growth of ephemeral plants,and grey desert soil provides more favorable conditions for the growth of ephemeral plants.

Key words: Ephemeral plant, Biomass, Nutrient content, Chlorophyll fluorescence, Physical and chemical properties of soil

摘要： 本研究通过对莫索湾地区2种土壤类型(风沙土和灰漠土)中的优势短命植物生物量、养分含量、叶绿素荧光和土壤因子进行测定，阐明短命植物对不同土壤类型的响应及土壤与植物之间的关系。结果表明，2种土壤的pH值、速效钾(Soil available potassium，SAK)含量等均有极显著差异(P<0.01)；灰漠土中植物总生物量(Total biomass，TB)、全氮(Plant total nitrogen，PTN)含量、N∶P等显著高于风沙土中植物(P<0.05)；灰漠土中植物PSⅡ实际光化学效率(Actual photochemical efficiency of PSⅡ，Φ_PSⅡ)、相对电子传递速率(Apparent electron transfer rate，rETR)极显著高于风沙土中植物(P<0.01)；土壤与植物各指标存在一定的相关关系，如土壤SAK与植物TB、最大荧光(Maximum fluorescence，F_m)呈极显著负相关关系，与PTN呈极显著正相关关系。综上，不同土壤对短命植物的生长有显著影响，灰漠土为短命植物生长提供了更有利的条件。

关键词: 短命植物, 生物量, 养分含量, 叶绿素荧光, 土壤理化性质

CLC Number:

Q948

DING Si-jia, CHENG Mo-xiang, XIE Shuang-quan, WANG Xiu-suang, HAO Xing-ming, ZHUANG Li. Response of Growth Characteristics and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Ephemeral Plants to Different Soil Types[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(12): 3308-3316.

丁思佳, 程模香, 谢双全, 王秀爽, 郝兴明, 庄丽. 短命植物生长特性及叶绿素荧光特性对不同土壤类型的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(12): 3308-3316.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.12.017

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2022/V30/I12/3308

References

[1] NIU S,REN L,SONG L,et al. Plant Stoichiometry Characteristics and Relationships with Soil Nutrients in Robinia Pseudoacacia Communities of Different Planting Ages[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2017,37(6):355-362
[2] 左晨,王梦亭,王礼欣,等. 不同生境大托叶猪屎豆构件生物量分配的权衡特征[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(2):454-460
[3] 周兵,闫小红,肖宜安,等. 不同生境下入侵植物胜红蓟种群构件生物量分配特性[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(8):2602-2608
[4] 侯钰荣,安沙舟. 不同生境下伊犁绢蒿构件生物量特征的研究[J]. 西北植物学报,2010,30(7):1449-1457
[5] 袁素芬,唐海萍,孟丽红. 荒漠短命植物的养分含量与荧光特征初探[J]. 世界生态学,2017,6(1):6-15
[6] 陈文,王桔红,彭玉姣,等. 不同生境中鬼针草碳氮磷化学计量特征及其营养利用策略[J]. 广西植物,2018,38(3):281-288
[7] 徐苏男,李虹仪,李悦,等. 养分异质条件下结缕草克隆分株生长、光合色素及叶绿素荧光特性的生理整合[J]. 江苏农业学报,2018,34(4):754-761
[8] 屠臣阳,皇甫超河,姜娜,等. 不同生境黄顶菊碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 中国农学通报,2013,29(17):171-176
[9] 陈嘉茜,张玲玲,李炯,等. 蕨类植物碳氮磷化学计量特征及其与土壤养分的关系[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报,2014,22(6):567-575
[10] 伍德彦,阴俊齐,秦璐,等. 准噶尔荒漠—绿洲交错带短命植物和荒漠灌木的光合特征[J]. 新疆环境保护,2017,39(2):7-11
[11] KALAJI H M,BABA W,GEDIGA K,et al. Chlorophyll Fluorescence as a Tool for Nutrient Status Identification in Rapeseed Plants[J]. Photosynthesis Research,2018,136(3):329-343
[12] LATIFINIA E,EISVAND H R. Soybean Responses to Nutrients Deficiency,and the Possibility of Detecting this Deficiency Using Chlorophyll Fluorescence Technique[J]. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,2022(22):1942-1954
[13] 邱娟,谭敦炎,樊大勇. 准噶尔荒漠早春短命植物的光合特性及生物量分配特点[J]. 植物生态学报,2007,31(5):883-891
[14] 袁素芬,唐海萍. 短命植物生理生态特性对生境的适应性研究进展[J]. 草业学报,2010,19(1):240-247
[15] 丁改改,蒋进,宋春武,等. 土壤因子对莫索湾梭梭林林下植被分布和多样性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报,2017,37(4):20-26
[16] 尚白军,朱家龙,周智彬,等. 近30年莫索湾垦区150团植被覆盖度时空变化及现状评价[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,43(2):412-420
[17] 肖方南,姜梦,李媛媛,等. 塔里木河下游柽柳灌丛土壤真菌群落结构及多样性分析[J]. 干旱区地理,2021,44(3):759-768
[18] 赵朋波,邱开阳,谢应忠,等. 毛乌素沙地南缘不同固沙灌木下土壤养分的空间异质性[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(9):2040-2048
[19] 唐庄生,安慧,上官周平. 荒漠草原沙漠化对土壤养分与植被根冠比的影响[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(3):463-468
[20] 曹艳峰. 两种土壤中梭梭冠下土壤微生物群落的空间变异研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆大学,2016:24-33
[21] 郭浩,庄伟伟,李进. 古尔班通古特沙漠4种短命植物生物量与化学计量特征[J]. 西北植物学报,2019,39(12):2263-2270
[22] LI L,QIU S,CHEN Y,et al. Allocation of Photosynthestically-fixed Carbon in Plant and Soil During Growth of Reed(Phragmites australis)in Two Saline Soils[J]. Plant and Soil,2016,404(1):277-291
[23] 古赵晶,汪溪远. 古尔班通古特沙漠南缘3种生活型草本植物生物量分配及相关生长关系[J]. 植物研究,2017,37(2):304-311
[24] 郭文婷,王国华,缑倩倩,等. 河西走廊荒漠绿洲过渡带3种典型一年生藜科植物构件生长及生物量分配特征[J]. 草业学报,2022,31(2):25-38
[25] 德科加,张德罡,王伟,等. 不同海拔下高寒草甸土壤养分分异趋势及其与地上植物量间的相关性研究[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(1):25-29
[26] LIN Y M,CHEN A,YAN S W,et al. Available Soil Nutrients and Water Content affect Leaf Nutrient Concentrations and Stoichiometry at Different Ages of Leucaena Leucocephala Forests in Dry-hot Valley[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments,2019(19):511-521
[27] 王振南,杨惠敏. 植物碳氮磷生态化学计量对非生物因子的响应[J]. 草业科学,2013,30(6):927-934
[28] 邢雪荣,韩兴国,陈灵芝. 植物养分利用效率研究综述[J]. 应用生态学报,2000,11(5):785-790
[29] KOERSELMAN W,MEULEMAN A F M. The Vegetation N∶P Ratio:a New Tool to Detect the Nature of Nutrient Limitation[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,1996,33(6):1441-1450
[30] 陶冶,张元明. 古尔班通古特沙漠4种草本植物叶片与土壤的化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2015,26(3):659-665
[31] 赵洛琪,吴晓妮,付登高,等. 滇池流域磷矿山区优势植物叶片与土壤养分生态化学计量特征[J]. 土壤,2021,53(2):383-390
[32] 安飞飞,陈霆,李庚虎,等. 华南8号木薯光系统Ⅱ叶绿素荧光参数日变化[J]. 西南农业学报,2015,28(6):2469-2474
[33] 陈兰英,许航,徐正刚,等. 生境对药食两用植物接骨草的生长、叶绿素含量与叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 生态科学,2021,40(5):69-77
[34] 刘落鱼,潘澜,侯晓丽,等. 两种基质对三种室内垂直绿化植物叶片养分含量和叶绿素荧光的影响[J]. 广东农业科学,2018,45(7):40-47
[35] 李月灵,金则新,王强,等. 不同生境华东野核桃光合生理特性及叶绿素荧光参数比较[J]. 浙江大学学报(理学版),2013,40(2):221-229
[36] 张磊,吕光辉,蒋腊梅,等. 影响艾比湖流域荒漠植物生物量分布的土壤驱动力分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报,2019,28(3):12-18
[37] ZHANG G,ZHANG P,PENG S,et al. The Coupling of Leaf,Litter,and Soil Nutrients in Warm Temperate forEsts in Northwestern China[J]. Scientific Reports,2017,7(1):1-11
[38] KALAJI H M,OUKARROUM A,ALEXANDROV V,et al. Identification of Nutrient Deficiency in Maize and Tomato Plants by in Vivo Chlorophyll a Fluorescence Measurements[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry,2014(81):16-25
[39] 付为国,王凡坤,赵云,等. 土壤氮磷化学计量特征对小麦光合气体交换参数和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J].西北植物学报,2016,36(7):1435-1442
[40] NACIRI R,LAHRIR M,BENADIS C,et al. Interactive Effect of Potassium and Cadmium on Growth,Root Morphology and Chlorophyll a Fluorescence in Tomato Plant[J]. Scientific Reports,2021,11(1):1-10

Response of Growth Characteristics and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Ephemeral Plants to Different Soil Types

短命植物生长特性及叶绿素荧光特性对不同土壤类型的响应

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WANG Yu-qin, SONG Mei-ling, ZHOU Rui, WANG Hong-sheng, MA Yu-shou. Characteristics of Plant Community Structure of Different Ligularia virgaurea Density Patches in Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2264-2272.
[2]	LI Jia-xiu, ZHANG Qing-song, DU Zi-yin. Research Progress on the Effects of Livestock Reduction on Grassland Vegetation Growth and Soil Characteristics [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2280-2290.
[3]	FENG Qin, WANG Bin, HAI Yi-rui, WANG Teng-fei, NI Wang, DENG Jian-qiang, LI Man-you, LAN Jian. Effects of Mixed Sowing of Vetch and Oat on Community Competition and Biomass Allocation of Oats [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2423-2429.
[4]	TONG Xin, YANG Zhen-lei, ZHANG Yi-ran, WU Yu-chen, DUAN Li-min. Estimation of Pasture Aboveground Biomass using Different Orders of Differential Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2438-2448.
[5]	ZANG Jia-yi, MA Yu-rong, LIANG Rui-ze, LI Yu-yue, YANG Xin. Effects of Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculation and Phosphorus Addition on the Biomass and Competitiveness of Legumes-grasses Mixture System [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2469-2476.
[6]	FEI Xuan, SUO Cai-xu, XIANG Shuang, SUN Shu-cun. Responses of Plant Community Structure and Functional Group Characteristics to Long-term Seasonal Grazing in an Alpine Meadow on Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(8): 1954-1963.
[7]	WANG Li-yuan, WANG Jian, DING Xi-peng, OU Fang-xiu, LI Jia-xu, LI Xue-feng. Effects of Root Exudates of Three Stylosanthes guianensis Sw. on the Growth of Weed Seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(6): 1500-1508.
[8]	DANG Xu, MA Rui, WEI Lin-yuan, ZHANG Ying-hua, SHI Xin-ping. Effects of Wind-sand Flow Stress on Physiological Characteristics of Lycium ruthenicum Leaves [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(6): 1509-1516.
[9]	YANG Fan, WEI Bao, WANG Yu, HE Feng. Response of Yield, Quality and Root Characteristics of Alfalfa to Cutting Height [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(6): 1597-1602.
[10]	WANG Qi, ZHENG Jia-hua, ZHAO Meng-li, ZHANG Jun. Effects of Warming on Early Restoration of Degraded Grassland in Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1077-1085.
[11]	NAN Si-rui, LUO Yong-zhong, YU Si-min, HE Yu, TONG Hui-xin. Effects of Rewatering after Drought Stress on Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Medicago sativa cv. xingjiangdaye Seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1141-1149.
[12]	YUAN Xiao-qiang, WANG Min, ZHANG Xian-hua, TAN Jia-qi, YUAN Hui, HAN Xi-qing. Study on the Relationship between Species Diversity and Biomass of Typical Desert Grassland Communities around Urumqi [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1253-1262.
[13]	SUN Hui, ZHAO Yun-ge, LIU Guang-liang, GAO Li-qian, WANG Peng, MA Xin-xin, LI Wen, XU Ming-xiang. Effects of Grazing Intensity on the Grassland Vegetation Community Characteristics in the Hilly Loess Plateau Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(4): 810-817.
[14]	ZHANG Yu-xin, HUANG Jian-xi, JIN Yun-xiang, WANG Jie, ZHAO Yuan-yuan, FENG Quan-long, MA Qin. Estimation of Grasslands Aboveground Biomass:A Review [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(4): 850-858.
[15]	ZHANG Hai-juan, LU Guang-xin, FAN Yue-jun, ZHOU Hua-kun, ZHOU Xue-li, DOU Sheng-yun, YAO Shi-ting, YAN Hui-lin, MA Kun, ZHAO Yang-an, QI Yan-hui, GOU Heng-rui. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Growth of Six Gramineous Forages of Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(4): 1013-1020.