The Influence of Different Stocking Rates on Herbage Regrowth and Aboveground Net Primary Production

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.1998.04.006

›› 1998, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (4): 275-281.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.1998.04.006

Previous Articles Next Articles

The Influence of Different Stocking Rates on Herbage Regrowth and Aboveground Net Primary Production

Wang Shiping, Wang Yanfen, Li Yonghong, Chen Zuozhong

Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecosystem Research Station, Institute of Botany, CAS, Beijing, 100093

Online:1998-11-15 Published:1998-11-15

不同放牧率对草原牧草再生性能和地上净初级生产力的影响

汪诗平, 王艳芬, 李永宏, 陈佐忠

中国科学院植物研究所, 内蒙古草原生态系统研究站, 北京, 100093

基金资助:
国家科委“九五”攻关项目和国家自然科学基金项目(49790020)资助

Abstract

Abstract: The experiment was conducted in the Inner Mongolia steppe are located at 43°26'-44°08'N,116°04'-117°05'E from 1990 to 1997.The stocking rates were 1.33,2.67,4.00,5.33 and 6.67 sheep/ha(or 1.33,2.00,2.67,3.33 and 4.00 in 1990)with Inner Mongolia fine wool sheep.There were 3 ha rota-tional paddocks per treatment with 45 or 46 days of grazing circle and 30 days of grazing intervals.The results showed that the heavy grazing resulted in faster herbage regrowth during autumn.Theaboveground present bioma5s(APB)decreased linerly with increase of stocking rates,but the abovegroundnet primary production(ANPP)(APB+intake of sheep)did not decreased linerly with increase of stockingrates,it mean the compensation or overcompensation exsited for ANPP.The stocking rate of 2.67 sheep/ha may be the optimum for maximum of ANPP during growth season.

Key words: Inner Mongolia steppe, Stocking rates, Herbage regrowth, Aboveground net primary production

摘要： 在生长季研究不同放牧率对草原牧草再生性能和地上净初级生产力的影响。结果表明,随着放牧率的增大,地上现存量呈线性下降,但地上净初级生产力(地上现存量＋家畜采食量)以2.67只羊/hm²处理最大,即存在超补偿性生长。地上最大现存量和最大净初级生产力出现的日期随着放牧率的增大有提前的趋势,二者随着放牧年限的延长均有较大幅度的下降。但降水可以缓和或加剧此变化的趋势。在冷蒿小禾草退化草原上,1.33和2.67只羊/hm²始牧时期为5月中下旬为宜,而重度放牧宜在6月上、中旬；重牧或过度放牧可降低牧草早期的再生能力,但可加快后期的再生速度,即后期牧草补偿性生长较明显。

关键词: 内蒙古典型草原, 放牧率, 牧草再生, 地上净初级生产力

Wang Shiping, Wang Yanfen, Li Yonghong, Chen Zuozhong. The Influence of Different Stocking Rates on Herbage Regrowth and Aboveground Net Primary Production[J]. , 1998, 6(4): 275-281.

汪诗平, 王艳芬, 李永宏, 陈佐忠. 不同放牧率对草原牧草再生性能和地上净初级生产力的影响[J]. , 1998, 6(4): 275-281.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.1998.04.006

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y1998/V6/I4/275

References

[1] 毛诗学、朱庆斌,1982.天然牧草产量与气象条件的关系.中国草原,(4):46-49
[2] 王仁忠、李建东,1995.松嫩草原碱化羊草草原放牧空间演替规律的研究.应用生态学报,6(3):278-281
[3] 朱志红、王刚、赵松岭,1994.不同放牧强度下矮篙草无性系分株种群的动态与调节.生态学报,14(1):40-45
[4] 李永宏、汪诗平,1998.草原植物的补偿性生长与草原放牧系统持续管理.见:“典型草原地畜牧业优化生产模式研究"(陈佐忠,汪诗平主编).北京:气象出版社,15-19
[5] 李永宏,1992.放牧空间梯度上和恢复演替时间梯度上羊草草原群落特征及其对应性.草原生生态系统研究.第四集.北京:科学出版社,1-8
[6] 夏景新、Hodgson J.,Matthew C.、朱昌平,1995.多年生黑麦草草地生态系统中放牧强度对草地结构及组织转化的影响.应用生态学报,6(1):23-28
[7] 阎贵兴、宁布,1982.内蒙古中部针茅草原草场生产力动态与过度放牧对草场植被的影响.中国草原,30-33
[8] 袁庆华、李向林,1996.放牧草地的产量和质量管理.草业学报,8(3):4-6
[9] 夏景新,1993.放牧生态系统中的组织物质循环及其在放牧管理中的应用.草业学报,2(2):35-41
[10] Belsky A J,1986.Does herbivory benefit plants;a review of the evidence.American naturalist,(127):870-892
[11] Carpenter J R ,1940.The grassland biome.Ecol.Monog.,10:617-684
[12] Christiansen S O,Srejcor T,1988.Grazing effects on shoot and root dynamics and above and belowground non-structure carbohydrate in Caucasian bluestem.Grass and Forage Science,43(2):111-119
[13] Dyer M I,1975.The effects of red-winged Blauk birds on biomass production of am grains.].of Applied Ecology,12:719-726
[14] McNaughton S J,1976.Serengeti migratory wildbeest:facilitation of energy flow bygrazing.Science,191:92-94
[15] McNaughton S J,1979.Grazing as optimization process:grass-ungulate relationships in the serengeti.American Naturalist,5:691-703
[16] Pieper R D,1985.放牧对草地的影响及放牧过程.国外畜牧一草原与牧草,25(4):16-19
[17] Veiga J B D,1984.Effect of grazing management upon a dwarf elephantgrass pasture.Dissertation Abstracts.International B(Science and Engering),45(6):1642-1643

The Influence of Different Stocking Rates on Herbage Regrowth and Aboveground Net Primary Production

不同放牧率对草原牧草再生性能和地上净初级生产力的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 10

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WANG Cheng-jie, ZHOU He. Effects of Herbages and Diet Composition on Rumen Fermentation,Nutritional Degradability and Methane Emission of Sheep in the Inner Mongolia Steppe [J]. , 2007, 15(1): 100-101.
[2]	LIU Jing-ling, GAO Yu-bao, HE Xing-dong, WANG Jin-long, ZHAO Nian-xi. Biodiversity and Stability of the Plant Communities in the Middle and Eastern Parts of Inner Mongolia Steppe [J]. , 2006, 14(4): 390-392.
[3]	MIN Qing-wen, LIU Shou-dong, YANG Xia. Evaluation of the Ecosystem Services of the Inner Mongolia Steppe [J]. , 2004, 12(3): 165-169,175.
[4]	Wang Shiping, Li Yonghong, Chen Zuozhong. The Optimal Stocking Rate on Grazing System in Inner Mongolia SteppeⅡ.Based on Relationship Between Stocking Rate and Aboveground Net Primary Productivity [J]. , 1999, 7(3): 192-197.
[5]	Wang Yanfen, Wang Shiping. Influence of Different Stocking Rates on Belowground Biomass in Inner Mongolia Steppe [J]. , 1999, 7(3): 198-203.
[6]	Li Xiangzhen, Niu Haishan, Sun Tiejun, Chen Zuozhong. Element Composition of Nostoc commune and Xanthoparmelia camtschadalis under Grazing Pasture and Their Relations with Stocking Rates [J]. , 1999, 7(3): 252-257.
[7]	Liu Zhongling, Wang Wei, Liang Cunzhu, Hao Dunyuan. The Regressive Succession Pattern and Its Diagnostic of Inner Mongolia Steppe in Sustained and Superstrong Grazing [J]. , 1998, 6(4): 244-251.
[8]	Wang Shiping, Wang Yanfen, Yao Yiqun. The S Cycling in Inner Mongolia Steppe Grazed by Sheep [J]. , 1998, 6(4): 252-257.
[9]	Wang Shiping, Li Yonghong, Wang Yanfen, Han Yuanhong. The Succession of Artemisia frigida Rangeland and Multivariation Analysis Under Different Stocking Rates in Inner Mongolia [J]. , 1998, 6(4): 299-305.
[10]	Yao Yiqun, Wang Shiping, Wang Yanfen. Influence of Sulfur Fertilizer on Productivety of Herbage and Performance of Chinese Merino fine Sheep (Wether) in Inner Mongolia Steppe [J]. , 1997, 5(4): 236-243.